![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Burgomaster
|
Vertical Farming
Featured in last month's Popular Science:
The Vertical Farm Project - Agriculture for the 21st Century and Beyond... According to proponents, about 4-6 times more food per acre can be grown in indoor vertical farming than traditional "horizontal" farming. No pesticides, emissions, restoration of ecosystems, etc. I think it's an exciting concept.
__________________
The Buck Stops Here |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Postmaster General
Military Professional
|
Fantastic!
__________________
![]() "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination." I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to. HAKUNA MATATA |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Burgomaster
|
Quote:
If vertical farming proved viable and profitable, food could be grown where it was needed. For example, citrus fruits right here in Minneapolis. While the infrastructure would be quite an investment, I believe the crops grown could be competitive, as there are virtually no transportation costs, much less waste, no expenditure on fertilizers or pesticides, and no exposure to drought, freezing, or other environmental factors that negatively affect agriculture, as well as the ability to produce year-round. According to the site, agricultural yields in such as system could be 4-6 times higher than traditional agriculture. Imagine one of these round buildings, an acre per story, 30 stories high. Accordingly, that would replace 120-180 acres of traditional farmland if those numbers are accurate. Of course, such enterprise would need to be profitable, but I see no harm in setting aside some funding to test its viability. If profitable... well, the market would decide which is more competitive and cost-effective, and it would either be on or another. Why build skyscrapers when we can build one-story buildings so efficiently? One of the problems facing the world is the loss of forest land of all types to agriculture, including slash-and-burn. Everywhere, agricultural desertification exists. And if there's one thing we would achieve in the US, it's energy independence in agriculture. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
|
I agree that transportation costs can be considerable, which is probably one of the reasons for the growth of 'farmers markets' over here where on set days a market is set up in town for them to sell their locally produced crops. This is becoming increasingly popular.
__________________
Semper in excretum. Solum profunda variat. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Green, White 'n Orange
Senior Contributor
|
Excellent idea, but the changes to be made to current farming would be huge, and the cost is surely gigantic.
Would we be able to impliment such a project?
__________________
'Liberty - it is newly strung and shall be heard.' - Motto of the United Irishmen. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
WAB Cautioner of Poo
Senior Contributor
|
Vertical farming is a great idea. Just think, all of that silly extra farmland can be used for housing. So - be happy and propagate more, do away with all that open space, vertical farming is coming in glass structures. Yippie and may I be dead before I see any of this come to fruition. If I am not dead it will further my wish to be dead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Senior Contributor
|
I'm not an agricultural expert, however, vertical farming reminded me of another type of vertical farming.
Mussel production, mussels attach themselves to large ropes or cables, that are attached to large floats. a single farm can have hundreds of these cables of mussels. The mussels need very little attention, they feed themselves by filtration, and when they grow to market size the cables are brought to the surface and collected. Mmm I want some steamed garlic mussels now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
![]() -dale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Foreign Service
Moderator Lei Feng Protege |
good point, dale. in that case, california will get even more popular than it is today- ain't no tornadoes in salinas.
![]()
__________________
Never let the future disturb you. You will meet it, if you have to, with the same weapons of reason which today arm you against the present. -Marcus Aurelius, Meditations |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
|
It will be worth investigating. I can see farms like this being incredibly useful in some parts of the world, and less so where arable land is plentiful. The structures will have to be capable of withstanding the weather conditions for the area. Looks like Kansas and the rest of Tornado Alley is a no-no.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pakistan Economy | Neo | Political Discussions | 3653 | 11-06-2007 10:30 AM |
| How clean is India? | Neo | Political Discussions | 163 | 05-03-2006 19:09 PM |
| Clouded Thinking (Thunking) | tarek | Political Discussions | 14 | 01-27-2005 04:17 AM |