ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > General Forums > Political Discussions
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-24-2006, 12:13 PM   #1 (permalink)
platinum786
Banished
 
platinum786's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-14-04
Posts: 1,986
Kashmiir's launch pro Pakistan party

Islamabad, April 20 (IANS) Former Pakistan-administrated Kashmir prime minister Sultan Mehmood Chaudhry Thursday launched here a new party - Peoples Muslim League - seeking 'Kashmir's accession to Pakistan'.

The party will support Pakistan-administered Kashmir's accession to Pakistan, Chaudhry told reporters.


The Peoples Muslim League will have its central secretariat in Islamabad and will actively participate in the forthcoming elections.


Chaudhry said he would name the central body members April 24 while district-level functionaries would be announced later.


He asserted that the launching of the new party would end the two-party system in Pakistani Kashmir and provide alternative leadership to the people.


Chaudhry had to quit the Pakistani Kashmir chapter of Benazir Bhutto's Pakistan Peoples Party following violations of party discipline.

http://in.news.yahoo.com/060420/43/63ofi.html
platinum786 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2006, 12:26 PM   #2 (permalink)
Asim Aquil
Banished
Senior Contributor
 
Asim Aquil's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-11-04
Location: Dubai
Posts: 8,135
Country:
Meeeh, I don't support it.

I think its in Pakistan's best interest to let Azad Kashmir go free. Of course only in conjunction with the independence of J&K.
Asim Aquil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2006, 12:37 PM   #3 (permalink)
Jay
Tamizhanban
Senior Contributor
 
Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 6,507
Country:
So Asim, does it mean that there is a caveat, that Pakistan will only give Azadi to Kashmir only when you get Jammu & Kashmir back?
__________________
A grain of wheat eclipsed the sun of Adam !!
Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2006, 12:46 PM   #4 (permalink)
Asim Aquil
Banished
Senior Contributor
 
Asim Aquil's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-11-04
Location: Dubai
Posts: 8,135
Country:
Errr Kashmir is not ours or India's to give and take back n forth.

What I support is that India and Pakistan simultaneously relent control off of the entire Kashmir. There need not be any giving or taking. Meanwhile Pak & India plan this historic move, A Kashmiri government could be brought in place by a neutral party like the UN or anyone that Pak, Ind & the Kashmiris agree to.

A nice, non-greedy proposal, Jay?
Asim Aquil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2006, 12:50 PM   #5 (permalink)
Jay
Tamizhanban
Senior Contributor
 
Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 6,507
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Asim Aquil
A nice, non-greedy proposal, Jay?
You are still not getting the point. Pakistan says it struggles for Kashmiri independence and right for self dutermination, shouldnt they make a model out of Pakistan Occupied Kashmir by allowing free and fair elections?

Why do you tie India and Jammu and Kashmir here? Its a pretty neat trick, you know that India is not going to let go J&K, and by this plan you can hold on to PoK for ever, which means Kashmiri freedom and self determination is just a smoke screen.

Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2006, 12:54 PM   #6 (permalink)
Asim Aquil
Banished
Senior Contributor
 
Asim Aquil's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-11-04
Location: Dubai
Posts: 8,135
Country:
Errrr IF Pak army pulls out without getting the Indian army off the LoC, they'd just invade.

Plus the majority of the Pak Kashmiris won't have it.
Asim Aquil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2006, 12:57 PM   #7 (permalink)
Jay
Tamizhanban
Senior Contributor
 
Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 6,507
Country:
You could still have your military in LoC and allow free and fair elections in PoK unless your military controls/want to control PoK all by itself.
Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2006, 13:31 PM   #8 (permalink)
Asim Aquil
Banished
Senior Contributor
 
Asim Aquil's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-11-04
Location: Dubai
Posts: 8,135
Country:
Exaaaaaaaactly. No one would believe that they're free and fair as long as Pak presence is there! Just as no one believes about Indian elections.
Asim Aquil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2006, 13:43 PM   #9 (permalink)
Jay
Tamizhanban
Senior Contributor
 
Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 6,507
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Asim Aquil
Exaaaaaaaactly. No one would believe that they're free and fair as long as Pak presence is there! Just as no one believes about Indian elections.
Err, a lot of neutral observers have endorsed the elections, so did 45% of people who voted.
Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2006, 17:12 PM   #10 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 28,378
Country:
Errrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

What this new word?

If it indicates doubt, then might as well not say wahtever you are saying!
__________________


"Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

HAKUNA MATATA
Ray is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2006, 18:13 PM   #11 (permalink)
Jay
Tamizhanban
Senior Contributor
 
Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 6,507
Country:
Sir,
its like saying ugh, uhm or hmm
Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2006, 12:49 PM   #12 (permalink)
platinum786
Banished
 
platinum786's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-14-04
Posts: 1,986
The new party should be interesting.

Persoanlly i think our interests lie with Pakistan, it's a strong muslim state and can protect us from aggressors, afterall it's the right of every muslim in the subcontinent, why deny it to us Kashmiri's.
platinum786 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2006, 13:07 PM   #13 (permalink)
Ray
Postmaster General
Military Professional
 
Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-20-03
Posts: 28,378
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by platinum786
The new party should be interesting.

Persoanlly i think our interests lie with Pakistan, it's a strong muslim state and can protect us from aggressors, afterall it's the right of every muslim in the subcontinent, why deny it to us Kashmiri's.

Great.

So, you are suggesting all Indian Moslems should make a beeline to Paksitan.

BTW, Platinum, do you know what they think of Mirpuris in Kashmir?

The Mangla dam feeds Punjab while Mirpur's fertile land lies below the waters!

However genuine these feelings of Kashmiri nationalism may be, they must also be put in context. In the first place they are reinforced by some yet more parochial considerations, not least because the present administration in distant Muzaffarabad – which can be reached much more quickly by way of
Islamabad and Murree than along the long winding road through the hills – is not only controlled by non-Mirpuris, but by people who ultimately favour Kashmir's incorporation into Pakistan. So it was that when Sardar Qayyum, an integrationist Poonchi Sudhan who was subsequently to become Chief
Minister of Azad Kashmir, sought to speak at an election rally in Dadial in 1985, he faced hostile demonstrations. Only when protected by a substantial military presence could be escorted safely out of town. Such tensions remain to this day.


Last edited by Ray : 04-25-2006 at 13:19 PM.
Ray is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2006, 13:45 PM   #14 (permalink)
platinum786
Banished
 
platinum786's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-14-04
Posts: 1,986
what do kashmiri's think of mirupri's probably the same player hate the punjabi's have.

hate teh game folks not the players.
platinum786 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2006, 13:59 PM   #15 (permalink)
Jay
Tamizhanban
Senior Contributor
 
Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 6,507
Country:
So why did the subcontinenet Bengali muslims decided that Pakistan is not game for them?
Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pakistan Airspace: Night before the nuke tests Asim Aquil Warfare in the Modern Age 19 06-13-2007 01:36 AM
India may pull out from Siachen Ray South Asian Defense Topics 31 11-12-2006 14:41 PM
Topic For Hongkongfeuy lemontree Political Discussions 21 09-09-2005 02:15 AM
Future of afghanistan raja khan Operation Enduring Freedom 113 09-20-2004 19:23 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:20 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8