ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > General Forums > Political Discussions
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-06-2005, 19:05 PM   #1 (permalink)
Gautam
Banished
 
Gautam's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-28-05
Location: London
Posts: 903
Has Bush forced a shift in US policy of regional containment in relation to India?

Without going into great detail, I would like to hear views of Americans on WAB as to what they think about the US Policy towards India in terms of regional containment and nuclear proliferation.

Since George Bush came into power in January 2001, there has been a huge shift in the foreign policy of United States towards India.

Quote:
Background for anyone not familiar with US foreign Policy towards India from 1950's.

There is no doubt that by forming an alliance with Pakistan, US tried to regional contain India. Similarly transfer of nuclear technology from China 2 Pakistan was largely ignored as well.

Successive failed attempts by US to coerce India into signing CTBT (Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty), NPT, FMCT and the warnings given to India in 1996 when US Spy satellites picked up India's preperation for nuclear tests.

Breaking away with years of tradition to allow China from early 90's 2 act as a mediator in Indo-Pak disputes

The Brown Ammendment in 1995, that pushed forward the supply of more f-16's to Pakistan by the Clinton administration.
But suddenly in 2001 US made a huge shift in its foreign policy which is even continuing today.

George Bush along with than National Security advisor underlined the strategic importance of India in an article in ("Promoting the National Interest", Foreign Affairs, 79 (January-February

It (the US) should pay closer attention to India's role in the regional balance, There is a strong tendency cnceptually to connect India with Pakistan and to think only of Kashmir or the nuclear competition between the two states. But India is an element in China's calculation and it should be in America's too. India is not a great power yet, but it has the potential to emerge as one.


Following these comments Bush dispatched Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage to India along with a few select countries to explain the NMD (National Missile Defence) system plan.
Armitage's statements on his tour and after the tour showed high Importance by US for India which was a major shift from its previous policy stand.

These few events are just a few from many happenings in the last four years but the most important of these statement could be considered when for the first time someone from the US went on record in saying

Assistant Secretary of State for South Asia, Christina Rocca, welcomed "India's new global status" during her confirmation hearings in May 2001"

"US welcomes India's New Global Status" Times of India May 18,2001.
and the comments were picked up by Collin Powell who also reiterated Rocco's comments.

Better was yet 2 come

While the administration is keen on good relations with Pakistan, too, we have informed the Indians that India would be treated in its own right and not in reference to US ties with Pakistan.

This was followed by appointment of Robert Blackwell and eminent strategic expert as the ambassdor to INdia.

To me this seems to a break away from the traditional approach of containment through Pakistan and given that the break up of USSR no longer leaves the option of a tilt of India towards Communism surely has made some difference.

Yet things are far from clear given that Hillary Clinton might run and may even get elected in next US elections and given Bill Clinton would be on her side would make a heck of diff?

I look forward to all of your comments.
Gautam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2005, 20:01 PM   #2 (permalink)
Shek
Military Professional
Moderator
 
Join Date: 02-23-05
Location: Krblachistan
Posts: 7,788
Country:
Gautam,
To be honest, most Americans are not too familiar with US-Indo or US-Pakistani relations. The war against radical Islam and Iraq dominate the news. However, you didn't mention the strategic cooperation agreement that was signed this past summer. I believe that the average American doesn't see India as a threat, except maybe to the good health of their computer .

Personally, I don't see India as a threat. With the rising aspirations of China, while not a threat in the immediate decade, it will be important to have both India and Pakistan as an ally. While I see a lot of duplicity in the US-Pakistani relationship, the alternative is worse.

So, I think you'll see a continuing cooperation that increases between India and US.
__________________
"So little pains do the vulgar take in the investigation of truth, accepting readily the first story that comes to hand." Thucydides 1.20.3
Shek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2005, 20:07 PM   #3 (permalink)
Gautam
Banished
 
Gautam's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-28-05
Location: London
Posts: 903
Quote:
Originally Posted by shek
Gautam,
To be honest, most Americans are not too familiar with US-Indo or US-Pakistani relations. The war against radical Islam and Iraq dominate the news. However, you didn't mention the strategic cooperation agreement that was signed this past summer. I believe that the average American doesn't see India as a threat, except maybe to the good health of their computer .

Personally, I don't see India as a threat. With the rising aspirations of China, while not a threat in the immediate decade, it will be important to have both India and Pakistan as an ally. While I see a lot of duplicity in the US-Pakistani relationship, the alternative is worse.

So, I think you'll see a continuing cooperation that increases between India and US.
As I said that last 4 years have seen a major shift and a lot of co-operation. Pasting that all here would be fruitless but still I would like 2 know american people's views on this issue.
Gautam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2005, 22:19 PM   #4 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 8,552
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
As I said that last 4 years have seen a major shift and a lot of co-operation. Pasting that all here would be fruitless but still I would like 2 know american people's views on this issue.
With all due respect, the last thing myself, and I suspect the same of a few others here, want to get into is some kind of India thread.

In my experience, within about 5 posts some jackknob from Pakistan will come in here flinging his poo and then some jackknob from India will respond in kind and before you know it there will be six pages of outrage over who raped whose elephant 1,200 years ago.

And then it will morph into some useless poll about SU-5000s being better than F4U Corsairs, and why is Pakistan being forced to purchase Sopwith Camels when India has X-wings.

Apologies, but that's my impression.

-dale
dalem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2005, 22:56 PM   #5 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,468
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by shek
While I see a lot of duplicity in the US-Pakistani relationship, the alternative is worse.

So, I think you'll see a continuing cooperation that increases between India and US.
ABSOLUTELY CORRECT.
__________________
"The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory."
- George Orwell
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2005, 22:56 PM   #6 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,468
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalem
With all due respect, the last thing myself, and I suspect the same of a few others here, want to get into is some kind of India thread.

In my experience, within about 5 posts some jackknob from Pakistan will come in here flinging his poo and then some jackknob from India will respond in kind and before you know it there will be six pages of outrage over who raped whose elephant 1,200 years ago.

And then it will morph into some useless poll about SU-5000s being better than F4U Corsairs, and why is Pakistan being forced to purchase Sopwith Camels when India has X-wings.

Apologies, but that's my impression.

-dale
ABSOLUTELY CORRECT.
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2005, 23:34 PM   #7 (permalink)
Bulgaroctonus
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 10-29-04
Location: Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 1,139
Country:
The new U.S. approach to India is certainly an effort to establish a regional balance or foil to China. India has the population and the resources to equal China's power, but it still lags in military strenght and foreign investment, to name a few categories.

The U.S. is placing more of its bets with India because India has several advantages over Pakistan. India can command many more resources than Pakistan can will serve as a better counter to China. Also, large parts of the Pakistani population are hostile to the U.S., and Pakistan is, in general, less stable than India. The U.S. expects a better return on its investment from India.

As an American, I have been watching the Indian-American relations with hope. One of the best ways to prevent war with China is to prove to them that it is not in their interest. If China sees a strong regional power like India arrayed against it, the CCP will stay peaceful.
Bulgaroctonus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2005, 02:59 AM   #8 (permalink)
Horrido
Staff Emeritus
Chief Subversive
 
Horrido's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-04-03
Location: Secure, and undisclosed.
Posts: 979
I don't believe the average American really has a clue as to what India's all about, other than maybe elephants, the Taj Mahal, outsourced computer and tech-support jobs, and an infinite supply of corner grocery store managers.

As to my personal belief, I'm in line with Bulgaroctonus, in that we wish to use India against China as we used China against the Soviet Union, and that India seems less aggressive and politically controlling than China, and more ammicable and in line to US policies and goals.


Quote:
Originally Posted by dalem
and before you know it there will be six pages of outrage over who raped whose elephant 1,200 years ago.

And then it will morph into some useless poll about SU-5000s being better than F4U Corsairs, and why is Pakistan being forced to purchase Sopwith Camels when India has X-wings.

-dale
ROFLMAO! WOW! Can't wait to see the movie!

Laughing too hard...Can't breath...send help...
__________________
The black flag is raised: Ban them all... Let the Admin sort them out.

I know I'm going to have the last word... I have powers of deletion and lock.
Horrido is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2005, 03:50 AM   #9 (permalink)
Gautam
Banished
 
Gautam's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-28-05
Location: London
Posts: 903
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalem
With all due respect, the last thing myself, and I suspect the same of a few others here, want to get into is some kind of India thread.

In my experience, within about 5 posts some jackknob from Pakistan will come in here flinging his poo and then some jackknob from India will respond in kind and before you know it there will be six pages of outrage over who raped whose elephant 1,200 years ago.

And then it will morph into some useless poll about SU-5000s being better than F4U Corsairs, and why is Pakistan being forced to purchase Sopwith Camels when India has X-wings.

Apologies, but that's my impression.

-dale
WHat's ur problem,
If u r not interested than stay out, I am only trying 2 have a sensible conversation here. This ain't about India or Pak but I am only trying 2 get an average american's viewpoint on their preceptions about their foreign policy.

Above all one thing I have learnt here is not 2 indulge so called India/Pak Patriots because it only feeds thier hollow ego
Gautam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2005, 06:05 AM   #10 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,468
Country:
Right on time with that reaction, G. Livin' up to expectations...
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2005, 12:48 PM   #11 (permalink)
Gautam
Banished
 
Gautam's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-28-05
Location: London
Posts: 903
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluesman
Right on time with that reaction, G. Livin' up to expectations...
=Is that so
Gautam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2005, 13:12 PM   #12 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 27,195
Country:
Dalem,

While you do have a point, yet you are goading the thread into a fight.

Even if that happens, so what?

It is for the discerning observer to shift wheat from the chaff.

I do sift the wheat from the chaff when I find these Republican vs Democrat tripe that surface ever so often on this forum.

The thread is an important issue to Indians and to the world. Is it to balance China or is there more to it? If so, what is the effect on the geo strategic equation and how will each player find their slot?

These are important military and strategic issues.

I concede that the average oaf will not understand and will take the thread off course.

I am astonished to learn that the average American has no clue of international affairs.

I just don't believe it to be true.
__________________


"Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

HAKUNA MATATA

Last edited by Ray : 12-07-2005 at 13:17 PM.
Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2005, 13:53 PM   #13 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 8,552
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray
I am astonished to learn that the average American has no clue of international affairs.
We have a clue, Ray.

We're just kinda busy most of the time.

-dale
dalem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2005, 15:56 PM   #14 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 27,195
Country:
And we are the idle rich with all the time on our hands?
Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2005, 17:01 PM   #15 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 8,552
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray
And we are the idle rich with all the time on our hands?
Apparently enough time to worry about how much you think Americans do or do not know.

-dale
dalem is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
India has sold its nuclear soul to the US Asim Aquil Political Discussions 60 08-02-2008 01:37 AM
Indo-Pakistan Talks – Myths, Delusions and Fantasies!! Ray South Asian Defense Topics 11 05-06-2007 21:25 PM
How clean is India? Neo Political Discussions 163 05-03-2006 19:09 PM
Pakistan: The State of Denial Ray South Asian Defense Topics 22 05-07-2005 08:47 AM
Dr. Henry Kissinger on Indo-US Relations Hari_Om The Western Alliance 2 11-17-2004 00:05 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:52 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8