ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > General Forums > World Affairs Board Pub > Science & Tech
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-12-2007, 17:40 PM   #31 (permalink)
ArmchairGeneral
Devil's Advocate
Senior Contributor
 
ArmchairGeneral's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-03-06
Location: The boonies of NC, USA.
Posts: 2,883
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
Well, the velocity of photon is 3*10^8 m/s

The gravitational acceleration of a black hole has to be greater than -3*10^8 m/s/s in order to stop light from leaving.

Earth's gravitational acceleration is 9.8 m/s/s, therefore, light can escape earth.

Again, this is a very linear thinking. When speed exceeds 30% of the speed of light, we have to ditch mechanics and use relativity to explain motion.
Incorrect. Escape velocity is a lot more complicated than that. I'll be honest, I don't really understand how to calculate it, but I will point out that while Earth's gravitational acceleration is 9.8 m/s/s, escape velocity at the surface is approximately 11,200 m/s.

Helpful link: Escape velocity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________
"Apocalyptic thought is curiously pleasurable."
-Theodore Dalrymple

Last edited by ArmchairGeneral : 06-12-2007 at 23:06 PM.
ArmchairGeneral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 17:42 PM   #32 (permalink)
ArmchairGeneral
Devil's Advocate
Senior Contributor
 
ArmchairGeneral's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-03-06
Location: The boonies of NC, USA.
Posts: 2,883
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by glyn View Post
I think technically in physics that acceleration is 'a change in direction or rate'. So it should be theoretically possible to accelerate to a halt!
However the OED says it is taken from the Latin ac (add to) celer (swift) and they state 'motion increased in velocity'.
That is correct. Negative acceleration (deceleration) is what you feel whenever you slow down.
ArmchairGeneral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 17:47 PM   #33 (permalink)
ArmchairGeneral
Devil's Advocate
Senior Contributor
 
ArmchairGeneral's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-03-06
Location: The boonies of NC, USA.
Posts: 2,883
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by highsea View Post
Photons are massless, and are not affected by gravity.

It's the SPACE that's curved. Light always travels in straight lines. (technically space-time geodesics)
I'm no physics whiz, but I think you're making a unnecessary distinction between massy and massless objects. As I understand it, what we think of as a gravitational attraction is considered in relativity to be nothing more than the curvature of spacetime. Thus, everything that exists in spacetime, including photons, is affected by gravity.
ArmchairGeneral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 17:54 PM   #34 (permalink)
dave lukins
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 01-04-07
Location: cheshire uk
Posts: 5,508
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by highsea View Post
Photons are massless, and are not affected by gravity.

It's the SPACE that's curved. Light always travels in straight lines. (technically space-time geodesics)
Measurements taken during an eclipse in 1919 showed that light from a distant Galaxy was bent by the mass of the Sun... that was in accordance with Einstein's law of gravitation
dave lukins is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 18:08 PM   #35 (permalink)
ArmchairGeneral
Devil's Advocate
Senior Contributor
 
ArmchairGeneral's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-03-06
Location: The boonies of NC, USA.
Posts: 2,883
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dave lukins View Post
Measurements taken during an eclipse in 1919 showed that light from a distant Galaxy was bent by the mass of the Sun... that was in accordance with Einstein's law of gravitation
Technically, what was bent was space. Light was following the shortest path through space, which is by definition a straight line. A good analogy is seen in the flight paths of airplanes, which follow great circles (circles that bisect the Earth). On a Mercator projection, the path will look curved, but it's actually the shortest line between two points, and thus a straight line in spherical geometry.
ArmchairGeneral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 18:30 PM   #36 (permalink)
dave lukins
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 01-04-07
Location: cheshire uk
Posts: 5,508
Country:
Yes, in theory of general relativity, light would be bent by the deformation of the space-time continuum around an object such as a Planet
dave lukins is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 18:38 PM   #37 (permalink)
highsea
Defense Professional
 
highsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-04
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,585
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArmchairGeneral View Post
I'm no physics whiz, but I think you're making a unnecessary distinction between massy and massless objects. As I understand it, what we think of as a gravitational attraction is considered in relativity to be nothing more than the curvature of spacetime. Thus, everything that exists in spacetime, including photons, is affected by gravity.
I was trying to point out that the description of photons being somehow accelerated by gravitational force is not the case. Photons do not "fall back" into a black hole, for example.

Photons are NOT affected by gravity. The space that they exist in IS. That is not an unnecessary distinction to physists, I can assure you. Gravity has absolutely no effect on a photon (or any other massless particle). If it did, photons could be sped up and slowed down, and the speed of light would not be a universal constant.
__________________
My baby called me up. She said- Why don't you ever take me out? Pick me up in your brand new car....You shake the short change from the old fruit jar...
highsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 19:21 PM   #38 (permalink)
omon
Field mechanik
Senior Contributor
 
omon's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-06
Location: bk
Posts: 2,058
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by highsea View Post
It's not "pressure" in the Newtonian sense, it's electromagnetic radiation pressure. They are very different things that happen to have a common name.
oh, ok i see it makes sence now, is it like magnets have force or pressure, but flux itself(the force it self) has no weight, or does it?
omon is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 22:35 PM   #39 (permalink)
ArmchairGeneral
Devil's Advocate
Senior Contributor
 
ArmchairGeneral's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-03-06
Location: The boonies of NC, USA.
Posts: 2,883
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by highsea View Post
I was trying to point out that the description of photons being somehow accelerated by gravitational force is not the case. Photons do not "fall back" into a black hole, for example.

Photons are NOT affected by gravity. The space that they exist in IS. That is not an unnecessary distinction to physists, I can assure you. Gravity has absolutely no effect on a photon (or any other massless particle). If it did, photons could be sped up and slowed down, and the speed of light would not be a universal constant.
But, if I understand correctly, in general relativity, there is no such thing as a gravitational force. What we think of as gravity is nothing more than an effect of curved space. Which is what affects photons, and everything else. So what's the difference between gravity (space-time curvature) affecting mass, and space-time curvature (gravity) affecting light?
ArmchairGeneral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 22:52 PM   #40 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 10,217
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArmchairGeneral View Post
Incorrect. Escape velocity is a lot more complicated than that. I'll be honest, I don't really understand how to calculate it, but I will point out that while Earth's gravitational acceleration is 9.8 m/s, escape velocity at the surface is approximately 11,200 m/s.

Helpful link: Escape velocity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ahh, but I did make the difference.

I stated the earth's gravitational acceleration is 9.8m/s/s

I never once said the earth's escape velocity is 9.8m/s

__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 22:53 PM   #41 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 10,217
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by highsea View Post
Photons are massless, and are not affected by gravity.

It's the SPACE that's curved. Light always travels in straight lines. (technically space-time geodesics)
OK, got it. That makes sense.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 22:55 PM   #42 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 10,217
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dave lukins View Post
Measurements taken during an eclipse in 1919 showed that light from a distant Galaxy was bent by the mass of the Sun... that was in accordance with Einstein's law of gravitation
Actually, light was not bent.

The space that light travels in was bent by the gravity of the star. So it "appears" that light was bent. But in reality light travels in a straight line, but if we curve the space, we can bent light.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2007, 23:04 PM   #43 (permalink)
ArmchairGeneral
Devil's Advocate
Senior Contributor
 
ArmchairGeneral's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-03-06
Location: The boonies of NC, USA.
Posts: 2,883
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
Ahh, but I did make the difference.

I stated the earth's gravitational acceleration is 9.8m/s/s

I never once said the earth's escape velocity is 9.8m/s

No, but you stated that since the escape velocity of a black hole must be at least 300 million m/s, the gravitational acceleration of a black hole must be at least negative 300 million m/s/s. Thus, by the same reasoning, since the escape velocity of the earth is 11,200 m/s, the gravitational acceleration must be 11,200 m/s/s. Which it ain't.

My apologies for leaving an /s on my previous post.
ArmchairGeneral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2007, 03:20 AM   #44 (permalink)
dave lukins
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 01-04-07
Location: cheshire uk
Posts: 5,508
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
Actually, light was not bent.

if we curve the space, we can bent light.
So you ARE saying that light was bent If not, I'm gonna wake Albert up and tell him he was wrong, and send him to your address

If you don't agree with "Bent" lets agree with the term "Deflected" (for now)
dave lukins is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2007, 03:40 AM   #45 (permalink)
dave lukins
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 01-04-07
Location: cheshire uk
Posts: 5,508
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArmchairGeneral View Post
No, but you stated that since the escape velocity of a black hole must be at least 300 million m/s,
For a Black Hole to stop emitting Light it has to shrink under its own gravity. As it shrinks the gravitational field at the surface becomes stronger and the escape velocity increases. By the time the Radius is down to 30km its escape velocity would have increased to 300,000 kps.. the velocity of light. After that, any light emitted by the star would not be able to escape to infinity and would be dragged back by the grav. field
dave lukins is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Antarctic air is warming faster than rest of world Parihaka Science & Tech 13 04-01-2006 12:20 PM
Beating a Speeding Ticket Bulgaroctonus World Affairs Board Pub 16 03-16-2006 09:41 AM
THL Gets A Speeding Ticket THL World Affairs Board Pub 27 02-24-2006 09:46 AM
Earth's Core Rotates Faster Than Its Crust Endangered Science & Tech 2 10-27-2005 01:19 AM
Developing countries’ goods trade share surges to 50-year peak oneman28 World Affairs Board Pub 0 04-21-2005 13:58 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:14 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8