ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > General Forums > Political Discussions
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-21-2007, 02:31 AM   #61 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 8,518
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmosGraber View Post
Quote:
Dalem posted, “Why can't I just go over to some guy's house and bed his hot wife? Eat his food? Drive his car? I want all of these things, so aren't I free to just take them?

Of course I'm not.

You are ignoring the basic concept of ownership and private property and the traditions and laws behind them. Are you a Socialist?”
I was trying to bring an historic perspective to immigration which is mired by present day politics. The ethnic historic heritages of most migrant workers are that they are Native Americans: most “Mexican illegals” (as many like to describe them) are in fact descended from Apache, Navajo, Sioux, Cheyenne, Pueblo, and Aztec Indians; just to name a few. To use your “house” example analogy; in the sense of understanding history, European colonialist have already came over to someone’s house, following your analogy, to the Native American's house. However in this comparison you not only bedded their wife; but killed the husband, children and burned down their house; then built your own house, then wonder why they are banging at the door wondering why they can’t come back in.
Blah.

Blah.

Blah.

Quote:
I do agree with you it really is basic concept of ownership, private property, traditions, laws, and I will add one more honoring past treaties made with Native Americans. This is the reason we allow some Indian Nations to have their own autonomous nations throughout Oklahoma for instance.

Sometimes you should not make present day judgments without fully understanding the historical perspectives.
Blah.

Blah.

Blah.

Okay, so you're building a little mountain out of a palmfull of crap, and you call me ignorant because I disagree with you.

Let's start RIGHT at the basics.

Do you accept the legal validity, existance, and consequences of the current national borders of the country known as the United States of America?

A simple Yes or No will get us started.

-dale
dalem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2007, 02:34 AM   #62 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 8,518
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by FibrillatorD View Post
Dale and Julie, why must immigration be compared to adultery or parties.
Because they are apt comparisons?

Quote:
Do we deport people for tax evasion? Do we deport people for mail fraud or government corruption?

I mean, if you believe in the punishment fitting the crime (the criminality of it was never in doubt), and the crime is mooching the system, I think we have a double standard, eh?
Why is the simple concept of citizenry so difficult for some people to understand?

If I'm a U.S. citizen it is (relatively) impossible to deport me!

Dig?

-dale
dalem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2007, 03:47 AM   #63 (permalink)
Adux
Banished
 
Join Date: 07-29-05
Location: Cochin
Posts: 2,931
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Expat Canuck View Post
I lived in the UK for 2 years, my last address was in Seven Sisters, London and I had a nice yellow and blue sign asking for info on a gang rape in the park....

I lived in Newquay, Shetland Islands as well as a village called Hook Norton (Best Bitter!!). I also stayed in Kilmarnoch (spelling?) outside Glasgow and a bunch of other places. I know it's rough and there are a lot of new dipshits which is why I stand by my statement saying the issue is not being able to deport jerks and their kids, I don't care if they where born there. The parents should have taught their kids better and if they can't or will not they can get the f**k out.
hmm, what do you think of paisley then????

Glasgow is heading towards a meltdown.

Look at this Indian dude here, did my MBA at Graduate School of Business, Strathclyde Uni, Found it is better to be in India, and can make more money here. Didnt even bother about a permenant visa or anything of that sort, got the next plane to India. 3 years over there, had a great time. Got drunk in all the clubs over there. Women were real nice, especially the one's with viking heritage. As time goes, you will see less and less of Indians going abroad.

Honestly hated the Indians and Pakistani's living there, they are not ready to integrate into the society as well are more narrow minded, racist(even towards me), Heck, Native Indians are more liberals than the dud heads who stay there.

Last edited by Adux : 12-21-2007 at 03:55 AM.
Adux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2007, 03:58 AM   #64 (permalink)
Adux
Banished
 
Join Date: 07-29-05
Location: Cochin
Posts: 2,931
Country:
Amosgraber,

If one goes so much in history and make decisions based on that, nation states as it is today will cease to exist. The moment US government drew the boundery line, everyone outside that has no right. Just like LoC, People on the Pakistani side of Kashmir has no business on our side of Kashmir. They dont like it, well thats life.
Adux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2007, 10:48 AM   #65 (permalink)
AmosGraber
Regular
 
AmosGraber's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-13-07
Location: La Junta, Colorado
Posts: 44
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalem View Post
Blah.

Blah.

Blah.



Blah.

Blah.

Blah.

Okay, so you're building a little mountain out of a palmfull of crap, and you call me ignorant because I disagree with you.

Let's start RIGHT at the basics.

Do you accept the legal validity, existance, and consequences of the current national borders of the country known as the United States of America?

A simple Yes or No will get us started.

-dale
Dale,

I would never call anyone ignorant, nor have I called you ignorant. I find your points of view very interesting and compelling even though we may be at somewhat of an impasse on the issue of immigration.

However I will just try to simply categorize my points:

1. I served this country in the Corp...(Ewww-RAH), I am semper fidelis to this country, I would die in less than a moments breath for this country.

2. I just truly believe migrant workers profit this country.

3. Historically migrant workers have helped make this country as strong as it is now.

4. I will admit, it somewhat angers me, when people mislabel Native Americans south of the Rio Grande as "Mexican illegals" simply because they adopted Spanish rather than English like their cousins who live north of the Rio Grande.

5. The European ethnocentric culture in America is changing in the 21st century.

6. This change no matter how strongly opposed today is inevitable.

7. When the Hispanic American population starts to become more dominant than the traditional European based population; immigration laws will become more sympathic to the plight of migrant workers coming from Mexico. This will resemble the same sympathic immigration policy towards European migrants during the early 20th century.


However, if any of these positions or how I may have inferred them in any of my previous posts somehow implied I viewed your positions as ignorant; I humbly apologize.

Kind Regards,

Amos
__________________
Wherever there is authority, there is no freedom-Prince Peter Kropotkin

Last edited by AmosGraber : 12-21-2007 at 14:17 PM.
AmosGraber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2007, 11:25 AM   #66 (permalink)
AmosGraber
Regular
 
AmosGraber's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-13-07
Location: La Junta, Colorado
Posts: 44
Country:
[quote=texasjohn;440026]
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmosGraber View Post
[b]

The obvious difference is when India was controlled by the British Empire they did not commit an entire genocide upon your people, and those that were left living, relocate them outside of their nation. Your comparison is like comparing apples with oranges, there is no correlation.

[.QUOTE]

Please read this first:

Britain India Massacre 1919

The Amritsar Massacre

Sepoy Mutiny - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Now take a deep breath....read, read, and read....
Interesting links; my last class in history last semester was centered on British Imperialism. I was in no way trying to infer there was no mistreatment or abuse by the British upon India's population. However, trying to state that to compare the British imperial abuse to the uttermost devastation of the Native American is somewhat a stretch at the best. Historian’s estimates place the pre-colonial population of Native Americans at more than 100 million, with about two-fifths in North America, including Mexico, its population alone being 30 million. By contrast, during the same period, the fifteenth century, the population of Europe up to the Ural Mountains, that is, western and eastern Europe combined, was populated by some 50 million people.

Historians believe the spread of European diseases, like small pox and others devastated this population within a few generations. Historians have concluded that the result of the process constituted the greatest demographic disaster in human history: a 90 percent decrease within a few generations of European invasions.

Returning to my previous point that is: trying to compare the atrocities committed by the British upon the India people to the genocide of Native Americans. Well as far as I understand India is still populated in the millions, if not billions by indigenous people; while the Native American population will take centuries to return to their pre-colonial numbers.

I hope this clarifies my previous statements.
AmosGraber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2007, 12:02 PM   #67 (permalink)
bonehead
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 01-12-05
Posts: 1,913
AmosGrabber. I have a couple of questions for you:

1) People have been "stranded" on the wrong side of countries' borders all over the world as political boundaries have been changed. In nearly every other instance around the world people are shot at, detained and treated like criminals when they illegally cross boarders. Specifically, how does Mexico treat immigrants who illegally cross Mexico's southern border. Additionally, Mexicans are settling in places that were never their "original ancestral homeland.( not too very many Apaches lived in the Chicago area hundreds of years ago as any that did make the trip would most likely been wiped out by the local native population) Immigration is one thing but a mass movement of people who cross the border at will is another thing entirely. The question is,"Why should the U.S. be any different than any other country in the world when it comes to protecting its borders?"
2) What is wrong with Mexicans staying at home and fixing their own problems. Mexico does have many things going for it, but the corruption is standing in the way of a healthy economy and thus good jobs at home and therefore no reason to pull up stakes and go north.
bonehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2007, 12:29 PM   #68 (permalink)
bonehead
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 01-12-05
Posts: 1,913
[quote=AmosGraber;440117]
Quote:
Originally Posted by texasjohn View Post

Interesting links; my last class in history last semester was centered on British Imperialism. I was in no way trying to infer there was no mistreatment or abuse by the British upon India's population. However, trying to state that to compare the British imperial abuse to the uttermost devastation of the Native American is somewhat a stretch at the best. Historian’s estimates place the pre-colonial population of Native Americans at more than 100 million, with about two-fifths in North America, including Mexico, its population alone being 30 million. By contrast, during the same period, the fifteenth century, the population of Europe up to the Ural Mountains, that is, western and eastern Europe combined, was populated by some 50 million people.

Historians believe the spread of European diseases, like small pox and others devastated this population within a few generations. Historians have concluded that the result of the process constituted the greatest demographic disaster in human history: a 90 percent decrease within a few generations of European invasions.

Returning to my previous point that is: trying to compare the atrocities committed by the British upon the India people to the genocide of Native Americans. Well as far as I understand India is still populated in the millions, if not billions by indigenous people; while the Native American population will take centuries to return to their pre-colonial numbers.

I hope this clarifies my previous statements.
The devastation of the native new world population was because they had no resistance to the "old world" diseases. Tens of millions died, not because of malice, but of ignorance and the randomness of life. India always had closer ties to the "old world" and thus resistance to old world diseases. Later on, "when the west was won" era in the U.S. disease was intentionally spread among the native population and that was genocide, pure and simple.
bonehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2007, 13:18 PM   #69 (permalink)
AmosGraber
Regular
 
AmosGraber's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-13-07
Location: La Junta, Colorado
Posts: 44
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by bonehead View Post
AmosGrabber. I have a couple of questions for you:


2) What is wrong with Mexicans staying at home and fixing their own problems. Mexico does have many things going for it, but the corruption is standing in the way of a healthy economy and thus good jobs at home and therefore no reason to pull up stakes and go north.
My point is the United States is equally responsible for the current immigration problem, along with, as you correctly stated the Mexican government.

First our responsibility lies in two different concepts the first being historical, which I referred to in my previous postings as blowback. The first blowback began at the end of the Spanish-American War to the present with American businesses and employers being more than welcoming to migrant workers; during these times migrant workers helped to build our great nation, just a few examples: the continental railways and helping turn the desert southwest into productive farmland. The second blowback occurred more recently in the form of American corporate greed.As I stated previously: during the late 20th century and early 21st century widespread abject poverty and starvation in Mexico was at almost epidemic levels due to US corporations relocating their cheap-labor plants from the US-Mexico border to Asia, and after Mexican banks and telecommunications were privatized, this created dozens of instant billionaires and plunged millions into poverty.

Now to further clarify my point, in regards to responsibility, the United States is a great nation. We should also be a responsible nation in accordance to our actions. In addition I believe the current mentality of those who just want to; "kick them all out" fail to realize the responsibility our nation has played in promoting the plight of migrant workers.

Furthermore, we will never 'kick them all out', because for one important simple reason the demographic culture of the United States is changing. Soon the Hispanic population will gain the upper hand in dealing with this problem, due to white European descent Americans dropping to below 50% of the population; so whatever tough legislation may or may not be passed by the federal, state, or local governments in the present; is in reality a little too late so to speak. When the Hispanic population, probably by the year 2050, gains the upper hand they will either reverse or create new immigration laws that will be more sympathic to migrant workers, than the current public opinion and trend.

Last edited by AmosGraber : 12-21-2007 at 13:23 PM.
AmosGraber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2007, 13:51 PM   #70 (permalink)
Adux
Banished
 
Join Date: 07-29-05
Location: Cochin
Posts: 2,931
Country:
So Canada is white, therefore open borders, while Mexico Hispanic therefore closed? So in 2050 Hispanic's closes the Canadian borders and open's the Mexican one.


Seriously.

Canada border is open, because there is postive and profitable impact on the USA, while Mexicans with their lower education standards and purchasing power, will always take away from the USA and never returning the favour. The result the American tax payers paying for the benfit some other nationalities. When USA currently has 37 million citizens under the poverty line. USA cant afford its genorsity.

If mexico is as bad as it is now in comparison to USA, in 2050. I dont think Hispanic Americans will open thier borders for them.

Last edited by Adux : 12-21-2007 at 13:57 PM.
Adux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2007, 13:58 PM   #71 (permalink)
AmosGraber
Regular
 
AmosGraber's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-13-07
Location: La Junta, Colorado
Posts: 44
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adux View Post
So Canada is white, therefore open borders, while Mexico Hispanic therefore closed? So in 2050 Hispanic's closes the Canadian borders and open's the Mexican one.

Seriously.

Canada border is open, because there is postive and profitable impact on the USA, while Mexicans with their lower education standards and purchasing power, will also take from the USA, than give it.
The federal government receives over $7 billion dollars annually from migrant workers, through Social Security taxes. This is hardly "chump" change. Canada is also the country that all but one of the 9/11 hijackers entered from; along with the fact there is a rising fundamentalist Muslim population in Canada is hardly close to qualify the open border with Canada as being positive and profitable.
AmosGraber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2007, 14:11 PM   #72 (permalink)
Adux
Banished
 
Join Date: 07-29-05
Location: Cochin
Posts: 2,931
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmosGraber View Post
The federal government receives over $7 billion dollars annually from migrant workers, through Social Security taxes. This is hardly "chump" change. Canada is also the country that all but one of the 9/11 hijackers entered from; along with the fact there is a rising fundamentalist Muslim population in Canada is hardly close to qualify the open border with Canada as being positive and profitable.

You are equating Canadian citzens with illegal immigrants is deplorable, They were the first one's to offer you support after 9/11, and is fighting a war on your behest in a manner of speaking in Afghanistan. Should we compare the crime rates of people coming through the canadian border to that of Mexican. Though 9/11 was tragic event, it was not done by canadians. is it?

What is the monetary comparison of trade being done with Canadians to that of Mexicans. How much does Canadians contribute to USA, to that of Mexicans. I dont agree with your notion, that USA is a 'birthright' of some people in Mexico who havent had conenctions with USA for generations.


I am not from your country therefore dont know much how healthcare, as well as this extra illegals have affected society, crime rates, money going out of the country etc. How much having these illegals is costing the USA. I will read about it and will definitly get back to you on that.

Last edited by Adux : 12-21-2007 at 14:13 PM.
Adux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2007, 14:19 PM   #73 (permalink)
bonehead
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 01-12-05
Posts: 1,913
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmosGraber View Post
My point is the United States is equally responsible for the current immigration problem, along with, as you correctly stated the Mexican government.

First our responsibility lies in two different concepts the first being historical, which I referred to in my previous postings as blowback. The first blowback began at the end of the Spanish-American War to the present with American businesses and employers being more than welcoming to migrant workers; during these times migrant workers helped to build our great nation, just a few examples: the continental railways and helping turn the desert southwest into productive farmland. The second blowback occurred more recently in the form of American corporate greed.As I stated previously: during the late 20th century and early 21st century widespread abject poverty and starvation in Mexico was at almost epidemic levels due to US corporations relocating their cheap-labor plants from the US-Mexico border to Asia, and after Mexican banks and telecommunications were privatized, this created dozens of instant billionaires and plunged millions into poverty.

Now to further clarify my point, in regards to responsibility, the United States is a great nation. We should also be a responsible nation in accordance to our actions. In addition I believe the current mentality of those who just want to; "kick them all out" fail to realize the responsibility our nation has played in promoting the plight of migrant workers.

Furthermore, we will never 'kick them all out', because for one important simple reason the demographic culture of the United States is changing. Soon the Hispanic population will gain the upper hand in dealing with this problem, due to white European descent Americans dropping to below 50% of the population; so whatever tough legislation may or may not be passed by the federal, state, or local governments in the present; is in reality a little too late so to speak. When the Hispanic population, probably by the year 2050, gains the upper hand they will either reverse or create new immigration laws that will be more sympathic to migrant workers, than the current public opinion and trend.
There is never a shortage to the problems of illegal immigration but to say, "OH what the hell. We lost so we may as well throw the doors open wide and whatever happens happens", is a piss poor way to go about things. The flipping of American demographics is by your words about 45 years from now. much can happen by then. Much will happen by then so it may be premature to count the chickens at this time. Corporate greed is indeed one of the driving factors(American fault) and it is being dealt with, though not nearly as aggressively as many would like, but to allow illegals to come in because of corporate greed is like trying to get a right out of two wrongs. Lastly, this line of thinking is like saying, Hey, the radical muslims want to come in and take us over as well. Can't do nothing about it so what the hell. Lets let the terrorist in too as they are going to change our world anyway." Good lord man. Isn't your current way of life worth fighting for?
bonehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2007, 14:31 PM   #74 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 8,518
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by AmosGraber View Post
Dale,

I would never call anyone ignorant, nor have I called you ignorant. I find your points of view very interesting and compelling even though we may be at somewhat of an impasse on the issue of immigration.

However I will just try to simply categorize my points:

1. I served this country in the Corp...(Ewww-RAH), I am semper fidelis to this country, I would die in less than a moments breath for this country.

2. I just truly believe migrant workers profit this country.

3. Historically migrant workers have helped make this country as strong as it is now.

4. I will admit, it somewhat angers me, when people mislabel Native Americans south of the Rio Grande as "Mexican illegals" simply because they adopted Spanish rather than English like their cousins who live north of the Rio Grande.

5. The European ethnocentric culture in America is changing in the 21st century.

6. This change no matter how strongly opposed today is inevitable.

7. When the Hispanic American population starts to become more dominant than the traditional European based population; immigration laws will become more sympathic to the plight of migrant workers coming from Mexico. This will resemble the same sympathic immigration policy towards European migrants during the early 20th century.


However, if any of these positions or how I may have inferred them in any of my previous posts somehow implied I viewed your positions as ignorant; I humbly apologize.

Kind Regards,

Amos
Yes or No. That's all I asked for. Not an apology, not a resume.

Yes or No. Start with that.

-dale
dalem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2007, 14:37 PM   #75 (permalink)
AmosGraber
Regular
 
AmosGraber's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-13-07
Location: La Junta, Colorado
Posts: 44
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by bonehead View Post
Good lord man. Isn't your current way of life worth fighting for?

I have fought for my country. I served in the United State Marine Corps. My statements were more observations and reflections of the reality of the situation. We will never kick them all out, that is unrealistic and bordering on fantasy thinking; which will only result in a massive waste of tax payers’ money which will be wasted on government bureaucracy placating current public opinion. What we can do is reform immigration laws. I believe this reform should be centered on accountability not on expulsion.
AmosGraber is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Opposition to US immigration bill intensifies xrough Political Discussions 11 05-27-2007 14:08 PM
Immigration issue fizzling? Anon Political Discussions 3 08-28-2006 19:06 PM
Attempted Immigration THL Current Affairs 34 08-26-2006 13:42 PM
Europe’s next immigration crisis Ray Political Discussions 8 04-17-2006 23:28 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:48 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8