Page 6 of 10 FirstFirst 12345678910 LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 147

Thread: Chinese Carriers

  1. #76
    Defense Moderator
    Defense Professional
    Lei Feng Protege
    xinhui's Avatar
    Join Date
    17 May 06
    Posts
    7,822
    Rumor has it, they are putting up a phase array radar there.
    “the misery of being exploited by capitalists is nothing compared to the misery of not being exploited at all” -- Joan Robinson

  2. #77
    Global Moderator
    Comrade Commissar
    TopHatter's Avatar
    Join Date
    03 Sep 03
    Posts
    13,565
    The purpose of the ski jump (not to mention the incredibly detailed island mock-up) is to get everybody used to the exact layout of the flight deck.

    When the crews finally go to sea on the real Varyag, they'll be in totally familiar territory...right down to the giant ski jump sitting on the bow.

    Train as you fight
    Fight as you train

    I wouldn't doubt that they've equipped the island to train the guys on the "Ouija Board" and all the rest of the non-flight deck air ops lads as well.

    The Chinese aren't playing around, that's for damn sure.
    Among the community of nations, Pakistan today stands out on one hand as a petty thug brandishing a dangerous weapon, and at other times as a concubine, sleeping with anyone willing to pay for her expensive tastes. ~ Tarek Fatah

  3. #78
    Global Moderator
    Devil's Advocate
    ArmchairGeneral's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 May 06
    Location
    Boston, MA.
    Posts
    4,668
    Quote Originally Posted by TopHatter
    The purpose of the ski jump (not to mention the incredibly detailed island mock-up) is to get everybody used to the exact layout of the flight deck.

    When the crews finally go to sea on the real Varyag, they'll be in totally familiar territory...right down to the giant ski jump sitting on the bow.

    Train as you fight
    Fight as you train

    I wouldn't doubt that they've equipped the island to train the guys on the "Ouija Board" and all the rest of the non-flight deck air ops lads as well.

    The Chinese aren't playing around, that's for damn sure.
    I guess that makes sense.

    Here's Feng at ID's take. Information Dissemination: Work on Varyag + full scale mock up in Wuhan
    Some more good pics there, too.

    Also, why put it on a building at all? Seems like it would be pretty easy to just lay it out on the ground, maybe on an airfield. Do they want to practice jumping off out of the way of crashes or something?
    I enjoy being wrong too much to change my mind.

  4. #79
    Defense Moderator
    Defense Professional
    Lei Feng Protege
    xinhui's Avatar
    Join Date
    17 May 06
    Posts
    7,822
    of all people.... Feng mis-ID-ed the Wuhan ship design institute as 711 institute, it was the 701 institute.

    Wuhan ship design institute (also known as 711 institute of China Ship Design Institute).
    The following article is correct.....because I help write it.

    Oct. 20 (Bloomberg) -- Welding torches flare at dusk in the coastal Chinese city of Dalian as workers mill about on the flight deck of an unfinished aircraft carrier once intended for the Soviet navy.

    More than 400 miles (643 kilometers) from the ocean, a full-size mock-up sits next to a lake in Wuhan. While the twin can be used to train deck crews, it will never sail. Its “hull” is a 1,000 foot-long (300 meter) building.

    China’s leaders have talked for five decades about acquiring what they call “aircraft mother ships.” Spurred by dependence on safe sea lanes for exports and inbound shipments of oil, gas and iron ore, the world’s fastest-growing major economy is preparing to send a carrier to sea within a few years, military analysts say. Such a move in the Pacific, where the U.S. has dominated since World War II, would give China added power in territorial disputes with Japan, South Korea, Vietnam and the Philippines.

    “A Chinese aircraft carrier is probably a matter of when, not if,” says David Finkelstein, director of China studies at CNA, an Alexandria, Virginia-based consulting group with national-security expertise. “There is already a strategic rationale for the need for an aircraft carrier or some sort of vessel that can project air power within the region.”

    The first will be the former Varyag being completed in Dalian, according to a July report by the U.S. Office of Naval Intelligence. It predicts the warship will become operational as a training platform between 2010 and 2012, with domestically built carriers “sometime after 2015.”

    Destroyers, Submarines

    They would join a fleet of about 190 principal ships, including destroyers, submarines and amphibious vessels, according to a 2009 U.S. Defense Department report. That compares with about 285 U.S. ships, including 11 aircraft carriers displacing about one-third more than the 65,000-ton ex- Varyag.

    China must buy jets, train aviators, build support vessels and learn the skills required to conduct air operations at sea. One such battle group costs about $10 billion, U.S. Naval War College researchers estimate.

    While China’s commission of an aircraft carrier may cause consternation in Washington, it won’t change the military balance between the two nations because of the U.S. lead in numbers of carrier battle groups and platforms such as ultra- silent cruise-missile-carrying nuclear submarines, says Robert Ross, a professor at Boston College in Massachusetts who specializes in U.S.-China relations.

    Military Installations

    That reality may be lost amid alarm in the U.S. Congress and among allies including the Philippines, which came to the brink of conflict with China in 1995 over alleged Chinese military installations on a South China Sea reef and will look for reassurance from the U.S. that defense ties remain strong.

    “The carrier is a symbol of power projection, which will simply resonate in other countries as it resonates in China,” Ross says.

    China concentrated on protecting its home waters with missiles, submarines and minelayers until this decade; carriers weren’t seen as necessary or cost-effective, Ross says. It bought a World War II-era vessel from Australia in 1985 that it later scrapped, according to the Australian Navy. Two Russian carriers became tourist attractions.

    China’s fleet has begun to range beyond its coast. Two destroyers and a supply ship deployed for anti-piracy patrols off Somalia in December 2008. With a $3.9 trillion economy and the world’s largest foreign-exchange reserves, at $2.3 trillion, China’s leadership is showing signs it is serious about joining the U.S., Russia, France and Brazil in possessing vessels capable of launching conventional fixed-wing airplanes.

    Offensive Operations

    China “won’t forever be without an aircraft carrier,” Defense Minister Liang Guanglie told his Japanese counterpart in March, Xinhua News reported. China’s 2006 Defense White Paper said the navy would extend its mandate beyond coastal defense to include “offshore defensive operations.”

    The Varyag was originally intended to be the second 65,000- ton carrier of the former Soviet Union when construction began in the 1980s; it wasn’t completed after the country broke up in 1991, according to the U.S. Office of Naval Intelligence July report. Its sister, the Admiral Kuznetsov, is the flagship of Russia’s navy.

    Ukraine inherited the Varyag, selling it to China in 1998. It arrived in 2002 in Dalian, site of China’s largest shipyard, the report said. It was in plain view during a visit last month, in drydock about 600 meters from an Ikea furniture store.

    Crew Training

    During renovation, its future crew could train in Wuhan’s southern suburbs. Construction on the mock-up began last year, heralded by drummers and the provincial Communist Party leader, according to a press release from state-owned China Shipbuilding Industry Corp. in Beijing. Two cranes towered above the structure as of last week, visible to farmers across Huangjia Lake fertilizing vegetable plots.

    Finkelstein and Ross say they believe China is trying to avoid surprising the world when it inaugurates its carrier program and has allowed the military to make public statements about its plans, even though two people at China Shipbuilding’s 701 Institute hung up when called about the project, and the Defense Ministry didn’t return fax and e-mail requests for comment.

    “This shouldn’t be a shock when it happens,” Finkelstein says. “The real question is, what are they going to do with these things?”

    --Michael Forsythe. With assistance from Tony Capaccio in Washington. Editors: Melinda Grenier, Bill Austin.

    China Moves to Project Air Power With Soviet Carrier Overhaul - Bloomberg.com
    “the misery of being exploited by capitalists is nothing compared to the misery of not being exploited at all” -- Joan Robinson

  5. #80
    Defense Moderator
    Defense Professional
    Lei Feng Protege
    xinhui's Avatar
    Join Date
    17 May 06
    Posts
    7,822
    Monday, November 16, 2009
    An update on the PLAN officers to train on Brazilian Aircraft Carrier report
    Six month ago, it was reported that China and Brazil had reached an agreement to train PLA Naval personnel in Brazil on aircraft carrier operations. (here) (here) The recently reached "five-point consensus" agreement during the Brazilian Defense Minister Nelson Jobim's visit to China seems to add credence to the earlier report.


    China, Brazil reach five-point consensus to strengthen military exchanges

    China, Brazil reach five-point consensus to strenghten military exchanges_English_Xinhua

    English_Xinhua 2009-11-17 00:13:38

    Chinese Defense Minister Liang Guanglie (L) and visiting Brazilian Defense Minister Nelson Jobim inspect the guard of honour in Beijing, China, Nov. 16, 2009. (Xinhua/Liu Jiansheng)



    BEIJING, Nov. 16 (Xinhua) -- China and Brazil here on Monday reached the five-point consensus to strengthen bilateral military exchanges during talks between their senior military officers.

    Chinese Defense Minister Liang Guanglie held talks with visiting Brazilian Defense Minister Nelson Jobim Monday afternoon.

    The two sides have decided to increase group visits and strengthen young and middle-aged military officer exchanges. They would also seek to expand cooperation on military and personnel training and conduct exchanges and coordination in peacekeeping actions.

    China and Brazil would enhance cooperation on military industry and science and technology. And a joint commission of the defense ministries of the two countries would be established for further exchanges and cooperation.

    During the talks, Liang said China-Brazil relations have entered a new phase of comprehensive development since Chinese President Hu Jintao and Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula visited each other's country in 2004.

    The pragmatic cooperation in various areas between the two countries has been continuously enhanced and their strategic partnership has been increasingly deepened, Liang said, adding that their military ties have developed smoothly with frequent high-level visits and increased pragmatic exchanges and cooperation.

    Liang said, the two armed forces are expected to explore new areas of cooperation and further their friendly cooperation.

    Nelson Jobim said Brazil hoped to continuously deepen its pragmatic military cooperation with the Chinese armed forces within the framework of their strategic partnership.
    Editor: Yan


    Here is a good review from the "China Brief" back in June 12 on the training program.
    single - The Jamestown Foundation[tt_news]=35116&tx_ttnews[backPid]=13&cHash=f072084889

    Publication: China Brief Volume: 9 Issue: 12
    June 12, 2009 08:14 AM Age: 157 days
    Category: China Brief, In a Fortnight, Military/Security, China and the Asia-Pacific, Latin America
    By: Russell Hsiao

    NAe Sao Paulo

    In a May 9 interview with Brazilian defense, strategy and intelligence news website Defasanet, Brazilian Defense Minister Nelson Jobim stated that Brazil and China had reached an agreement to train personnel from the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) in Brazil. In the interview (available in Portuguese), Jobim announced that the two sides reached a training agreement to stage PLAN officers aboard the NAe Sao Paulo, Brazil’s Clemenceau-class aircraft carrier (Defesanet, May 13). There has been no reported official confirmation from the Chinese government concerning this agreement, however, on May 19 the official Xinhua News Agency released a news report in its Spanish portal (no equivalent has been found in the news agency’s Chinese or English portal), which cites remarks that Jobim made to the media about the nature of the plan in question. The Xinhua report cited Jobim as saying that the agreement was reached in April during Navy Admiral Carlos Soares de Moura Neto’s official visit to Qingdao to attend the PLAN’s 60th Anniversary Naval Review (Xinhua News Agency [Spanish], May 20). The defense minister noted that the Chinese wanted aircraft carriers for power projection, and that he hopes naval cooperation between Brazil and China can serve as the gateway for defense cooperation in other areas (Defesanet, May 13, Xinhua News Agency [Spanish], May 20). Jobim is planning a visit to China in September or October, which analysts say is likely to finalize the training agreement.


    Although the details of this alleged agreement are still unknown, given the chronic lack of funding for the NAe Sao Paulo within Brazil’s national budget, some observers speculate that a part of the deal may involve the Chinese paying for some of the restoration of the aircraft carrier in return for some real on-deck operational experience for its carrier officers. An article that appeared in a Chinese naval university’s website, “Why did China Choose Brazil to Train it Carrier Pilots?” referenced an unspecified source as saying that the Chinese will provide technical support to Brazil for constructing its nuclear submarines (Haijun.xaut.edu.cn, June 1). Western and Chinese analysts believe that at a minimum this agreement will allow the Chinese access to Brazilian naval aviation expertise in addition to the carrier itself. In any event, training of PLAN officers on NAe Sao Paulo would accelerate the development of Chinese capacity in naval aviation, which has been a major weakness in China’s efforts to operationalize an aircraft carrier.


    There are currently nine navies with aircraft carriers in active service, and the United States, France, Russia and Brazil are the only four naval forces that have operational aircraft carriers capable of launching and recovering conventional aircraft. Reports that appeared in the Chinese press in the past have suggested that the PLAN is planning to employ the CATOBAR (Catapult Assisted Take Off But Arrested Recovery) launch and recovery system for its carriers. This may explain why Chinese leaders have selected the NAe Sao Paulo as the operational carrier for training its future star carrier officers. Moreover, France is restricted from participating in any technical training that may lead to a possible transfer of sensitive technology to China due to the current EU embargo on China. On the other hand, Russian—and the British navy, which will launch its Queen Elizabeth class carriers from 2014 to 2018—operates STOVL (Short Take-Off and Vertical Landing) system, thus Brazil appears to be the only viable candidate for the PLAN if they intend to adopt the CATOBAR system. In addition, China's turn to Brazil may be the result of the standstill in Sino-Russian defense cooperation, Russia recently suspended negotiations to sell China—its number one client—the Su-33 fighter jet due to allegations that the Chinese are illegally copying the Su-27SK and other Russian military hardware and technology (Defense News, May 4; Haijun.xaut.edu.cn, June 1).
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by xinhui; 17 Nov 09, at 00:39.
    “the misery of being exploited by capitalists is nothing compared to the misery of not being exploited at all” -- Joan Robinson

  6. #81
    Defense Moderator
    Defense Professional
    Lei Feng Protege
    xinhui's Avatar
    Join Date
    17 May 06
    Posts
    7,822
    ,,,,,,,,
    Attached Images Attached Images   
    “the misery of being exploited by capitalists is nothing compared to the misery of not being exploited at all” -- Joan Robinson

  7. #82
    Defense Professional Dreadnought's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 May 05
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA.
    Posts
    13,832
    Two things about the above article.

    China’s leaders have talked for five decades about acquiring what they call “aircraft mother ships.” Spurred by dependence on safe sea lanes for exports and inbound shipments of oil, gas and iron ore, the world’s fastest-growing major economy is preparing to send a carrier to sea within a few years, military analysts say. Such a move in the Pacific, where the U.S. has dominated since World War II, would give China added power in territorial disputes with Japan, South Korea, Vietnam and the Philippines.

    *I dont see how it would give China any advantage with South Korea, Japan and the Phillippines since you have a US CV(N)BG stationed to Japan year round. It can also easily reach South Korea and the Phillipines in short order.

    One thing they overlook is the the USN carriers are nuclear powered, they only require replentishment for food stores and av gas, not for main propulsion such as China's and India's will require.

    China's carriers and soon to be India's carriers are fossile fueled so their respective groups can only move as fast and as far as their tankers can and are limited on range. And everybody knows that during war time the oilers are sitting ducks.

    It will take them a long time,many accidents to come and many expenses to be paid for they havent even taken baby steps as of yet while the US has been running CVNBG's at full stride for atleast the last five decades.
    Last edited by Dreadnought; 29 Mar 10, at 16:36.
    Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.

  8. #83
    Regular Maeda Toshiie's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Oct 08
    Posts
    139
    Quote Originally Posted by Dreadnought View Post
    One thing they overlook is the the USN carriers are nuclear powered, they only require replentishment for food stores and av gas, not for main propulsion such as China's and India's will require.

    China's carriers and soon to be India's carriers are fossile fueled so their respective groups can only move as fast and as far as their tankers can and are limited on range. And everybody knows that during war time the oilers are sitting ducks.
    The oilers are as much sitting ducks as replenishment ships laden with food, av gas and munitions. Adding or subtracting an extra oiler from the (escorted) replenishment fleet won't matter much.

    Plus, the carrier escorts are non-nuclear, which makes them reliant on oilers.

  9. #84
    Defense Professional Dreadnought's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 May 05
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA.
    Posts
    13,832
    Quote Originally Posted by Maeda Toshiie View Post
    The oilers are as much sitting ducks as replenishment ships laden with food, av gas and munitions. Adding or subtracting an extra oiler from the (escorted) replenishment fleet won't matter much.

    Plus, the carrier escorts are non-nuclear, which makes them reliant on oilers.
    *The difference is the USN has several ports they can takes stores and fuel (av gas) from without oilers or replent ships at all. The CVN's can also literally run away from the rest of the group if necessary and her range is unlimited due to nuclear proplusion not by fossile fuel. Thats why they can circumnavigate the globe so quickly, they dont have to wait for slowpoke oilers to keep up once their av tanks are topped.

    The USN carrier escorts burn the very same fuel as her airwings do, they are gas turbine powered no need for oilers when on operations and can detach them at any point and leave them far behind because the CVN herself can refuel the escorts, which means the have a far greater range then any fossile fueled carriers or escorts now or in the very close future. As mentioned the USN have been doing this for decades where as the others have'nt even left their cribs to learn how to crawl as of yet nevermind walk.

    Further...

    The United States Navy is taking a big leap forward in "greening" its 50,000-strong, gas-guzzling fleet of vehicles, committing to a 50 percent cut in oil use by 2015, the Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus declared in a speech at the Naval Energy Forum.

    That's not all. Mabus said the Navy will attempt to get 50 percent of its total energy from alternative sources by 2020, including its ships, aircraft, tanks, vehicles and bases. Currently, that figure is at 17 percent.

    The reason: The Navy's imported oil addiction is socking the service with billions of dollars in losses. The Navy's new "hybrid of the seas," the USS Makin Island (pictured above), is expected to yield $250 million in savings over its lifetime, Mabus said. The ship has an electric motor that kicks in at low speeds. The money-saving hybrid-electric systems will soon be installed on 12 vessels.

    The same is true for planes. Improving the efficiency of each aircraft by just 3 percent would save the Navy 127,000 barrels of fuel per plane, per year. That's $15 million per aircraft, annually, at today's fuel prices.

    What it boils down is that the geopolitics of petroleum has gotten costly. The numbers don't lie.

    And we all know the price of oil seldomly goes down when its used in mass quantities like fueling a fossile fueled carrier. You talking millions of gallons of fuel for the carriers alone, not to mention its airwing and escorts. Fuel is of great cost when you look closely, that dont include any of the necessaties vital to a CV battlegroup either. China and India will both find this out in the near future. They better start saving their pennys, as their will be a few heart attacks after they recieve their first bill and fuel milege reports. They are going to want to make a lot of friends very quickly.)
    Last edited by Dreadnought; 29 Mar 10, at 17:54.
    Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.

  10. #85
    Defense Professional Dreadnought's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 May 05
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA.
    Posts
    13,832
    USS Ronald Reagan CVN-76 refueling USS Chancellorsville CG-62 at sea.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.

  11. #86
    Defense Moderator
    Defense Professional
    Lei Feng Protege
    xinhui's Avatar
    Join Date
    17 May 06
    Posts
    7,822
    Apr 12, 2010
    Taiwan developing 'carrier killer'

    TAIPEI - TAIWAN has unveiled the first images of a high-tech missile corvette specifically designed to counter the threat of China acquiring an aircraft carrier, officials and media said on Monday.

    A computerised graphic of the 1,000-tonne 'carrier killer', which has so far been kept secret from the public, has gone on display at Taipei's military museum, run by the defence ministry.

    The vessel will be capable of cruising at speeds of up to 55 kilometres (34 miles) an hour and boast technologies helping it to evade radar detection, the Taipei-based Apple Daily reported, citing military officials. The navy hopes to arm the corvette with Taiwan's home-grown Hsiungfeng III supersonic ship-to-ship missile, according to the report.

    The military museum did not provide any details, while the defence ministry declined to comment on the report.

    The report came after the head of Taiwan's National Security Bureau, Tsai Teh Sheng, told parliament in November that China has started building its first aircraft carrier. Taiwanese military analysts expect China to need at least 10 years to build its first operating carrier group complete with carrier-based fighters and other warships. But they warn that once the Chinese arms build-up is completed, it will have a far-reaching strategic impact on the region.

    Ties between China and Taiwan have improved markedly since China-friendly Ma Ying Jeou became the island's president in 2008, vowing to adopt a non-confrontational policy towards the mainland. But China still regards Taiwan as part of its territory awaiting reunification, by force if necessary, although the island has governed itself since 1949 when the mainland's civil war ended. -- AFP
    “the misery of being exploited by capitalists is nothing compared to the misery of not being exploited at all” -- Joan Robinson

  12. #87
    Senior Contributor Rumrunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    15 Jul 09
    Location
    New York, NY - Da Heights
    Posts
    971
    Quote Originally Posted by Dreadnought View Post
    Further...

    The United States Navy is taking a big leap forward in "greening" its 50,000-strong, gas-guzzling fleet of vehicles, committing to a 50 percent cut in oil use by 2015, the Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus declared in a speech at the Naval Energy Forum.

    That's not all. Mabus said the Navy will attempt to get 50 percent of its total energy from alternative sources by 2020, including its ships, aircraft, tanks, vehicles and bases. Currently, that figure is at 17 percent.

    Let's not forget the USN has already deployed nuke-powered CG's and large DDG-size vessels and has the experience with their operation and upkeep. The end of the cold war made their operation cost-prohibitive when compared to conventionally powered ships, but with the emergence of another boogeyman state and the increase in fuel costs will make nuke-powered cruisers seem both sensible and cheaper to run.
    You know JJ, Him could do it....

  13. #88
    Contributor Stan's Avatar
    Join Date
    11 Jul 06
    Posts
    651
    new pics





    Naval Warfare Discussion is dying on WAB

  14. #89
    Defense Moderator
    Defense Professional
    Lei Feng Protege
    xinhui's Avatar
    Join Date
    17 May 06
    Posts
    7,822
    J-15 with arresting hook retracted beneath the redesigned tail cone spotted at Shanyang AC company
    Attached Images Attached Images    
    “the misery of being exploited by capitalists is nothing compared to the misery of not being exploited at all” -- Joan Robinson

  15. #90
    Defense Moderator
    Defense Professional
    Lei Feng Protege
    xinhui's Avatar
    Join Date
    17 May 06
    Posts
    7,822
    A J-15 prototype was seen parked at the SAC airfield in May 2010 revealing its arresting hook retracted beneath the redesigned tail cone. J-15 is the first generation of Chinese shipborne fighter aircraft being developed by both 601 Institute and SAC for PLAN's first aircraft carrier. Initially there were rumors claiming that J-15 was a new semi-stealth design based on a similar but more advanced stealth design developed earlier by SAC/601 Institute to compete for the J-20 project (see below), but this design (J-19?) turned out to be a follow-on design which is in the early development stage at SAC . In order to save time and cut cost, the aircraft is now believed to be based on Russian Su-33 in terms of structural configuration and flight control system as well as domestic J-11B (see above) in terms of radar and weapon systems. Similar to Su-33, J-15 features folding wings, strengthened landing gears, an arresting hook, a pair of small canard foreplanes to improve its low speed handling and shortened tailcone to avoid tail-strike during high AoA landing. Some key shipborne aircraft technologies such as landing/navigational systems are believed to have been obtained from Russia and Ukraine. One Su-33 prototype (T-10K-3) was acquired from Ukraine around 2001 and has been studied extensively. J-15 is believed to share many common components with J-11B, such as a similar radar, the same glass cockpit as well as the improved WS-10 turbofan engine. It can also fire a variety of Chinese designed weapons, including PL-8, PL-12 AAMs and YJ-83K AShM. Overall J-15 is believed to be in the same class of American F/A-18C. The first prototype has been undergoing assembly at SAC since 2008. J-15 is expected first to be stationed onboard the Varyag aircraft carrier currently being fitted in Dalian. The first prototype made its maiden flight on August 31, 2009, powered by the domestic WS-10 turbofan engines. The latest rumor claimed that the first takeoff from a land based simulated ski-jump occurred on May 6, 2010.
    “the misery of being exploited by capitalists is nothing compared to the misery of not being exploited at all” -- Joan Robinson

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Most needed in US NAVY
    By Praxus in forum Naval Warfare
    Replies: 345
    Last Post: 18 May 08,, 01:36
  2. For all those stuck in the Cold War..
    By rickusn in forum Europe and Russia
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11 Feb 07,, 06:05
  3. China’s democratization and reunification
    By pin_qinghai in forum East Asia and the Pacific
    Replies: 100
    Last Post: 06 Jan 07,, 11:59

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •