+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 117

Thread: No pals in Nepal

  1. #61
    Fully Dressed Military Professional Deltacamelately's Avatar
    Join Date
    29 Sep 07
    Posts
    1,156
    Country: India
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    That just it, Major. The Chinese can show you the paperwork of whom they sold their stuff to. None of them are terror orgs. By international standards, however, the Chinese are obligated to keep track of where their stuff goes after they reached their initial clients. They don't. However, this is not a legal obligation.
    Sir,
    That still does not change the fact that the Chinese are arming terrorists. If the PA hands over a Chinese grenade to a Taliban fcker that blows a baby here or anywhere else and if this business is sustained then the paperwork notwithstanding, China supports terror. And in anycase I was not debating over legalities on terrorism with anybody. The case in hand is that you and I know fully well that China tried
    (multiple times, and one unsuccessfully) to stop a terrorist organization from getting banned and if a fellow wabber, in the know of things claims otherwise, I would cry ostreich.
    And on the sixth day, God created the Field Artillery...

  2. #62
    Fully Dressed Military Professional Deltacamelately's Avatar
    Join Date
    29 Sep 07
    Posts
    1,156
    Country: India
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    No Major, the Chinese are NOT violating 1267 and 1373. In order for the Chinese to violate them, the UNSC MUST declare JuD to be a terror group and fall under 1267 and 1373 and since China has vetoed that action, then 1267 and 1373 DOES NOT APPLY. That is the legality of it.
    Sir,

    It still remains a violation, even before the banning of the JuD.
    Al-Qaida and the Taliban (wherever located)
    Al-Qaida;
    Osama bin Laden;
    Taliban;
    Other individuals, groups, undertakings and entities associated with them
    In addition, the obligation extends to any funds derived from property owned or controlled by persons acting on behalf of, or at the direction of, these designated persons or entities.
    And JuD was wearing Lashkar's diapers.
    ......Bottom line, Major, JuD was not a terror org because Pakistan lobbied the hell out of the Chinese. After that, it is geopolitics, as simple as that.
    The Paks are the one who created the JuD. Its immaterial why they lobbied for the or against them. But its material to note that the US didn't buy their crap, the Chinese did.
    And on the sixth day, God created the Field Artillery...

  3. #63
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,433
    Country: Canada
    Major, when talking about the UN, only legalities are a concern. Everything else is platitude for the birds on how the world is unfair. You've got one UNSG (Annan) who accused the US of committing a crime when he had no legal authority to state so and that same UNSG vetoed the last chance to stop the Rwandan genocide. That same Annan is taken to be the Holly Ghost of the US is a criminal gang while 800,000 human beings were litterally butchered by machete to be croc and worm food.

    You're using outside rules to impose a morality on the UNSC. Not only does that not apply but morality is the last thing you should use when it comes to the UNSC. It doesn't exist.
    Chimo

  4. #64
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,433
    Country: Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by Deltacamelately View Post
    Sir,

    It still remains a violation, even before the banning of the JuD.

    And JuD was wearing Lashkar's diapers.
    And the UNSC MUST DECLARE THEM to be wearing diapers.

    Quote Originally Posted by Deltacamelately View Post
    The Paks are the one who created the JuD. Its immaterial why they lobbied for the or against them. But its material to note that the US didn't buy their crap, the Chinese did.
    So? How is that different from Hezbollah?
    Chimo

  5. #65
    Fully Dressed Military Professional Deltacamelately's Avatar
    Join Date
    29 Sep 07
    Posts
    1,156
    Country: India
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    And the UNSC MUST DECLARE THEM to be wearing diapers.
    Sir,

    The Lashkar has already been declared, JuD fills the same rank and funds, that is for anyones take.
    So? How is that different from Hezbollah?
    Yes, and today the Hezbollah is the biggest provider of social services in Lebanon, running schools, hospitals, social networks and agricultural services, while retaining their weapons. Heck, even the The Lebanese parliament overwhelmingly approved a national unity government that allows Hezbollah to keep its weapons, something that the Pak Parliament should have done, if they wanted to dish out legal credibility to the Lashkar.
    And on the sixth day, God created the Field Artillery...

  6. #66
    Contributor
    Join Date
    03 Jul 09
    Posts
    325
    The argument boils down to this Is china deliberately using these organization to harm India or Is it just throwing bones at pak? IMV China has no interest in these organizations or their activities in India....rather it looks at them with a pakistani prism. And above all what will a UN resolution achieve anyway if pak is just going to shove these organizations underground?

  7. #67
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,433
    Country: Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by Deltacamelately View Post
    The Lashkar has already been declared, JuD fills the same rank and funds, that is for anyones take.
    That only makes it legal for anyone taking them on but it does not make it illegal for anyone supporting them. Do you see that blurred line, Major? India can well choose to go after JuD but it does NOT obligate anyone else to do so since they can declare that JuD is NOT a terror org ... and Pakistan and China have.

    If you want to force everyone on the same page, you need a new UNSC Resolution which is exactly what all the past JuD resolutions attempted to do.

    Quote Originally Posted by Deltacamelately View Post
    Yes, and today the Hezbollah is the biggest provider of social services in Lebanon, running schools, hospitals, social networks and agricultural services, while retaining their weapons. Heck, even the The Lebanese parliament overwhelmingly approved a national unity government that allows Hezbollah to keep its weapons, something that the Pak Parliament should have done, if they wanted to dish out legal credibility to the Lashkar.
    Again, how is that different? Hezbollah rains rockets on Israeli children and JuD blows up hotel guests.
    Chimo

  8. #68
    Arzi Hukumat-e-Azad Hind Senior Contributor Tronic's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Dec 04
    Location
    Patiala, Punjab
    Posts
    2,839
    Country: India
    Quote Originally Posted by pChan View Post
    The argument boils down to this Is china deliberately using these organization to harm India or Is it just throwing bones at pak? IMV China has no interest in these organizations or their activities in India....rather it looks at them with a pakistani prism.
    As far as India is concerned, it has got to look at China which has protected these terror organizations in the past where Pakistan has been powerless to do so. China is the concern there, not Pakistan! The Chinese wish to merrily support terror organizations against India under the garb of Pakistan; India doesn't see it that way. Everyone is accountable for their actions, including China.

    And above all what will a UN resolution achieve anyway if pak is just going to shove these organizations underground?
    Trying to send them underground is still better than funding and supporting them openly. Anything that'll make it harder and more expensive for Pakistanis to support terror is always good.
    Nabha Sparasham Deeptam
    -Touch The Sky With Glory

  9. #69
    Contributor
    Join Date
    03 Jul 09
    Posts
    325
    Quote Originally Posted by Deltacamelately View Post
    Yes, and today the Hezbollah is the biggest provider of social services in Lebanon, running schools, hospitals, social networks and agricultural services, while retaining their weapons. Heck, even the The Lebanese parliament overwhelmingly approved a national unity government that allows Hezbollah to keep its weapons, something that the Pak Parliament should have done, if they wanted to dish out legal credibility to the Lashkar.
    The same can be said of JUD albeit to a different degree. After all they were all over POK to help the stranded when the earthquake struck. Both organizations are terrorist organizations & trying to distinguish between based on some third party recognition is a slippery slope that will lead to nowhere. Lets face it the bottom line is Lebanon is responsible for hezbollah & pak is responsible for Lakshar. The difference is pak can get away with it.

  10. #70
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,433
    Country: Canada
    Then why hasn't India banned Hezbollah?
    Chimo

  11. #71
    Arzi Hukumat-e-Azad Hind Senior Contributor Tronic's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Dec 04
    Location
    Patiala, Punjab
    Posts
    2,839
    Country: India
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    Again, how is that different? Hezbollah rains rockets on Israeli children and JuD blows up hotel guests.
    Hezbollah is a very visible conventional and a political force in Lebanon, who are accountable for their actions. JuD is not! Yes, the day JuD takes over a section of Pakistan across the Indian border and carries out strikes from there, maybe then it could be compared with Hezbollah. As of now, they operate underground within Pakistan and carry out covert terror strikes throughout India. Pakistan + China is a perfect umbrella for these terror groups to operate from.

    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    Then why hasn't India banned Hezbollah?
    They're a political group who hold seats and a veto in the Lebanese parliament.
    Last edited by Tronic; 14 Dec 09, at 14:50.
    Nabha Sparasham Deeptam
    -Touch The Sky With Glory

  12. #72
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,433
    Country: Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by Tronic View Post
    Hezbollah is a very visible conventional and a political force in Lebanon, who are accountable for their actions.
    Accountable? Has anyone been arrested for raining rockets on children? Have they even acknowledged that they've done wrong?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tronic View Post
    They're a political group who hold seats and a veto in the Lebanese parliament.
    Through a force of arms. They hold those seats and their own army because they won the tiny civil war that errupted.

    That only shows that terror works in Lebanon.
    Chimo

  13. #73
    Contributor
    Join Date
    03 Jul 09
    Posts
    325
    Quote Originally Posted by Tronic View Post
    As far as India is concerned, it has got to look at China which has protected these terror organizations in the past where Pakistan has been powerless to do so. China is the concern there, not Pakistan! The Chinese wish to merrily support terror organizations against India under the garb of Pakistan; India doesn't see it that way. Everyone is accountable for their actions, including China.
    Wrong. Pakistan is the only player with the power to stop this madness. The taliban is "outlawed" by the UN but an entire suburb in quetta is teeming with the afghan taliban and the americans could do squat about it with Obama crowing about it NOW. Shifting blame from pak to china just doesn't make sense to me. Sure the chinese are no saints but you are after the wrong target.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tronic View Post
    Trying to send them underground is still better than funding and supporting them openly. Anything that'll make it harder and more expensive for Pakistanis to support terror is always good.
    BS. 26/11 would have still happened from the "underground".

  14. #74
    Contributor
    Join Date
    03 Jul 09
    Posts
    325
    Quote Originally Posted by Tronic View Post
    Hezbollah is a very visible conventional and a political force in Lebanon, who are accountable for their actions. JuD is not!
    By Israel may I add. They levelled the shia towns. Thats the only fcuking accountability for hezbollah's actions.

  15. #75
    Arzi Hukumat-e-Azad Hind Senior Contributor Tronic's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Dec 04
    Location
    Patiala, Punjab
    Posts
    2,839
    Country: India
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    Accountable? Has anyone been arrested for raining rockets on children? Have they even acknowledged that they've done wrong?

    Through a force of arms. They hold those seats and their own army because they won the tiny civil war that errupted.

    That only shows that terror works in Lebanon.
    They've been pounded by Israel in retaliation every now and then. They are a conventional force and a political force that the Israelis can engage. Where is the conventional and political force of JuD which India can engage? Pakistan and China?
    Nabha Sparasham Deeptam
    -Touch The Sky With Glory

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Nepal China Economic Relationship
    By oneman28 in forum International Politics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 17 Aug 05,, 21:14

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts