+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4
Results 46 to 54 of 54

Thread: Dutch Subs "Sinking" US Carrier and many ships

  1. #46
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,433
    Country: Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by sidishus View Post
    You fight in war like you practice in peace...
    I was not under the impression that they were practicing anything. They kept up a normal screen but was not actively looking for threats.
    Chimo

  2. #47
    Regular
    Join Date
    27 May 06
    Posts
    61
    Quote Originally Posted by YellowFever
    I have serious doubt that killing one would be "much easier than the USN wants to admit".
    Mind you, I was talking about "mission kill".

    It was an excercise, dude, an excercise!
    And in this case the "exercise" for the Chinese apparently came out quite well...

    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    I was not under the impression that they were practicing anything. They kept up a normal screen but was not actively looking for threats.
    It is always practice. Especially against a real world threat. To be fair though, it may have been a situation that they had had her earlier and it had gone cold datum.

    However, this illustrates what gets usually missed in these discussions. Carriers don't get surprised by diesels in open ocean transits. It is during their presence role when carriers routinely stake themselves about a point conducting flight ops to make a point (When the president asks, "Where are the carriers?"...etc.).
    It makes it mighty easy for a diesel to find its way into the MODLOC-undetected- and simply wait for the carrier to come barging along on Fox Corpen overhead.

    I've seen the Russians do it, the Dutch do it, the Brits do it, the Israelis do it, the French,... Looks like the Chinese are in on the act.

    And that is most worrisome.
    Last edited by sidishus; 13 Nov 06, at 18:09.

  3. #48
    Official Thread Jacker Senior Contributor gunnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jan 06
    Location
    DPRK, Demokratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
    Posts
    21,322
    Country: United States
    How does a diesel sub shadow a CBG while submerged? I thought diesel subs usually have a top submerged speed of around 20 knots and a range of less than 200nm at that speed. After that, it has to surface and recharge the batteries.
    "Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.

  4. #49
    Regular
    Join Date
    27 May 06
    Posts
    61
    Quote Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
    How does a diesel sub shadow a CBG while submerged? I thought diesel subs usually have a top submerged speed of around 20 knots and a range of less than 200nm at that speed. After that, it has to surface and recharge the batteries.
    Again, you are thinking of an open water transit scenario and yes they would be hard to catch with a diesel...Except in an opposed breakout from a port like how the Onslow bagged the Vinson on the previous page.

    However, due to the overarching Presence missions (or currently, continual support to forces ashore a la Dixie Station of the Vietnam days), carriers stay in relatively constrained geographical areas for extended periods conducting flights ops.

    They are not hard to find and catch up with in a diesel once "on station".

  5. #50
    Global Moderator Defense Professional
    Join Date
    30 May 06
    Posts
    997
    Country: Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by sidishus View Post
    From what I have seen gf, I would not be so sanguine that a single ADCAP or similar would not take a carrier out of the fight -along with a substantial part of the remaining offensive assets in order to protect her- in very short order.
    We'll have to disagree. I've seen the proximity data for an ADCAP based on the BL7 mods. Unless its a golden BB, one ADCAP sized torpedo will not kill a carrier. (mobility kill is another issue altogether)

    Pulling a carrier from the LOC is a tactical decision - and then its up to someone to decide whether presence while mobilility impaired is still a greater deterrent than giving them the first string. (ie west of and incl guam)

    FWIW, my view is that this is a continuation of the string of pearls philosophy - they are attempting to push back the US as close to Guam as possible so as to reduce response times in the event of a move on taiwan.

    the PLAN has been more than active over the last few years west africa, the indian ocean, sth china sea etc... they had some boats sniffing around during Talisman 06 (and everyone could hear them) - so I seriously doubt that the cousins (ie the US) are oblivious to the "lift" in blue water tempo by the PLAN - in fact I know they aren't.

    I'm not being sanguine - but there is a need to pause and be able to recognise deliberate shows of colour and movement. The PLAN are nowhere near the skillset of the Soviets, and my personal belief is that they're nowhere near the technical capability and competency of the singaporeans. (who are a very professional and technically proficient outfit)
    Last edited by gf0012-aust; 14 Nov 06, at 08:15.

  6. #51
    Regular
    Join Date
    27 May 06
    Posts
    61
    Quote Originally Posted by gf0012-aust View Post
    We'll have to disagree. I've seen the proximity data for an ADCAP based on the BL7 mods. Unless its a golden BB, one ADCAP sized torpedo will not kill a carrier. (mobility kill is another issue altogether)

    Actually we do agree. My point has not been about sinking a carrier. It has been about an opponent mounting a credible sea-denial capability.
    In that regard, an opponent need not worry about sinking a carrier, just deter that crucial Presence mission, or, at the initiation of the fight, keep the carrier from flying at the most critical time.

    The Chinese are getting mighty close to being able to do that was we speak.
    Last edited by sidishus; 16 Nov 06, at 01:51.

  7. #52
    Regular
    Join Date
    27 May 06
    Posts
    61
    A cogent and insightful analysis of the Chinese Song's little dust up with the Kitty Hawk...which has significant pertinence to this thread since it concerns the viability of pitting a "crummy little" diesel boat against a "mighty" aircraft carrier...written by somebody currently in the business (which explains his inability to discuss in depth) can be found here:

    http://cdrsalamander.blogspot.com/20...r_archive.html

    Quote Originally Posted by Cdr Salamander
    Wednesday, November 15, 2006
    The Stalking of the KITTY HAWK
    Like Lex, I have held off putting anything down on the Chinese Sub that interrupted the USS KITTY HAWK's games. You see, there are some things you just don't talk about. Bubblehead has some interesting thoughts that I am mostly in line with, but TheSubReport has a percentage of the smart thinking as well. Being that, Admiral Fallon has spoken, I will dip my toe in the water some.

    First let me say this; cocky arrogance based on your archaic POV of ASW is a recipe for getting your ship sunk and your Sailors killed. Period. A lot of the "bunch of primitive Chinamen" bravado crap has to stop. Now. That same kind of talk was made about the fighting ability of Iraqis and the cake walk we would have. Not so funny, or true, now - is it? Stow it.

    The Chinese know what they are doing. They are playing the Long Game - an ongoing story here that long time readers are aware of. They are smart, large, and growing stronger by the WalMart shopping day. They have a history and culture that makes our upstart post-colonial melting pot look like the long-legged, klutzy teenager that it is. Sure they have challenges, but I ask you - where is their trend line?

    Enough of the Chinese. Let's talk about us. I am not going to talk about what did or did not happen with the Sh1tty Kitty. I am going to talk in more general terms.

    1. Sitting in your chair in confidence of Foxtrot Mike technology making everything easy? Nice tools, but you are a fool.

    2. How familiar are you with the waters around China?

    3. Do you really understand the time-distance challenges of the Pacific? Seriously, get the map out with your circular slide rule.

    4. Assume your subs are as perfect as you think. Fine. Can they be everywhere? Of course not. ASW is a numbers game in wartime. Look at the proficiency of our SH-60 series of helos in ASW. Ditto what little is left of our fixed wing ASW. S-3 is long gone, and what few P-3s we have left are trying to stay together long enough to preserve their community's Major Command billets till the P-8A shows up ~ half-way through the next decade. Ship ASW? Harumph. DD's - gone. FF(not so G)'s - might as well be gone. DDG-51s? Nice bit of kit - but those MK-41 cells have employment elsewhere outside ASW. As for the training and tactical sustainability of the above units? Don't BS a BS'r. I know where the money has gone over the last 15 years. ASW sensors and training has not been it.

    5. Assume you have found your "Made in China" SS. Ready to kill it? Really? 'Nuff said there.

    6. Ready for sustained ASW prosecution? Read what I have about the Falklands War? Magazine and lockers ready to go?

    7. Like your LWT? What if they don't quite work like you want, or you run out after a few days attacking ghosts? What then? Have a back-up plan? Have a back-up weapon? Where are all your eggs? It isn't hard to figure out how things can twist in war. It really isn't. Arrogance and wishing your problems away will only get you killed.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    It is hard to laugh at that non-nuke submarine that sank that USS ASHLAND 36 hours ago when you only have one SSTT MK-46 left and your helo is down until you can get another engine. To think that crew sailed all the way from Norfolk just to go like that. What was it, around 60 out of 800 or so Sailors and Marines the LASSEN and CARR managed to pluck out of the water?

    You know she is out there. 8 hours ago the P-3 flying out of Guam thought she saw her and dropped two MK-54 on a POSSUB contact over a 45 minute timeframe with nothing to show for it; and that was 15NM away from where everyone else thinks the SS is. Well, where the LASSEN attacked her. Thinks she attacked her. At least she still has a helo and 6 LWT left. The nearest US SSN, the HOUSTON, is another 8 hrs or so away...you think... You can't sleep because every 90 minutes or so someone thinks they saw something or there is something interesting on the UYS-1 that they just have to tell you about. You don't know if it is the caffeine or the pain in your stomach that is keeping you awake...but you are bolt awake.

    So, here you are. You, the REUBEN JAMES and the HOPPER are limping your way back to Guam at 5 knots with only one mission - get the NEW ORLEANS and her 1,000 plus Sailors and Marines back in one piece while the rest of the STRIKE GROUP keeps heading west. There she is. Still a 10 degree port list.

    5 knots. You swear she is going backwards. Lucky ship though. They say that Yuan-class (they think) fired four torps at her. Only one hit. Lucky ship. How many dead? Don't know. Forgot. Missing? They don't know. We aren't looking. Something tells you we left someone behind. You'll worry about that later.

    Why can't she go faster. Why? Two up helos that have even a prayer of doing ASW. 4 hours of P-3 time a day.
    the more reliable P-8s are all going west. Why didn't they give us more to fight with knowing we are on our own?

    "Unlikely to follow... possibly sunk... mission kill... better water for ASW..." Is it because you are so tired that you laugh everytime you hear someone say that?

    With the ESG running as fast as the slowest Gator Freighter to the waiting arms of the NORTH CAROLINA, and the BUSHSTRIKEGROUP; it is you and the Pacific. Cold, dark, quite Pacific. It doesn't look so peaceful anymore. A cigar on the helo deck isn't a time to relax. Every wave top looks like something it shouldn't be. There is so much that needs to be done.

    5 KTS. Days away. ASCM, even with less than a minute warning, you are comfortable with; but their torpedoes. The impotence. When you put your last MK-46 over the side and listen until its motor runs out of Otto fuel, what do you do then? Throw bug-juice at her? Have another P-3 chase a ghost in the middle of the night keeping your little ambulance service on edge? From what you are reading of message traffic, the odds are they will be out of sonobuoys by tomorrow anyway at the rate they are throwing them out to the west. So, you will that going for you. You'll take the radar though.

    You are sick of contact reports that mean nothing. Intel that takes 3 pages to remind you that there are known unknowns out there. This morning you watched a 18-year Navy AD1 break into tears because he couldn't fix your helo's broke-a55 engine and he was convinced that hundreds were going to die because he could make it happen. All he needs is sleep, but he won't. You won't. You can't.

    5 KTS. If you could get another 100NM away from the flaming DATUM you would feel better. 20 hours. No way that Chinese Skipper is still stalking our poor wounded girl. You would know. You should know. You don't know, do you. Our active sonar is so good and our tails are the best in the world - buy why did we miss her after the attack a day and a half ago? It isn't supposed to happen this way. You are so tired.

    5 KTS. 20 minutes of sleep, that is all you want. 20 minutes of blessed slumber.


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [W]e don't need to panic now. This Chinese SS thingy isn't a crisis...but it is an opportunity to think. Be humble. Do a little ORM. It is sleeping now while a potential challenger slowly reaches the tipping point that makes me worry.


    // posted by CDR Salamander @ 16:08

  8. #53
    Global Moderator Defense Professional
    Join Date
    30 May 06
    Posts
    997
    Country: Australia
    I do enjoy the Salamander Blog....

    The issue is that if this is supposed to be representative of systemic command malaise (as its not a craft competency issue - it is a commanders local doctrine isssue) - then the wake up call should have kick started off of Angola.

    Are you suggesting that this operation is a continuation of systemic command indolence?

    I think it is grossly negligent to continue to see the PLAN as a backwater greenwater navy as they will change - and they have the political will and intent to make that change. Similarly we know that they've been making concerted efforts to fast track development of their own tech and divorce themselves of copied western equipment like arrays, sonars and transducers - after all they blatantly offer them for sale at Western UDT events.

    I do question what amounts to a polarised change in their overall competency though as its not as if they aren't monitored. Not everything hits the press.

  9. #54
    Regular
    Join Date
    27 May 06
    Posts
    61
    Quote Originally Posted by gf0012-aust View Post
    I do enjoy the Salamander Blog....

    The issue is that if this is supposed to be representative of systemic command malaise (as its not a craft competency issue - it is a commanders local doctrine isssue) - then the wake up call should have kick started off of Angola.Are you suggesting that this operation is a continuation of systemic command indolence
    Sure this is a matter of malaise. The USN's operating patterns have fundamentally remained the same since Vietnam days.

    Care to share (as best you can) what happened off Angola?

    Also, in the matter of how much damage a carrier can sustain from a torpedo hit, I'm sure much imperical data has been obtained from the America sinkex, but ANY kind of hit on a carrier is going to force its retirement regardless of notional studies.


    I think it is grossly negligent to continue to see the PLAN as a backwater greenwater navy as they will change - and they have the political will and intent to make that change. Similarly we know that they've been making concerted efforts to fast track development of their own tech and divorce themselves of copied western equipment like arrays, sonars and transducers - after all they blatantly offer them for sale at Western UDT events.
    Excellent point.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts