ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > General Forums > World Affairs Board Pub > Science & Tech
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-12-2005, 20:56 PM   #1 (permalink)
Asim Aquil
Banished
Senior Contributor
 
Asim Aquil's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-11-04
Location: Dubai
Posts: 8,135
Country:
Spacecraft takes off for Mars

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...2/MNmars12.DTL

Another machine.

Why don't they just send a manned mission to Mars already? I'm sure its risky and all that, but I'm sure astronauts would be ready to risk their lives for an opportunity like that. I know I would.
Asim Aquil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2005, 21:40 PM   #2 (permalink)
highsea
Defense Professional
 
highsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-04
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,473
This mission is a prelude to a manned mission. One of the main objectives is to look for water and scout out landing sites. A manned mission will have to stay on Mars for an extended period (something like 10 months) until the return orbits are correct. So this mission (and the next one, scheduled for 2009) is needed for planning purposes. You don't want to go all the way to Mars and then land in a sh*tty spot.

edit to add: The "Mars Direct" mission profile calls for an 18 month stay. The "optimum" NASA plan calls for up to 600 days on the surface, with a total mission time of ~900 days. Realistically, we are probably 25 years from a manned Mars mission.
__________________
My baby called me up. She said- Why don't you ever take me out? Pick me up in your brand new car....You shake the short change from the old fruit jar...

Last edited by highsea : 08-12-2005 at 23:27 PM.
highsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2005, 21:56 PM   #3 (permalink)
Sameer
Banished
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 07-12-05
Posts: 2,541
When the heck are we going to develop Worp engines and travel in space.
Sameer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Iraqi air force takes flight Ironduke The War in Iraq 0 03-29-2007 17:06 PM
NATO takes the fight to Pakistan Ray Political Discussions 20 11-12-2006 16:04 PM
10yo takes SUV for a spin THL Current Affairs 0 07-19-2006 21:38 PM
Militancy takes a huge hit in J&K hammer South Asian Defense Topics 46 05-02-2005 09:07 AM
Hu Jintao takes over from Jiang Zemin Jay South Asian Defense Topics 0 09-19-2004 17:18 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:55 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8