Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: The South Korea Navy

  1. #1
    Defense Moderator
    Defense Professional
    Lei Feng Protege
    xinhui's Avatar
    Join Date
    17 May 06
    Posts
    7,454

    The South Korea Navy

    South Korea Develops Mobile Force
    Braces for Japan, China Buildups
    By JUNG SUNG-KI
    Published: 4 May 2009
    http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=4070495

    SEOUL - South Korea is advancing its plans to establish an expeditionary Navy capable of overseas operations and countering regional threats, and not simply focused on coastal defense against a North Korean invasion.

    Regional concerns include China's rapid naval buildup and a potential territorial dispute with Japan over the sovereignty of South Korea's easternmost islets of Dokdo, South Korean Navy sources said.

    "For the Republic of Korea Navy, a focus is now on expanding its capabilities beyond littoral defense against North Koreans into open-sea operations to cope with emerging regional threats," a Navy official said. "In particular, we need to secure the minimum capabilities to deal with Chinese and Japanese naval capacities."

    To that end, the Navy wants to operate a "strategic mobile fleet" of two Aegis destroyer-led squadrons in the next decade, he said.

    The service already has in place a plan to inaugurate a strategic mobile squadron by 2015. The squadron will consist of 4,500-ton KDX-II destroyers, 7,600-ton KDX-III destroyers fitted with the Aegis combat system, Type-214 1,800-ton submarines, 2,300-ton next-generation FFX-I-class frigates that will begin service in 2011, anti-submarine Lynx helicopters and other support vessels.

    To form one more squadron, the Navy is seeking approval to build three more Aegis destroyers following the three planned by 2012. The service has set afloat two of the planned three Aegis destroyers with the lead ship, Sejong the Great, beginning operations last December. The per-unit price is about $1 billion.

    "We hope to operate five to six Aegis destroyers for better operational flexibility in the future if budget conditions are met," Vice Adm. Park Jung-hwa, commander of the South Korean Navy's Operations Command, told a group of Korean journalists in the command headquarters in the southern port city of Busan on April 21.

    This would require a pair of Aegis ships in combat positions, another pair on standby and a fifth ship under regular maintenance, he said.

    The KDX-III is one of the most advanced Aegis warships. Its SPY-1D radar can simultaneously track about 1,000 aircraft within a 500-kilometer radius, providing 360-degree coverage. The 166-meter-long, 21-meter-wide ship can carry 128 anti-air, land-attack and anti-submarine missiles in its vertical launch systems.

    Among the missile systems for the KDX-III are SM-2 Block IIIA/B ship-to-air missiles with a range of 170 kilometers, locally developed Cheonryong ship-to-ship surface cruise missiles with a range of more than 500 kilometers, Hongsangeo ship-to-submarine torpedoes with a target range of 19 kilometers, and Haeseong ship-to-ship missiles with a range of 150 kilometers.

    Strategic Naval Base

    In an important step toward establishing a mobile fleet, the Navy on April 27 received approval to build a forward-deployed naval base on the country's southern resort island of Jeju after eight years of controversy.

    The base, scheduled for completion by 2014, will serve as the home port for the strategic mobile squadrons, the Navy said in a news release. It will be able to harbor two 150,000-ton commercial cruise liners, as well as about 20 warships, it said.

    Defense experts say the Jeju command will play a key role in handling potential regional conflicts.

    "Jeju has long been considered a tactical, strategic point to secure southern sea lanes for transporting energy supplies and carry out operations in the case of an emergency in Northeast Asia," said Cmdr. Bae Sung-woo of the Navy's public affairs office, here. "Following the construction of the forward-deployed base, the ROK Navy will be able to successfully conduct long-range, mobile operations to protect our commercial vessels in blue waters, including the Malacca Strait, as well as carry out full-fledged operations around the Korean Peninsula."

    Submarine Plans

    To thwart North Korea's asymmetrical capabilities and other regional hostile forces, the Navy has emphasized strengthening its submarine fleet. The Navy has nine German-made Type-209 1,200-ton submarines and three Type-214 1,800-ton submarines, first built locally under technical cooperation with HDW of Germany. They are all diesel- and electric-powered.

    "Submarine fleets are seen as one of the most powerful features of any military force," said Park Chang-kwon, a researcher at the state-funded Korea Institute for Defense Analyses (KIDA). "For South Korea, the requirements and roles of advanced attack submarines are essential to help neutralize the North's increasing asymmetrical capabilities."

    Six more Type-214 subs are scheduled to be commissioned by 2018, when the Navy will inaugurate a submarine command. The Type-214 submarine, a core part of the future strategic mobile squadrons, is armed with modern torpedoes and submarine-to-surface missiles.

    The 65.3-meter-long sub can submerge to depths of up to 400 meters, with a maximum submerged speed of 20 knots. With the help of Air Independent Propulsion (AIP), which improves its underwater performance and gives it stealth capability, the submarine can carry out underwater operations for as long as two weeks, putting Guam in its operational range, according to the Navy.

    The sub's ISUS-90 integrated sensor enables operators to detect about 240 targets simultaneously and track 32 targets.

    Beginning in 2018, South Korea plans to build indigenous 3,000-ton KSS-III submarines fitted with domestically built submarine combat systems aimed at automating target detection, tracking, threat assessment and weapon control. The heavy sub will be armed with indigenous ship-to-ground cruise missiles and be capable of underwater operations for up to 50 days with a more advanced AIP system, Navy officials said.

    According to informed government sources, the Navy wants to deploy about six KSS-III submarines and then may push to develop a nuclear-powered submarine as a hedge against future uncertainties in Northeast Asia.

    The Navy denies any plan to develop a nuclear-powered submarine.

    Park, of KIDA, admitted the Navy needs nuclear-powered submarines in the long term but was skeptical about the plan, citing the potential political and diplomatic backlash, particularly from the United States.

    South Korea initially pushed for developing a nuclear-powered sub in 2004 but canceled the initiative later for the same reason.

    "The nuclear-powered submarine plan involves both military and political aspects," Park said. "Nuclear subs will, of course, offer benefits to the Navy in terms of much longer operational range and fuel efficiency. But the thing is, unless legal and political problems are resolved first, we can't go forward with the plan."

    The analyst apparently referred to a 1991 inter-Korean non-nuclear declaration and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, in which non-nuclear weapon states such as South Korea are required to place all of their nuclear materials under inspection by the International Atomic Energy Agency to ensure they are not used to develop atomic weapons.

    Some proponents say that because nuclear-powered submarines use low-grade nuclear fuel, they do not violate the denuclearization pledge. Opponents say that since a nuclear-powered sub would require enriched uranium fuel, the ability to enrich uranium also could be used to produce material for building nuclear weapons.

    Nuclear submarines can remain underwater much longer than conventional submarines propelled by diesel generators and are considered a strategic weapon second only to aircraft carriers.
    “the misery of being exploited by capitalists is nothing compared to the misery of not being exploited at all” -- Joan Robinson

  2. #2
    Defense Moderator
    Defense Professional
    Lei Feng Protege
    xinhui's Avatar
    Join Date
    17 May 06
    Posts
    7,454
    http://english.donga.com/srv/service...=2012010667358

    Judging from the $5.6 billion acquisition budget and reference to another flotilla that is composed of three Aegis destroyers and six KDX-II destroyers, this new fleet will be composed of entirely new vessels.

    Older article on the previous flotilla:

    To form one more squadron, the Navy is seeking approval to build three more Aegis destroyers following the three planned by 2012. The service has set afloat two of the planned three Aegis destroyers with the lead ship, Sejong the Great, beginning operations last December. The per-unit price is about $1 billion.

    "We hope to operate five to six Aegis destroyers for better operational flexibility in the future if budget conditions are met," Vice Adm. Park Jung-hwa, commander of the South Korean Navy's Operations Command, told a group of Korean journalists in the command headquarters in the southern port city of Busan on April 21.
    “the misery of being exploited by capitalists is nothing compared to the misery of not being exploited at all” -- Joan Robinson

  3. #3
    Global Moderator
    Devil's Advocate
    ArmchairGeneral's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 May 06
    Location
    Boston, MA.
    Posts
    4,634
    I'm sure PRC is ecstatic about this...

    I've never been clear on how the KDX-IIIs are related to the Burkes. To my eye they look like straightforward copies of the basic design, of course with lots of modifications, but ROK always seems to insist that they're not the same. Is the similarity just surface deep (apart from the Aegis, obviously, or are they in fact direct descendants of the DDG-51 design?
    I enjoy being wrong too much to change my mind.

  4. #4
    Defense Moderator
    Defense Professional
    Lei Feng Protege
    xinhui's Avatar
    Join Date
    17 May 06
    Posts
    7,454
    enlarged and updated

    Sometimes described as an enlarged and updated DDG-51 Arleigh Burke Class, KDX-III will also use the advanced AEGIS radar & combat system combination with the AN/SPY-1D radar, and carry 128 Mk 41 vertical launch cells. They can be loaded with vertically-launched SM-2 Block IIIB surface-to-air missiles for anti-aircraft duties, advancing to ABM-capable SM-3s with radar and combat system upgrades. The cells can also carry vertically-launch anti-ship missiles, or even anti-submarine rocket/torpedo combinations like Korea’s own Red Shark “K-ASROC.” KDX-III destroyers are expected to fill 16 of their cells with those. Other naval and land targets can be confronted with any combination of Hyunmoo or Tomahawk cruise missiles, SSM-700K Haesung anti-ship missiles, etc. that the ROKN decides to place in the remaining MK 41 and K-VLS vertical launch cells. A pair of 324mm torpedo mounts in KMK 32 configuration round out the ship’s anti-submarine strike capability.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    “the misery of being exploited by capitalists is nothing compared to the misery of not being exploited at all” -- Joan Robinson

  5. #5
    Global Moderator
    Comrade Commissar
    TopHatter's Avatar
    Join Date
    03 Sep 03
    Posts
    12,856
    The ROK's need to crank up production of their Dokdo-class amphibs and acquire some F-35B squadrons for them.
    They've talked about it in the past but I haven't seen anything recent.

  6. #6
    Global Moderator
    Devil's Advocate
    ArmchairGeneral's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 May 06
    Location
    Boston, MA.
    Posts
    4,634
    Quote Originally Posted by TopHatter View Post
    The ROK's need to crank up production of their Dokdo-class amphibs and acquire some F-35B squadrons for them.
    They've talked about it in the past but I haven't seen anything recent.
    With stuff like this (not to mention the whole deal up north right now...) looking more and more likely to me. I could definitely see a mini-arms race shaping up in East Asia next decade or so. Kinda scary.
    I enjoy being wrong too much to change my mind.

  7. #7
    Global Moderator
    Devil's Advocate
    ArmchairGeneral's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 May 06
    Location
    Boston, MA.
    Posts
    4,634
    Quote Originally Posted by xinhui View Post
    enlarged and updated
    Sometimes described as an enlarged and updated DDG-51 Arleigh Burke Class
    It's that 'sometimes described' that annoys me. Nobody ever seems to straight out say, 'yes, the USN loaned us the plans for the Flight IIAs and we went from there' or something like that.
    I enjoy being wrong too much to change my mind.

  8. #8
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    14 Mar 08
    Posts
    1,273
    Quote Originally Posted by ArmchairGeneral View Post
    I'm sure PRC is ecstatic about this...
    Tokyo probably isn't too thrilled either. There's only one reason why the ROK is building a huge pier at Ulleung Island.

  9. #9
    Global Moderator
    Devil's Advocate
    ArmchairGeneral's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 May 06
    Location
    Boston, MA.
    Posts
    4,634
    Quote Originally Posted by Skywatcher View Post
    Tokyo probably isn't too thrilled either. There's only one reason why the ROK is building a huge pier at Ulleung Island.
    Yeah, I was thinking about the Japanese reaction...could be complicated, seems to me. No love lost between the two countries, of course, but on the other hand it might be nice to have another counterweight to Chinese power, but on the third hand it might piss the Chinese and/or the DPRK off, make the whole area tenser, and maybe set off an arms race... The only thing I'm confident of is, those 27,000 ton 'destroyers' they're building look less and less destroyerish by the day.
    I enjoy being wrong too much to change my mind.

  10. #10
    Defense Moderator
    Defense Professional
    Lei Feng Protege
    xinhui's Avatar
    Join Date
    17 May 06
    Posts
    7,454
    ROK simply does not view China in the same lens as Japan, knowing the role China can play w.r.t DPRK.



    SKorea, China to conduct joint naval exercise SAREX

    http://brahmand.com/news/SKorea-Chin...8495/1/17.html

    SKorea, China to conduct joint naval exercise SAREX
    SKorea China Navy Drill
    Posted On: Nov 21, 2011
    print this news Buzz it share this news on facebook

    SEOUL (BNS): South Korea and China will begin the joint Search and Rescue Exercise or SAREX from Tuesday, according to a news report.

    The two countries will also hold military talks during the exercise which will be held in waters off Ningbo and Shanghai till Friday, a Yonhap report said.

    This is the fourth exercise between the two navies. The South Korean Navy will deploy its 4,500-ton Wang Geon destroyer while China will send a frigate to the exercise.

    The Defence ministers of the two countries have agreed to hold the exercise during South Korean Minister Kim Kwan-jin's visit to Beijing in January and it be will be a humanitarian exercise, the South Korean Navy said in a statement.

    The two countries will also held talks on naval exchange and cooperation in areas such as naval search and rescue operations, as well as holding similar meetings on a regular basis.

    Rear Adm. Moon Byung-ok, commander of the 3rd Navy Fleet, will lead South Korea's delegation, countered by Vice Adm. Xu Jianzhong, political commissar for China's East Sea Fleet, it added.
    “the misery of being exploited by capitalists is nothing compared to the misery of not being exploited at all” -- Joan Robinson

  11. #11
    Defense Moderator
    Defense Professional
    Lei Feng Protege
    xinhui's Avatar
    Join Date
    17 May 06
    Posts
    7,454
    Joint fishery patrol as a result of the ROK coast guard killing by a Chinese fisherman.

    notice how depoliticize both sides in handling ugly incidents, not the same can be applied to Japan.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    “the misery of being exploited by capitalists is nothing compared to the misery of not being exploited at all” -- Joan Robinson

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. North Korea tears up all peace agreements with South Korea
    By erik in forum East Asia and the Pacific
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 09 Feb 09,, 06:33
  2. South Korea Vs Japan
    By kukiyi in forum Naval Warfare
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10 Jun 08,, 21:01
  3. North Korea vs South Korea
    By USAUSAUSA in forum Ground Warfare
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: 14 Aug 07,, 18:15
  4. South Korea Next Gen Tank, XK2.
    By American_Raider in forum Ground Warfare
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 25 Apr 07,, 22:25
  5. Japan vs South Korea
    By vishv29 in forum Military Aviation
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 28 Dec 05,, 22:22

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •