ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > General Forums > World Affairs Board Pub > Science & Tech
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-02-2007, 15:58 PM   #16 (permalink)
FibrillatorD
Senior Contributor
 
FibrillatorD's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-11-07
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 800
Country:
Send a message via AIM to FibrillatorD
Wouldn't leave the 3rd world with much of any competitive advantage, assuming all the talk is true about wasting energy, despite the kind of highly-specialized system of food manufacturing we have today.

I don't have any data, but remember those assembly lines with live hanging skinless pigs being polled around a butchering factory? It might not be humane, but its efficient.

I'm assuming the same kind of efficiency holds for fruits and veggies. Again, the numbers, 40-1, stated above sure sounds bad. But how does the ratio compare to an autarky?

Actually, by cutting out transportation costs, vertical farming would bring us full circle, wouldn't it?

Last edited by FibrillatorD : 07-02-2007 at 16:03 PM.
FibrillatorD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2007, 15:59 PM   #17 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 8,325
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by FibrillatorD View Post
Wouldn't leave the 3rd world with much of any competitive advantage
So what?

-dale
dalem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2007, 17:17 PM   #18 (permalink)
FibrillatorD
Senior Contributor
 
FibrillatorD's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-11-07
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 800
Country:
Send a message via AIM to FibrillatorD
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalem View Post
So what?

-dale
Yeah, its not enough for the billion or so people scraping small plots of land to face irrational 1st-world agricultural subsidies and banana quotas. After all, most of them have good manufacturing jobs waiting for them in the city.

Besides the whole like compassion for your fellow man thing, its in the 1st-world consumer's best interest for the 3rd world's farmers to gain access to 1st world markets, where we're at a competitive disadvantage.

Moral argument aside, why shouldn't this happen, Dale?
FibrillatorD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2007, 17:25 PM   #19 (permalink)
Parihaka
Moderator
 
Parihaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-04
Location: Te Ika a Maui
Posts: 9,465
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironduke View Post
Low-energy input, fertilizer and pesticide-free crops still have transportation costs. For example, organic crops have been shown to have higher transportation costs which erase any environmental benefits from the practice of organic farming.
Oh aye, but you have to offset it against this only being useful in high population density areas. Which means land costs are extremely high and ongoing, construction costs are high and carry their own carbon costs, and transportation of food over long distances is extremely cheap, especially by sea.
To offset the high land value and construction costs, the product has to be high value, so is only really useful for niche market products or it simply won't be cost effective. great for specialist mushrooms for instance, but sod all use for rice.
__________________
In the realm of spirit, seek clarity; in the material world, seek utility.
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
Parihaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2007, 17:29 PM   #20 (permalink)
Parihaka
Moderator
 
Parihaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-04
Location: Te Ika a Maui
Posts: 9,465
Country:
We already have the same efficiencies by the way, they're called hydroponics and glasshouses, and cost only a fraction of both the construction, land costs, and energy requirements of this proposal.
Parihaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2007, 17:39 PM   #21 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,802
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalem View Post
Hmm. In that light it does seem quite useful. Hate to see what happens in a tornado though.

-dale
A building in the Midwest has a 1 in 70 million chance of getting hit by a tornado. There's insurance for that, I assume. The WTC was insured, for example.
__________________
The Buck Stops Here
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2007, 17:44 PM   #22 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,802
Country:
Quote:
Oh aye, but you have to offset it against this only being useful in high population density areas. Which means land costs are extremely high and ongoing, construction costs are high and carry their own carbon costs, and transportation of food over long distances is extremely cheap, especially by sea.
Land may be expensive right at the city center, but it can be bought cheap in a suburb or some other area of the city.

Quote:
We already have the same efficiencies by the way, they're called hydroponics and glasshouses, and cost only a fraction of both the construction, land costs, and energy requirements of this proposal.
For all practical purposes, this building is just a very tall greenhouse. I don't see how it would be expensive, after all, it's not like it would have the costs associated with an office building or residential high-rise.

Greenhouse farming has been shown to be profitable... why couldn't a multi-story greenhouse be profitable?
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2007, 18:52 PM   #23 (permalink)
Parihaka
Moderator
 
Parihaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-04
Location: Te Ika a Maui
Posts: 9,465
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironduke View Post
Land may be expensive right at the city center, but it can be bought cheap in a suburb or some other area of the city.
yes it can, but still far more expensive than in a rural area, so again it still has the competition cost with cheap arable land.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironduke View Post
For all practical purposes, this building is just a very tall greenhouse. I don't see how it would be expensive, after all, it's not like it would have the costs associated with an office building or residential high-rise.

Greenhouse farming has been shown to be profitable... why couldn't a multi-story greenhouse be profitable?
It can be, but just like greenhouse farming, it's only really useful for high value niche market produce. The trick is finding land suitably cheap. The building is just set-up cost vs return, but the same costs of structure, safety, and climate control would still apply as with an apartment complex, and might have greater costs related especially to the climate control and durability of materials.
Parihaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2007, 19:25 PM   #24 (permalink)
JAD_333
Defense Professional
 
JAD_333's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,691
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironduke View Post
Featured in last month's Popular Science:

The Vertical Farm Project - Agriculture for the 21st Century and Beyond...

According to proponents, about 4-6 times more food per acre can be grown in indoor vertical farming than traditional "horizontal" farming. No pesticides, emissions, restoration of ecosystems, etc. I think it's an exciting concept.
Brave new world. One hellova salad bar. The inevitable consequence of rising population. I hear a city kid in some future time asking, "mom, what is dirt?" All kidding aside, these high rise farms could be prefabbed and stacked by cranes and dismantled easily as a city grows and needs land.

But I still wonder whether finding solutions to the problems we create is better than not creating the problems in the first place.

I wonder at all the factories pumping out products, many of which we really don't need. It seems weird that raw materials goes in one end and things come out the other, make their way into our homes, get used, then are thrown away or recycled. It's so bad that the storage business is booming. What do you do with your old stuff when your garage, basement and closets are full? Rent a storage unit. I'd rather give stuff away than pay rent to store a bunch of plastic junk. Ever try to give away a 4 year old computer?

Oh well, this is a subject for a separate thread.
__________________
To be Truly ignorant, Man requires an Education. (Plato)
JAD_333 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2007, 19:40 PM   #25 (permalink)
omon
Field mechanik
Senior Contributor
 
omon's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-06
Location: bk
Posts: 1,925
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAD_333 View Post
Ever try to give away a 4 year old computer?

.
i know what you mean, i tryed very hard to give away 36" 2 years old crt tv, couldn,t find anyone.
omon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2007, 20:22 PM   #26 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 8,325
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by FibrillatorD View Post
Yeah, its not enough for the billion or so people scraping small plots of land to face irrational 1st-world agricultural subsidies and banana quotas. After all, most of them have good manufacturing jobs waiting for them in the city.

Besides the whole like compassion for your fellow man thing, its in the 1st-world consumer's best interest for the 3rd world's farmers to gain access to 1st world markets, where we're at a competitive disadvantage.

Moral argument aside, why shouldn't this happen, Dale?
I'm not saying it shouldn't. I am saying that I don't care if it doesn't. The problem in the Third World is based on bad governments, not bad markets. Get good governments in Whereveristanesia and we will beat a path to their door to buy and sell everything and everything from their people.

Leave bad governments in place and all the money, resources, and farm towers on the planet won't make a bit of difference to them.

-dale
dalem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2007, 20:27 PM   #27 (permalink)
FibrillatorD
Senior Contributor
 
FibrillatorD's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-11-07
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 800
Country:
Send a message via AIM to FibrillatorD
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalem View Post
I'm not saying it shouldn't. I am saying that I don't care if it doesn't. The problem in the Third World is based on bad governments, not bad markets. Get good governments in Whereveristanesia and we will beat a path to their door to buy and sell everything and everything from their people.

Leave bad governments in place and all the money, resources, and farm towers on the planet won't make a bit of difference to them.

-dale
There are well over 100 members of the WTO. The path has already been beaten pretty bare, but its a one-way street.

Its hypocritical to push liberalization without dropping our own barriers to foreign imports.
FibrillatorD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2007, 23:56 PM   #28 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 8,325
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by FibrillatorD View Post
There are well over 100 members of the WTO. The path has already been beaten pretty bare, but its a one-way street.

Its hypocritical to push liberalization without dropping our own barriers to foreign imports.
Why?

-dale
dalem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2007, 00:41 AM   #29 (permalink)
FibrillatorD
Senior Contributor
 
FibrillatorD's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-11-07
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 800
Country:
Send a message via AIM to FibrillatorD
Because joining is slightly less bad than not joining, in most cases.
FibrillatorD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2007, 04:11 AM   #30 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 8,325
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by FibrillatorD View Post
Because joining is slightly less bad than not joining, in most cases.
Joining what, in this case?

-dale
dalem is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pakistan Economy Neo Political Discussions 3653 11-06-2007 10:30 AM
How clean is India? Neo Political Discussions 163 05-03-2006 19:09 PM
Clouded Thinking (Thunking) tarek Political Discussions 14 01-27-2005 04:17 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:02 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8