![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
Angry China
“Angry China” is the cover story of the current (May 3rd) issue of The Economist, arguably the most respected international news magazine. The article provides very thoughtful analysis to support the highlighted opinion: The recent glimpses of a snarling China should scare the country's government as much as the world. And here is the reason:
“But the appeal to nationalism is a double-edged sword: while it provides a useful outlet for domestic discontents, it could easily turn on the government itself.” China | Angry China | Economist.com Senior Chinese government officials probably already sense the danger raised by this article. I hope they carefully consider their options before it is too late. There is no question that the rage of Chinese is genuine. Yet, there is no suitable “punishment” in sight for Chinese to vent the anger. Boycott to Carrefour will not be satisfying. CNN did not really apologize. Yielding to international pressure, Chinese officials are meeting with Dalai Lama’s representatives. How do the mass Chinese feel? Hence the danger: “Popular anger, once roused, can easily switch targets.” Ironically, Tiananmen Square incident had a similar flavor: strong popular anger, no action could calm the crowd, and switched targets. The outcome was very sad. The CCP government is in an impossible position. They have to maintain order in order to host the Olympic. Yet, they don’t have good outlets to calm the crowd. As additional conflicts are surely to come during Olympic events, they will find themselves backed into a corner, having little room to maneuver. This is also a good opportunity for different factions within CCP to struggle for power! In my opinion, appealing to nationalism was a big mistake. Rousing the popular anger without any clue how to calm them down was a bigger mistake. Anger is a negative human emotion which can’t be satisfied until something is destructed. I can only hope that Chinese are not the ones suffering the destruction. Next time, how about rousing the positive emotion of hope to build up a democratic society! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Postmaster General
Military Professional
|
As I wrote earlier in a post - don't underestimate the USA!
One down, other will follow - bloodless and with no blame!!
__________________
![]() "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination." I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to. HAKUNA MATATA |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Postmaster General
Military Professional
|
That is right.
I had written earlier that, (I am putting it simplistically here) the USA will ensure that capitalism takes grip over China and encourage crass consumerism so that it changes the mindset. The people, who were earlier denied the 'bounties' of life would suddenly lose their balance and become greedy with all its attendant vices. The Party apparatchiks because they have the control will be the first ones to manipulate the system and get rich quick, which would lead to discontent amongst the common man and the Party will be discredited. The rural and urban divide would be immense. Turmoil shall follow. The Communist Party would lose its control over the people since the people would have psychologically changed and the end of Communism would be heralded! It is all a Mind Game - control of the Mind!! I had read something on these lines written by a British chap years ago when I was in school of how to control the mind, corrupt the youth and change the system! Last edited by Ray : 05-05-2008 at 02:40 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Regular
|
Quote:
Materialism and consumerism are all human nature. We want those 'bounties' of life because we feel good having them. The party establishment will want to manipulate the system to get rich quickly, and get corrupted by power in the process. This is just human nature, with no need for USA’s help. The idea that USA wants to control the mind, corrupt the youth and change the system sounds like a science fiction to me. The youth in USA may be more corrupted by materialism than in other countries. School age boys in USA spend so much time on video games that their minds are literally controlled by those stupid games. I certainly do not see USA wants their children to be addicted to these material possessions. And who is USA anyway? The politician, the business people, or the citizen? They are all occupied with their own interests, and their interests hardly align. IMHO, the problem in China has much more to do with incompetent bureaucrats who mindlessly follow instructions from above, promote their self interests, don’t care, miscalculate, or are just stupid. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 8,594
Country:
|
Quote:
China doesn't have a good control over materialism yet. It's entirely new to the communist regime. The party bosses are the first to benefit and as a result the system is corrupt. They deal with this issue by encouraging nationalism. And of course nationalism can easily turn on its master.
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Postmaster General
Military Professional
|
what must be understood is the ''control of the mind".
If one feels that it has to be a open highly publicised campaign, then that is the first fallacy. It has to be unobtrusive! I have here an Australian poster who says he would give $50 and a pat on the back if his son screwed his woman teacher! Would it have been accepted earlier? Indeed, if sex become commonplace and nothing extraordinary, so will rape! Back to the days of Sodom and Gomorrah ! Make society licentious and you can control it! |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
The west wont recover from the 'hippie' revolution till they're dead, and even then you've got their kids.
__________________
In the realm of spirit, seek clarity; in the material world, seek utility. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
New Member
|
Quote:
![]() CCP is nothing but yet another authority of a largely capitalized country, who tries desperately to maintain its rule for the $$. Even their communist skins are full of "Chinese (American?) character" nowadays. Nationalism turn on the government itself? As long as I can see from the Chinese forums, not necessarily. Previously intensely debated domestic issues has been overwhelmed by anti-west posts. I have never seen CCP gained so much one-sided support in recent years. Fooled by CCP press censor? Could be. But the burst of Nationalism coupled with a ruling authority at its prime should definitely scare the world more.
__________________
天下兴亡,匹夫有责 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Postmaster General
Military Professional
|
Quote:
But to speed up the process, you require a catalyst. USA is providing it. Is the USA mad to run up such a huge deficit in balance of trade? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Postmaster General
Military Professional
|
Quote:
But to speed up the process, you require a catalyst. USA us providing it. Is the USA mad to run up such a huge deficit in balance of trade? Last edited by Ray : 05-05-2008 at 16:11 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
I don't think democracy will come as long as in my productive age. And the catalyst from USA is the last thing i want. See what happen in these days. Actually the West countries are pushing the people to the government.
Last edited by xunil : 05-05-2008 at 16:27 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| INDIA’S DRIVE FOR A ‘BLUE WATER’ NAVY : Dr.David Scott | Adux | Naval Forces | 50 | 04-29-2008 14:14 PM |
| The Chinese Military’s Strategic Mind-set | xinhui | The Field Mess | 116 | 04-29-2008 13:45 PM |
| Tibet: A lost hope or a bright tomorrow | OnlinePhuntsho | Political Discussions | 195 | 04-18-2008 09:17 AM |
| Analysis: Spratly Islands | Ironduke | South Asian Defense Topics | 31 | 02-01-2008 11:54 AM |
| Africa: 'Who's Afraid of China in Africa?' | troung | International Defense Topics | 0 | 12-16-2006 23:22 PM |