![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
| View Poll Results: Should we use nuclear power? | |||
| Yes |
|
56 | 88.89% |
| No |
|
7 | 11.11% |
| Voters: 63. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#31 (permalink) |
|
New Member
|
I'm in favour. There's risks, but so long as safety procedures are followed that's not a problem. Safety has been a huge issue with nuclear plants, and so it's been developed a whole hell of a lot. The safety measures available for nuclear power plants these days definitely make nuclear power safe enough to operate on a much larger scale that currently.
Every power source has its advantages and disadvantages, but I think today the benefits of nuclear energy outweigh the drawbacks. It's cheap after the initial investment, clean, and doesn't rely on a bunch of crazy guys out in the desert to work. No single source is going to meet our energy needs, but nuclear can definitely be a big part of it if we'll just pull our balls out of our back pocket and get to it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
The residue of nuclear power generation is toxic. If we can agree on that, where can it be disposed of in a manner so that it will we not be used as a threat to our progeny? Wherever it appears, radioactive elements are detrimental to human health. To say we can contain this danger beyond our lietime is absurd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) |
|
Distant Deeps or Skies
Senior Contributor
|
__________________
HD Ready? |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) | |
|
tankie
Military Professional
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
TANKIE , WITHOUT WAX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) | |
|
Contributor
|
Quote:
Good lord, he really is a boyscout. He's trying to build one again, apparently? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
|
Friends, atomic energy is an essential power generation platform for humanity's future. Present & past energies advocates efforts to undermine the same have a potent ally in public ignorrance. From the mother of all fuels: wood, western ingenuity has led to a series of energy innovations which must in the name of progress be exploited.
I discourage the Lluditism inherent in scare-mongering over wastefuels, ethanol, biodiesel, peanut oil, solar & wind farming & especially fission which is being artificially suppressed in most of the developed world.
__________________
"If we will not be governed by God then we will be ruled by tyrants" -William Penn |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| China-Pak N-Deal.Yes Or No? | cold blooded | International Politics | 2 | 08-29-2007 01:55 AM |
| US preparing to nuke Iran | Ray | Political Discussions | 149 | 04-15-2006 22:40 PM |
| Indian nuclear forces, a 2004 estimate | Sameer | South Asian Defense Topics | 53 | 10-03-2005 13:57 PM |
| Is the US-India Nuclear Agreement Good or Bad for Proliferation? | Neo | Political Discussions | 1 | 09-02-2005 15:48 PM |
| US's $5 billion nuclear gamble with China | Ray | The Western Alliance | 0 | 03-14-2005 04:53 AM |