ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > General Forums > World Affairs Board Pub > Science & Tech
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-14-2005, 16:16 PM   #241 (permalink)
barrowaj
Contributor
 
barrowaj's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-22-04
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 710
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalem
I'd cut the crap out of all of them, across the board. Let the people and the states keep more money, let failing industries fail, let people pay more of their own way or rely on private industry instead of copycat government industry golems.

I'd do it in a scheduled rollback to ease the pain.

-dale
Private industry won't step in to provide those services though. Its been seen in the past, ie. before the depression, which is what made social security necessary. Social security is an insurance program, not a tax. It would be able to fund itself if politicians hadn't treated it like an extra source of government revenue.

And interestingly, medicare and medicaid have a lower overhead cost (11%) than private insurance companies (30-35%). My source for those figures was an AMA representative that came to speak to us about their health plan (which, by the way, doesn't involve socialized medicine). Sure, you have to pay for people that don't put as much money in as they receive, like the disabled, but a private system would have the same drawbacks, in addition to having higher overhead.

I'm not totally defending business subsidies and corporate welfare. I think there is a certain good to trying to prop up a business that may have just had a bad year and has a large social good. But providing constant subsidies in the long run will distort the way the market operates.

I do disagree with the way we get taxed though. I can't figure out how it makes sense to tax companies on the money they earn, then tax citizens on the money they earn, and then tax citizens and companies on the products they buy. I would think taxing companies on the resources they use and pollution they generate makes sense, but not just a generalized tax. And for products it would seem that a value added tax would make a lot more sense. That way only the extra value that a business adds to its products is actually taxed, not every single transaction.
barrowaj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 16:21 PM   #242 (permalink)
barrowaj
Contributor
 
barrowaj's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-22-04
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 710
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxus
Thats a lie.
If you think so, then get permission to do some volunteer work at a local VA hospital. Sit down with some veterans and ask them what they did in their lives. Ask them where they worked, what they did in the service, and ask them how they get by now. I guarantee you that the answer to the latter is social security 90% of the time.
barrowaj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 18:02 PM   #243 (permalink)
Praxus
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-26-03
Posts: 3,237
Quote:
Originally Posted by barrowaj
If you think so, then get permission to do some volunteer work at a local VA hospital. Sit down with some veterans and ask them what they did in their lives. Ask them where they worked, what they did in the service, and ask them how they get by now. I guarantee you that the answer to the latter is social security 90% of the time.
Prove it.
Praxus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 18:50 PM   #244 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxus
Running a red light endangers the rights of others. Not paying your taxes, doesn't.
More importantly, driving is a privelidge, not a right.

Apples and oranges.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 18:52 PM   #245 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by barrowaj
Yeah, but the thing is that people weren't obese like 75 years ago. So what's changed since then? --the environment. So its the fact that people are being unable to cope with the fact that these products are available to them that they become obese. And unlike Selma Hayek, obesity is a disease, and an epidemic one, that will cost America tens of billions of dollars, possibly more.
Obesity is no disease. It's a symptom.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 18:53 PM   #246 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulgaroctonus
I also don't agree with your insinuation that Socialism is a type of insanity. At worst it is harmful political system, but it certainly not a disease.
The hell if it aint.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 18:54 PM   #247 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulgaroctonus
What Clegane is writing about is the fact that all of our rights are ultimately priveledges given by a government. We often have the misconception that rights are written in stone or exist in a comparably indelible format. Unfortunately, the truth is that rights are an indicator of a government's clemency, and can be taken away.

Our rights have their foundation in the Constitution. However, the Constitution is only the legal construction of a few men. I like the Constitution, but I have realized that government preceded rights. That is, the writers of the constitution (and their affiliate government) existed before the Bill of Rights was created.

It is usually in our interest that government adhere to the original principles of the Constitution. However, we must also remember that we cannot trust the Constitution to defend itself. Our rights can only be defended through continuous action. As much as we might not like it, the Constitution could be negated.

Have you ever read the declaration of independence?

"All rights are bestowed by the creator".

Dumbass.

My rights are god given. Come try to take them...i dare you.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 18:58 PM   #248 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulgaroctonus
My point is that people with bad health habits often do know the consequences of their actions, they just don't care to change their ways.
And that's THEIR business, not YOUR business, and most definitely NOT the Gov'ts business.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 19:00 PM   #249 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by barrowaj
What entitlements and pork spending would you want to eliminate?
All of them.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 19:01 PM   #250 (permalink)
Praxus
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-26-03
Posts: 3,237
Quote:
Originally Posted by M21Sniper
Have you ever read the declaration of independence?

"All rights are bestowed by the creator".

Dumbass.

My rights are god given. Come try to take them...i dare you.
My rights are derived from my nature. Come and take them, I dare you.
Praxus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 19:01 PM   #251 (permalink)
Praxus
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-26-03
Posts: 3,237
Quote:
Originally Posted by M21Sniper
All of them.
Amen!
Praxus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 19:07 PM   #252 (permalink)
Praxus
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-26-03
Posts: 3,237
Quote:
Our rights have their foundation in the Constitution. However, the Constitution is only the legal construction of a few men. I like the Constitution, but I have realized that government preceded rights. That is, the writers of the constitution (and their affiliate government) existed before the Bill of Rights was created.
What do you mean by "Government preceded rights"? Rights are those things which are required by men in a society, so that they may be able to act morally (act in accordance with their life & happiness).

I'm not interested in your skepticism (inconsistent at that), so don't bring it up.


To Barrowaj: Tell us what you are for, and why.

Last edited by Praxus : 12-14-2005 at 19:10 PM.
Praxus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2005, 22:10 PM   #253 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 8,320
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by barrowaj
I would think taxing companies on the resources they use and pollution they generate makes sense,
You had to work pollution in there somewhere, didn't you?

-dale
dalem is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2005, 13:21 PM   #254 (permalink)
barrowaj
Contributor
 
barrowaj's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-22-04
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 710
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxus
My rights are derived from my nature. Come and take them, I dare you.
<sarcasm>
I don't believe you.

Prove it.
</sarcasm>

If you want to see how people actually live Praxus, go out and do some volunteer work on your own. Go to a hospital and see what goes on, see how people get cared for.

Last edited by barrowaj : 12-15-2005 at 13:32 PM.
barrowaj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2005, 13:29 PM   #255 (permalink)
barrowaj
Contributor
 
barrowaj's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-22-04
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 710
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalem
You had to work pollution in there somewhere, didn't you?

-dale
Sure, I mean if they are costing everyone by polluting to make a profit for themselves then that should be reconciled, right? I'm no enviro-Nazi, but I think its important to protect our environment for future generations. Hopefully mankind will be able to live on this planet for quite some time, and so we should try to plan accordingly. I mean, look at what happened in China with that benzene spill. I don't want that happening to my drinking water.

Even though we have it better here there are still some problems. I went fishing last month in Galveston bay, and thought I'd check out the parks and wildlife fishing report. The report said flounder was good on mud mullet and shrimp, but it also said that you shouldn't eat more than 8 ounces a month because the fish are polluted with PCBs in the ship channel and upper bay. Children and pregnant women were advised not to eat any of it. I just find that a shame.
barrowaj is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Global Warming, A Good Thing? brokensickle Science & Tech 388 06-30-2007 04:33 AM
The Great Global Warming Swindle Canmoore Science & Tech 86 06-30-2007 04:32 AM
Antarctic air is warming faster than rest of world Parihaka Science & Tech 13 04-01-2006 12:20 PM
The Basic Laws of Human Stupidty sparten World Affairs Board Pub 0 03-08-2006 08:44 AM
10 Most Stupid questions (courtsey PDF) sparten World Affairs Board Pub 2 07-24-2005 23:28 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:14 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8