ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > General Forums > Political Discussions
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
View Poll Results: Who would have won the 2000 election if the Gore recount had been allowed?
Al Gore 10 40.00%
George W. Bush 15 60.00%
Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-30-2008, 22:12 PM   #1 (permalink)
Shek
Military Professional
Moderator
 
Join Date: 02-23-05
Location: Krblachistan
Posts: 7,629
Country:
2000 US Presidential Election

I'm curious to see how people perceive the impact of the Supreme Court decision to disallow the Gore recount on the outcome of the election. The reason that I'm asking is because of a specific way in which a news piece I saw tonight was presented.

Please participate in the poll, but give it a few days before discussing the answer. Thanks.
__________________
"So little pains do the vulgar take in the investigation of truth, accepting readily the first story that comes to hand." Thucydides 1.20.3
Shek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008, 22:23 PM   #2 (permalink)
Cowman88
New Member
 
Join Date: 02-12-08
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 19
Country:
There is really isn't much that leads me to belive that the recount would have changed anything
Cowman88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 23:41 PM   #3 (permalink)
Tangyiying
Regular
 
Join Date: 02-17-08
Posts: 27
Too bad, Obama and Hillary are in the same party. I d rather see them compete for the president. A female and a Black people, that is more intriguing.


Quote:
Who would have won the 2000 election if the Gore recount had been allowed?
It could be still that shrub in the office whom we have seen today. I m curious that the supreme court overruled the appeal for recount by following the precedent or rendering it a new lawcase thus trying with creation? what did it hold for the judgment?

Last edited by Tangyiying : 04-02-2008 at 23:49 PM.
Tangyiying is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2008, 23:52 PM   #4 (permalink)
Gun Grape
Resident Curmudgeon
Military Professional
 
Gun Grape's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-12-05
Location: Panama City Fl
Posts: 2,566
I need to change my answer I voted Bush

I saw Gore recount and just thought recount.

Under the Gore plan ( pick and choose various counties/districts) He may have won.

Under a statewide recount, he would have lost.
Gun Grape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 00:00 AM   #5 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,365
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tangyiying View Post
Too bad, Obama and Hillary are in the same party. I d rather see them compete for the president. A female and a Black people, that is more intriguing.
Typical liberal. You only see skin colors and the location of reproductive organs. Both of them are socialist.

McCain is a socialist also, but at least the difference between him and the other 2 are greater than just those 2.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tangyiying View Post
It could be still that shrub in the office whom we have seen today. I m curious that the supreme court overruled the appeal for recount by following the precedent or rendering it a new lawcase thus trying with creation? what did it hold for the judgment?
The recount was halted because Gore was picking and choosing the districts he want recounted. The court didn't want it to turn into a farce.

As what Gun Grape said, if the recount involved a standardized method of counting and involved the entire state, Bush would have won anyways.
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2008, 20:45 PM   #6 (permalink)
Shek
Military Professional
Moderator
 
Join Date: 02-23-05
Location: Krblachistan
Posts: 7,629
Country:
GG and gunnut,

You both got it backwards

Quote:
EXAMINING THE VOTE: THE OVERVIEW; Study of Disputed Florida Ballots Finds Justices Did Not Cast the Deciding Vote - New York Times

Contrary to what many partisans of former Vice President Al Gore have charged, the United States Supreme Court did not award an election to Mr. Bush that otherwise would have been won by Mr. Gore. A close examination of the ballots found that Mr. Bush would have retained a slender margin over Mr. Gore if the Florida court's order to recount more than 43,000 ballots had not been reversed by the United States Supreme Court.

Even under the strategy that Mr. Gore pursued at the beginning of the Florida standoff -- filing suit to force hand recounts in four predominantly Democratic counties -- Mr. Bush would have kept his lead, according to the ballot review conducted for a consortium of news organizations.
They are other scenarios that weren't pursued by the Gore campaign that would have put Gore ahead.
Shek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2008, 20:47 PM   #7 (permalink)
Shek
Military Professional
Moderator
 
Join Date: 02-23-05
Location: Krblachistan
Posts: 7,629
Country:
This piece that motivated this poll is here - it's a 60 Minutes piece with Gore. The first link is the article on the piece, and the second link is the video itself. As you'll see if you watch, the way the question is presented, the implication is that the election was stolen by the courts, which is false.

Al Gore's New Campaign, Tells 60 Minutes That Doubting Global Warming Is Man-Made Is Akin To Believing Earth Is Flat - CBS News

CBS News Video - Top Stories and Video News Clips at CBSNews.com
Shek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 03:21 AM   #8 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,802
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut
McCain is a socialist also, but at least the difference between him and the other 2 are greater than just those 2.
That's quite a stretch -- if he were a socialist he's be advocating nationalized health care, higher taxes, more re-distributive programs, etc. The man's supported every free trade agreement he's had the opportunity to vote on.

Furthermore, and most importantly, socialism advocates state control/ownership of the means of economic production.

I'm not sure what your definition of socialism is, because John McCain, quite clearly, does not support state ownership of the means of production.
__________________
The Buck Stops Here
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 11:08 AM   #9 (permalink)
Masada
Regular
 
Join Date: 05-14-08
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 34
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironduke View Post
That's quite a stretch -- if he were a socialist he's be advocating nationalized health care, higher taxes, more re-distributive programs, etc. The man's supported every free trade agreement he's had the opportunity to vote on.

Furthermore, and most importantly, socialism advocates state control/ownership of the means of economic production.

I'm not sure what your definition of socialism is, because John McCain, quite clearly, does not support state ownership of the means of production.
Looks like gunnut is an ARFCOMMER, he's beyond hope.
__________________
Πάντα ῥεῖ καὶ οὐδὲν μένει

Last edited by Masada : 05-18-2008 at 12:14 PM.
Masada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2008, 23:05 PM   #10 (permalink)
Clarkie
Banished
 
Join Date: 03-02-08
Location: Scotland
Posts: 19
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironduke View Post
I'm not sure what your definition of socialism is, because John McCain, quite clearly, does not support state ownership of the means of production.
And neither do Hillary or Obama, I wish some folks would look into things a little further instead of brandishing generalizations.
Clarkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
US-Taiwan: status quo strain Ray International Defense Topics 34 10-30-2007 01:14 AM
Venezuelans march against closure of TV station Kansas Bear International Politics 66 05-31-2007 21:28 PM
George Bush, please! Punish Kim Jong Il roseman Political Discussions 122 04-12-2006 17:33 PM
25,000 civilians KilledIn Iraq jimmy22 The War in Iraq 88 08-13-2005 11:41 AM
World selected birthrates Ironduke World Affairs Board Pub 5 07-12-2004 23:16 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:47 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8