ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > General Forums > Political Discussions
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-06-2006, 02:09 AM   #1 (permalink)
Amled
Senior Contributor
 
Amled's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-10-04
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,436
Country:
Free Speech to Debate in UN

The 56 member countries comprising the Organization of Islamic Conferences (OIC), will this week at a meeting of the UN organization UNESCO control group in Paris, try to establish clear limits to the concept of free speech and expression.
The EU-countries are of the opinion that free speech is sacrosanct, while the Muslim countries mean that respect for religion and religious symbols should weigh heavier then free speech.
(Translated from a Danish Television news bulletin)

This is the second time in my memory that UNESCO is involved in dealings that would put a hamper on free speech.
Some years ago they published a rapport that recommended that the news media be obliged to practice self-censorship in regards to stories that might have “adverse” implications.
A rapport which was hardily condemned by both media and governments in the then Free World.
Freedom of speech IS sacrosanct; it is the linchpin of a free and open society.
Any attempt to abrogate or limit it, is a slippery pole leading to repression and censorship.
Any misuse of it is a matter for the courts of the country involved, not from dictates from some supra-governmental organization.
__________________
When we blindly adopt a religion, a political system, a literary dogma, we become automatons. We cease to grow. - Anais Nin
Amled is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2006, 02:25 AM   #2 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,143
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amled
The 56 member countries comprising the Organization of Islamic Conferences (OIC), will this week at a meeting of the UN organization UNESCO control group in Paris, try to establish clear limits to the concept of free speech and expression.
The EU-countries are of the opinion that free speech is sacrosanct, while the Muslim countries mean that respect for Islam and Islam alone should weigh heavier then free speech.
(Translated from a Danish Television news bulletin)
Corrected words in bold.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2006, 03:04 AM   #3 (permalink)
indianguy4u
Real Madrid CF
Senior Contributor
 
indianguy4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-07-05
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 3,213
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut
Quote:
The EU-countries are of the opinion that free speech is sacrosanct, while the Muslim countries mean that respect for Islam and Islam alone should weigh heavier then free speech
Corrected words in bold.
Do these moslem countries give damn for other religions?
__________________
Hala Madrid!!
indianguy4u is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2006, 10:08 AM   #4 (permalink)
Confed999
Staff Emeritus
 
Confed999's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-10-03
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,681
Country:
Send a message via AIM to Confed999
My opinion, to put it as bluntly as is humanly possible: F**K the UN!
__________________
No man is free until all men are free - John Hossack
I agree completely with this Administration’s goal of a regime change in Iraq-John Kerry
even if that enforcement is mostly at the hands of the United States, a right we retain even if the Security Council fails to act-John Kerry
He may even miscalculate and slide these weapons off to terrorist groups to invite them to be a surrogate to use them against the United States. It’s the miscalculation that poses the greatest threat-John Kerry
Confed999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2006, 11:40 AM   #5 (permalink)
BenRoethig
Senior Contributor
 
BenRoethig's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-03-04
Location: Dubuque, IA
Posts: 1,035
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by indianguy4u
Do these moslem countries give damn for other religions?
Nope. They have more or less the same worldview we in the west had during the dark ages.
__________________
F/A-18E/F Super Hornet: The Honda Accord of fighters.
BenRoethig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2006, 18:11 PM   #6 (permalink)
Parihaka
Moderator
 
Parihaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-04
Location: Te Ika a Maui
Posts: 9,336
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Confed999
My opinion, to put it as bluntly as is humanly possible: F**K the UN!
While I still support the many humanitarian and peacekeeping operations the UN undertakes, they can be a bunch of dickheads at times. We recently had some indigenous affairs idiot here investigating recent legislation which guarantees public ownership of the foreshore and seabed. Some Maori organisations objected to this, claiming that as they were indigenous the foreshore and seabed belonged to them alone. This UN idiot came here, talked to the organisations involved and wrote a report about wholesale land grabs (or should that be seabed grabs) by the current government. His alternative was to place ownership exclusively with Maori in perpetuity, in other words ownership priviledge based on race in perpetuity, or as we call it in this part of the world, Apartheid.
After the report was issued he expressed shock and surprise when told that the vast majority of Maori live in the main cities, own cell phones and work for a living, rather than living off the land in the flax and timber huts in the bush that he imagined after a tour of a tourist centre, complete with Maori in grass skirts.
__________________
In the realm of spirit, seek clarity; in the material world, seek utility.
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
Parihaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2006, 18:17 PM   #7 (permalink)
HistoricalDavid
Distant Deeps or Skies
Senior Contributor
 
HistoricalDavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-19-05
Location: North London, UK
Posts: 1,972
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amled
Freedom of speech IS sacrosanct; it is the linchpin of a free and open society.
If only you had been a major Western statesman during the last six months.
HistoricalDavid is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
And from the "only in New Zealand" file... Parihaka Current Affairs 83 06-05-2008 23:39 PM
Free Speech? THL World Affairs Board Pub 2 04-17-2007 18:01 PM
It's important to keep this topic on the boil... Bluesman Current Affairs 374 04-04-2006 15:30 PM
The terrorists "are no match for the United States" - Bush's speech Tuesday night Leader Political Discussions 10 07-02-2005 12:50 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:55 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8