Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!
The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
|
 |
04-09-2007, 14:43 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Postmaster General
Military Professional
Join Date: 08-20-03
Country: 
|
Only one way to move forward in Ukraine
Quote:
Monday, April 9, 2007
Only one way to move forward in Ukraine
By YULIYA TYMOSHENKO
KIEV -- Suddenly, Ukraine faces another stark choice: Dismiss the government and Parliament and hold new elections, or see the country's independence surrendered bit by bit. There is renewed talk, too, of violent civil unrest. None of this should be surprising, given how our corrupt rulers systematically incite regional and ethnic hatred.
Some say that President Viktor Yushchenko's decision to dismiss Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovich's government was unwarranted. They are wrong: Yushchenko's actions were necessary because the Yanukovich government, in clear violation of the law, was preparing to mount a constitutional coup that would have stripped the president of his remaining supervisory powers over the army and police.
Either the president acted now, or Ukraine would return to the absolute rule of criminal clans that existed before our Orange Revolution in 2004.
I did not agree with Yushchenko's decision to appoint Yanukovich prime minister following last year's parliamentary election. For a democratic-minded president to "cohabit" (as the French call it) with the very man who sought to sabotage Ukraine's last presidential ballot would, I knew, provoke institutional paralysis and political chaos. And so it has.
The ultimate shortcoming of that cohabitation was its curtailment of the democratic process. Ukraine's democrats, who won that election, were denied their voice and their place in government. Yushchenko offered his hand to his foes in good faith so as to bind up our nation's wounds; in return, the governing pact that he reached with Yanukovich was betrayed at every turn. A new election will restore democratic choice -- and thus revitalize our democracy.
Europe and the world are, of course, right to worry. But Ukraine has changed dramatically since the Orange Revolution. Even those Europeans who believe -- wrongly -- that democracy does not easily take root in post-Soviet countries should recognize that our people now feel empowered. A country that emerged so recently from one period of dictatorship is unlikely to volunteer for another at the hands of a man who sought to falsify the presidential election of 2004.
Economic growth since the Orange Revolution reinforces that reluctance, because an expanding middle class nearly always prefers the flexibility of pluralism to the thump of an authoritarian's fist. The general election called for May 27 will help to keep things this way.
But the dangers that Ukraine faces are serious, stemming from problems -- particularly fragile institutions and economic dislocation -- that are common to every young post-communist democracy, as well as from some special problems of its own. Many of Ukraine's richest citizens, who gained their wealth through the crony capitalism that is the only way Yanukovich knows how to govern, remain unreconciled to Ukraine's democracy. For them, manufactured discontent in Ukraine's Russian-speaking regions -- which have embraced a centrifugal tendency greater than in any other European democracy -- impels them toward the system of managed democracy found in Russia in order to protect their continued misrule.
A decade ago, the world had a foretaste of what can happen when ethnic divisions are exploited for sinister political purposes. Yugoslavia is but a miniature version of what might happen in Ukraine if Yanukovich's tactics are allowed to bring ethnic antagonisms to the boiling point.
Ukraine's unity, however, is not artificial. It is natural, as is demonstrated by the huge majority -- even among the Russian minority -- that continues to support the country's independence. So it would be wrong to say that the democratic center cannot hold in Ukraine.
The best and still most living thing about our Orange Revolution was the democratic empowerment of our people. As a result, something remarkable for a former Soviet country informs the habits of those who are demanding that their liberties be preserved: a deep respect for the rule of law, which is the ultimate check on abuse of power.
Our people understand that the Yanukovich government is not just political poison. It seeks to dominate, and deaden, the whole economy, too. No business can be conducted without kowtowing to the regime for permission.
Ukraine's neighbors should now help us by offering support and hope. Europe must send a clear signal that Ukraine, unlike Czechoslovakia to Neville Chamberlain in 1938, is not some faraway place of which it knows little, but rather an integral part of the European project.
After all, the European Union is first and foremost a community of democracies: if Ukraine can aspire to membership, any oligarch or criminal politician who undermines that prospect will have to face the ire of all Ukrainians. Moreover, all of Europe needs a truly democratic Ukraine. New elections to secure our democracy are the only way forward, both for us and for advancing Europe's interest in seeing that genuine democracy takes root in the nations of the former Soviet Union.
Yuliya Tymoshenko, Ukraine's former prime minister, is leader of the parliamentary opposition. Copyright Project Syndicate 2007 (Project Syndicate)
The Japan Times
(C) All rights reserved
Only one way to move forward in Ukraine | The Japan Times Online
|
How far is this article to reality of the situation in Ukraine?
What is the opinion of the Ukraine watchers of WAB?
__________________
"Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."
I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.
HAKUNA MATATA
|
|
|
|
04-10-2007, 03:32 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Defense Professional
|
Hi Ray!
This lad did her chance twice in the past.... did not work quite well. Ukraine is a very complicated problem. The nation is too much split apart and these two parts do not want to agree on most of the issues.
She is radical... and she already proved that. I guess that people like Timoshenko in power is same as Miloshevitch at his time in 1989..... it may ignite split of the country!!!
|
|
|
|
04-10-2007, 04:21 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Postmaster General
Military Professional
Join Date: 08-20-03
Country:
|
Quote:
Ukraine's rival leaders battle on
Supporters of Ukrainian PM Viktor Yanukovych are keeping up their protest outside parliament in Kiev against his rival, President Viktor Yushchenko.
The power struggle continued over the Easter holiday, with Mr Yushchenko refusing to revoke his decision to call a snap election for 27 May.
The constitutional court is due to consider his decision later this week.
Mr Yushchenko accuses Mr Yanukovych of undermining democracy by luring deputies to his bloc in parliament.
In an Easter address to the nation, Mr Yushchenko said Mr Yanukovych's ruling coalition had been "artificially and illegally beefed up step-by-step to achieve 300 votes" - the number required to overrule presidential vetoes.
Pro-Yanukovych deputies hit back at an extraordinary session on Monday, adopting a resolution which accused the president of putting pressure on constitutional court judges, Interfax news agency reported.
Mr Yanukovych's power base is the mainly Russian-speaking east of Ukraine. He has told the cabinet not to prepare for a snap election until the constitutional court rules on the dispute.
The latest escalation of the long-running power struggle began on 2 April, when Mr Yushchenko ordered the dissolution of parliament and the 27 May election. His power base is in western Ukraine, where support for Western-style liberal reforms is strong.
The rivalry started during the 2004 Orange Revolution, which eventually swept Mr Yushchenko into power.
BBC NEWS | Europe | Ukraine's rival leaders battle on
|
If the PM has been able to lure the Parliamentarians to his side so much so that he has been able to overrule the President, then either the President's incompetency has riled the Parliamentarians or the President is dumb!
To an outsider, the President appears to have lost the confidence of the Parliament and all this shenanigans are desperate attempts to keep power by hook or by crook. It is surprising that a person who won so overwhelming and could organise the Orange Revolution has so quickly lost his charm. One can't believe it! Must be a prize chump!
I hope the Constitutional court can solve this problem since Ukraine is sensitive for world peace.
One can't have unrest and turbulence in East Europe where as it is poverty and despondency is high!
Yushchenko has been a great let down! |
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:07 PM.
|
| 
Similar Threads
