+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 17 of 17

Thread: Russian Sub Casualties

  1. #16
    Defense Professional
    Join Date
    18 Jun 04
    Posts
    1,632
    Quote Originally Posted by Dreadnought
    I agree they werent designed for prolonged use but we cant give up on the space program as a whole either.
    I guess that nobody in NASA or White House have seen dropping a mannged space program in their worst nightmare..... even though their yield is not tangible.... a pride as you said. At least I did not read anything about such discussions.

    However this particular vehicles - remaining Shuttles are old now and need to be replaced. Replacing them with the same design is not really smart..... it will not yield any additional knowledge. I remember reading in this forum quite interesting articles how the next generation launch vehicles and spacecrafts are being now designed from elements of the now outdated Shuttle program. It was quite an interesting reading.....

    So even if US stops manned flights it will not last beyond 2010 or 2011 when a new, economically viable, and safe programe of CEV + New launch vehcile will be in use.

  2. #17
    Defense Professional Dreadnought's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 May 05
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA.
    Posts
    13,518
    Country: United States

    Post

    Just on a related note today in the news:

    WASHINGTON (Reuters/CNN) -- NASA unveiled plans on Monday to return humans to the moon by 2018 at a cost of $104 billion.

    NASA Administrator Michael Griffin showcased a mission to the moon in an Apollo-style capsule sitting atop rockets fashioned from shuttle components.

    "The space program is a long-term investment in our future," Griffin said.

    The new lunar program would begin in 2018 by landing four astronauts on the moon for a seven-day stay.

    The last lunar landing was Apollo 17 in 1972.

    The centerpiece of NASA's moonshot is the new spaceship known as the crew exploration vehicle, or CEV. It will be "designed to carry four astronauts to and from the moon, support up to six crew members on future missions to Mars, and deliver crew and supplies to the international space station," according to NASA's Web site.

    The new crew vehicle and lander will be similar to those used during the Apollo missions, but three times larger.

    Griffin said building a larger rocket system will allow for landing anywhere on the lunar surface. The Apollo missions only had enough fuel to land along the moon's equator.

    NASA hopes to have the rocket system ferrying crew and supplies to the space station in five years, according to NASA's Web site.

    The scenario was presented to White House officials last week before its formal unveiling to the public on Monday.

    Even before the official announcement, there was criticism from Capitol Hill over the cost of the lunar program, given U.S. government commitments to the Iraq war and recovery from Hurricane Katrina.

    "This plan is coming out at a time when the nation is facing significant budgetary challenges," Rep. Bart Gordon, a Tennessee Democrat on the House Science Committee, said in a statement. "Getting agreement to move forward on it is going to be heavy lifting in the current environment, and it's clear that strong presidential leadership will be needed."

    Bush's vision for space
    President Bush's plan to send Americans back to the moon by 2020 and eventually on to Mars has drawn skepticism since its unveiling in January 2004, less than a year after the February 1, 2003, shuttle Columbia disaster.

    Bush's vision for space exploration called for the development of a system to replace the aging shuttles, a goal that appears even more important given problems with the shuttle fleet's return to flight.

    The same problems with falling debris that doomed Columbia recurred in July with the launch of Discovery, prompting the grounding of the shuttle fleet even as Discovery continued to fly its mission. A September shuttle mission was delayed until November and then to March.

    Some $1.1 billion damage by Hurricane Katrina to NASA facilities in Louisiana and Mississippi could push the launch date back further still.

    Bush's plan also mandated the completion of the international space station, but without shuttles to do the heavy lifting, that process has been on hold. A pair of Russian vehicles -- the space taxi Soyuz and the space delivery van Progress -- have been ferrying people and material.

    Since the fatal Columbia disaster, only two-person crews have stayed aboard the station, rather than the normal three-person crew.

    With the shuttles slated for retirement in 2010, Griffin has estimated that the number of construction flights to the station could be pared from its earlier estimate of 28 to 15.

    Reuters contributed to this report.
    Attached Images  

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Random Thoughts on the Mighty Hog - Part 2
    By Shipwreck in forum Military Aviation
    Replies: 168
    Last Post: 22 Nov 09,, 00:46
  2. Analysis: Chechnya
    By Ironduke in forum Europe and Russia
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 29 Jul 08,, 01:30
  3. Top Ten Chinese Military Modernization Developments
    By oneman28 in forum East Asia and the Pacific
    Replies: 96
    Last Post: 23 Jun 08,, 07:49
  4. Russian facism
    By Alamgir in forum International Economy
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 23 Apr 08,, 22:16
  5. So who moved the WMD? Someone did...
    By Bill in forum The Middle East and North Africa
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 16 Mar 06,, 16:54

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts