![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Guest
|
The indo-russian Medium Transport Aircraft as a joint developement programme has been signed already.
The requirements will be around 200 to 300 for IAF "45 being first order" and around 100 to 150 for Russia and a lot for export. Here is a video directly from Irsktusk. It will replace the An 12 and An 24 of Indian and Russian Air force and also for export. So far the Video looks amazing pretty cool!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRZ6oZcx8Q8 |
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Defense Professional
|
Well, we've been hearing about this for the last 5 years. So far, nothing has materialized.
Russia hasn't even finalized their requirements yet. India is thought to have at the end of last year, but a tender has yet to be issued. Presumably there will be a bidding process, which means there may be other contenders besides the IL-214. Also, there is no Russian turbofan engine in the class, which means some additional investment would be needed. As far the numbers, the feasability study was based on the assumption that India would buy 45 frames and Russia would need 60. An additional 95 frames were identified as potential exports, split between a military and commercial variant, and looking ahead to 2020. Development costs were estimated at $400 Million, not counting the new engine. This was to be split equally. How much has actually been allocated? IOW, the program is yet to be actually launched. No doubt there is a need for some new transports, but who knows what will eventually fill that need. Developing a new AC is not always the best option, especially when we're dealing with a relatively small number of frames. I usually like to see a little more than a CG video before I start popping the champagne corks... ![]()
__________________
My baby called me up. She said- Why don't you ever take me out? Pick me up in your brand new car....You shake the short change from the old fruit jar... |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | ||
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Defense Professional
|
Quote:
Sounds like another LCA deal. Hang on to your wallet. Interesting that the estimate of the development cost has doubled to $600 Million though... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Guest
|
IMHO the deal has been passed in the parliament.
I have to find the exact source. But India had 2 aircraft deal during putins visit. 1> MTA 2> 5th gen PAKFA. We got go ahead on MTA, and declined the PAKFA as we asked for a developement from scratch "atleast 12 years". so a 5th gen thing might happen next year on putins visit...as PAKFA is not really going to be any 5th gen thing. This MTA's requirements has been EVALUATED by IAF and RuAF, then only it has been given go ahead. what makes you guys think IAF didnt know bout the operational capabilities and HAL went ahead? no way! |
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | ||||
|
Defense Professional
|
Quote:
This deal for co-development was signed back in 2001! The Russian Defense Ministry didn't announce their tender till late 2004. The IAF has yet to issue a tender. Comprende? Quote:
Now this project may actually go forward- we'll have to wait and see. But if the IAF doesn't have a say in whether they want to field this plane in 2012 or something else, you're buying a pig in a poke. Quote:
Joey, it will take at least 5 years from the time the program is actually launched. That's assuming that there are no major roadblocks, and the engine doesn't delay the dev cycle. India will probably want CFM-56's while Russia will want upthrusted D-30's or D-436's. The PS-12 is delayed, so that does not appear to be an option as of right now. There are always trade-offs- India's high-altitude and short field requirements are different then Russia's. Details have to be hammered out wrt the basic capacities and layouts. So far, most of the actual specs appear to have been set out by Russia, ability to carry BMP-3 and BTR-90, etc. I am sure the IAF will want a say. The Russian tender specified an increase in the cargo capacity from 15 to 20 tons. The heavier it gets, the harder it is to meet high-altitude goals. There will be organizational and financial issues to deal with, production share between HAL and Irkut, etc. You can't expect to launch the program in Jan 2007 and have a maiden flight in 2 years. Look how long it took to India to get the first MKI's- and that was starting with an existing production AC. HAL has no experience building transports. You really think they can start from scratch and be flying in 2 years? Quote:
As of December 2005, the numbers were India 45, Russia 100. This was from the Indian Defence Minister's trip to Moscow in November, and the deal was supposed to be signed last January. It wasn't. And every year we the estimated development cost going up $100 Million for each party, and the projected sales seem to going up accordingly to justify the cost increase. Which means the stakes get higher and higher. How many transports can India buy today for those dollars, with zero risk? Last edited by highsea : 11-16-2006 at 15:47 PM. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
New Member
|
Quote:
(Hows the fishing going Cassy, its Amit from DTalk a.k.a PJ-10 BrahMos)
__________________
"Life is cruel. Why should the afterlife be any *different*? I offer you a choice. Join my crew, and postpone the judgment. One hundred years before the mast. Will ye serve?" - Captain Davy Jones |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | ||
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
Quote:
Are you asking about money spent on development? Not many 15-20? Highsea, think as an Indian not American. India would like to develop on her own. Going by the history thats not a capability India currently has. Next best solution is Joint Development. Buying an off the shelf product is easiest way out, but India wants to develop her industrial/knowledge base too. So this is less risky than complete indigenous development. As to the numbers, timeframe we may know in January 2007, when President Putin will be visiting India. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Regular
|
Quote:
regards, y raj |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Defense Professional
|
As I understand it, that was a NAL program (JV with Russia again, the Myasishchev Design Bureau), not HAL. HAL only contributed a little funding?
So how many have been built? This is from the Hindu (2004): Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Indo Pak Talks: Pressure is on Pakistan! | Ray | Political Discussions | 16 | 11-16-2006 15:22 PM |
| Indo Pak Dialogue Over? | Ray | Political Discussions | 8 | 09-04-2006 23:03 PM |
| Indo US war | ishaansaxena | Military Aviation | 16 | 05-14-2006 20:03 PM |
| Anti-union thread | Shek | Political Discussions | 33 | 12-27-2005 01:19 AM |
| Indo - Iranian special strategis relationship & partnership | visioninthedark | South Asian Defense Topics | 50 | 10-02-2004 04:17 AM |