ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > General Forums > World Affairs Board Pub > Science & Tech
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
View Poll Results: Do you use CFL light bulbs?
Yes 66 75.86%
No 21 24.14%
Voters: 87. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-03-2008, 17:58 PM   #76 (permalink)
omon
Field mechanik
Senior Contributor
 
omon's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-06
Location: bk
Posts: 1,925
Country:
auto manufacturers, use led more and more, why? is it economy? to be green? none of above, if you noticed first led, in cars, were stop lights,(and still are for the most part) led lights up faster, so you see car in front of you brake sooner with led, than incd. how much sooner? at 60mph you have extra 5-7 feet, according to tv program i saw, but it isn,t all, leds last longer, more visible in fog, and you don,t need reflector, so entire taillight assembly can be sealed,(if all lights are led), and flatter.
my 06 accord has led stop lights, but incd turn light, in the same housing.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!" B. Franklin
omon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2008, 18:22 PM   #77 (permalink)
RustyBattleship
Defense Professional
 
RustyBattleship's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-06
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by Southie View Post
Hey that's kind of like me answering a history quiz question that was eliminated because the 12 hours were up!
Don't feel bad. I didn't know there was a time limit either. But it does make sense.

Oh, one more thing I dislike (hate, loathe) about CFL bulbs is they will NOT fit in some sockets. A friend gave us a small fold-up Manger scene that came with a light fixture to illuminate it at night. We first tried a CFL.

Yup! You guessed it. It didn't fit. We finally wound up using a clear incadescent.

I have also found that true with my front porch sensor activated security lights. CFLs do NOT fit in a weather-tight socket.
__________________
Able to leap tall tales in a single groan.
RustyBattleship is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2008, 19:42 PM   #78 (permalink)
Gun Grape
Resident Curmudgeon
Military Professional
 
Gun Grape's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-12-05
Location: Panama City Fl
Posts: 2,566
I am slowly replacing then in my house as the old bulbs burn out.

Quote:
This means that they can produce light that subtly flickers, unnoticeable by many, but a big problem for others, especially epileptics, who can suffer from seizures under fluorescent bulbs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Southie
We have the regular fluorescent bulbs in my office and every once in a while I get eye migraines. They don't hurt, but the constant flickering in my eyes makes it extremely difficult to do my job on the computer. It's kind of like looking through a prism.
This can be solved on regular fluorescent bulbs by using a high frequency electronic ballast. I believe that most of the high quality CFLs already have them. I read somewhere that CFLs may do that when they are nearing the end of their bulb life
Gun Grape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2008, 20:43 PM   #79 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,800
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyBattleship View Post
Don't feel bad. I didn't know there was a time limit either. But it does make sense.

Oh, one more thing I dislike (hate, loathe) about CFL bulbs is they will NOT fit in some sockets. A friend gave us a small fold-up Manger scene that came with a light fixture to illuminate it at night. We first tried a CFL.

Yup! You guessed it. It didn't fit. We finally wound up using a clear incadescent.

I have also found that true with my front porch sensor activated security lights. CFLs do NOT fit in a weather-tight socket.
Rusty, do you mean they will not fit the socket itself, due to the socket being of a non-standard type, or the bulb itself is too large or won't fit because of the sheer size of the bulb? If it's the latter, they are made in all bulb sizes.
__________________
The Buck Stops Here
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2008, 21:14 PM   #80 (permalink)
RustyBattleship
Defense Professional
 
RustyBattleship's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-06
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironduke View Post
Rusty, do you mean they will not fit the socket itself, due to the socket being of a non-standard type, or the bulb itself is too large or won't fit because of the sheer size of the bulb? If it's the latter, they are made in all bulb sizes.
The weather seal of the outside socket will not accept the short stem of a CFL. When I turn on electrical items in the rain, I feel a bit more confident if they are watertight. So naturally I will not cut out the rubber seal just to take an overpriced and badly designed CFL.
RustyBattleship is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2008, 21:30 PM   #81 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,800
Country:
Just because you can't find one that doesn't fit inside a particular fixture, doesn't mean they're useless in every application.

I've just had the feeling however from some of your previous posts that you were unaware of the varying bulb sizes of CFLs, however. In contrast to incandescent bulbs which are the same size emitting different light outputs on a standard size bulb, CFLs are of various sizes, and some as manufactured are too long to fit in certain fixtures because of the size of the bulb itself.
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2008, 23:57 PM   #82 (permalink)
JAD_333
Defense Professional
 
JAD_333's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,691
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironduke View Post
Overall sales volume goes down with CFLs, more expensive light bulbs are sold but far fewer are.

60W equivalents can be had for $1.65/bulb, a 100W for $2.52.

$.40 to $.75 for an incandescent, and 8 of them are used over the life of a CFL. Whoever is using incandescents is spending more money on bulbs.
Where are you finding those prices. I thought I did well getting a 150Watt equivelent today for $7.95 at Target (down from $11).

In my experience, a good CFL will outlast more than 8 incandescents; I've had a CFL on my porch going on 6 years...6 years of 100 watt incandescents at 3-4 a year comes to 18 to 24 bulbs. I have a 24" flourescent going strong from 1996, which is 11 years at 3 to 4 a year or 33 to 44 incandescents. I've been sold on CFL and flourescents for years, except where color was an issue. Now I see CFLs with 6400K, which is pretty close to true color.
__________________
To be Truly ignorant, Man requires an Education. (Plato)
JAD_333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 00:02 AM   #83 (permalink)
JAD_333
Defense Professional
 
JAD_333's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,691
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyBattleship View Post
The weather seal of the outside socket will not accept the short stem of a CFL. When I turn on electrical items in the rain, I feel a bit more confident if they are watertight. So naturally I will not cut out the rubber seal just to take an overpriced and badly designed CFL.
One of the downsides of switching to CFLs is not all existing light fixtures work for all of them. And try attaching a lampshade to one of those sprial jobs... Rusty, you'll just have to do what we did back when the horseless carriage came along...adapt. Remember?
JAD_333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 00:52 AM   #84 (permalink)
RustyBattleship
Defense Professional
 
RustyBattleship's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-06
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAD_333 View Post
One of the downsides of switching to CFLs is not all existing light fixtures work for all of them. And try attaching a lampshade to one of those sprial jobs... Rusty, you'll just have to do what we did back when the horseless carriage came along...adapt. Remember?
You mean I don't need to stable my horse anymore?
RustyBattleship is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 01:13 AM   #85 (permalink)
JAD_333
Defense Professional
 
JAD_333's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,691
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyBattleship View Post
You mean I don't need to stable my horse anymore?
Let's not be too hasty. The way gas prices are going, the old nag may get a new lease on life. Hope you kept your buggy whips.
JAD_333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 02:16 AM   #86 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,800
Country:
Quote:
Where are you finding those prices. I thought I did well getting a 150Watt equivalent today for $7.95 at Target (down from $11).
4-pack of 100W equivalent for $7.58 ($1.90 ea):
Great Value CFL Light Bulb: 23 Watt (100W Equiv), 4-Pk - Wal-Mart

6-pack of 100W equivalent at Wal-Mart for $15 ($2.52 ea):
Walmart.com - Always Low Prices! - GE CFL Light Bulb: 26 Watt (100W Equivalent), 6-Pk

6-pack of 60W equivalent for $9.88 ($1.64 ea):
Walmart.com - Always Low Prices! - GE CFL Light Bulb: 13 Watt (60W Equivalent), 6-Pk
Quote:
In my experience, a good CFL will outlast more than 8 incandescents; I've had a CFL on my porch going on 6 years...6 years of 100 watt incandescents at 3-4 a year comes to 18 to 24 bulbs.
A disabled friend of my mom's, an AF vet, I picked up six CFLs for him in July 2004 so he wouldn't have to get up on a chair and change his incandescents which frequently burned out because of the electrical in his apartment. Of these, four he never turns off (100w equiv).

The first one of those four burned out in September 2007, after about 27,000 hours of use. The other three are still good, and have clocked up over 30,000 hours, as are the ones in his desk lamp and bathroom.

Back then, CFLs were rated at around 8000 hours... if not less. So they have lasted over three times their rate life, and three of them are approaching four times their rated life.

At the rated life of the incandescents, he would have had to install 117 to 156 incandescent bulbs during this time frame.

At 50 to 75 cents apiece, that's $59 to $117. Truth be told, they burned out more often than that. And instead of installing 117 to 156 incandescents (in his case probably over 250 purchased at a gas station), he's had to install 1 CFL.
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 15:10 PM   #87 (permalink)
Ctom3
New Member
 
Join Date: 12-01-07
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironduke View Post

The first one of those four burned out in September 2007, after about 27,000 hours of use. The other three are still good, and have clocked up over 30,000 hours, as are the ones in his desk lamp and bathroom.
There is another issue regarding life expectancy. All lamp types suffer light loss over a period of time. This is certainly true with any fluorescent lamp. Cathodes erode and the phosphor coating gets "tired". Light loss on a typical, good quality CFL is a 20% reduction at mean output, which is generally at about 40% life. So, after about 3,200 hours on a 8,000 hour lamp, its light output is only 80% of what it started at. This is pretty good, but it gets much, much worse as time goes by. So, a lamp that is still burning many thousands of hours after its rated life is no longer efficient and should be replaced. More importantly, it simply is not doing its intended job and the lighting environment is very poor. I bet replacing those "good" lamps with new ones will have pretty startling results.

This situation is rarely a problem with incandescents since they normally have the decency to completely fail before lumen depreciation gets too low. The all time winner for the "lamp that refuses to die" award is mercury vapor. They typically have a rated lamp life of 24,000 hours, but it is not uncommon for them to last 50-60,000 hours. G.E. has shown that in those cases, output can drop to only about 10-15% of their initial output. Since the owner sees that the lamp is still burning, he or she thinks that it is still good; however, it has become a money pit that is not producing needed illuminance levels. It is the same for fluorescent, just not as dramatic.
Ctom3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 16:38 PM   #88 (permalink)
RustyBattleship
Defense Professional
 
RustyBattleship's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-06
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAD_333 View Post
Hope you kept your buggy whips.
My ex-wife took all of our whips with her.
RustyBattleship is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 18:35 PM   #89 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,800
Country:
Quote:
There is another issue regarding life expectancy. All lamp types suffer light loss over a period of time. This is certainly true with any fluorescent lamp.
Quote:
So, a lamp that is still burning many thousands of hours after its rated life is no longer efficient and should be replaced. More importantly, it simply is not doing its intended job and the lighting environment is very poor.
There was absolutely no visible difference between the three old lamps and the new one. Overall, the apartment he lives in is too well-lit. He could stand to put the glass lamp covers back up.
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 19:21 PM   #90 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 8,323
Country:
I don't care if someone wants to light their home with "enviro friendly" stuff or a burning mouse in a glass bowl - I just don't want them forcing me to do one or the other.

If I want to use 8 billion kW hours a day, I'll pay for it and do so.

-dale
dalem is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Light Horse Charge at Beersheba Parihaka The Early Modern & Imperial Ages 17 05-07-2008 14:59 PM
Ban Incandescent Light Bulbs? Ironduke Science & Tech 36 02-24-2008 01:27 AM
How many politicians does it take to change a light bulb? Bluesman Political Discussions 30 01-01-2008 00:51 AM
Faster than a speeding photon Jay Science & Tech 46 06-13-2007 04:22 AM
LED evolution could replace light bulbs Ironduke Science & Tech 1 04-17-2005 14:37 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:05 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8