View Poll Results: Best response to Somali piracy?

Voters
111. You may not vote on this poll
  • Large-scale military action against pirate vessels and their bases of operations

    55 49.55%
  • Smaller-scale measures such as increased patrols and deterrence

    23 20.72%
  • Cargo and merchant ships should take it upon themselves to provide their own security

    15 13.51%
  • Other (specify)

    18 16.22%
Page 15 of 17 FirstFirst ... 67891011121314151617 LastLast
Results 211 to 225 of 255

Thread: Best response to Somali piracy?

  1. #211
    Defense Professional Dreadnought's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 May 05
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA.
    Posts
    13,648
    Quote Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
    Just heard on radio, the Somali government is asking for international assistance to establish a coast guard to combat the piracy problem.

    How about that? Western military advisers with Somali crews on small patrol boats based from coastal cities of Somalia?

    More effective? Less effective?

    More expensive? Cheaper in the long run?
    *More like less to contain politically. That is until they start sharing in the profits.
    Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.

  2. #212
    Regular
    Join Date
    02 Feb 09
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    44
    Re: Chunder:

    I seem to remember finding the Cyclone when I did the initial "hmmmm, do we have any of these already?" check months ago. The Cyclone you could actually deploy with just a few frigate-sized ships in the area as tenders, as far as I'm aware. Still, it's a bit bigger than what I figured... The unmanned ships might work, but just some 20-30 meter vessels with M2s mounted on them are you really need. And then you have a boarding crew already on-site when you engage pirates, rather than needing to wait.

  3. #213
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    18 Nov 05
    Location
    Suburban Ohio, I commute to redneck land on the we
    Posts
    1,038
    Quote Originally Posted by Dreadnought View Post
    They did at one time. The Asheville Class gun boats. We still have one here in Philly (Cannon) tied up in the rerserve. With some updating and more hulls no reason why they couldnt do the job for patroling and use an LS? as a mothership.

    Honestly other than modern radios so they can communicate fairly easily with the rest of the fleet not much to update to take on somali pirates, most of their hulls are two low in the water to be effectively seen at any distance with any radar, and their armaments are such that its not likely that any truely armed ship will be in much danger. Patrol gunboats are cheap as well and seem like they would be fairly sensible to operate in most circumstances. Sure its expensive to run on turbines, but the cruising desiels are pretty efficeint. It'd also be somewhat handy to have a few of these for carribian operations for the coasties, who always seem to be clamoring for new/more hulls. From what I understand they are/were truely oceangoing vessels as well though not real comfortable in heavy weather.

    Truely something like a nasty class ship with a fiberglass hull and some armour around the crew spaces and engineering would be really inexpensive and useful for a whole bunch of operations in most of the world save for the norther oceans.

  4. #214
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    18 Nov 05
    Location
    Suburban Ohio, I commute to redneck land on the we
    Posts
    1,038
    Quote Originally Posted by GC13 View Post
    Re: Chunder:

    I seem to remember finding the Cyclone when I did the initial "hmmmm, do we have any of these already?" check months ago. The Cyclone you could actually deploy with just a few frigate-sized ships in the area as tenders, as far as I'm aware. Still, it's a bit bigger than what I figured... The unmanned ships might work, but just some 20-30 meter vessels with M2s mounted on them are you really need. And then you have a boarding crew already on-site when you engage pirates, rather than needing to wait.
    The cyclones have all been retired and transfered to either the coastguard or other nations navies. For some reason The USN decided in the late 90's to get out of the patrol boat bussiness. You'd think with bases all around the world and having concerns about littoral combat (LCS anyone) that they might consider building some small combatants.

  5. #215
    Defense Professional Dreadnought's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 May 05
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA.
    Posts
    13,648
    Quote Originally Posted by Maxor View Post
    Honestly other than modern radios so they can communicate fairly easily with the rest of the fleet not much to update to take on somali pirates, most of their hulls are two low in the water to be effectively seen at any distance with any radar, and their armaments are such that its not likely that any truely armed ship will be in much danger. Patrol gunboats are cheap as well and seem like they would be fairly sensible to operate in most circumstances. Sure its expensive to run on turbines, but the cruising desiels are pretty efficeint. It'd also be somewhat handy to have a few of these for carribian operations for the coasties, who always seem to be clamoring for new/more hulls. From what I understand they are/were truely oceangoing vessels as well though not real comfortable in heavy weather.

    Truely something like a nasty class ship with a fiberglass hull and some armour around the crew spaces and engineering would be really inexpensive and useful for a whole bunch of operations in most of the world save for the norther oceans.
    *My first reply would have been the original PT boats. Perfect for just such an enviroment. Light, Fast and armed to the teeth. Wish we would have kept some of those ideas alive for just such purposes.
    Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.

  6. #216
    Regular
    Join Date
    02 Feb 09
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    44
    So who here is in such a position that they're able to write up a convincing letter and suggesting to the office of the navy that they commission a couple hundred new Cyclones (or another appropriate design) and have a snowball's chance of the letter actually being read?

  7. #217
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    18 Nov 05
    Location
    Suburban Ohio, I commute to redneck land on the we
    Posts
    1,038
    Honestly the original PT boats burned gas like no tomorrow. Truely massive amounts of it. The capabilites of such boats/ships (calling anything over 50' in legnth a boat seems a little weird even though I'm not english) would be really handy for this type of situation as well as a number of others that seem to be oddly filled in the US navy. That why I suggested PTGs nearly as fast and slightly better seakeeping they are also much more fuel efficient. Heck even something like the cape or marine protector classes with heavier armament would be really useful. Dorva type vessels would be pretty easy to build a US clone of and use.

  8. #218
    Regular
    Join Date
    02 Feb 09
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    44
    Well, to further the discussion on using smaller ships I've made a blog post on the subject. We can talk there without threadjacking this thread quite so far into one direction. Though what's a thread without a little threadjacking?

  9. #219
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    18 Nov 05
    Location
    Suburban Ohio, I commute to redneck land on the we
    Posts
    1,038
    Quote Originally Posted by GC13 View Post
    So who here is in such a position that they're able to write up a convincing letter and suggesting to the office of the navy that they commission a couple hundred new Cyclones (or another appropriate design) and have a snowball's chance of the letter actually being read?
    Honestly cyclones are big, probably to big for this type of thing and 200 are way more than needed. Only 14 were initially built.


    I don't think true bluewater boats are the way to go. 100' max length (I'd personally go with 85') 15'-20' max beam. 1 M242 Bushmaster in the bow, in an armoured tub, a pair of dual mount .50's mounted on the aft, I'd also have a pair of light MG's amidships or just before the pilot house, mount in a modified avenger system, design in a possibility to mount harpoons. Should be able to get 35 knot speed with relatively inexpensive engines. Berthing for 18, normal complement 14. That should be able to have cruising range of around 1,200 miles and about 10 days enduence. It wouldn't be particualarly comfortable for anybody on board. Put in the caterpiller marine 3512 C engine. 1 starboard 1 port each with its own reduction gearing and drive shaft to a prop. I'm tempted to use the 3512 generator set as well since it would more than provide enough power and have many interchangable parts. You are looking at $200,000 for the bushmaster, $14,000 per M2 so $60,000 for guns and mounting. The pintle mounted m240g's forward would be $25,000 total, $500,000 for the avenger, $300,000 per engine x3 , 2 harpoons at 700,000 each, Eads/lockhead TRS-3D $1,300,000, GPS 5,000 Hull and other mechanicals, $2,300,000. Thats a bit under 7 mill
    at listed prices which are fairly accurate. Call it 10 mill hull price and you have room for over runs and some operating costs.

  10. #220
    Colonist Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    02 Mar 08
    Location
    Adelaide, Australia
    Posts
    1,611
    Quote Originally Posted by Maxor View Post
    Honestly cyclones are big, probably to big for this type of thing and 200 are way more than needed. Only 14 were initially built.


    I don't think true bluewater boats are the way to go. 100' max length (I'd personally go with 85') 15'-20' max beam. 1 M242 Bushmaster in the bow, in an armoured tub, a pair of dual mount .50's mounted on the aft, I'd also have a pair of light MG's amidships or just before the pilot house, mount in a modified avenger system, design in a possibility to mount harpoons. Should be able to get 35 knot speed with relatively inexpensive engines. Berthing for 18, normal complement 14. That should be able to have cruising range of around 1,200 miles and about 10 days enduence. It wouldn't be particualarly comfortable for anybody on board. Put in the caterpiller marine 3512 C engine. 1 starboard 1 port each with its own reduction gearing and drive shaft to a prop. I'm tempted to use the 3512 generator set as well since it would more than provide enough power and have many interchangable parts. You are looking at $200,000 for the bushmaster, $14,000 per M2 so $60,000 for guns and mounting. The pintle mounted m240g's forward would be $25,000 total, $500,000 for the avenger, $300,000 per engine x3 , 2 harpoons at 700,000 each, Eads/lockhead TRS-3D $1,300,000, GPS 5,000 Hull and other mechanicals, $2,300,000. Thats a bit under 7 mill
    at listed prices which are fairly accurate. Call it 10 mill hull price and you have room for over runs and some operating costs.
    I do see some problems with that (to be honest I went to the blog with them).

    It's not just a Patrol boat... Far from it, especially if it's manned.
    It will need provisions for taking on board pirates (i.e. cells). It will need a dedicated medical detache to each boat (operating room) because it anticipates aggressive action & detainment. It will need provision for more than 4 extra berths if its expecting to take on a SOF team. It will need to by & large take care of wounded & casualties until there is a ship nearby that can take them on board. Crammed on board an 85' boat.

    It will also be what amounts to a little boat, which has to sail great distances (Across the Atlantic, Pacific, Indian) for rotations, and it will have to stay on station for a month, where it will be doing a lot of patrolling. Those are very cramped conditions, being tossed around on a boat in anyones language, sucking up important resources.

    Again, what is wrong with a resupply ship with an operations room, capable of operating some Unmanned Zodiacs, doing some good old port - security? Its exactly what the Israel's have been doing, and Singapore iirc

  11. #221
    Official Thread Jacker Senior Contributor gunnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jan 06
    Location
    DPRK, Demokratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
    Posts
    21,348
    Quote Originally Posted by Chunder View Post
    I do see some problems with that (to be honest I went to the blog with them).

    It's not just a Patrol boat... Far from it, especially if it's manned.
    It will need provisions for taking on board pirates (i.e. cells). It will need a dedicated medical detache to each boat (operating room) because it anticipates aggressive action & detainment. It will need provision for more than 4 extra berths if its expecting to take on a SOF team. It will need to by & large take care of wounded & casualties until there is a ship nearby that can take them on board. Crammed on board an 85' boat.
    Why do you want to operate on this boat? That also means you will need a surgeon on board. They are expensive to station on such a small boat. I think a sick bay with enough supplies for a medic to stablize the wounded is good enough.

    Quote Originally Posted by Chunder View Post
    It will also be what amounts to a little boat, which has to sail great distances (Across the Atlantic, Pacific, Indian) for rotations, and it will have to stay on station for a month, where it will be doing a lot of patrolling. Those are very cramped conditions, being tossed around on a boat in anyones language, sucking up important resources.
    You assume this boat will be stationed in the US, and then travel to that part of the world. What if we just transport these boats to Somalia, lease a base, and station them right there on the spot?
    "Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.

  12. #222
    Regular
    Join Date
    02 Feb 09
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    44
    Yeah, it would be a bad idea to be constantly shuttling smaller craft across the ocean. A base nearby would be necessary, for sure.

    If the smaller craft would be operating with larger craft in the area (a near certainty) they would only need the barest provisions for taking on board wounded and prisoners: handcuffs for the prisoners and bandages for the wounded. Facilities on board a frigate or destroyer would hopefully be more adequate for long-term care, but you can deal with them temporarily while you're in transit.

  13. #223
    Patron Proyas's Avatar
    Join Date
    24 May 08
    Location
    Washington, DC area
    Posts
    240
    I would fix up a couple dozen cheap corvettes and fast gun boats and staff them with contractors and men looking for adventure and send them out to the coast to fight the pirates. Use our good forces for air support, radar, intel, and land strikes against pirate bases and homes.

  14. #224
    Colonist Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    02 Mar 08
    Location
    Adelaide, Australia
    Posts
    1,611
    Quote Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
    Why do you want to operate on this boat? That also means you will need a surgeon on board. They are expensive to station on such a small boat. I think a sick bay with enough supplies for a medic to stablize the wounded is good enough.
    Why do I? I don't mate!, anything more is an added expense & a drain on resources. But when you are designing a ship to combat piracy, the DoD has a good tendency to over specificy, it would be suprising that anyone designing a boat to suppress & apprehend subjects completely by itself wouldn't have appropriate facilities. Let alone all the other stuff that gets 'added on'. The whole point is, as soon as you go manned, thats a lot of extra things you need. The RAN experiences this whenever there is an illegal migrant boat entering Australia's waters... If something goes wrong, it's go for a bat out of hell for the nearest port of call & get them on a plane & even after that, there still is a stink about it.

    If the Navy were to specify a new class of boat for this thing Tommorrow, and get an RFP out, you would say the following would be incurred, and we all know this:

    Determine the RFP requirements: Up to six months

    Get a design concept and responce from Industry: up to a year.

    Problem: One company has thought of something the Navy didn't, but liked. Navy alters RFP - 2 months.

    Contract finally awarded:

    Government Accountability Office Appeal - 3 Months

    No Gaurantee the initial contract will be ordered.

    Murtha intervenes & boggs down selection in so – called 'enquiries' (who knows how long)

    If Ordered, Prototype built, say, 1-2 years... Problems Ironed out, (who knows)

    Navy decides it wants to integrate another system onto an already prototyped system: take your pick.. another year...

    Fleet built over a period of 8 years... All of a sudden we're up to 10 - 12 years. With all this 'Future Proofing' talk, one would expect that to be carte blanche add on fiesta for the Navy.

    Meanwhile Piracy rattles on...

    Now these are estimates, and I am not involved in shipbuilding whatsoever, so I'd be asking a Naval architect what could be expected in such a design. Eitherway it's one hell of a cost, both in Time & money. You want cheap & available now.



    You assume this boat will be stationed in the US, and then travel to that part of the world. What if we just transport these boats to Somalia, lease a base, and station them right there on the spot?
    I don't know if one would be available in Somalia, maybe it would be a worthwhile foothold, if you have just been asked by a faction to provide anti-piracy measures. But your right, I do assumed the boat would be stationed in the U.S. Either way it's not much bigger than a trawler sized vessel with quite a few people on board, bobbing away off a hostile coast on the other side of the world. Maybe you could station them at Diego Garcia.

    The alternative is this: Order some USV's already in production now, bang a modulated control center on a fleet auxillary ship, or something else capable of holding a few container sized compartments, add a few davits, and send them off to recon the ports of operations, and let the Pirates know what they are there for. If you can bang one in the back of, or underneath a Chinook, you can effectively deploy them as needed much like a SOF Zodiac.

    The Advantage is that it's very unlikely you would send a patrol boat to a hostile port, With a Patrol boat, the tendency is to detain people, which is VERY costly, putting them through a legal system, not to mention the boat have a tendency to enter combat. With a USV your constrained by the fact you don't have the option to take them into custody (which I think is the better option) but you can hold them on station to be taken into custody by another vessel if need be. Your not endangering any lives, the optical and targetting package on board is far better than any scope or human can manage, and you need to feed far less mouths, and accomodating everyone else on a larger, more comfortable vessel in a completely modularised form. With a simple 2 crew per boat, + whatever maintenance facilities, back at your own 'mother ship'. Limited only by the amount of fuel & food the ship can carry, and he amount of zodiacs you can carry.

    You want to avoid putting them on Trial, You want to avoid having to heal anyone, and you want to avoid putting your own people in danger.

    Why stuff around for 10-12 years whilst piracy rattles on at enormous expense, when you could have a deployable example by the end of this year? Stop them in the simplest, cheapest easiest form.
    Last edited by Chunder; 24 Apr 09, at 04:47.

  15. #225
    Regular
    Join Date
    02 Feb 09
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    44
    Nobody's talking about designing a totally new ship, except for you it seems. And Kenya is handling the piracy prosecutions at the moment.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Somali piracy thread
    By TopHatter in forum Naval Warfare
    Replies: 820
    Last Post: 06 Jan 12,, 22:34
  2. PLA debates China's role in Somalia mission
    By xinhui in forum East Asia and the Pacific
    Replies: 114
    Last Post: 20 Oct 09,, 22:47
  3. Piracy in the 21st Century
    By BadKharma in forum Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn
    Replies: 78
    Last Post: 12 Jan 09,, 11:15
  4. Poll: McCain-Palin vs. Obama-Biden
    By Ironduke in forum American Politics & Economy
    Replies: 508
    Last Post: 27 Oct 08,, 21:14
  5. The Kyoto Protocol is Dead
    By Gio in forum International Economy
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 07 Jan 05,, 07:53

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •