ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > General Forums > World Affairs Board Pub > Science & Tech
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-17-2007, 00:21 AM   #16 (permalink)
ArmchairGeneral
Devil's Advocate
Senior Contributor
 
ArmchairGeneral's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-03-06
Location: The boonies of NC, USA.
Posts: 2,742
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by eboyer
You take salt water (Sea Water). Apply an energy source (radio waves) and whala! Hydrogen. Apply heat. Whala!. Flame.
Quote:
Originally Posted by eboyer View Post
ArmchairGeneral is missing my point. The point is, you do not burn the hydrogen. The point is you use the process to free hydogren from salt water to dirve fuel cells from sea water (which of course is vey abundant). It is obvious the process must be economical. Resources and it's costs used vs power supplied.
Um. Right.

That said, you're still missing the idea here. The burning of hydrogen is a redox reaction between hydrogen and oxygen, releasing heat energy. The waste product is water. Hydrogen fuel cells use a redox reaction between hydrogen and oxygen to produce electric current. The waste product is water. Notice any similarities? It's the same reaction: 2H2+O2 -> 2H2O.

When you split water into hydrogen and oxygen, and then recombine them into water, the net energy production will be zero or negative. The heat from burning hydrogen or the energy of the electrons moving from hydrogen to oxygen will be less than the energy of the radio waves that split the water in the first place. If you find otherwise, you'll either win a Nobel Prize, or be slaughtered by hordes of enraged physicists.
__________________
"Apocalyptic thought is curiously pleasurable."
-Theodore Dalrymple
ArmchairGeneral is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Afghanistan and the Future of Warfare troung Military Aviation 5 02-22-2008 20:59 PM
Principles of War for the Battlefield of the Future Ray The Field Mess 2 11-05-2006 10:42 AM
Russia ignores U.S., delivers nuclear fuel to India Asim Aquil Political Discussions 15 04-27-2006 12:55 PM
Indian Army transformation Ray South Asian Defense Topics 36 12-22-2005 02:00 AM
IAF purchasing more and more. ajaybhutani South Asian Defense Topics 54 04-20-2005 09:05 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:25 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8