ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > General Forums > World Affairs Board Pub > Science & Tech
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-01-2007, 22:29 PM   #1 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,800
Country:
Vertical Farming

Featured in last month's Popular Science:

The Vertical Farm Project - Agriculture for the 21st Century and Beyond...

According to proponents, about 4-6 times more food per acre can be grown in indoor vertical farming than traditional "horizontal" farming. No pesticides, emissions, restoration of ecosystems, etc. I think it's an exciting concept.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg chris_jacobs_light.jpg (110.0 KB, 74 views)
__________________
The Buck Stops Here
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2007, 01:00 AM   #2 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 26,144
Country:
Fantastic!
__________________


"Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

HAKUNA MATATA
Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2007, 03:18 AM   #3 (permalink)
Dago
Patron
 
Join Date: 02-23-06
Posts: 226
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Dago
Concept is sound. X amount in X amount of space. As opposed to X*x amount in X*x Space. With the use of composites, and modulated designs to bring the engineering costs down, it could become reality.

Last edited by Dago : 07-02-2007 at 03:21 AM.
Dago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2007, 04:03 AM   #4 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 8,323
Country:
But is it necessary? We're already incredibly efficient, food-wise. Why pay to rebuild farming infrastructure?

-dale
dalem is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2007, 05:16 AM   #5 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,800
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalem View Post
But is it necessary? We're already incredibly efficient, food-wise. Why pay to rebuild farming infrastructure?

-dale
Dale, while American agricultural output is huge (we produce something like 130% of our needs), I wouldn't call it efficient. According to what I've read in Rifkin's The Hydrogen Economy, modern agriculture requires about ten times the energy inputs than is yielded in outputs (calories). And this is just the growing of food. According to the same source, including transportation, processing, packaging, this number grows to 40 to 1, and 17% of energy used in the US is used in agriculture and the food industry.

If vertical farming proved viable and profitable, food could be grown where it was needed. For example, citrus fruits right here in Minneapolis. While the infrastructure would be quite an investment, I believe the crops grown could be competitive, as there are virtually no transportation costs, much less waste, no expenditure on fertilizers or pesticides, and no exposure to drought, freezing, or other environmental factors that negatively affect agriculture, as well as the ability to produce year-round. According to the site, agricultural yields in such as system could be 4-6 times higher than traditional agriculture.

Imagine one of these round buildings, an acre per story, 30 stories high. Accordingly, that would replace 120-180 acres of traditional farmland if those numbers are accurate.

Of course, such enterprise would need to be profitable, but I see no harm in setting aside some funding to test its viability. If profitable... well, the market would decide which is more competitive and cost-effective, and it would either be on or another. Why build skyscrapers when we can build one-story buildings so efficiently?

One of the problems facing the world is the loss of forest land of all types to agriculture, including slash-and-burn. Everywhere, agricultural desertification exists.

And if there's one thing we would achieve in the US, it's energy independence in agriculture.
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2007, 05:46 AM   #6 (permalink)
Parihaka
Moderator
 
Parihaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-04
Location: Te Ika a Maui
Posts: 9,465
Country:
Why not just get us folks who are actually good at low energy sustainable farming to show you how to do it?
__________________
In the realm of spirit, seek clarity; in the material world, seek utility.
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
Parihaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2007, 06:17 AM   #7 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,800
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parihaka View Post
Why not just get us folks who are actually good at low energy sustainable farming to show you how to do it?
Low-energy input, fertilizer and pesticide-free crops still have transportation costs. For example, organic crops have been shown to have higher transportation costs which erase any environmental benefits from the practice of organic farming.
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2007, 06:22 AM   #8 (permalink)
glyn
Military Professional
 
glyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-15-06
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
Posts: 6,531
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironduke View Post
Low-energy input, fertilizer and pesticide-free crops still have transportation costs. For example, organic crops have been shown to have higher transportation costs which erase any environmental benefits from the practice of organic farming.
I agree that transportation costs can be considerable, which is probably one of the reasons for the growth of 'farmers markets' over here where on set days a market is set up in town for them to sell their locally produced crops. This is becoming increasingly popular.
__________________
Semper in excretum. Solum profunda variat.
glyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2007, 09:42 AM   #9 (permalink)
crooks
Green, White 'n Orange
Senior Contributor
 
crooks's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-17-06
Location: Blarney, County Cork, Ireland
Posts: 1,291
Country:
Excellent idea, but the changes to be made to current farming would be huge, and the cost is surely gigantic.

Would we be able to impliment such a project?
__________________
'Liberty - it is newly strung and shall be heard.' - Motto of the United Irishmen.
crooks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2007, 10:06 AM   #10 (permalink)
Debbie
WAB Cautioner of Poo
Senior Contributor
 
Debbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-20-06
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 3,457
Country:
Vertical farming is a great idea. Just think, all of that silly extra farmland can be used for housing. So - be happy and propagate more, do away with all that open space, vertical farming is coming in glass structures. Yippie and may I be dead before I see any of this come to fruition. If I am not dead it will further my wish to be dead.
Debbie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2007, 10:25 AM   #11 (permalink)
omon
Field mechanik
Senior Contributor
 
omon's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-06
Location: bk
Posts: 1,925
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalem View Post
But is it necessary? We're already incredibly efficient, food-wise. Why pay to rebuild farming infrastructure?

-dale
my toughts exactly, waste of money,
omon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2007, 12:05 PM   #12 (permalink)
Canmoore
Senior Contributor
 
Canmoore's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-18-06
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,331
Country:
I'm not an agricultural expert, however, vertical farming reminded me of another type of vertical farming.

Mussel production, mussels attach themselves to large ropes or cables, that are attached to large floats. a single farm can have hundreds of these cables of mussels. The mussels need very little attention, they feed themselves by filtration, and when they grow to market size the cables are brought to the surface and collected.

Mmm I want some steamed garlic mussels now.
Canmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2007, 12:44 PM   #13 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 8,323
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironduke View Post
Dale, while American agricultural output is huge (we produce something like 130% of our needs), I wouldn't call it efficient. According to what I've read in Rifkin's The Hydrogen Economy, modern agriculture requires about ten times the energy inputs than is yielded in outputs (calories). And this is just the growing of food. According to the same source, including transportation, processing, packaging, this number grows to 40 to 1, and 17% of energy used in the US is used in agriculture and the food industry.

If vertical farming proved viable and profitable, food could be grown where it was needed. For example, citrus fruits right here in Minneapolis. While the infrastructure would be quite an investment, I believe the crops grown could be competitive, as there are virtually no transportation costs, much less waste, no expenditure on fertilizers or pesticides, and no exposure to drought, freezing, or other environmental factors that negatively affect agriculture, as well as the ability to produce year-round. According to the site, agricultural yields in such as system could be 4-6 times higher than traditional agriculture.

Imagine one of these round buildings, an acre per story, 30 stories high. Accordingly, that would replace 120-180 acres of traditional farmland if those numbers are accurate.

Of course, such enterprise would need to be profitable, but I see no harm in setting aside some funding to test its viability. If profitable... well, the market would decide which is more competitive and cost-effective, and it would either be on or another. Why build skyscrapers when we can build one-story buildings so efficiently?

One of the problems facing the world is the loss of forest land of all types to agriculture, including slash-and-burn. Everywhere, agricultural desertification exists.

And if there's one thing we would achieve in the US, it's energy independence in agriculture.
Hmm. In that light it does seem quite useful. Hate to see what happens in a tornado though.

-dale
dalem is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2007, 13:08 PM   #14 (permalink)
astralis
Foreign Service
Moderator
Lei Feng Protege
 
Join Date: 08-23-05
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,944
Country:
good point, dale. in that case, california will get even more popular than it is today- ain't no tornadoes in salinas.
__________________
Never let the future disturb you. You will meet it, if you have to, with the same weapons of reason which today arm you against the present.

-Marcus Aurelius, Meditations
astralis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2007, 13:43 PM   #15 (permalink)
glyn
Military Professional
 
glyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-15-06
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
Posts: 6,531
Quote:
Originally Posted by crooks View Post
Excellent idea, but the changes to be made to current farming would be huge, and the cost is surely gigantic.

Would we be able to impliment such a project?
It will be worth investigating. I can see farms like this being incredibly useful in some parts of the world, and less so where arable land is plentiful. The structures will have to be capable of withstanding the weather conditions for the area. Looks like Kansas and the rest of Tornado Alley is a no-no.
glyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pakistan Economy Neo Political Discussions 3653 11-06-2007 10:30 AM
How clean is India? Neo Political Discussions 163 05-03-2006 19:09 PM
Clouded Thinking (Thunking) tarek Political Discussions 14 01-27-2005 04:17 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:59 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8