ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > General Forums > Political Discussions
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-15-2008, 09:22 AM   #76 (permalink)
citanon
Contributor
 
Join Date: 11-13-07
Posts: 324
Quote:
Originally Posted by TopHatter View Post
I'm not terribly interesting in your justifications for organized fraud. I've heard it from more Chinese posters on boards (not to mention the ass-holes that have tried to rip off my company) that I'm frankly tired of it.

Basically what you're saying is that fraud perpetuated by Chinese businesses is just and OK to do.



What you call "unfair" rules are what the rest of the world calls CRIME.

So basically what you're saying is that the Chinese people are entitled to do whatever they want, however they want and if the rest of the world doesn't like, then that's just tough.

Well guess what Comrade, that attitude won't take you very far in the business world. Sooner or later your house of cards is going to come crashing down...probably sooner, given the rate at which your country seems to be trying to poison the rest of the world.

You'd better hope like HELL that there isn't a mass food-poisoning incident during the Olympics, when all the eyes of the world will be on your country.

A labor-lawyer? In China? That is one sad, sick JOKE.

The "law" in China.

The law in China is "Who can you pay off with a nice bribe?"

The "law". Give me a break! Your so-called court system is about as phony and corrupt as the propaganda that your government spews out on a daily basis.

Spare me the rest of your "We're the victims" bullshi!, I'm tired of hearing it.
TopHatter,

Honesty requires an institution. I bet you would be saying much the same things about Americans if you managed to travel from 2008 America to 1908 America to do business. The construction of the Chinese legal system and enforcement mechanisms is woefully incomplete. Of course fraud and corruption are rampant. That says nothing about the relative honesty or dishonesty of the Chinese people nor does it indicate the future direction of Chinese society.
citanon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 10:58 AM   #77 (permalink)
ravi12
Regular
 
Join Date: 03-26-08
Location: where the aliens meet predator
Posts: 122
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ying View Post
I have to say I didn’t find too much disagreement between us except some misunderstandings.

One misunderstanding is you think Chinese government is breaking her words. No, I have to say it is not the truth. Copyright infringement is not encouraged in China by Chinese government no matter the copyright is owned by Chinese or western companies. On the contrary, copyright infringement is illegal and even considered to be serious crime in some cases. It is some individual Chinese and enterprises that produce copied goods, not Chinese government. It’s all about “economic incentives” and has nothing to do the promise of Chinese government. I do believe the central government is really doing something to improve the copyright protection in China since the infringement of copyright can not bring any direct economic benefits to it rather than international pressures. But you have to understand, there are too many greedy people want to make big money and don’t care copyright. And they are usually protected by some local governments. The protection of copyright is not an easy task to the Chinese central government which has to fight against the local governments, criminals, and extreme-nationalists.
The simple thing is, when china can come down on every tibetan seeking independence and at that time, it doesnt face these constraints. But when we ask them to do their obligations, all this helplessness comes up.

How about this? That gulsar is not made in a small room in the woods, but in a big factory - , making "ipods" requires big factories. When china has the manpower to go and search houses for photos, it damn well has the resources to stop these factories.

It doesnt do this, simply because it doesnt wish to stick to its end of bargain.
ravi12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 11:52 AM   #78 (permalink)
abhishek
Regular
 
Join Date: 01-29-07
Posts: 67
Actually i tend to agree with ying here. Im no China lover, but why and how exactly do rich western countries with existing monopolies over high technology most of which they themselves acquired through industrial espionage over decades expect China to play by the rules Westerners made to protect their interests ?

Infact western nations themselves trounce over their own rules to protect their interests, and then point the finger at us third world'ers.

The china bashing in vogue is partly based on valid reasons, but a small part of it is most definitely due to the insecurity China's rise has caused among the global big shots.

Its really not that simple.
abhishek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 11:58 AM   #79 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 16,649
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ravi12 View Post
How about this? That gulsar is not made in a small room in the woods, but in a big factory - , making "ipods" requires big factories. When china has the manpower to go and search houses for photos, it damn well has the resources to stop these factories.
No, it does not. Aside from the big monistaries, sthe CCP does not have the manpower to go into every home, every village in Tibet. It merely controls the roads so that it limits but not eliminate the communications. Hell, 1000 Tibetans cross into India what almost every 2nd week? That is one hell of a leakage of supposedly a tight border.
__________________
Chimo
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 12:03 PM   #80 (permalink)
TopHatter
Administrator
 
TopHatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-03
Location: Fort Myers FL
Posts: 9,822
Country:
Send a message via AIM to TopHatter
Quote:
Originally Posted by citanon View Post
TopHatter,
Honesty requires an institution. I bet you would be saying much the same things about Americans if you managed to travel from 2008 America to 1908 America to do business.
If this was 1908, I could see your point. But it's not. It's Two-Thousand And F-cking Eight and the Chinese had better start realizing that.


Quote:
Originally Posted by citanon View Post
The construction of the Chinese legal system and enforcement mechanisms is woefully incomplete. Of course fraud and corruption are rampant. That says nothing about the relative honesty or dishonesty of the Chinese people nor does it indicate the future direction of Chinese society.
And if I'd been dealing with the Chinese legal system or it's enforcement for the past 5 years, once again I could see your point.

But I've been dealing with individual Chinese businesses and people and I'm telling you right here and now that the vast overwhelming majority of them don't have a concept of dishonesty or fraud. "As long as you are making money, then you are doing the right thing." THAT is their honesty. THAT is their Ethics.

I have shoved the proof of their fraud under their noses time and time again and I always get the same response: "Well, the product is still good, please try it anyway."

We're talking about microchips that go into medical machines, elevators, airplanes. IN OTHER WORDS I'M TALKING ABOUT PEOPLE'S F-CKING LIVES BEING AT STAKE AND THESE 'HONEST' PEOPLE YOU REFER TO DON'T GIVE A DAMN OR DON'T KNOW THE DIFFERENCE

GET IT?
TopHatter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 12:15 PM   #81 (permalink)
glyn
Military Professional
 
glyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-15-06
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
Posts: 6,886
[quote=abhishek;482707]Actually i tend to agree with ying here. Im no China lover, but why and how exactly do rich western countries with existing monopolies over high technology most of which they themselves acquired through industrial espionage over decades expect China to play by the rules Westerners made to protect their interests ?

Who do you suggest these rich western countries were spying on? Do you disagree with 'the rules westerners made to protect their interests'? In fact they are laws, so are you saying you wouldn't avail yourself of the laws protection if you were a manufacturer who was being copied?

Infact western nations themselves trounce over their own rules to protect their interests, and then point the finger at us third world'ers.

Examples please.
__________________
Semper in excretum. Solum profunda variat.
glyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 12:24 PM   #82 (permalink)
citanon
Contributor
 
Join Date: 11-13-07
Posts: 324
Quote:
Originally Posted by TopHatter View Post
If this was 1908, I could see your point. But it's not. It's Two-Thousand And F-cking Eight and the Chinese had better start realizing that.


And if I'd been dealing with the Chinese legal system or it's enforcement for the past 5 years, once again I could see your point.

But I've been dealing with individual Chinese businesses and people and I'm telling you right here and now that the vast overwhelming majority of them don't have a concept of dishonesty or fraud. "As long as you are making money, then you are doing the right thing." THAT is their honesty. THAT is their Ethics.

I have shoved the proof of their fraud under their noses time and time again and I always get the same response: "Well, the product is still good, please try it anyway."

We're talking about microchips that go into medical machines, elevators, airplanes. IN OTHER WORDS I'M TALKING ABOUT PEOPLE'S F-CKING LIVES BEING AT STAKE AND THESE 'HONEST' PEOPLE YOU REFER TO DON'T GIVE A DAMN OR DON'T KNOW THE DIFFERENCE

GET IT?
It's very simple. Different legal environments creates selective pressures favoring different business behavior. The fact that you have been dealing with dishonest people is Darwinism at work. Namely, the present legal environment favors survival of less-than-honest businesses in your particular sector. One needs only to examine sectors in American business opaque to regulatory and legal supervision to find examples of dishonesty. Need I remind you of Enron and other financial scandals or the behavior of some American PMCs in Iraq, or irregularities in UN food for oil program, or pharmaceutical industry reluctance to disclose unfavorable clinical trial results, or the efforts of the American tobacco industry during the past half century?

If there are still plenty of legal and regulatory loopholes in the United States after nearly 300 continuous years of legalist government operations and reforms, then is it really surprising that China, a country that only tentatively began to construct its legal and regulatory system in the early 80's, today has an incomplete and chaotic legal system?
citanon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 14:10 PM   #83 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 27,195
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
No, it does not. Aside from the big monistaries, sthe CCP does not have the manpower to go into every home, every village in Tibet. It merely controls the roads so that it limits but not eliminate the communications. Hell, 1000 Tibetans cross into India what almost every 2nd week? That is one hell of a leakage of supposedly a tight border.
They allow Tibetans to cross so that it reduces the Tibetan population in Tibet.

Clever ethnic cleansing and none can complain.

As also burden the Indian economy with refugees.

Killing two birds with one stone!
__________________


"Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

HAKUNA MATATA
Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 16:17 PM   #84 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 16,649
Country:
Sir,

Insightful.
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 16:53 PM   #85 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 27,195
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
Sir,

Insightful.
Colonel,

Maybe in my last life I was a Chinese steeped in legalism.

Indeed, if I were, I am proud of it!

That is why I am quick in my defence of my country.

However, maybe my exposure to western thought in this life has mellowed me a wee bit, where I can see the stupidity of my country of choice too!!

And yet it does not blind me to realtime angles of an issue.
Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 17:28 PM   #86 (permalink)
ravi12
Regular
 
Join Date: 03-26-08
Location: where the aliens meet predator
Posts: 122
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
No, it does not. Aside from the big monistaries, sthe CCP does not have the manpower to go into every home, every village in Tibet. It merely controls the roads so that it limits but not eliminate the communications. Hell, 1000 Tibetans cross into India what almost every 2nd week? That is one hell of a leakage of supposedly a tight border.
Sir,
I understand that there was a little wee bit of extrapolation

The gulsar and "chinese ipods" are not made by small towners but made by "respectable and big" chinese companies. The gulsar is advertised all over china and marketed for export to latin america, sri lanka and where not.

Actually I wouldnt be surprised if most of these companies have the chinese govt itself as the majority share holder. Well, when chery made the QQ copying matiz, GM faced the problem that GM itself was the minority shareholder in it, with another being the chinese govt itself.

New Page 1
consider the makers sir, with their vast i mean vast (larger product line than the biggest motorcycle company of india and the chinese govt cant do anything about them? I think it is a case of mostly doing a blind eye to it than anything else.
ravi12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 18:42 PM   #87 (permalink)
Tronic
Navajo Code Talker
Senior Contributor
 
Tronic's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-27-04
Location: Patiala, India
Posts: 5,361
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by abhishek View Post
Actually i tend to agree with ying here. Im no China lover, but why and how exactly do rich western countries with existing monopolies over high technology most of which they themselves acquired through industrial espionage over decades expect China to play by the rules Westerners made to protect their interests ?
There are laws which just those westerners developed to make sure that the market remains innovative. It is not "their" interests which are being protected. It is in the interest of every damn innovator and inventor out there.

Quote:
Infact western nations themselves trounce over their own rules to protect their interests, and then point the finger at us third world'ers.
Example?

Quote:
The china bashing in vogue is partly based on valid reasons, but a small part of it is most definitely due to the insecurity China's rise has caused among the global big shots.
Thats just bull. If those global big shots were so insecure, they wouldn't even allow China to rise. I would like to see how China would grow if those 'big shots' you refer to slap sanctions. It is not the West who seems insecure at China; but it seems as you being insecure about the West.
__________________
Nabha Sparasham Deeptam
-Touch The Sky With Glory
Tronic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 19:55 PM   #88 (permalink)
zraver
Contrary by nature.
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 10-22-06
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,129
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by citanon View Post
TopHatter,

Honesty requires an institution. I bet you would be saying much the same things about Americans if you managed to travel from 2008 America to 1908 America to do business. The construction of the Chinese legal system and enforcement mechanisms is woefully incomplete. Of course fraud and corruption are rampant. That says nothing about the relative honesty or dishonesty of the Chinese people nor does it indicate the future direction of Chinese society.
My student job is working as a writing tutor. Do you know what the single biggest issue with Chinese students is? Plagarism and source citation, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery in China. They don't have a clue about intellectual property rights. Getting them to properly cite sources, or not simply lift whole works is like pulling teeth.
zraver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 21:36 PM   #89 (permalink)
citanon
Contributor
 
Join Date: 11-13-07
Posts: 324
Quote:
Originally Posted by zraver View Post
My student job is working as a writing tutor. Do you know what the single biggest issue with Chinese students is? Plagarism and source citation, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery in China. They don't have a clue about intellectual property rights. Getting them to properly cite sources, or not simply lift whole works is like pulling teeth.
Citation of sources is something fairly peculiar to Western countries in my experience. In China, daily conversation draws on a rich fabric of stories and fables, all of which were invented by somebody at some point, none of which are stated starting with "so and so said". So yes, that's a problem, mainly because it simply isn't emphasized that much in China, and does not evoke as much controversy. I too am annoyed by this, but, considering the amount of definitely legal music that have magically appeared on someone else's HD that I may have had access to in the definite past, perhaps I should not be the one to cast the first stone.

These issues will sort them out once the proper frameworks are put in place and the academic field and other sectors becomes more fairly competitive.

On a side note, anyone who has spent any significant amount of time in China lately will agree with me that the far more urgent aspect of Western culture that needs transplanting to China is obedience to traffic rules.

Last edited by citanon : 04-15-2008 at 21:47 PM.
citanon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2008, 21:41 PM   #90 (permalink)
TopHatter
Administrator
 
TopHatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-03
Location: Fort Myers FL
Posts: 9,822
Country:
Send a message via AIM to TopHatter
Quote:
Originally Posted by citanon View Post
It's very simple. Different legal environments creates selective pressures favoring different business behavior.
Wonderful. Then the Chinese can go play in a different economic environment. God knows they sure want to.

Sorry, once again, ain't happening.

Quote:
Originally Posted by citanon View Post
The fact that you have been dealing with dishonest people is Darwinism at work. Namely, the present legal environment favors survival of less-than-honest businesses in your particular sector.
Not quite, but thank you for your uninformed opinion. Try this instead: Namely, the present legal environment presently favors survival of less-than-honest Chinese businesses in my particular sector, but that state of affairs cannot and will not last much longer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by citanon View Post
One needs only to examine sectors in American business opaque to regulatory and legal supervision to find examples of dishonesty. Need I remind you of Enron and other financial scandals or the behavior of some American PMCs in Iraq, or irregularities in UN food for oil program, or pharmaceutical industry reluctance to disclose unfavorable clinical trial results, or the efforts of the American tobacco industry during the past half century?
One only needs to laugh at the "point the finger at somebody else" response that seems to come up again and again.

The difference between the United States and China is that people actually get prosecuted after they're caught committing fraud, from the top on down. In China, somebody who get's caught a little too publicly gets picked to be an example, has the benefit of a show trial, followed by a swift execution...and the beat goes on.

Quote:
Originally Posted by citanon View Post
If there are still plenty of legal and regulatory loopholes in the United States after nearly 300 continuous years of legalist government operations and reforms, then is it really surprising that China, a country that only tentatively began to construct its legal and regulatory system in the early 80's, today has an incomplete and chaotic legal system?
The funny thing is, China actually has pretty good laws...but they are shackled to a corrupt JOKE of a justice system and a gang of goons and thugs for a government.

Quote:
Originally Posted by zraver View Post
Do you know what the single biggest issue with Chinese students is? Plagarism and source citation, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery in China. They don't have a clue about intellectual property rights. Getting them to properly cite sources, or not simply lift whole works is like pulling teeth.
That's it in a nutshell. It's quite simply ingrained in the fabric of their culture, aided and abetted by a justice system and a government that feels exactly the same way.

It's no big deal to them...kind of like driving 3 or 4 miles over the speed limit here in the United States...no big deal.

And this country (China) feels that they can bring this to the world economic scene and woe to the person who crys foul.

Enjoy it while it lasts guys.
TopHatter is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Invasion and illegal annexation of Tibet: 1949-1951 Associate Political Discussions 146 04-16-2008 11:52 AM
British FM says China must prove itself 'responsible' xrough Political Discussions 10 03-03-2008 23:31 PM
Chinese dragon awakens Neo International Defense Topics 40 08-09-2005 22:31 PM
US Encircling China? Ray Political Discussions 156 07-10-2005 22:04 PM
How China Will Change Your Business oneman28 Political Discussions 6 04-04-2005 12:21 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:46 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8