ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > General Forums > Political Discussions
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-31-2007, 10:25 AM   #1 (permalink)
MrFirst
Contributor
 
MrFirst's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-02-07
Location: Russia
Posts: 668
Imperialism comes back

Imperialism comes back

MOSCOW. May 31 (Interfax) - Attempts by certain members of the international community to impose their will on others are exceedingly dangerous, President Vladimir Putin told a press conference after negotiations with his Greek counterpart on Thursday. "In our opinion, this is nothing but diktat and imperialism," he said. "Certain members of the international community wish to dictate their will to everyone despite the norms of international communication and law," Putin said. "We think that this is dangerous and harmful. We are against using such methods in international affairs," he said.

http://www.interfax.ru/e/B/0/0.html?id_issue=11759053
MrFirst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2007, 12:19 PM   #2 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,793
Country:
IMO Putin has no right to speak. His country is/has armed Iran with nuclear technology and weapons. These weapons find their way from Iran to Iraq and Syria then on to Hezbollah and the Taliban. Putin knows that we know what his arms dealers have been up to lately. He balks at the missle defense systems being put in place around his country and then launches a new ICBM and blames the U.S. in so many words. I would almost bet the missle defense was also partly put up to make him think further about what his little black market arms dealers do in the very near future. All I have to say to him is...How does it feel?

Ever notice there are no Russian troops in these countries? Maybe he doesnt want his Russian troops killed by Russian weapons sold to these countries by HIS country.
__________________
Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.

Last edited by Dreadnought : 05-31-2007 at 12:47 PM.
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2007, 13:25 PM   #3 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,793
Country:
ANKARA, Turkey (AP) - Turkish authorities seized weapons hidden among construction materials on a Syria-bound train from Iran after Kurdish guerrillas bombed and derailed the train, a prosecutor said Wednesday.

The cargo was discovered when authorities checked containers on the train, which was attacked by separatist Kurdish guerrillas on May 25 near the town of Genc in southeastern Bingol province, Prosecutor Ismail Sari told reporters Wednesday.

The bomb attack derailed seven of the train's cars, Sari said. Authorities were investigating the incident, and would also check cargo on the rest of the train, he said.

The Iranian Embassy issued a statement Wednesday denying that the weapons belonged to Iran, and said the allegations were being made "by circles" aiming to disrupt Turkey's close relations with Iran.

Earlier Wednesday, a government official said the cargo included machine guns and pistols. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the media. The private Dogan news agency said the cargo included a rocket launch pad and 300 rockets, as well as other weapons and ammunition.

Turkish authorities suspect Iran is using Turkey as a transit point to send arms to Lebanon's Hezbollah movement via Syria.

On Tuesday evening, Turkish authorities forced a Syrian plane flying from Iran to land in the southeastern city of Diyarbakir and searched it for weapons. No arms were found.

Turkey, the only Muslim member of NATO, borders both Iran and Syria. It has good relations with Israel and its Arab neighbors and has contributed troops to the U.N.-led peacekeeping force in Lebanon
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2007, 13:55 PM   #4 (permalink)
Indirect Fire
Contributor
 
Indirect Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-01-06
Location: Colleyville - Grapevine, US
Posts: 314
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreadnought View Post
IMO Putin has no right to speak. His country is/has armed Iran with nuclear technology and weapons. These weapons find their way from Iran to Iraq and Syria then on to Hezbollah and the Taliban. Putin knows that we know what his arms dealers have been up to lately. He balks at the missle defense systems being put in place around his country and then launches a new ICBM and blames the U.S. in so many words. I would almost bet the missle defense was also partly put up to make him think further about what his little black market arms dealers do in the very near future. All I have to say to him is...How does it feel?

Ever notice there are no Russian troops in these countries? Maybe he doesnt want his Russian troops killed by Russian weapons sold to these countries by HIS country.
By selling weapons to Syria, and Iran, Putin is arming them against the US.

The same thing is happening in Asia where China is arming the Maoist Rebels against India.
Indirect Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2007, 14:38 PM   #5 (permalink)
MrFirst
Contributor
 
MrFirst's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-02-07
Location: Russia
Posts: 668
Dreadnought,
Russia hasn't armed Iran with nuclear technology and weapons. Bushehr nuclear reactor that is under construction with help of Russia has still no fuel loaded, while Iran already has its uranium enrichment plant. What does that mean? That that Russia has no regard to the Iran's nuclear weapon programm. Who has? Some countries, such as USA, Germany, France, which assisted Iran to gain nuclear technologies before revolution of 1979.

Quote:
"President Gerald Ford signed a directive in 1976 offering Tehran the chance to buy and operate a U.S.-built reprocessing facility for extracting plutonium from nuclear reactor fuel. The deal was for a complete 'nuclear fuel cycle'."[5] At the time, Richard Cheney was the White House Chief of Staff, and Donald Rumsfeld was the Secretary of Defense. The Ford strategy paper said the "introduction of nuclear power will both provide for the growing needs of Iran's economy and free remaining oil reserves for export or conversion to petrochemicals."

Iran, a U.S. ally then, had deep pockets and close ties to Washington. U.S. and European companies scrambled to do business there.[6]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_program_of_Iran
But that was a long time ago, though who knows which technologies the Iranians have managed to receive from its the then western allies? That's a question. Anyway, the modern Iranian nuclear weapon program is successful because of Pakistan aid as Iran got its centrifuges from this country. So, where did the Pakistanis get their nuclear bomb? The US has built the light water reactor for it, Canada - the atomic power station with heavy water reactor and heavy water plant, France also has built the nuclear station and transfered the technologies of plutonium refining. Pakistanis have stolen technology of gas centrifuge in Europe. Then Chinese helped, they supplied Pakistan with heavy water reactor and energy reactor, they intentionally delivered the complete technology of producing of explosive device with yield of 25 kilotons, and for practical realization of exactly of weapon nuclear enrichment they delivered 5000 annular magnets and sent the specialists who installed all this. In Switzerland the Pakistanis got the documents on uranium enrichment plant, in England they got some high-frequency inverters, in Germany - tritium and technology of processing of plutonium with tritium. Then the Pakistanis made their bomb and after all of this they helped Iran to create its own weapon uranium, that, in turn, troubles you so much, Dreadnought.
And so, who armed Iran with nuclear technology???
MrFirst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2007, 14:52 PM   #6 (permalink)
GVChamp
Patron
 
GVChamp's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-25-06
Location: Chicago
Posts: 244
Oh, please. There is a huge difference between trying to integrate the world economically and politically and trying to impose our will on nations, let alone actually CONQUERING them, DEPOSING their government, and SETTING UP puppet governments.
And our foreign policy is certainly a lot more timid than creating blockades over a statue, or engineering a cyber-attack on a soverign nation.
__________________
"The great questions of the day will not be settled by means of speeches and majority decisions but by iron and blood"-Otto Von Bismarck
GVChamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2007, 15:07 PM   #7 (permalink)
gamercube
Banished
Senior Contributor
 
gamercube's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-20-06
Location: Barbados
Posts: 771
Country:
Quote:
And our foreign policy is certainly a lot more timid than creating blockades over a statue, or engineering a cyber-attack on a soverign nation.
Is it? American policy since WWII has been such that among the industrialized nations, the US has fought the most wars, engineered the largest number of coups, and destabilized more number of countries than anyone else. Timid? By what measure?
gamercube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2007, 16:03 PM   #8 (permalink)
GVChamp
Patron
 
GVChamp's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-25-06
Location: Chicago
Posts: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by gamercube View Post
Is it? American policy since WWII has been such that among the industrialized nations, the US has fought the most wars, engineered the largest number of coups, and destabilized more number of countries than anyone else. Timid? By what measure?
Cold War enviornment, neccessary to ensure world stability against Soviet encroachment. Since 1990, the United States hasn't practiced anything close to imperialism.
GVChamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2007, 16:20 PM   #9 (permalink)
gamercube
Banished
Senior Contributor
 
gamercube's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-20-06
Location: Barbados
Posts: 771
Country:
Quote:
Cold War enviornment, neccessary to ensure world stability against Soviet encroachment. Since 1990, the United States hasn't practiced anything close to imperialism.
********. There's always an excuse for imperialist actions at any time. When the European countries colonized the rest of the world, their reasons were noble too: They wanted to "civilize" the barbarian races of the world.

Besides, all this bullshyt about "countering" Soviet machinations fails to mention how most of the countries that were destabilized had massive American economic interests in them. Many coups were engineered to protect those instruments of American hegemony, especially when democratically elected leaders sought to nationalize them in the interests of their countrymen.

In fact, even the Soviet Union never destabilized as many countries as the US did. So this talk about "countering" Soviet encroachment is meaningless.
gamercube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2007, 16:37 PM   #10 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 10,193
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gamercube View Post
In fact, even the Soviet Union never destabilized as many countries as the US did. So this talk about "countering" Soviet encroachment is meaningless.
Wow, aren't we ignorant today? More so than yesterday.

Look at any unstable nation around the world today. What are the locals using to kill each other? Not M-16s. AKs are the prefered weapons. Soviets had a different way of destablizing governments. They don't use the evil corporations. They flood the area with AKs, mostly made by their satellites in eastern Europe.

Why do you hate the west so much? Why are you in Canada if you hate the west so much? Are you some kind of a masochist? Maybe you should think about going back to your beloved India that is perfect and benign.
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2007, 16:43 PM   #11 (permalink)
gamercube
Banished
Senior Contributor
 
gamercube's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-20-06
Location: Barbados
Posts: 771
Country:
Quote:
Wow, aren't we ignorant today? More so than yesterday.

Look at any unstable nation around the world today. What are the locals using to kill each other? Not M-16s. AKs are the prefered weapons. Soviets had a different way of destablizing governments. They don't use the evil corporations. They flood the area with AKs, mostly made by their satellites in eastern Europe.

Why do you hate the west so much? Why are you in Canada if you hate the west so much? Are you some kind of a masochist? Maybe you should think about going back to your beloved India that is perfect and benign.
Tch, tch. Same lame tactics of putting words in my mouth. Did I say I hate the "west"? No. I posted my views about the foreign policy of the US. Is the US synonymous with the "west"? Certainly not.

So next time you attempt to find flaws in my arguments, I suggest you pay close attention to what I'm actually saying.
gamercube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2007, 16:47 PM   #12 (permalink)
Archer
Senior Contributor
 
Archer's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-13-03
Posts: 2,888
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
Why do you hate the west so much? Why are you in Canada if you hate the west so much? Are you some kind of a masochist? Maybe you should think about going back to your beloved India that is perfect and benign.
Perish the thought, Canada is welcome to have him and keep him, forever and forever. We already have Arundhati Roy and enough commies as it is. If you act smart, we'll encourage him to move to the US.
__________________
Karmani Vyapurutham Dhanuhu

My bow is stretched for its task
Archer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2007, 16:50 PM   #13 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 10,193
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gamercube View Post
Tch, tch. Same lame tactics of putting words in my mouth. Did I say I hate the "west"? No. I posted my views about the foreign policy of the US. Is the US synonymous with the "west"? Certainly not.

So next time you attempt to find flaws in my arguments, I suggest you pay close attention to what I'm actually saying.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gamercube View Post
********. There's always an excuse for imperialist actions at any time. When the European countries colonized the rest of the world, their reasons were noble too: They wanted to "civilize" the barbarian races of the world.
I guess Europe doens't count as the west either.

Hey I give you credit for at least not arguing about you being more ignorant today than before.

Last edited by gunnut : 05-31-2007 at 16:55 PM.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2007, 16:52 PM   #14 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 10,193
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archer View Post
Perish the thought, Canada is welcome to have him and keep him, forever and forever. We already have Arundhati Roy and enough commies as it is. If you act smart, we'll encourage him to move to the US.
You can keep him. We have enough US haters here already. I live in California. I know.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2007, 17:02 PM   #15 (permalink)
Grim
Military Professional
 
Grim's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-22-06
Location: Oregon
Posts: 164
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gamercube View Post
In fact, even the Soviet Union never destabilized as many countries as the US did. So this talk about "countering" Soviet encroachment is meaningless.
Gamercube Sir
Would you be so kind as to support your blanket accusation against the USA with some statistics please. To your knowledge just how many nations did the USA try to destabilize compared to how many did the USSR try to destabilize? I will leave my opinion on this at the door. I am just curious as to what it is that you believe about this and I would like to consider it more.
Grim is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Your Thoughts on David Icke? joey2 World Affairs Board Pub 12 12-29-2006 07:55 AM
Marine Corpsman Returned Home vaughn World Affairs Board Pub 1 12-18-2006 13:13 PM
Improv Everywhere - Not So Practical Jokes THL World Affairs Board Pub 1 01-23-2006 16:29 PM
Future of afghanistan raja khan Operation Enduring Freedom 113 09-20-2004 19:23 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:01 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8