![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#76 (permalink) | |
|
Contributor
|
Quote:
Honesty requires an institution. I bet you would be saying much the same things about Americans if you managed to travel from 2008 America to 1908 America to do business. The construction of the Chinese legal system and enforcement mechanisms is woefully incomplete. Of course fraud and corruption are rampant. That says nothing about the relative honesty or dishonesty of the Chinese people nor does it indicate the future direction of Chinese society. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#77 (permalink) | |
|
Regular
|
Quote:
How about this? That gulsar is not made in a small room in the woods, but in a big factory - , making "ipods" requires big factories. When china has the manpower to go and search houses for photos, it damn well has the resources to stop these factories.It doesnt do this, simply because it doesnt wish to stick to its end of bargain. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#78 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
Actually i tend to agree with ying here. Im no China lover, but why and how exactly do rich western countries with existing monopolies over high technology most of which they themselves acquired through industrial espionage over decades expect China to play by the rules Westerners made to protect their interests ?
Infact western nations themselves trounce over their own rules to protect their interests, and then point the finger at us third world'ers. The china bashing in vogue is partly based on valid reasons, but a small part of it is most definitely due to the insecurity China's rise has caused among the global big shots. Its really not that simple. |
|
|
|
|
|
#79 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
Moderator Scotch taster |
No, it does not. Aside from the big monistaries, sthe CCP does not have the manpower to go into every home, every village in Tibet. It merely controls the roads so that it limits but not eliminate the communications. Hell, 1000 Tibetans cross into India what almost every 2nd week? That is one hell of a leakage of supposedly a tight border.
__________________
Chimo |
|
|
|
|
|
#80 (permalink) | ||
|
Administrator
|
Quote:
Quote:
But I've been dealing with individual Chinese businesses and people and I'm telling you right here and now that the vast overwhelming majority of them don't have a concept of dishonesty or fraud. "As long as you are making money, then you are doing the right thing." THAT is their honesty. THAT is their Ethics. I have shoved the proof of their fraud under their noses time and time again and I always get the same response: "Well, the product is still good, please try it anyway." We're talking about microchips that go into medical machines, elevators, airplanes. IN OTHER WORDS I'M TALKING ABOUT PEOPLE'S F-CKING LIVES BEING AT STAKE AND THESE 'HONEST' PEOPLE YOU REFER TO DON'T GIVE A DAMN OR DON'T KNOW THE DIFFERENCE GET IT? ![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#81 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
|
[quote=abhishek;482707]Actually i tend to agree with ying here. Im no China lover, but why and how exactly do rich western countries with existing monopolies over high technology most of which they themselves acquired through industrial espionage over decades expect China to play by the rules Westerners made to protect their interests ?
Who do you suggest these rich western countries were spying on? Do you disagree with 'the rules westerners made to protect their interests'? In fact they are laws, so are you saying you wouldn't avail yourself of the laws protection if you were a manufacturer who was being copied? Infact western nations themselves trounce over their own rules to protect their interests, and then point the finger at us third world'ers. Examples please.
__________________
Semper in excretum. Solum profunda variat. |
|
|
|
|
|
#82 (permalink) | |
|
Contributor
|
Quote:
If there are still plenty of legal and regulatory loopholes in the United States after nearly 300 continuous years of legalist government operations and reforms, then is it really surprising that China, a country that only tentatively began to construct its legal and regulatory system in the early 80's, today has an incomplete and chaotic legal system? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#83 (permalink) | |
|
Postmaster General
Military Professional
|
Quote:
Clever ethnic cleansing and none can complain. As also burden the Indian economy with refugees. Killing two birds with one stone!
__________________
![]() "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination." I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to. HAKUNA MATATA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#85 (permalink) |
|
Postmaster General
Military Professional
|
Colonel,
Maybe in my last life I was a Chinese steeped in legalism. ![]() Indeed, if I were, I am proud of it! That is why I am quick in my defence of my country. However, maybe my exposure to western thought in this life has mellowed me a wee bit, where I can see the stupidity of my country of choice too!! And yet it does not blind me to realtime angles of an issue. |
|
|
|
|
|
#86 (permalink) | |
|
Regular
|
Quote:
I understand that there was a little wee bit of extrapolation The gulsar and "chinese ipods" are not made by small towners but made by "respectable and big" chinese companies. The gulsar is advertised all over china and marketed for export to latin america, sri lanka and where not. Actually I wouldnt be surprised if most of these companies have the chinese govt itself as the majority share holder. Well, when chery made the QQ copying matiz, GM faced the problem that GM itself was the minority shareholder in it, with another being the chinese govt itself. New Page 1 consider the makers sir, with their vast i mean vast (larger product line than the biggest motorcycle company of india and the chinese govt cant do anything about them? I think it is a case of mostly doing a blind eye to it than anything else. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#87 (permalink) | |||
|
Navajo Code Talker
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Nabha Sparasham Deeptam -Touch The Sky With Glory |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#88 (permalink) | |
|
Contrary by nature.
Military Professional
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#89 (permalink) | |
|
Contributor
|
Quote:
These issues will sort them out once the proper frameworks are put in place and the academic field and other sectors becomes more fairly competitive. On a side note, anyone who has spent any significant amount of time in China lately will agree with me that the far more urgent aspect of Western culture that needs transplanting to China is obedience to traffic rules. ![]() Last edited by citanon : 04-15-2008 at 21:47 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#90 (permalink) | |||||
|
Administrator
|
Quote:
Sorry, once again, ain't happening. Quote:
Quote:
The difference between the United States and China is that people actually get prosecuted after they're caught committing fraud, from the top on down. In China, somebody who get's caught a little too publicly gets picked to be an example, has the benefit of a show trial, followed by a swift execution...and the beat goes on. Quote:
Quote:
It's no big deal to them...kind of like driving 3 or 4 miles over the speed limit here in the United States...no big deal. And this country (China) feels that they can bring this to the world economic scene and woe to the person who crys foul. Enjoy it while it lasts guys. |
|||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Invasion and illegal annexation of Tibet: 1949-1951 | Associate | Political Discussions | 146 | 04-16-2008 11:52 AM |
| British FM says China must prove itself 'responsible' | xrough | Political Discussions | 10 | 03-03-2008 23:31 PM |
| Chinese dragon awakens | Neo | International Defense Topics | 40 | 08-09-2005 22:31 PM |
| US Encircling China? | Ray | Political Discussions | 156 | 07-10-2005 22:04 PM |
| How China Will Change Your Business | oneman28 | Political Discussions | 6 | 04-04-2005 12:21 PM |