Bush Lied? Well then so did these people

**JOgershok** · 26 Jan 09,, 13:51

Originally Posted by bugs

He only made his add because they refused to sign his precious petition.
Does the MSA has ties to Terrorism?

So you say. I do not know the motives behind the ad. It was not Horowitz who claims that as the reason for the ad but it is either the hypothesis of the author you quoted or you own opinion. I know not which. Did the MSA condemn terrorism?

What is your point. The Muslim Students' Association was founded by the Christian equivalent of The Aryan Brotherhood. Do you think that matters?

I am done answering your points. You have no answers to the facts that the war in Iraq was not just for oil, not because Bush lied but because Saddam pushed the limits of diplomacy, violated his surrender agreement, and violated countless UN resolutions with impunity. The rest is a red herring you seemed to have embraced.

**JOgershok** · 26 Jan 09,, 13:57

Originally Posted by bugs

Bill Clinton was also committed to Yugoslavia as well as Iraq.

What about Somalia?

A congressional resolution to authorize the use of force was something that Bill Clinton never even sought when he went to war in Kosovo. This was a constitutional oversight that didn't bother Democrats at the time or since, which shows how partisan and indefensible is this aspect of their critique of the war in Iraq. The Authorization for the Use of Force in Iraq that President Bush did seek and obtain in October 2002 has a total of 23 clauses. These 23 clauses spell out the rationale for the war. I invite you to go on the web and read the clauses. Out of all 23 clauses, I found only two that even mention stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction. What the clauses do stress - twelve of them, by my count - are U.N. resolutions that Saddam ignored or defied.

**~~bugs~~** · 26 Jan 09,, 14:03

You posted a article by this fellow in which he ignores the president commitment in Europe in order to express his political views.
He calls the president incapable to fulfill his role as commander in chief .That is serious accusation and he has nothing to back it up.

**~~bugs~~** · 26 Jan 09,, 14:53

Originally Posted by JOgershok

The Authorization for the Use of Force in Iraq that President Bush did seek and obtain in October 2002 has a total of 23 clauses. These 23 clauses spell out the rationale for the war. I invite you to go on the web and read the clauses.

http://www.c-span.org/resources/pdf/hjres114.pdf