Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 46

Thread: AEGIS Systems

  1. #1
    Regular
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Posts
    113

    AEGIS Systems

    Is there any other (foreign) system comparable to the AEGIS system out there?

    AEGIS I believe is on the Arleigh Burke Class Destroyers, Ticonderoga Class Cruisers, and the Oliver Hazard Perry Class Frigates(not sure).

  2. #2
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Posts
    16,429
    Not on the Perry frigates. Pretty soon they won't even have the ability to launch ANY missiles at all.

    There are a few foriegn operators of Aegis as well. Those include the Spanish F-100, and some German FFG whose name escapes me.
    Japan operates Kongou DDG's which are based on the Arleigh Burkes and have the SPY-1D.

    The new UK Type 45 promises to easily eclipse Aegis for fleet AAW with the new SAMPSON radar and Aster 15/30 fire and forget active radar homing SAMs.

  3. #3
    Regular
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Posts
    113
    Do you know if the Zumwalt Class Destroyers, will be equipped with a new system or an upgraded AEGIS system?

  4. #4
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Posts
    16,429
    The Zumwalt, or DD-21 was cancelled, and has been subsequently replaced by the DD-X concpet. It will be in the 12,000ton displ. range, and will indeed use a new version of Aegis, designated SPY-2A. Supposedly it will be LPI, and will be compatible with the SM-3 ABM.

  5. #5
    Regular
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Posts
    113
    Damnit the Zumwalt Class is cancelled :-x

    Zumwalt was a good man...

  6. #6
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Posts
    16,429
    The new ship is pretty similar in concept, just a different name really.

  7. #7
    Regular
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Posts
    113
    Cool...will it come out the same timeframe as the cancelled Zumwalt? I think the time frame for the Zumwalt was 2008-2012?

  8. #8
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Posts
    16,429
    Realisticly, 2015 at the earliest.

  9. #9
    New Member
    Join Date
    08 Aug 03
    Posts
    10
    How will the DDX compare to the Type 45 when it comes to AAW?

  10. #10
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Posts
    16,429
    DDX is expected to have 184-192 PVLS missile tubes, armored, that run along the periphery of the tumblehome form hull. These are designed to contain the explosion of even a large missile hit on the hull into one individual missile cell, thus preventing serious damage. That's the concept. If it works, it's a very good idea, lolol.

    The DD-X is also a full stealth design like the Visby. It has a fwd folding 6.1" AGS gun that will fire guided ANSR rounds to 79 nautical miles(There is still hope it will be fitted with fore and aft gun mounts). Magazine capacity will be between 700-1000rds.

    Close in defense is expected to be handled by twin Phalanx/SeaRam 11rd mounts and manned 25mm cannon mounts.

    Theater area air defense will be handled with the SM-2ACTIVE(a active homing-full vectored thrust SM-2ER now being developed). It will retain the SSM mode of all other SM series missiles.

    DD-X will also be capable of the TBMD role with full SM-3 anti ICBM capability.

    Fleet air defense will be handled wit the RIM-162 ESSM.

    This will be accomplished with the legacy SPY-2 improved Aegis Mk7 system, incorporating the latest in AESA technology including LPI capabilities. SPY-2 will also have full counterbattery artillery capability.

    Of course DD-X will also have full TACTOM and ASROC VLS compatibility.

    DD-X is expected to weigh between 12,000-14,000 tons, so in reality DD-X is a cruiser in all but name.

    A theoretical VLS loadout for a 192 tube DD-X could be 64 TACTOM, 96 SM-2ACTIVE, 96 ESSM, and 6 ASROC VLS, together with the 2x11 SeaRam and guns.

    The ship's comprehensive layered defenses, combined with as much as 1000 tons of Kevlar armor, full EMP hardening, the PVLS armored belt, electric drive engines capable of exceeding 30knots, Prairie/Masker sonar masking, and an as yet unselected torpedo defense system- DD-X is expected to be extremely survivable in even the most severe threat environments.

    DD-X TACTOM capability gives it a massive stand-off punch in both the strike and OTH antishipping roles.

    This will all be accomplished with unprecedented digitial systems integration and greatly reduced manning.

    Now we just have to sit back and see if it all works...

    Here's a link on the PVLS system...

    http://peoships.crane.navy.mil/ddx/vls.htm


    Link for the EMP resistant LO superstructure...

    http://peoships.crane.navy.mil/ddx/deckhouse.htm

    Here's a link on the AGS gun system...

    http://peoships.crane.navy.mil/ddx/ags.htm

    Here's a pic of the ship...


  11. #11
    Regular
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Posts
    113
    Damn, that is gonna be one kick ass warship.

  12. #12
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Posts
    16,429
    If the navy don't cancel it. They have a habit of cancelling systems after they spend billions on their development. Goes a long way toward explaining the massive budget crunch the USN is faced with.

  13. #13
    Jay
    Jay is offline
    Tamizhanban Senior Contributor Jay's Avatar
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    2,692
    pff thats one hell of an ABM/air defense platform :-(

    I got some questions about AESA radar...how come the chinese were able to make this...with out havind what so ever knowledge in active radar systems??

  14. #14
    Regular
    Join Date
    08 Aug 03
    Posts
    29
    Probably, Clinton let them steal the specs.

  15. #15
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    03 Aug 03
    Posts
    16,429
    AESA radar is nothing new, it's been around for several decades(See the US Cobra Dane radar array in Alaska).

    Ship sized units require the least miniturization, so it's no surprise that the PRC managed to field one of those first.

    While the new Chinese radar is AESA, it is almost certainly not to the same level of reliability, sensitivity, and fidelity as the US Aegis system.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Littoral Combat Ship Analysis
    By Dago in forum Naval Warfare
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 18 Jan 11,, 03:06
  2. Replies: 125
    Last Post: 21 Jun 08,, 04:33
  3. 2003 Navy Global Conops
    By Defcon 6 in forum Naval Warfare
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07 Jul 06,, 03:26
  4. JSF vs Rafale vs EF-2000
    By indianguy4u in forum Military Aviation
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 29 Aug 05,, 09:33

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •