ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > General Forums > World Affairs Board Pub > Science & Tech
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
View Poll Results: Do you believe that Perpetual Motion is possible?
Yes 20 42.55%
No 27 57.45%
Voters: 47. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-26-2006, 12:10 PM   #16 (permalink)
joey2
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
u cannot have a perpetual motion like tht.first we need is a frictionless inertial system which can accelerate for infite time upon the application of a single force.
this kind of system is very much in dreamland in the exa-universal system. but deep down inside who knows how some unknown particles behaving or behaves..
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2006, 13:28 PM   #17 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 8,185
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by joey
u cannot have a perpetual motion like tht.first we need is a frictionless inertial system which can accelerate for infite time upon the application of a single force.
this kind of system is very much in dreamland in the exa-universal system. but deep down inside who knows how some unknown particles behaving or behaves..
First we need people to communicate in complete sentences.

-dale
dalem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2006, 15:44 PM   #18 (permalink)
Harish Kumar
Regular
 
Join Date: 08-09-06
Posts: 25
You dont really need a perpetual motion machine.What you need is just a machine that does a lot of work for very little input.The birdie which drinks endlessly a toy we see in most houses is a good example of a near perpetual motion machine and that should be enough.It would be great even if we just found some gift motion machines , which use inexhaustible natural forces to do work , eg: hydroelectric power station under waterfalls , solar sails , etc...
Harish Kumar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2006, 19:29 PM   #19 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harish Kumar
You dont really need a perpetual motion machine.What you need is just a machine that does a lot of work for very little input.The birdie which drinks endlessly a toy we see in most houses is a good example of a near perpetual motion machine and that should be enough.It would be great even if we just found some gift motion machines , which use inexhaustible natural forces to do work , eg: hydroelectric power station under waterfalls , solar sails , etc...
That's what the magnet motors supposedly are- very low power input force amplifiers.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2006, 14:41 PM   #20 (permalink)
highsea
Defense Professional
 
highsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-04
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,466
Anything that puts out more than you put in is by definition a perpetual motion machine. IOW, it is a violation of 2LOT.

Like the country bumpkin said when he saw his first giraffe at the zoo: "There ain't no sich animal."

Hydropower is "free energy", because we don't pay the sun to shine. But even the sun is not a perpetual motion machine.
__________________
My baby called me up. She said- Why don't you ever take me out? Pick me up in your brand new car....You shake the short change from the old fruit jar...
highsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2006, 12:58 PM   #21 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,242
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canmoore
Science tells us that it is impossible, however people have always been curious about the possibility of making a perpetual motion device.

For those of you who dont know what Perpetual Motion is (italics are taken from wikipedia)

As defined: Perpetual motion refers to a condition in which an object moves forever without being driven by an external source of energy

The reason why science prooves that Perpetual motion is impossible, is because it breaks two laws of physics.

First law of thermodynamics: The increase in the internal energy of a thermodynamic system is equal to the amount of heat energy added to the system minus the work done by the system on the surroundings.

and

Second law of thermodynamics: The entropy of an isolated system not at equilibrium will tend to increase over time, approaching a maximum value. or in laymans terms Heat cannot of itself pass from a colder to a hotter body.

However, science is always breaking new barriers and challenging previously unchallalangable laws...such as the earth being round, Theory of Evolution, Space travel..

Do you or dont you believe that Perpetual Motion is possible?

What about a compass yes it reads an ouside magnetic source but its the natural "pole" of the earth and its rotation?
__________________
Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2006, 19:15 PM   #22 (permalink)
FOG3
Patron
 
Join Date: 05-04-06
Posts: 193
A compass has an external force acting on it creating the impulse.

The closest thing we have to a Perpetual Motion machine is a pendulum. The basic idea is no loss of KE, which is impossible as no process can be 100% efficient nevermind have greater efficiency, according to thermodynamics. It's not really possible to get closer then a pendulum in minimizing inefficiencies, sorry.

It doesn't have to do with the fact your car will require refueling and maintenance preventing it from running indefinitely, which is analogous to a compass as you used it.
FOG3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2006, 16:20 PM   #23 (permalink)
The Chap
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-18-04
Location: UK
Posts: 1,179
Country:
semantics

"Perpetual" is the key. As has quite rightly been alluded, it is in theory possible to create a device that will simply continue to function within a closed environment until such environment ceases to exist. "Perpetual" suggests, nay requires, an open system in positive and negative temporal terms thus necessitating a steady state universe.

Even within the bubble universe that is The Orthodoxy within the cosmological
and indeed astronomical community, infinities are paradoxically confined within the space-time posited.

Getting useful work out of something that goes on and on and on is an experience confined to the yack and credit card bills of my ex-girlfriend.

You know you were all waiting for that.

On a more local level many over parity ( in terms of thermodynamics ) devices
involving such eclectic disciplines as hydrodynamics, civil power engineering, comercial electronics etc. continue to through up the most disturbingly consistent anomolies.

Very high tension coupled with very high frequency is the most recalcitrent of any mugs line up.

To dismiss this - as is usual - as Tesla madness is idiocy of the highest order. In my lowley estimation.

Recently in New Scientist there was an artical ( Fortean Times reported yonks ago) about a reactionless drive that exploits, quite cunningly, relatevistic asymetry.

More things in heaven and Earth Horatio ... !
__________________
Where's the bloody gin? An army marches on its liver, not its ruddy stomach.
The Chap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2006, 00:44 AM   #24 (permalink)
omon
Field mechanik
Senior Contributor
 
omon's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-06
Location: bk
Posts: 1,879
Country:
why not our own earth is spinning (sun gives it energy), so why can't we make a machine that uses the same energy as earth.
omon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 09:24 AM   #25 (permalink)
The Chap
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-18-04
Location: UK
Posts: 1,179
Country:
time for bed?

Quote:
Originally Posted by omon View Post
why not our own earth is spinning (sun gives it energy), so why can't we make a machine that uses the same energy as earth.
You may need to re-phrase that sir.
The Chap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2006, 00:38 AM   #26 (permalink)
Nanovae
Regular
 
Join Date: 11-07-06
Posts: 68
science have proven for century perpetual motion is a myth.
It's not a question to know if it's possible or not, it's a question to know why it's not possible.
thermodynamical laws answer that easily.
__________________
"Go tell the Spartans, stranger passing by, that here, obedient to their laws, we lie"
Simonides of Ceos
Nanovae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2006, 16:15 PM   #27 (permalink)
omon
Field mechanik
Senior Contributor
 
omon's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-06
Location: bk
Posts: 1,879
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nanovae View Post
science have proven for century perpetual motion is a myth.
It's not a question to know if it's possible or not, it's a question to know why it's not possible.
thermodynamical laws answer that easily.
It also say evolution is imposible
Evolution: Violates law of thermodynamics
omon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2006, 16:51 PM   #28 (permalink)
Nanovae
Regular
 
Join Date: 11-07-06
Posts: 68
Quote:
Originally Posted by omon View Post
It also say evolution is imposible
evolution of perpetual motion ?
I don't get it Omon, could you refine a bit please (the thread link is sooooo big ...)
Nanovae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2006, 10:34 AM   #29 (permalink)
Sombra
Patron
 
Join Date: 11-27-04
Posts: 274
Quote:
Originally Posted by omon View Post
It also say evolution is imposible
Evolution: Violates law of thermodynamics
You would be right if both theories would contradict each other . Alas, the writer of the original article has 2 fundamental flaws in his thinking.


1. Earth isnt a closed system
2. Even in a closed system you can increase the order in a part of the system as long as the order of the whole system goes down.

Believe me if two well accepted theories contradict each other scientists are the first to yell and discuss about it... Not resting until they find a better way to explain both... They donīt say: God made it that way dont question it.

They ask and ask and sometimes they come to conclusions which contradict common sense and well known truths... This is why so many people dont like scientists.
Sombra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2006, 20:38 PM   #30 (permalink)
brokensickle
Senior Contributor
 
brokensickle's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-28-06
Posts: 780
Perpetual Motion

In a finite scale it seems we are seeing perpetual motion in the fluctuation of our universe. The ebb and flows from hot and cold, creation and destruction always seem to be in constant flux. Will they someday come to equilibrium and cease to exist? It is anybodies guess. But who started that pendulum rocking? That is the greater question. Science is always changing its views because it lacks absolute knowledge, this is why scientist can not be absolutist. When we plumb the depth of the heavens for answers we will be doing so infinitely, because the stuff of the universe is infinitely changing, changing ones point of reference. So the answers are like humanity, they are but a vapor, here today and gone tomorrow. Science is for the day but G>D is forever, His ways never change, He is absolutely infinite.

~~~~Ivan~~~><//>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

P.S. "It is the glory of God to conceal a matter, but the glory of kings is to search out a matter."--Solomon, Proverbs 25:2
__________________
"Evil opposes freedom and uses those who pervert it as pawns to destroy it."

Last edited by brokensickle : 11-12-2006 at 01:57 AM. Reason: cerebral flatuation
brokensickle is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Opp. MPs grill gov't on same-sex marriage Ironduke Political Discussions 8 12-12-2006 14:34 PM
US-India Nuclear Deal Clears House Bane Political Discussions 17 08-24-2006 15:57 PM
First motion picures of 'Barracuda' JG73 Military Aviation 0 05-14-2006 19:18 PM
Perpetual Student THL Current Affairs 2 05-10-2006 23:31 PM
Florida Bill Blocks Feeding Tube Removal barrowaj Current Affairs 24 03-22-2005 20:43 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:55 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8