![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
|
Canada reasserts Arctic sovereignty
Quote:
It seems that Danish patrol ships regularly call on the island, make landfalll and plant a Danish flag, and then leaves. later a Canadian patrol comes along and hoist the Canadian flag. And so it has gone on for quote a while now.
__________________
When we blindly adopt a religion, a political system, a literary dogma, we become automatons. We cease to grow. - Anais Nin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Contributor
|
I know that America has a policy where anything 12km from the mainland is considered International waters, and they do not recognize claims of soverignty on islands outside the 12k zone.
For that reason the Americans can take subs into Hudson and James bay, as well as the Arctic archapelago. And also under that policy, PEI does not belong to Canada! I surely believe that ALL land within Canada's borders belongs to Canada. I am glad that Harper wants to assert soverignty over the arctic, and put a new military base on Baffin Island, and ice breakers to patrol the NW passage. However i fear that this may never become real, unless Harper gets a Majority government, and all the hippies in the Cities could prevent this from happening. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |||||
|
Military Professional
Moderator Scotch taster |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Chimo Last edited by Officer of Engineers : 06-06-2006 at 00:27 AM. |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Senior Contributor
|
No, they can't. Let's be real for a second.
I was just using that as an example There's something called a government in PEI for crying out loud. of course, i was just being sarcastic. Who's going to see the Ice Breaker? arctic foxes, seals perhaps, maybe a whale. It may seem useless now, but 20-50 years down the raod, when the ice-pack starts to melt earlier and the NW passage becomes a more desireable route, they will be better than nothing in deturing anyone we dont want from entering our waters. It's not going to be real because we have far more pressing needs ... like tactical airlift and strategic sealift. yes, and i agree. Arctic defence is more of a long term issue, than an immediate one. Last edited by Canmoore : 06-06-2006 at 00:54 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
Moderator Scotch taster |
Quote:
Other than that, no one is exploiting the north like we are. And no one uses subs to raise a flag. That's contrary to a sub's mission - to stay hidden. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Military Professional
Moderator Scotch taster |
Do what? They're not going to admit that they're violating our waters; at least not with subs and ice breakers ain't going to catch subs. They're not spending money up there. We are.
You want to plant a flag? Send 3rd Rangers. Snowmobiles cost a hell of alot less than an icebreaker and just as effective. You want to patrol? Send an AURORA, it covers the territory in a 10th of the time. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Bandaid
Military Professional
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Cheers!...on the rocks!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
|
Quote:
It comes down to this, Canada does not have the military capacity to enforce its soveignty over the arctic waters at this time. There is basiclly nothing we can do to stop anyone from going through. In theory our plan if hostile forces entered into the arctic pass would be to call the Amercians for help. Hope that gives you an idea of what little we're capable of doing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
For example, during the AID's conference this summer in Toronto, the Liberal, Bloc, and NDP blasted Harper for not attending the conference. And the media just added fuel to the fire. But the question that SHOULD have been raised by the media, was this. What is more important? attending a conference that isnt going to solve the AID's problem, or making a trip to the arctic to claim soverignty and re-instate his plans for the Arctic. what is more important? Had Harper of attended that conference, would AID's have magically disapeared? would a cure be suddenly conjured up? what good would that have done? All that conference was, was a bunch of scientists, people with AID's, and politicians talking about AID's, there was no tangible work being done to correct AID's, there was no new vaccines being looked at or talked about, it was just a giant sit in and kumbaya for hippies and lefties. And meanwhile, Harper was DOING something tangible. He was in the North, asserting our claim on the north. Is protecting ones own country not more important than a giant multi-day multi-million dollar converstaion about AID's? THAT my friend is the real danger to the north, Canada CAN protect and defend the country, that is not the problem, the problem is educating the largely ignorant or just plain ill-informed Canadian public on the importance of protecting ones own country. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Be Proud Canada | Amled | The Western Alliance | 37 | 07-15-2008 01:11 AM |
| America's Closest Ally. | Veni Vidi Vici | Political Discussions | 299 | 05-04-2007 14:04 PM |
| U.S. had secret 1930 plan to invade Canada | Officer of Engineers | The World Wars | 66 | 10-28-2006 16:12 PM |
| has the U.S.A. gone too far | canadian boy | The Western Alliance | 87 | 01-04-2006 13:39 PM |
| E.U. Dependence Theory: Blame Canada | Leader | Political Discussions | 0 | 01-19-2005 22:14 PM |