![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
| View Poll Results: Should incandescent bulbs be banned? | |||
| Yes |
|
8 | 28.57% |
| No |
|
20 | 71.43% |
| Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Burgomaster
|
Ban Incandescent Light Bulbs?
Incandescent light bulbs have been with us since the 19th century. The latest improvement to incandescent bulbs occurred in 1911, when the tungsten filament was introduced.
An alternative to incandescent bulbs is the fluorescent light bulb, which consumes about 15-25% of the energy of an incandescent bulb, yet emits the same amount of light. Lawmakers in California and Connecticut have proposed laws banning incandescent lights, with similar proposals in the European Union. John Howard, the prime minister of Australia, has overseen legislation which will ban the production and import of incandescent light bulbs in Australia by 2010. Not only do fluorescent light bulbs consume far less energy than incandescents, they also have a much longer life span. I've literally seen fluorescent light bulbs last for years despite being used 12 hours a day. This lengthy life span helps offset the costs of the bulb, as fewer need to be purchased. So, should incandescent bulbs be banned and phased out in favor of fluorescent light bulbs? What are the environmental consequences of switching from incandescents to fluorescents?
__________________
The Buck Stops Here |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Senior Contributor
|
The frequency of some flourescent bulbs affects the moods of people who receive little natural light. Graveyard shift anyone? Incandesent bulbs are also usefull for keeping spaces heated so your water pipes don't freeze in the rare, shortlived cold spells. I don't want or need the extra mercury, but I am replacing the incandecents, when they burn out, with flourescents. I am waiting for the LED technology to arrive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,091
Country:
|
I voted NO.
I don't like to ban things. People should have the freedom to pick and choose, especially on something trivial like this. My house is running on nearly all florescent lighting.
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Lei Feng Protege
Foreign Service
|
an interesting link regarding the mercury issue:
fluorescent lights Quote:
__________________
Never let the future disturb you. You will meet it, if you have to, with the same weapons of reason which today arm you against the present. -Marcus Aurelius, Meditations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Burgomaster
|
Well, take a 60W incandescent light bulb and it runs for 1000 hours, this is 60kWh, right? Assuming astralis's statement about mercury emissions from the burning of fossil fuels is correct:
60 x 0.04 = 2.40mg mercury for incandescent (1000 hours) 14 x 0.04 = 0.56mg mercury for fluorescent light bulb (1000 hours) Philips 14w Universal Marathon has 2.56mg mercury per bulb EFI's Consumer Division Residential Catalogue | Philips 14w Universal Marathon® Given a 12,000 hour life for the Phillips, and 12 incandescents with a life of 1000 hours apiece: Incandescent: 2.40 x 12 = 28.8mg mercury Fluorescent: 0.56 x 12 + 2.56 = 9.28mg mercury It seems the fluorescent is the winner in every category. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Military Enthusiast
Senior Contributor
|
Not to mention that I save a shitload of money on utility bills. Also try out "Blue lights" by Phillips. It gives the natural sunlight color while saving money.
LED should be a big hit because it will give you best of both worlds, natural sunlight and energy savings. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,091
Country:
|
I read it in a newspaper article that explains how the mercury emitted from burning coal is different from the mercury from burying the florescent bulbs in landfills. The mercury from florescent bulbs in the landfill has a much higher chance of entering our food supply because it's in pure vapor form. The mercury from burning coal is in compound form and usually scrubbed out.
That's just what I read... |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Resident Curmudgeon
Military Professional
|
I voted no.
Mentioned in another thread was the fact that many/most places in the US are not set up to dispose of hazmat. SO if your county/waste management people use an incinerator all that mercury is going into the air. Unlike that coal power plant that uses stack scrubbers to catch it. If they are using a landfill, its going into your watertable. IronDuke, I'm assuming that you specificly meant Compact Fluorescent Lights(CFL), vice ths standard 4 foot models. The mercury in standard 4 foot models are much higher. Since the mercury content was reduced in 1994 the Avg 4 foot t-12 light has 22.8 milligrams of mercury. (use to be around 45) If you figure 2 or 4 per fixture, they are not as "Green" as we are led to believe. CFLs have a few problems, some can interfear with electronic equipment, and especially with remote devices that use infrared. They cannot be used in recessed light fixtures. The "long Life" only applies if they are installed with the Ballast down, like a floor lamp, Installed any other way will shorten the bulb life due to the ballast overheating. There are special precautions that you should take if a lamp breaks in your house. Sweep the glass up, never vacume, Open windows to vent the room, place broken peaces in a sealed bag and wipe the area with a damp paper towel that you also seal in a bag before disposing at your recycling/hasmat site. Rusty you are close to being right about dimmer switches. Floresents will not work with a normal dimmer switch, In fact it can cause a fire if you try. However they do make Florescent dimmers, which only work with certain brands, and if using CFLs they cannot be used on a circuit that also has regular bulbs. None will work with old school mechanical/mag ballast. Also cannot use timers or photocells with CFL. Now as for dimmers, a good dimmer switch will cost you about $20.00, A dimmer for regular Florescent bulbs runs around $150.00. If you buy the "Dimmable" CFLs a low cost dimmer runs about $45.00. And you have to match the dimmer with the bulb manufacturer. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional |
More 'do-gooder' crap to make us wards of the nanny state.
NO, it shouldn't be banned, unless I get the two bans I want: pro wrestling and rap music. ![]()
__________________
"The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory." - George Orwell |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Faster than a speeding photon | Jay | Science & Tech | 46 | 06-13-2007 04:22 AM |
| RAND: Lightning Over Water | Officer of Engineers | The Field Mess | 220 | 04-13-2007 14:11 PM |
| Ban Ki Moon sets a tone of openness, but some of his appointments create concern. | Ray | Current Affairs | 0 | 02-01-2007 06:21 AM |
| UNGA swears in Ban Ki-moon | Ironduke | Political Discussions | 0 | 12-15-2006 18:14 PM |
| LED evolution could replace light bulbs | Ironduke | Science & Tech | 1 | 04-17-2005 14:37 PM |