+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: How to Exit Iraq

  1. #1
    Ray
    Ray is offline
    Military Professional Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    20 Aug 03
    Posts
    19,528
    Country: India

    How to Exit Iraq

    How to Exit Iraq


    By JOHN NAGL, COLIN KAHL and SHAWN BRIMLEY
    Published: September 5, 2008

    JOHN McCAIN spoke of his hopes for Iraq’s future last night. When we traveled around Basra recently escorted by Iraqi Army soldiers and a handful of coalition advisers, we glimpsed a model of post-American Iraq that he and Barack Obama would do well to consider. This world, defined principally by more capable Iraqi security forces taking the lead with coalition support and an increasingly confident Iraqi government, defies the simplistic “all in” or “all out” way that Iraq is debated in Washington.

    With the Bush administration now working out an agreement on having American troops out by 2012, understanding how this withdrawal will proceed is vital. Basra is as an example of what an exit strategy might look like — and of the dangers of getting it wrong.

    After the 2003 invasion, control over southern Iraq was handed over to British forces. Without adequate troops to protect the population, security in Basra deteriorated, the British withdrew and Shiite militias took control. In late March of this year, Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki launched an offensive in Basra to clear the city of militias, but the Iraqi Army quickly got bogged down. American special operations forces and combat advisers reinforced Iraqi units, providing crucial air and fire support and detailed intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance. As a result, Iraqi security forces turned the tide and now control the city.

    The lesson of Basra is clear: a rapid withdrawal risks a resurgence of violence, but a responsible drawdown and a reorientation of the mission away from combat and toward advising Iraqi forces stand a good chance of advancing our interests in Iraq at acceptable cost.

    Under this model, embedded military advisers would provide just enough help to give Iraqis what they need on the battlefield, but not so much that it stymies their development and perpetuates a view of Western occupation. Yet this transition is risky.

    Security gains could come undone if Iraqis fail to strike political deals on elections, oil revenues and disputed territories. Sectarian conflict could also reignite if the Shiite-dominated government fails to accommodate the predominantly Sunni “Sons of Iraq,” the 100,000 security volunteers, many former insurgents, who have taken up arms against Al Qaeda.

    The biggest challenge America will face is our rapidly diminishing leverage. Iraq’s government is increasingly asserting sovereignty, demanding a new bilateral security relationship with the United States with more constraints on how American forces operate — and limits on how long they can stay. Mr. Maliki and his advisers have inflated confidence in the ability of the Iraqi forces to maintain security that has reduced our influence.

    This is apparent in the negotiations over a United States-Iraq security framework. The draft pact agreed to last month seems likely to establish a timeline for withdrawing American forces and moving from a lead combat role to a support role, but it asks little of Iraqis in return for continued assistance through 2011 and beyond.

    In this context, there are two things we must do and one thing we must not do. First, we must adopt a policy of strategic conditionality at the presidential level. For two years, the perception of an American blank check has been reinforced by regular video conferences in which President Bush has assured Mr. Maliki of his unwavering support. This has to change.

    The next president must make it clear that we do not endorse a particular set of Iraqi leaders, but rather the system as a whole, and thus our financial and military support is contingent upon progress toward political accommodation and improved governance. Most Iraqi leaders want continued security assurances, technical support for Iraqi ministries and help in renegotiating debt obligations and other financial liabilities. This support should be tied directly toward governmental progress.

    Second, we must exploit our still-significant leverage over Iraq’s security forces. While Mr. Maliki and others may be overconfident, the truth is that recent Iraqi operations in Basra, Sadr City and Mosul would not have succeeded without American military support. Underneath their rhetoric, most Iraqi leaders — civilian and military — understand they are not able to provide domestic order, combat terrorism or deter external foes without some continued American support.

    There are disturbing reports that the Iraqi government has been cracking down on the Sons of Iraq and stalling their integration into the Iraqi security forces. If Mr. Maliki persists in pursuing this sectarian agenda, our support — including technical advice and weapons sales — should be limited accordingly.

    Last, it is vital that the next president not send a signal that he hopes to establish an enduring Korea-style presence in Iraq. Most Iraqi leaders want continued American military support for several years, but do not want a permanent presence beyond the minimum advisory effort. If the next administration tries to lay the groundwork for an indefinite footprint, it will be forced to give in to all sorts of Iraqi demands.

    As we toured Basra, our armored Humvees had Iraqi flags on the sides and American shipping labels on the windshields. This made it hard to see the streets, but easy to see the future — one in which Iraqis increasingly take the lead as American forces pull back.

    John Nagl, a former Army lieutenant colonel, Colin Kahl, an assistant professor of security studies at Georgetown, and Shawn Brimley are fellows at the Center for a New American Security.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/05/op...on&oref=slogin
    Kiteflying?


    "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

    I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

    HAKUNA MATATA

  2. #2
    A Handsome Military Professional ShawnG's Avatar
    Join Date
    03 Jan 08
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    822
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Ray View Post
    Kiteflying?
    Windsurfing!

    During sandstorms in Iraq, or at least when there's a good bit of wind, some of us would don our goggles and bandanas over our mouth and nose. We would then get our rain-poncho out, which had a tie string at each corner. Tied each corner to an appendage, preferably a wrist/ankle. Once it was tied to us, we crouched down as low as possible and waited for a good gust of wind. When we had it, we would jump straight in the air as high as we could, and spread our arms and legs so the poncho would catch the wind like a sail!

    The landings were never good, but it sure was fun! Felt like a flying squirrel!
    Attached Images  
    "The way to a man's heart is through his stomach...just make sure you thrust upward through his ribcage."

  3. #3
    A Handsome Military Professional ShawnG's Avatar
    Join Date
    03 Jan 08
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    822
    Country: United States
    Not to be confused with the M-19 Flying Squirrel ultra-light.
    Attached Images  
    "The way to a man's heart is through his stomach...just make sure you thrust upward through his ribcage."

  4. #4
    A Handsome Military Professional ShawnG's Avatar
    Join Date
    03 Jan 08
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    822
    Country: United States
    On a serious note, in relation to the subject of the article, I really think this plan is well thought out and tangible.

    It probably would have been put off had Bush a year or two left as President, but this was drafted I think for a different reason. He wanted to take part of the Iraq argument away from the Democrats with the upcoming election given the fact that he is doing what he can to put his fellow republican in office. Obama harped on him drafting a plan to get our troops out of Iraq, so Bush, General Patreaus, and the Iraqi Government beat him to the punch!
    "The way to a man's heart is through his stomach...just make sure you thrust upward through his ribcage."

  5. #5
    Ray
    Ray is offline
    Military Professional Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    20 Aug 03
    Posts
    19,528
    Country: India
    Politics!


    "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

    I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

    HAKUNA MATATA

  6. #6
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    03 Jul 08
    Location
    Baltimore, Maryland
    Posts
    218
    Country: United States
    ...extended by other means...

  7. #7
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    19 Feb 06
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    763
    Country: United States

    thought

    most likely after we leave they will have a power struggle and the most organized/efficient enclave will win it. My guess Kurds if they use Sunnis as a leverage point.
    Originally from Sochi, Russia.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    11 Oct 08
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    15
    Country: England
    I think all the Allied Nations should pull out over an extended Period of Time.
    Like, one year.
    The Iraqi Government isn't pulling their Weight, and the Allied Nations are suffering from it.
    Mostly America.
    So, when the Iraqi Government, realizes, that they aren't taking anymore responsibility of their government, they will start to take actions.
    Meanwhile, The Allied Nations will start saving their Troops, and money.
    It seems to be the safest way about it.
    And hopefully we can catch Al Qaeda, Crush them kill, them Imprison them.
    something of the sort, so Everyone can get the Hell outta there.

  9. #9
    Ray
    Ray is offline
    Military Professional Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    20 Aug 03
    Posts
    19,528
    Country: India
    I wonder if the US can ever pull out of Iraq.

    The Shia Sunni historical divide is too ingrained to allow stability.

    Iraq should become a UN mandate and US, the power to govern.

    Radical thought that may not be acceptable, but that alone is the solution!


    "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

    I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

    HAKUNA MATATA

  10. #10
    New Member diago's Avatar
    Join Date
    08 Sep 08
    Location
    varanasi india
    Posts
    0
    Country: India
    has there been any kind of economic gains for US in Iraq?how would US cover the huge military expances? and how would it secure that even after pulling out of Iraq as par 2012 it would be still gaining from Iraq.

  11. #11
    Ray
    Ray is offline
    Military Professional Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    20 Aug 03
    Posts
    19,528
    Country: India
    There is no escape route!


    "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

    I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

    HAKUNA MATATA

  12. #12
    New Member diago's Avatar
    Join Date
    08 Sep 08
    Location
    varanasi india
    Posts
    0
    Country: India
    Quote Originally Posted by Ray View Post
    There is no escape route!
    sir i didn't understand.
    did u mean that US can never exit from iraq?

  13. #13
    Military Professional Ryan Bailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    25 Sep 07
    Location
    Megalopolis, US
    Posts
    332
    Country: United States
    Thanks for the insightful article, good comments particularly as relates to the Coalition Forces.
    "If we will not be governed by God then we will be ruled by tyrants" -William Penn

  14. #14
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    20 Jun 07
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia.
    Posts
    2,578
    Country: UK
    Quote Originally Posted by Ray View Post
    I wonder if the US can ever pull out of Iraq.

    The Shia Sunni historical divide is too ingrained to allow stability.

    Iraq should become a UN mandate and US, the power to govern.

    Radical thought that may not be acceptable, but that alone is the solution!
    They are to be out by 2011.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. The Causes & Consequences of Strategic Failure in Afghanistan & Iraq
    By lulldapull in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 20 May 08,, 09:48
  2. Kerry Slams U.S. Foreign Policy
    By Enzo Ferrari in forum American Politics & Economy
    Replies: 252
    Last Post: 08 Feb 07,, 10:34
  3. The real story Joe Wilson's twisted tale
    By Leader in forum American Politics & Economy
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 03 Nov 05,, 15:09
  4. Americans Die for Sharia in Iraq
    By lulldapull in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02 Mar 05,, 19:40
  5. President Outlines Steps to Help Iraq Achieve Democracy and Freedom
    By Leader in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 26 May 04,, 02:13

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts