ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > General Forums > Political Discussions
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-15-2007, 00:07 AM   #16 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 28,269
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalem View Post
Sure. The Nobel Peace Prize has become a joke, assuming there was a time when it was taken seriously. It's simply a "Leftist Approved" label with a lot of zeroes tacked on.

-dale
I don't think it has a Leftist slant.

Yet, the Russian scientists somehow were left in the blue except occasionally for PC.

Solzhenitsyn and Boris Pasternak got the Nobel Prize and some suspect it was a "Rightist plot" aimed to embarrass the USSR!

On a tombstone:

Life is a joke and everything shows it,
I thought so once, but now I know it!


There is no doubt that in every important event/matter, politics cannot be far behind!
__________________


"Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

HAKUNA MATATA

Last edited by Ray : 12-15-2007 at 00:10 AM.
Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2007, 00:23 AM   #17 (permalink)
Expat Canuck
Homesick Fool
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 05-17-05
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,020
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parihaka View Post
You noticed that. After a meaningless signature on Kyoto, he's making exactly the same objections as Russia, Canada, Britain and of course the great Satan. He gets a hero's welcome, Al Gore says Americas the problem. I now understand more clearly why Gore failed what was considered a certainty over the 2000 election.

How could I miss it? Damn I'm glad he's not my PM what a joke he is. He's come out swinging at the US like a spoiled brat too. He seems to personally dislike the US like many other ignorant Australians for no reason other than it's the cool thing to do.

Oh well, at least he might make my internet faster....
Expat Canuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2007, 00:59 AM   #18 (permalink)
Feanor
Banished
 
Join Date: 06-12-07
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,385
Country:
Aww. Nobody appreciated my linking to the South Park episode with the vice president?
Feanor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2007, 04:27 AM   #19 (permalink)
Parihaka
Moderator
 
Parihaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-04
Location: Te Ika a Maui
Posts: 9,965
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor View Post
Aww. Nobody appreciated my linking to the South Park episode with the vice president?
I loved it and posted it on the wall of a greenie friends facebook. She's in Bali so I'm expecting something rude when she gets back.
__________________
In the realm of spirit, seek clarity; in the material world, seek utility.
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
Parihaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2007, 05:34 AM   #20 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 10,209
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parihaka View Post
I loved it and posted it on the wall of a greenie friends facebook. She's in Bali so I'm expecting something rude when she gets back.
Feanor, can you dig up the "hybrid" episode for Parihaka's friend.
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2007, 06:31 AM   #21 (permalink)
Bigfella
Senior Contributor
 
Bigfella's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-07
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 949
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Expat Canuck View Post
He could be like Kevin Rudd PM of Australia and sign the Kyoto agreement while backpeddling and saying we don't want to enforce targets yet.

What a putz. That man doesn't stand for anything.
Expat,

There is a reason why Rudd is backing away from specific targets. Thr outgoing government has left him a VERY poisoned chalice.

"Clive Hamilton, author of Scorcher, writes:


We have come to expect that soon after its election a new government will declare that the previous administration has left a hidden mountain of debt and that stringent measures will be required to deal with it.

After checking the books, the Labor Government has said that there is no hidden Howard debt. But Mr Rudd has discovered in Bali this week that John Howard has left him something much worse than a budget blow-out -- a huge greenhouse debt.

Over 11 years, the Howard Government allowed Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions to grow so profligately that the task of cutting them back and meeting international expectations appears almost impossible.

Lacking a Charter of Greenhouse Accounting Honesty, the Howard Government could hide its negligence through a special clause inserted into the Kyoto Protocol at the last minute.

The “Australia clause”, as it was instantly dubbed, allowed the Howard Government to mask the extraordinary growth in fossil emissions by offsetting them against the sharp fall in emissions from land-clearing.

So, as late as this year Malcolm Turnbull could claim that in 2005 our emissions were only 4% or so above 1990 levels, even though our emissions from burning fossil fuels had grown by over 30%.

The true picture, concealed by tricky accounting, was much worse than the Government let on. And the get-out-of-jail free card provided by the Australia clause has already been played. Any cuts now must come from coal, oil and gas.

The implications of this appalling policy failure have come to a head in Bali today. The sticking point in the negotiations is whether to include in the Bali mandate a recognition that developed countries need to cut their collective emissions by 25-40% below 1990 levels by 2020.


The pressure on Australia is enormous, but Kevin Rudd is trapped.

Australia’s total emissions will reach around 110% of 1990 levels in 2010, which means that a 25% cut below 1990 levels would require Australia to cut its emissions by a third over a 10 year period. No wonder the Prime Minister is blanching at the prospect.

If the Howard Government had taken its responsibilities seriously Australia’s emissions in 2010 could be at 95% of 1990 levels. At a minimum we could have had several years of building the new energy infrastructure that would permit a rapid reduction of our emissions. Savings from energy efficiency alone could get us to this point.

It’s much easier to get from 95% to 75% in 10 years than from 110% to 75%. Cutting domestic emissions by the latter amount is not feasible and Australia would be required to buy emission permits from other countries or invest heavily in developing countries through the Clean Development Mechanism.

There could have been a third and much more attractive option. The deal granted to Australia at Kyoto in 1997 was so generous that we could easily have come in under our target for the 2008-2012 period and been left with a swag of emission credits we could then have banked for the second commitment period.

Alternatively we could have sold them to other countries, such as Japan, that might struggle to meet their obligations.

It will take the Rudd Government many years to pay off John Howard’s massive greenhouse debt. In truth, the Australian public will pay for it. The economic modellers have been pointing out for a long time that delaying action drives up the cost of cutting our emissions.
Although it is now Rudd’s problem, it is Howard himself who must take all of the blame, for it was his personal decision, against all of the advice, to remain stubbornly opposed to accepting the reality of global warming."
Bigfella is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2007, 06:34 AM   #22 (permalink)
Bigfella
Senior Contributor
 
Bigfella's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-07
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 949
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalem View Post
Sure. The Nobel Peace Prize has become a joke, assuming there was a time when it was taken seriously. It's simply a "Leftist Approved" label with a lot of zeroes tacked on.

-dale

If the Peace Prize ever had credibility it lost it after they gave one to Kissinger. At least Le Duc Tho had the good grace to refuse - as he made clear, he was just doing his job.
Bigfella is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2007, 09:32 AM   #23 (permalink)
captain
Patron
 
captain's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-19-07
Location: South Australia
Posts: 262
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigfella View Post
Expat,

There is a reason why Rudd is backing away from specific targets. Thr outgoing government has left him a VERY poisoned chalice.

"Clive Hamilton, author of Scorcher, writes:


We have come to expect that soon after its election a new government will declare that the previous administration has left a hidden mountain of debt and that stringent measures will be required to deal with it.

After checking the books, the Labor Government has said that there is no hidden Howard debt. But Mr Rudd has discovered in Bali this week that John Howard has left him something much worse than a budget blow-out -- a huge greenhouse debt. Blah, Blah, Blah
In the interest of a little balance here, Clive Hamilton is a founder and outgoing executive director of The Australia Institute.
The Australia Institute is, according to it's web site, a left wing, socialist think tank.

Hamilton has written a number of books including one called Affluenza, the title alone giving an indication of his politics.

Hamilton is also one of the darlings of the green left which is the public face of the Austalian Socialist Alliance.

The Green left's alarmist reference to Hamilton's book "Scorcher" is published here;

Quote:
BRIEF
Scorcher launch in Brisbane


Jim McIlroy, Brisbane
5 May 2007


— Australia will face a moral duty to accept thousands of “environmental refugees” when rising sea levels caused by global warming displace the peoples of small Pacific island states in future decades, Clive Hamilton, director of the Australia Institute, told an audience of around 300 at the Irish Club on May 1.


Hamilton was launching his new book, Scorcher, which tackles issues raised by the effects of climate change. The launch was chaired by ecologist Professor Ian Lowe.

Around the world, millions of people will be affected by rising sea levels encroaching on low-lying areas, Hamilton said. He slammed the Howard government for not only refusing to sign the Kyoto Protocol to limit greenhouse gas emissions, but “for actively seeking to sabotage Kyoto”. “It’s painful to be a citizen of a country that behaves in such an immoral way”, he added.

From: Australian News, Green Left Weekly issue #708 9 May 2007.
The high priests of climate doom and gloom would be impressed with Hamilton's hatred of the evil Neocons and his huge sense of morality I'm sure.

Last edited by captain : 12-15-2007 at 10:47 AM. Reason: clarity
captain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2007, 13:06 PM   #24 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 8,737
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigfella View Post
If the Peace Prize ever had credibility it lost it after they gave one to Kissinger. At least Le Duc Tho had the good grace to refuse - as he made clear, he was just doing his job.
Yeah, equally ridiculous.

-dale
dalem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2007, 15:37 PM   #25 (permalink)
Feanor
Banished
 
Join Date: 06-12-07
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,385
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
Feanor, can you dig up the "hybrid" episode for Parihaka's friend.
Loading

Oh and just the general address allsp.com takes you to a general menu of the site. They have almost all the episodes.
Feanor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 01:32 AM   #26 (permalink)
tankie
tankie
Military Professional
 
tankie's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-22-06
Location: u/k
Posts: 2,287
Country:
Send a message via MSN to tankie Send a message via Skype™ to tankie
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
Guts, indeed. Especially how Bush has turned this country into a virtual copy of the Third Reich. It takes a very brave man and a principled man to stand up to the media blackout of anything that doesn't toe the line of the Bushitler regime.

Sorry. Al Gore and his hunt for manbearpig just put me in a sarcastic mood.
jeez , all i said was he had the balls to STAND UP and condemn his own country over the global warming issue , and now you lot have castrated him . now i know why i wont argue about politics , or religeon
__________________
TANKIE , WITHOUT WAX
tankie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 03:21 AM   #27 (permalink)
CyberPredator
Banished
 
Join Date: 12-09-07
Posts: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigfella View Post
If the Howard Government had taken its responsibilities seriously Australia’s emissions in 2010 could be at 95% of 1990 levels. At a minimum we could have had several years of building the new energy infrastructure that would permit a rapid reduction of our emissions. Savings from energy efficiency alone could get us to this point.

It’s much easier to get from 95% to 75% in 10 years than from 110% to 75%. Cutting domestic emissions by the latter amount is not feasible and Australia would be required to buy emission permits from other countries or invest heavily in developing countries through the Clean Development Mechanism.

There could have been a third and much more attractive option. The deal granted to Australia at Kyoto in 1997 was so generous that we could easily have come in under our target for the 2008-2012 period and been left with a swag of emission credits we could then have banked for the second commitment period.

Alternatively we could have sold them to other countries, such as Japan, that might struggle to meet their obligations.

It will take the Rudd Government many years to pay off John Howard’s massive greenhouse debt. In truth, the Australian public will pay for it. The economic modellers have been pointing out for a long time that delaying action drives up the cost of cutting our emissions.
Although it is now Rudd’s problem, it is Howard himself who must take all of the blame, for it was his personal decision, against all of the advice, to remain stubbornly opposed to accepting the reality of global warming."
In truth, the whole of humanity will try to pay for its own pollution - and it will fail. We cannot even pay the interest bill. In short we should forget about trying to avoid global warming because it cannot be prevented. Why? We are past the point of no return. We will go >5 C by 2100 and on the way suffer mass starvation and all-out world wide resource wars. We are phkd.

The first world has the science/technology to survive as long as it can resist hungry invaders until they starve to death. However, I wonder if we have the political courage to cut 80% of the world out of any future.

So, the aim of joining any carbon treaty is to ensure we remain part of the winning side. If we shirk our load, the likely winners might not want to have us in their group.
CyberPredator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 19:37 PM   #28 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 8,737
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberPredator View Post
In truth, the whole of humanity will try to pay for its own pollution - and it will fail. We cannot even pay the interest bill. In short we should forget about trying to avoid global warming because it cannot be prevented. Why? We are past the point of no return. We will go >5 C by 2100 and on the way suffer mass starvation and all-out world wide resource wars. We are phkd.

The first world has the science/technology to survive as long as it can resist hungry invaders until they starve to death. However, I wonder if we have the political courage to cut 80% of the world out of any future.

So, the aim of joining any carbon treaty is to ensure we remain part of the winning side. If we shirk our load, the likely winners might not want to have us in their group.
Your diaper full or something?

Take a breath and read the threads in the Science Forum.

It'll be fine.

-dale
dalem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2007, 13:53 PM   #29 (permalink)
bolo121
Senior Contributor
 
bolo121's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-19-07
Location: india
Posts: 1,021
Country:
Nah got to agree with cyber on this one
We have consumed our resources at a totally unsustainable rate
World pop 7 bil+ and rising
Id give us about 100 years before modern techno industrial civilisation collapses
Sure al gore goes overboard sometimes but he is needed to counterbalance the bushies and their corporate paymasters
bolo121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2007, 14:00 PM   #30 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,801
Country:
Global warming huh? Well according to Al the artic is melting but according to certain scientist it has newer layers of ice and is not melting. How can this happen if were melting down Al? Who would you trust Al or scientists? I know who I would trust.

Should have given him the "Putz" prize instead.
__________________
Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.

Last edited by Dreadnought : 12-21-2007 at 14:03 PM.
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why We Are in Iraq Leader The War in Iraq 109 09-02-2008 14:13 PM
Gore widely tipped for Nobel Peace Prize Friday Parihaka Political Discussions 29 10-14-2007 08:35 AM
Man who should be king Karthik 2008 US Presidential Election 109 06-30-2007 05:00 AM
Money Laundering: Al Gore and Hillary Clinton hillaryandgore Political Discussions 38 06-14-2007 18:15 PM
Al Gore photoshops Lunatock Pics & Videos 7 06-12-2004 10:00 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:56 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8