![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#46 (permalink) |
|
Senior Contributor
|
Fashionably late as ever ...
Fission or fusion devices will never be any more obsolete than a knife. They may well be superceded in terms of destructive power (pray to whichever god) but will always have their place. They kill people. Anything that does so will be as eternally usful as the bunched fist. Unfortunately.
I cannot buy stock in "a good right hander". A few brief comments on anti-matter: It can be stored. The do-dahs are either a Paul or Penning trap. Density distinguishes the two. Anti-matter is incredibly expensive. So would petrol be if some chain smoker had to suck it out of the ground using a bendy straw. The (for example) positrons created at Cern are not the specifacally designated aim of the facility. Hence, the piss-pooor efficiency and thus cost. A dedicated device i.e. a Heavy ion collider (most likely a lineac) can produce the stuff economically. As OoE astutely mentioned, los will soon be beam dominated. Indirect fire will, I risk, always be kinetic.. For the interested/baffled etc. I recommended some lit. in old posts somewhere. ![]()
__________________
Where's the bloody gin? An army marches on its liver, not its ruddy stomach. |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 (permalink) |
|
Banished
Regular
|
The missile defence shield is a multi billion dollar joke that only works about 50% of the time - and that is during staged defence tests
the only defence that really worked was MAD (Mutual assured destruction) The defence shield could never protect the United States of America from a full scale nuclear war, American and Soviet technology would easily turn any of the world's cities into a radioactive crater no matter what kind of shield the propaganda media were pusing. The new 'Son of Starwars' program is being pushed by Washington because it might stop a few scud missiles or IRBMs from a rogue nation that is trying nuclear blackmail. The only nuclear defence was MAD and it might have kept the sane communist leaders of Russia or China in check, however MAD (Mutual assured destruction) may have very little meaning to the Jihadists and Ayatollah's who might be keen on sticking an kind of warhead on top of their scuds. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Principles of War for the Battlefield of the Future | Ray | The Field Mess | 2 | 11-05-2006 10:42 AM |
| How clean is India? | Neo | Political Discussions | 163 | 05-03-2006 19:09 PM |
| Iran to be refered to U.N. Security Council | Dreadnought | Political Discussions | 13 | 01-16-2006 15:14 PM |
| Why use force when talk works so well? | Leader | International Defense Topics | 54 | 12-05-2005 04:29 AM |
| A Preemptive Attack on Iran's Nuclear Facilities: Possible Consequences | lulldapull | International Defense Topics | 14 | 11-20-2004 16:27 PM |