ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > General Forums > Political Discussions
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-22-2008, 08:26 AM   #31 (permalink)
Fiona Shrot
Contributor
 
Fiona Shrot's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-19-08
Location: Puxi, Shanghai
Posts: 313
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tronic View Post
Actually, it is on the contrary. China makes all the claims on Indian territory. Sikkim was not part of Tibet, its people decided that. And Arunachal is definitely not part of Tibet, not a single political separatist party in that state. As for, '62, Nehru was just an idiot. On the bright side, Indian army is only what it is today because of the '62 war. Now thats something which won't happen again.
Hey your words are quite like what Ray said.

OK, about that war, I really need to know more.

BTW, I never heard Sikkim was a part of Tibet. So why need its people decieded?
__________________
Cinderella was a Chinese.
Fiona Shrot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 10:19 AM   #32 (permalink)
bolo121
Senior Contributor
 
bolo121's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-19-07
Location: india
Posts: 756
Country:
Quote:
Ha, in Chinese, the thing is called "Anti-Fire Wall". So I didnt get it at first.
I often browse economist and thanks for the link.
Oh, I see. ok then.
About 1962, we indians mostly view it as the main factor that helped our army to modernise. Prior to the defeat Indian Army had been ignored and neglected by the govt. After it a major reform and modernisation effort was undertaken. Due in part to this we were successful in the next 2 major conflicts we faced which were against pakistan.
bolo121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 13:00 PM   #33 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 26,144
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiona Shrot View Post
Hey your words are quite like what Ray said.

OK, about that war, I really need to know more.

BTW, I never heard Sikkim was a part of Tibet. So why need its people decieded?
Fiona my girl,


You live in Ireland and you have developed the rebellious Irish psyche.

They are great fighters!

Some great Irish have also been a prime force in the Indian independence movement like Sister Nivedita. (I don't remember her Irish name!)

If you have not heard of Sikkim and what the Reds have to say, indicates that you have stayed too long outside your country and have been influenced by the revisionists and the running dogs of imperialism!
__________________


"Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

HAKUNA MATATA
Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 13:48 PM   #34 (permalink)
Fiona Shrot
Contributor
 
Fiona Shrot's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-19-08
Location: Puxi, Shanghai
Posts: 313
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray View Post
Fiona my girl,


You live in Ireland and you have developed the rebellious Irish psyche.

They are great fighters!

Some great Irish have also been a prime force in the Indian independence movement like Sister Nivedita. (I don't remember her Irish name!)

If you have not heard of Sikkim and what the Reds have to say, indicates that you have stayed too long outside your country and have been influenced by the revisionists and the running dogs of imperialism!
As far as I could remember, I always thought Sikkim belonged to India, not China. I also met some guys from Northern India. They kept long hair according to their religion. Did they just from Sikkim? Besides, it is said that even in the army, the their soldiers are allowed to have that hair-style, I mean, something like a big hat on the head?
Fiona Shrot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 14:19 PM   #35 (permalink)
Triple C
Contributor
 
Join Date: 04-10-06
Posts: 680
If the CCP is so necessary and beloved by the people, why is it affraid of disorder? Is it really disorder that it is trying to avert, or its own downfall? If there is a general election in China tommorow the CPP will win. The only reason for not having one is that they are too affraid to even face a competition!

The Russian senario is a scarecrow. There will be no break-away republics because over ninety per cent of the Chinese citizens are Hans. They also inhabit every province that is remotely hospitable to human life. Why would China worry about losing the Gobi desert and Himalyan mountains?

Every dictatorship want to tell its people that it is necessary, that armagaddon will come if it is removed from power--even though it is more often then not the regime responsible for creating the preconditions for that armagaddon. The longer the CPP stay in power, the more spectacular it will be when it goes.
__________________
What benefits the body is called medicine; what benefits the soul, discipline.
-Augustine of Hippo
Triple C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 15:09 PM   #36 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 26,144
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiona Shrot View Post
As far as I could remember, I always thought Sikkim belonged to India, not China. I also met some guys from Northern India. They kept long hair according to their religion. Did they just from Sikkim? Besides, it is said that even in the army, the their soldiers are allowed to have that hair-style, I mean, something like a big hat on the head?
You like the hairy ones it appears!

The are Sikhs who have long hair,

Cute, aren't they?

They don't have a hat,

The have a turban.

They are turbo charged they claim!! That is why girls like them!!
Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 15:31 PM   #37 (permalink)
Fiona Shrot
Contributor
 
Fiona Shrot's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-19-08
Location: Puxi, Shanghai
Posts: 313
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray View Post
You like the hairy ones it appears!

The are Sikhs who have long hair,

Cute, aren't they?

They don't have a hat,

The have a turban.

They are turbo charged they claim!! That is why girls like them!!
Oh, no

Though I have long hair, I dont like those hairy ones I met.

I think they have to spend a lot of time washing and combing their hair everyday.

And, will their heads feel very hot during India's summer?

BTW, what kind of a person do Indian girls like most

The world is so colorful. Some men wear skirts, and others have long hair
Fiona Shrot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 15:49 PM   #38 (permalink)
FullTank
Patron
 
Join Date: 07-11-07
Location: West Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 259
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiona Shrot View Post
one can find the political environment in China is far from mature enough to apply democracy.
Quote:
There are two situations: one, as what you said, to teach someone a lesson; another, to protect their home and nation.

Fiona,

Take some time and think about it.


1. CCP will always ensure that the environment will always remain immature. It takes something to give up power. As can be seen from large posters CCP has successfully created this image that without them China will collapse.(Actually CCP is not the only one, in my country too an image has been created that without the gandhi family India will collapse, so this branding is not a communist philosophy but what people do to stay in power and create in the minds of people--even inelligent ones. This kind of thinking hurts my country and I know that it will hurt your too)

Great foresight, renunciation(no longer in modern era) or a sense of imminent collapse or outright toppling is required to give up power. Which path will the ccp choose?


suggest you re-read the posts of OoE and Ray sir. Their convey much more than what one can perceive at a quick read. Its not just opinions what most of us give but understanding of human mind and what works, whats fact and what isnt. I can say for sure OoE knows much better about China than you do.


2.You are not going to get case 1 since even if it is to teach a lesson, CCP will always play it to its people like its to protect their home and nation. Going over the posts of the chinese here who call the 1962 teaching a leson as a protection from aggressive India shows how well China has been able to sell the idea. How would you feel if it ralized to you some day as a mother that your son lost his life trying to teach a lesson but was told he died protecting his nation?


3.CCP know that not only physically can you influence others but also through ideology. Why teach perverted history to its own people to make them bullish about china? Why you see a big gap between the chinese and the westerners-because the westerners are not thought the same history lessons as CCP. Why only maoists are found outside china in its neighbouring regions and not in China?


4. You find tons of chinese posters here saying come to Tibet etc. Obviously ccp's thinking is that if one sees huge buildings in Tibet it means CCP has done great for Tibet and it cannot think any other way. Not everyone has all the money to go to Tibet on every beck and call of a chinese poster? And what about the independent journalist who do want to go there? Why block them? Why have a paraded tour? More so why arent there any Tibetians on the internet from Tibet? Why cant they speak to us openly? If ccp has done so great for them couldnt they provide them a internet connection?


5. Why ccp thinks it can monitor and prevent what the chinese can view on the internet? Does it think it needs to 'protect' them? Its the same 'protected' person who will go on to join the ccp tomorrow with his/her perverted sense of understanding and rule his people isnt it?What really does the ccp have to hide?

Brainwashing can happen in any kind of govt communist, democratic, theocratic by the government or the media or non state actors- its only in a democracy you dont get shot at for asking difficult questions. You need to stay alive to know the truth.

btw its not that democracy wont be without flaws. Anyone who asks or thinks that democracy is without flaws is highly stupid. And if CCP shows flaws in some democracy as a means to stay in power then it thinks its people are are more stupid than it is. How can democracy not have flaws as long as human beings have flaws? But democracy allows those flaws to be seen in public and a problem visible is much better than a problem hidden. If not now atleast in future it will be possible that the problem is corrected in future but a hidden problem is never addressed.
__________________
God is a cruise missile.
FullTank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 18:01 PM   #39 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,915
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by citanon View Post
Sir, there is a misconception about what the GPCR was.
I was commenting on how the CCP needed a whip. They did not. They brainwashed the kids into doing their dirty work.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiona Shrot View Post
Sir. Ive lived in a democratic country, but uve never been to China. In fact, after observation and study, one can find the political environment in China is far from mature enough to apply democracy. I used to also believe it can save China, but now I think this idea was too idealist.
Then, you missed the point. Democracy is far from ideal. It is damned hard work. You have to work for it. You have to work to keep it. And at times, your work does absolutely nothing. But it is your work.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiona Shrot View Post
So suppose there would be an election for our future president, what would likely happen? The rich ones will buy the peasants' vote by money. And it is very easy to buy a lot: the peasants are poor and in the need to pay their bills for daughters' education, their treatments in hospital and so on; thus the rich just need to spend not too much in their eyes and can get huge leverage.
Same crap, different bowl. All politics are local. The rich guy in your example is just paying up front instead afterwards through job creation, welfare, managing the economy, etc.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiona Shrot View Post
Nevertheless, when can China has a president democracy? In my view, when the society get much more equal and when every family comes to such a stage: on the curve of marginal utility of its income, the slope is negative or positive but not very sharp. At that time, their votes will not be affected easily and the rich will not have that amount of money to determine the results of the election.
China already have a democracy. People vote either by ballot or by bullet. Thus far, the CCP have managed to avoid losing the vote by bullet but it's a lot safer to lose by ballot than by bullet.

This being said, while you look at Russia, you failed to see Eastern Europe who made the successful transition.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiona Shrot View Post
Yep, my classmates maybe run away finally the PLA wont.
Yes, they would. Only an idiot would stay and fight when the strategic and tactical requirements make a case for withdraw. Besides, the PLA had retreated several times in their history. The 1962 Sino-Indo War, the Korean War, and the Sino-Soviet Clashes. Even the 1979 1st Sino-Vietnam War could make a strong case the PLA ran home.

And let's not forget the one action that defined the PLA, the Long March, was in fact, the biggest retreat in communist military history.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiona Shrot View Post
For me, the question doesnt make sense. Lets generalize it: whether the parents will allow their children to die in a battlefield. There are two situations: one, as what you said, to teach someone a lesson; another, to protect their home and nation. The former, I even think it is very silly to start the war.
Let me give you the basics. In February of 1979, the PLA launched a 200,000 man invasion of Vietnam in what Beijing described as a counter-attack by local forces to teach Vietnam a lesson. In 30 days of combat, the PLA burned 3 Provincial Capitals while suffering 30,000 casualties. They claimed to have inflicted 50,000 Vietnamese casualties. After the fall of Lang Soon, the last Vietnamese Provincial Capital, the PLA began retreat across back to their border. In 30 days, the Chinese lost 30,000 troops with nothing to show for it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiona Shrot View Post
For the latter, the best example is that Mao require his son to join the China-Korea and he died in the battlefield, as many other parents did in that war.
Mao may have forced his son to join but that was no Volunteer Army. You don't assemble two entire volunteer field armies in 60 days.

Maybe you don't want to be here. I am going to shatter a lot of the myths you believe in. I've already wrecked the one about Tibet was China's since the time of the Yuan.
__________________
Chimo
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 19:05 PM   #40 (permalink)
Tronic
Navajo Code Talker
Senior Contributor
 
Tronic's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-27-04
Location: Patiala, India
Posts: 5,288
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiona Shrot View Post
As far as I could remember, I always thought Sikkim belonged to India, not China. I also met some guys from Northern India. They kept long hair according to their religion. Did they just from Sikkim? Besides, it is said that even in the army, the their soldiers are allowed to have that hair-style, I mean, something like a big hat on the head?
LOL, I actually fell off my chair laughing! Atleast could have bothered googling before making an ass out of yourself! Because Sikhism rhymes with Sikkim; Sikhs are from Sikkim?
__________________
Nabha Sparasham Deeptam
-Touch The Sky With Glory
Tronic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 19:50 PM   #41 (permalink)
ace16807
Regular
 
ace16807's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-01-08
Location: TN
Posts: 77
Country:
Send a message via AIM to ace16807 Send a message via MSN to ace16807 Send a message via Yahoo to ace16807 Send a message via Skype™ to ace16807
I actually don't doubt the CCP's ability to muster a large "military force" (i.e. volunteers) in the event of an invasion of the homeland, however, I seriously doubt many of those "Soldiers" will hold their ground, let alone stick it out beyond the first engagement. Just speculation though. Never have been in combat, nor the military.
ace16807 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 20:40 PM   #42 (permalink)
Herodotus
Contributor
 
Join Date: 04-05-07
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 443
Country:
Quote:
Let me give you the basics. In February of 1979, the PLA launched a 200,000 man invasion of Vietnam in what Beijing described as a counter-attack by local forces to teach Vietnam a lesson. In 30 days of combat, the PLA burned 3 Provincial Capitals while suffering 30,000 casualties. They claimed to have inflicted 50,000 Vietnamese casualties. After the fall of Lang Soon, the last Vietnamese Provincial Capital, the PLA began retreat across back to their border. In 30 days, the Chinese lost 30,000 troops with nothing to show for it.
So you are basing what the PLA will do today on what they did 30 years ago? 30 years ago even the US military could not withstand the tide of Vietnamese nationalism that was sweeping the Indochina peninsula. The Vietnamese hated and still hate the Chinese more than they ever did the French or the Americans.

We could go back further in Chinese history for even more military defeats; the First Sino-Japanese War, the Sino-French War, the Opium Wars. But is that going to be any indication how the PLA, with modernization, better training, and weapons upgrades is going to fight today? I wouldn't bet on it.

Quote:
I actually don't doubt the CCP's ability to muster a large "military force" (i.e. volunteers) in the event of an invasion of the homeland, however, I seriously doubt many of those "Soldiers" will hold their ground, let alone stick it out beyond the first engagement. Just speculation though. Never have been in combat, nor the military.
That's what some people said about the Iraqis (we will be greeted as liberators). Would the Chinese be less determined to fight for their homeland? Chinese history tells us they would at least fight, the First Opium War lasted eleven years and all China lost was Hong Kong. So why would they not fight against an invasion of the motherland.
Herodotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2008, 22:01 PM   #43 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,915
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Herodotus View Post
So you are basing what the PLA will do today on what they did 30 years ago? 30 years ago even the US military could not withstand the tide of Vietnamese nationalism that was sweeping the Indochina peninsula. The Vietnamese hated and still hate the Chinese more than they ever did the French or the Americans.
No, I am NOT basing what the PLA will today with what happened 30 years ago. In fact, I more than advocating that the CCP will fall if they try to repeat the episode.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Herodotus View Post
We could go back further in Chinese history for even more military defeats; the First Sino-Japanese War,
If your point is to show that the Chinese have advanced since that defeat, then you've used the wrong example. The Qing changed nothing and collapsed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Herodotus View Post
the Sino-French War,
I know you're trying to impress the membership but you do know the Qing won that one.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Herodotus View Post
the Opium Wars. But is that going to be any indication how the PLA, with modernization, better training, and weapons upgrades is going to fight today? I wouldn't bet on it.
Based on what you've just written, you have absolutely no idea how the PLA wants to fight. A clue to you - the War Zone Campaign, Brigadization, and Pockets of Excellence. Don't try to challenge me on this. I know far more than you, including what Generals Cao and Liang want to do.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Herodotus View Post
That's what some people said about the Iraqis (we will be greeted as liberators). Would the Chinese be less determined to fight for their homeland? Chinese history tells us they would at least fight, the First Opium War lasted eleven years and all China lost was Hong Kong. So why would they not fight against an invasion of the motherland.
What the hell are you talking about? The People's War is DEAD! If you have no idea what they're teaching at the NDU and obviously, you do not, FM 3-0 is a required read.

If an insurgency is indeed needed, then it won't be lead by the CCP. They've already wrecked any chance of that by reducing the militia down to nil.

Last edited by Officer of Engineers : 04-23-2008 at 07:02 AM.
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2008, 00:46 AM   #44 (permalink)
FullTank
Patron
 
Join Date: 07-11-07
Location: West Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 259
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tronic View Post
LOL, I actually fell off my chair laughing! Atleast could have bothered googling before making an ass out of yourself! Because Sikhism rhymes with Sikkim; Sikhs are from Sikkim?
Tronic your being too hard dude. It did sound like an honest mistake.

But its new and one that probably no one thought of before. You always hear a new thing everyday dont you.
FullTank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2008, 00:54 AM   #45 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 26,144
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiona Shrot View Post

The world is so colorful. Some men wear skirts, and others have long hair

They do not wear skirts. They wear a dhoti.

Yesterday, in Orissa it was 45 degrees Centigrade and where I am it was 40.

In such heat and with high humidity, you cannot go about in a Mao suit or a three piece suit either as you cannot go nude in the harsh winters of Northern China.

Clothes were as per the weather conditions in the old days and not as per what would be fashionable and chic!!
Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:02 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8