Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!
The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
|
 |
01-11-2008, 01:07 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Burgomaster
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Country: 
|
UK to build new nuclear plants
Quote:
New nuclear plants get go-ahead
A new generation of nuclear power stations in the UK has been given formal backing by the government.
Business Secretary John Hutton told MPs they would give a "safe and affordable" way of securing the UK's future energy supplies while fighting climate change.
He said any plants would be built at or near existing reactors by private firms and said he hoped the first one would be completed "well before 2020".
Critics say new reactors will be expensive, dirty and dangerous.
The government will not be building any reactors itself - but it says it will take steps, such as streamlining the planning process and identifying likely sites, to encourage private operators to build them.
Mr Hutton conceded that no nuclear plant had been built anywhere in the world without public money - but he insisted there would be no subsidies from the UK government.
"It is a matter for the power companies to bring forward proposals on the basis that there will be no public subsidies," he told BBC Radio 4's The World at One.
Public funds would only be provided in the "very unlikely circumstances of an emergency at a nuclear plant," added Mr Hutton.
According to its white paper, the government will not offer extra incentives to invest in nuclear power, but some tax advantages may be available to firms hit by decommissioning costs to ensure a "level fiscal playing field" with other forms of electricity generation.
The government has also yet to decide how much new nuclear operators should pay towards the cost of building underground caverns as a permanent storage site for Britain's nuclear waste.
Until a suitable site can be found, waste will continue to be stockpiled above ground at "interim" facilities at Sellafield, in Cumbria, it has said.
Mr Hutton rejected calls to find a permanent storage site before giving the green light to new nuclear plants.
'Tried and tested'
French energy giant EDF has already said it plans to build four nuclear plants in the UK by 2017, without subsidies, following the government's announcement.
Chief executive Vincent De Rivaz said: "We have made it clear that once the right frameworks are in place, we will be in a position to move fast, move first and move safe."
German power company E.On and British Gas parent Centrica also expressed interest in building nuclear plants in the UK, following the government's announcement.
Speaking earlier in the Commons, Mr Hutton said the government had concluded nuclear power was a "tried and tested", and safe, technology which had a role to play "in this country's future energy mix alongside other low-carbon sources".
Analysis of future gas and carbon prices showed nuclear was "affordable and provides one of the cheapest electricity options available to reduce our carbon emissions".
|
Source: BBC NEWS | UK | UK Politics | New nuclear plants get go-ahead
__________________
The Buck Stops Here
|
|
|
|
01-11-2008, 13:33 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Military Professional
Join Date: 09-15-06
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
|
At last we have a decision, and amazingly it's the right one!
__________________
Semper in excretum. Solum profunda variat.
|
|
|
|
01-11-2008, 18:21 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Distant Deeps or Skies
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 07-19-05
Location: North London, UK
Country: 
|
I just hope it isn't too little.
Quote:
|
Critics say new reactors will be expensive, dirty and dangerous.
|
Right on only the first descriptor.
__________________
HD Ready?
|
|
|
|
|
01-11-2008, 20:54 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 11-23-03
Country:
|
I like electricity and it isn't always windy enough to either create electricity or blow the **** from coal to Germany.
Go nuclear.
|
|
|
|
|
04-27-2008, 15:29 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
New Member
Join Date: 04-26-08
Location: London
Country:
|
I am not suprised that we're inviting the French to build new nuclear power plants in the UK. 80% of the UK's existing nuclear workforce is due to retire before long with no home grown replacement. Add to the burden of decommissioning many of the existing reactors which are coming to the end of their lives there is a skills shortage that will drive up costs.
Successive UK governments have seen no value to keeping inefficient and uncompetitive heavy industry but have encouraged a service economy. It's known that the uptake of engineering and science university degrees by UK students has fallen to an all time low over the last decade.
|
|
|
|
|
04-27-2008, 15:42 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Military Professional
Join Date: 03-28-08
Location: California
Country:
|
دزد
رفيق* شفيق
هم* پياله
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:58 AM.
|
| 
Similar Threads
