hammer

It was the other way around , the muslims slaughtered 400 people in coimbatore. You want to know why? coz the police opened fire on the muslim rioters who the previous day had killed a traffic constable and were lobbing home made bombs and stones at the police.

When the police tried to nab the muslim radicals(who killed the traffic constable) hiding in the muslim part of the city , the whole locality protested and started throwing stones and petrol bombs at the police. I am not saying the whole community is involved but they tried to protect them. The uneducated lot(which unfortunately is the majority) have a warped sense of loyalty and justice towards those idiots.
Now this kind of incidents puts the whole muslim community under the scanner. There will ofcourse be a deep divide in the society. The minority would be looked with suspicion. Now who has the solution to this problem ? the muslims themselves.

__________________
Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie!'...till you can find a rock. ;)

Asim Aquil

It sounds kind of unbelievable and made up that the whole Muslim community would be up in arms against the Indian law. Unless there's something more to be added to the story. Like the other side...

hammer

What Indian law? they have their own Sharia. Do some google on 'Coimbatore Bomb blast' and 'Marad'(which happened in Kerala). Read how the radical elements among the muslims were successful in dividing the society. Communal clashes never happened in the south before. But its a reality now.Thanks to 'mujahideens' or whatever.

Ray

Try.

It is in English!

Asim Aquil

Law as in LAW... the police!!

Sectarianism is a mentality. Fight that. Only advice I can give you.

The trash talk is beneath you... SIR!

Karthik

Right.

Here's a shinning example of the imagination of a person running riots :


Thank you very much for your views on the Indian society and your advice for us to reflect things with grief and sorrow. In return, we'd strongly recommend celebrations to hail the jihadi phenomenon in your country.

In what way has the general elections changed the 'future of the Indian state' ? Oh yes, I forgot. Thousands of people are slaughtered in the streets and in their homes.

__________________
"There is no excellence in all this world that can be separated from right living." - David Star Jordan My Blog

Samudra

Do not make sweeping assumptions.Nowhere did any one call for a 'retribution' against the Muslims.It is a figment of your imagination.Nay , it is what you want.Bloodshed.For it is your kind that scores or wants to score points over dead bodies.

Afterall , that is something the ISI has been trying to do.It comes to me as no surprise.Do not teach us , what you imagine as Secularism or whatever name you choose to call it.

It is so wonderfull of you.You call Indians as insensitive to death , a sweeping generalisation.I dont know if it can get any more stupid than that.

hammer

LOL... they were the first to be targeted.

You can convince the few educated muslim elite. But not the illiterate lot who believe that Allah sent 'tsunami' to punish the 'Kafirs'. I wonder what the Indonesians have to say about this. lol.

bull

Bomb attacks are made by terrorists.they are not relegious issues.

Not all the but what you mentioned below are

__________________
What's the difference between people who pray in church and those who pray in casinos?
The ones in the casinos are serious.

Asim Aquil

Actually the elitist class of the high ranked Mullahs said that. Not us.

If anything, it could be called a punishment upon the Muslims, since mostly Muslims died.

Anyway,

I'll hold you to that.

Samudra

About what are you talking ?

Asim Aquil

Its just a rhetorical statement. You don't have to search its deeper meaning or anything.

Samudra

In a riot , anywhere in India , its not the Muslims alone who die - although that is what it is made out to be.

Asim Aquil

When two gangs fight, its always the bigger and stronger gang that messes with the smaller and weaker one.

Samudra

Might is not right , and it is to prevent might becoming right that people have laws.

When the train in Godhra was burnt , it was the Muslim fanatics - I clearly state Muslim fanatics , which people are to understand as Muslims with fanatical ideas and they alone - who outnumbered the passengers.

When the traffic constable Selvaraj was stabbed ,he was outnumbered.

You seek to generalise everything , and intend to paint a picture of a society that is forever divided into communal lines.You seek to paint a picture that a minority can never live with a majority.The Raison Détre for a nation you claim citizenship to.

In other words , you seek to tell the reader that Muslims and Hindus - where Hindus are in a majority simply cannot live together.That has been proven false.And to be frank you know it as much as the founder of the nation you claim citizenship to did.

Such incidents, which when told in the right manner , can convey a message that nothing goes well in a multi-religious country.Infact it appears that is the sole intention of your posting it here.

But is it the truth ? Nay , it is merely selective display of facts.You chose to pin-point facts which favour your opinion.

You chose not to tell the facts, That we continue to facilitate Haj pilgrimage for Muslims.That we continue to have our supreme court voice its opinion very strongly , whenever needed , against people who have the slightest disagreement over the rule of law.That the very same supreme court itself cannot intrude in Muslims personal laws.

You chose not to tell the facts that deserving and hard working individuals in India always get their recognition irrespective of their communal identity and examples for the same are very well known , to you and to the world.And also that lazy undeserving fools continue to enjoy the perks which is made available to them because of their communal identity.

It is these fools, who are attempting to perpetuate their privileged position in the society, that you intend to paint as victims of a majortiy population.It is these fools you intend to use as justifications for a theory propagated by your nation that a multi-religious society - with a large majority of a specific religion , cannot live peacefully.

I now can only take pity in you.I assumed good reasoning where none existed in the first place.