Intelligence agencies see worrying signs of al-Qaeda’s revival

Ray · 01-18-2007, 13:55 PM

Quote:

On the march

Jan 18th 2007
From The Economist print edition

Intelligence agencies see worrying signs of al-Qaeda’s revival

AS THEY watch Iraq spiralling into civil war and Taliban attacks in Afghanistan increasing, Western leaders have until recently consoled themselves with one thought: at least the campaign against al-Qaeda has gone quite well. “Absolutely, we’re winning. Al-Qaeda is on the run,” said President George Bush in October.

After the West toppled the Taliban regime in Afghanistan, in 2001, and arrested or killed many of al-Qaeda’s leaders, officials believed it was largely broken up. Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri, his deputy, sent video and audio messages from their hiding places, but did not appear to control operations, which were “franchised” to local groups. In Europe, the jihadist cause was taken up by home-grown extremists. But their outrages, such as the London bombings on July 7th 2005, could not match al-Qaeda’s spectaculars.

Such was the received wisdom. But in his annual threat assessment this month, John Negroponte, America’s outgoing intelligence chief, changed his tone. Al-Qaeda’s core leadership was “resilient”. Its hiding places in Pakistan were “secure” and it was “cultivating stronger operational connections and relationships” with affiliated groups across the Middle East, north Africa and Europe.

That sombre view matches the alarm of British intelligence chiefs. In November, Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller, the head of the security agency, MI5, said her overstretched spooks were contending with some 200 terrorist networks involving about 1,600 suspects, and investigating up to 30 high-priority plots. Home-grown radicals were “foot-soldiers” trained and guided by al-Qaeda on an “extensive and growing scale”.

A series of investigations and court cases in Britain has cast light on the enduring role of al-Qaeda in attacks on the West, especially from Pakistan. In November Dhiren Barot, a Hindu convert to Islam, received a 40-year prison sentence after pleading guilty to planning several possible attacks. Mr Barot had planned to use a radioactive “dirty bomb” and blow up limousines filled with gas cylinders in London, among other schemes.

Intelligence agencies at first thought that the July 7th bombings had been home-grown. But investigators later found that the bombers’ leader, Mohammed Siddique Khan, had travelled to Pakistan beforehand. In London this week, a court heard of a similar link in a second (failed) plot to bomb London’s transport system two weeks later. The bombers’ alleged leader, Ethiopian-born Muktar Ibrahim, had gone to Pakistan several months before the attacks and is said to have attended a training camp in Sudan.

This was not a “copycat” attack, but long planned, prosecutors said. It failed because, apparently, the bombers botched the kitchen-stove preparation of the ingredients.

If this sounds too amateurish for al-Qaeda, then last August’s alleged plot to blow up ten airliners flying from London to America by using liquid explosives, had all the hallmarks of an al-Qaeda spectacular. Investigators say that it, too, involves close links to extremists in Pakistan.

Western security officials say the revitalisation of al-Qaeda is partly due to the fact that “the pressure is off” in North Waziristan, a Pakistani tribal region where the army agreed a ceasefire with militants last September. Afghan and NATO commanders complain that the truce has also provided cross-border safe havens for the Taliban. Mr Negroponte called Pakistan an important ally, but also “a major source of Islamic extremism”.

Western officials also worry about what they call “blowback” from Iraq: instead of sucking in would-be suicide bombers on one-way tickets, it could pump out battle-hardened fighters to wage violent campaigns elsewhere. Mr Negroponte said an American pull-out would allow Iraq to replace Afghanistan as an al-Qaeda sanctuary.

In recent weeks al-Qaeda and its sympathisers have taken a beating in Somalia, where the American-backed Ethiopians have routed the local Islamists. But al-Qaeda may be growing stronger in north Africa. Last September’s announcement of a merger of al-Qaeda and Algeria’s Salafist Group for Call and Combat (better known by its French acronym GSPC) may herald an attempt to open up a new front against Europe through its large population of Maghrebi immigrants.

The GSPC has dwindled to a few hundred fighters. But alleged members have been arrested across Europe. Last month it claimed responsibility for a bomb that killed the driver of a bus carrying workers for an affiliate of Halliburton, an American energy-services giant. “Al-Qaeda is not on the run,” says Bruce Hoffman of Georgetown University. “It is on the march.”
http://www.economist.com/daily/news/...82&top_story=1

Let us not be complacent.

Hard and dangerous times ahead.

Every time the needle point to Pakistan as the womb of terrorism.

And yet nothing is done.

Is it becoming a question of crying Wolf a tad too many times?

Is Pakistan really the worm and the womb of terrorists?

Or is it that having been stumped, it is easy to blame someone else?

Indeed, if Pakistan is the scene of the dastardly plots, then why are they being left alone to plague the world and are being allowed and indirectly even encouraged thus to kill the citizens of the very countries that accuse Pakistan as being the womb of terrorists?

Confusing!

Brian Douglas · 01-18-2007, 14:37 PM

Though I am not a military person myself I find it rather strange if some intellingence agancies are worried about an Al Qaeda revival as in reality they have never gone away, been disbanded or stopped from their deadly reign of terror.

Clearly this is a well structured organization capable of gathering ground in most countries and supporters, plus is well financed. The fact that last year Afghanistan became the first country to have a economy based on drug sales alone shows there is huge financing for terror in our wold today.

With regard to Pakistan and any involvement it may have with this terrorist group or not, I would have thought that the Indian secret service would have been best suited to infiltrate this area.

President Bush has no right to claim that Al qaeda is on the run when still they are killing the inoccent in various countries of the World and for certain in my mind will hit either or both the US and UK again. One can't be complacent with a few good results as the global fight for terror is far from won.

The re insurgance of the Taliban in Afghanistan shows clearly the determination of these terrorist groups. Iraq in my mind is a different question.

GVChamp · 01-18-2007, 23:28 PM

What can realistically be done to isolate Pakistan without having massive effects on India, Afghanistan, and Iran? Let alone Central Asia...

01-18-2007, 23:28 PM	#3 (permalink)
GVChamp Patron Join Date: 08-25-06 Location: Chicago Posts: 244	What can realistically be done to isolate Pakistan without having massive effects on India, Afghanistan, and Iran? Let alone Central Asia... __________________ "The great questions of the day will not be settled by means of speeches and majority decisions but by iron and blood"-Otto Von Bismarck

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Bush Orders Domestic Spying.	Bulgaroctonus	Political Discussions	191	02-23-2008 12:08 PM
Iran president wants Israel "wiped off the map"	ZFBoxcar	The Iranian Question	148	11-07-2005 07:43 AM
The real story Joe Wilson's twisted tale	Leader	Political Discussions	48	11-03-2005 10:09 AM
From Internet To Islamnet:net-centric Counter-terrorism	indianguy4u	Political Discussions	0	11-01-2005 12:31 PM
More proof of the Saddam al Qaeda Connection	Leader	International Defense Topics	3	05-31-2004 21:22 PM

01-18-2007, 14:37 PM	#2 (permalink)
Brian Douglas Regular Join Date: 12-28-06 Location: Iasi.Romania. Posts: 78 Country:	Though I am not a military person myself I find it rather strange if some intellingence agancies are worried about an Al Qaeda revival as in reality they have never gone away, been disbanded or stopped from their deadly reign of terror. Clearly this is a well structured organization capable of gathering ground in most countries and supporters, plus is well financed. The fact that last year Afghanistan became the first country to have a economy based on drug sales alone shows there is huge financing for terror in our wold today. With regard to Pakistan and any involvement it may have with this terrorist group or not, I would have thought that the Indian secret service would have been best suited to infiltrate this area. President Bush has no right to claim that Al qaeda is on the run when still they are killing the inoccent in various countries of the World and for certain in my mind will hit either or both the US and UK again. One can't be complacent with a few good results as the global fight for terror is far from won. The re insurgance of the Taliban in Afghanistan shows clearly the determination of these terrorist groups. Iraq in my mind is a different question.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)