Page 6 of 13 FirstFirst 12345678910111213 LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 195
Like Tree11Likes

Thread: Worlds Most Advance War Ship

  1. #76
    Senior Contributor Dago's Avatar
    Join Date
    23 Feb 06
    Location
    San Diego, Califonia
    Posts
    1,037
    Good Read on the development of radar over the decades and the Soviet Bomber threat and ABM efforts - http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/ai..._the_skies.htm

    Phased Arrays and Radars – Past, Present and Future - http://www.mwjournal.com/journal/art...sp?HH_ID=AR_29

    First monolithic radar transmit/receive modules with acceptable yields from Texas Instrument in 1985 (MMIC) - http://smithsonianchips.si.edu/texas/t_061.htm

    Missile Site Radar (MSR) / Missile Site Control Building (MSCB) to augment the first ABM effort dubbed "SafeGuard" which protected missile sites and utilized nuclear tipped missiles and array radars - http://srmsc.org/msr2000.html (http://www.maxwell.af.mil/au/awc/awc...8/au18003d.htm)

    ----------- ----------
    To complement these missiles (Nikes), the Army developed new radars. The perimeter acquisition radar (PAR), a phased array radar located at Concrete, North Dakota, detected incoming missiles and provided targeting data. The multifunction array radar, tested at WSMR in July 1964, proved inadequate and the Army replaced it with the improved missile site radar (MSR). The new radar first operated at KMR in September 1968. Located at the missile site, the MSR could discriminate targets at 700 miles and provided terminal phase guidance and targeting information for Spartan and Sprint. An ABM complex consisted of a long-range PAR, a short-range MSR, and Spartan and Sprint missiles with four remote Sprint launch sites about 25 miles from the MSR. Total cost was about $6 million.(138)


    Nike Zeus Radars (Brief on the history of US ABM's) - http://www.paineless.id.au/missiles/Radars.html and http://www.paineless.id.au/missiles/Sprint.html


    Ballistic Missile Early Warning System - http://www.bwcinet.com/thule/index.html


    AN/FPS-85 Spacetrack Radar - http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/.../an-fps-85.htm (The transmitter array contains 5,928 transmitter antennas in a 78 x 76 square array and 5,184 transmitter modules installed in a 72 x 72 square array. The receiver array contains 19,500 receiver antennas and 4,660 receiver modules.)


    More on the development of phased array over the years (More in detail) - http://www.ll.mit.edu/news/journal/p...hasedarray.pdf


    Abstract


    The Development of Phased-Array Radar Technology - Alan J. Fenn, Donald H. Temme, William P. Delaney, and William E. Courtneys Lincoln Laboratory has been involved in the development of phased-array radar technology since the late 1950s. Radar research activities have included theoretical analysis, application studies, hardware design, device fabrication, and system testing. Early phased-array research was centered on improving the national capability in phased-array radars. The Laboratory has developed several test-bed phased arrays, which have been used to demonstrate and evaluate components, beamforming techniques, calibration, and testing methodologies. The Laboratory has also contributed significantly in the area of phased-array antenna radiating elements, phase-shifter technology, solid-stateransmit-and-receive modules, and monolithic microwave integrated circuit (MMIC) technology. A number of developmental phased-array radar systems have resulted from this research, as discussed in other articles in this issue. A wide variety of processing techniques and system components have also been developed. This article provides an overview of more than forty years of this phased-array radar research activity.

    Excerpts


    - The Beginning

    Lincoln Laboratory started working on phased-array radar development projects around 1958 in the Spe- cial Radars group of the Radio Physics division. The initial application was satellite surveillance, and the level of national interest in this work was very high after the Soviet Union’s launch of the first artificial earth satellite—Sputnik I—in 1957.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




    First Electronically Steerable Array Radar


    1958 - Electronically Steerable Array Radar (ESAR) RADC developed the AN/FPS-46 Electronically Steerable Array Radar (ESAR). This was the first full-size pencil-beam phased-array radar system. (Prototype for the AN/APS-85)

    - http://www.rl.af.mil/History/1950s/1958.html

    1960 - Electronically Steerable Array Radar In November, the Electronically Steerable Array Radar (ESAR) was powered up for the first time. This radar was capable of positioning a beam in space by electronic means, eliminating the need for mechanical antenna rotation. ESAR subsequently proved useful in the development of Cobra Dane.

    -http://www.rl.af.mil/History/1960s/1960.html


    First deployed ESAR - http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/...an-fps-85.html


    PAR - http://srmsc.org/par2000.html
    - http://www.fas.org/spp/military/program/track/par.htm


    Cobra Dane - http://www.missilethreat.com/systems...ane_radar.html


    AN/FPS-108 (Cobra Dane)

    Cobra Dane was a large single-faced, phased-array radar built by Raytheon in the 1970s on Shemya Island in the Aleutians. As the main component of the Cobra system, the radar had the primary role of providing intelligence on Soviet test missiles fired at the Kamchatka peninsula from locations in southwestern Russia. Other components of the Cobra system included the ship-based Cobra Judy phased-array radar and the aircraft-based Cobra Ball and Cobra Eye radars. In addition to determining Soviet missile capabilities, Cobra Dane had the dual secondary role of tracking space objects and providing ballistic missile early warning. The radar antenna face of the building measured about ninety feet in diameter and contained some 16,000 elements. The L-band radar had a range of 2,000 miles and could track space objects as far as 25,000 miles away.





    --------------------------
    During the 1970s, the Soviets developed SLBMs that could be launched from greater distances away from the American Coastline. For example, the Soviet Delta I class ballistic missile submarine carried the SS-N-8 missile that had a range of over 4,000 nautical miles. This was beyond the detection capability of either the AN/FSS-7 or the OTH-B radar system being developed. 78 Consequently, the Air Force had to turn to another solution.

    The solution was a phased-array warning system to become known as "PAVE PAWS" (Perimeter Acquisition Vehicle Entry Phased-Array Warning System). Originally designed as a two-site system, PAVE PAWS sites were constructed in the late 1970s at Otis AFB, Massachusetts, and Beale AFB, California. From a distance, the PAVE PAWS structure looked like a three-sided pyramid with a flattened top. On the two seaward faces of the pyramid, Raytheon installed the AN/FPS-115 with its phased-array antenna. Thirty meters in diameter and consisting of 2,000 elements, each antenna could detect objects launched as far away as 3,000 miles. The Otis site became operational in 1979and the Beale site became operational a year later.

    A contract for two more continental PAVE PAWS sites, was awarded in 1984. AnANfFPS-115 at Robins AFB, Georgia, became operational in 1986 and another unit at Eldorado AFS, Texas, was activated in 1987. Additional AN/FPS-115 PAVE, PAWS radars were installed in the 1990s at BMEWS sites at Thule, Greenland, and Fylingdale Moor, England, to assume the ICBM detection mission. As PAVE PAWS sites in the United States were activated, the older AN/FSS-7 radars were phased out, except for the MacDill AFB site that continued to provide additional coverage over Cuba . 70
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------


    History -

    PART II

    SYSTEMS OVERVIEW

    RADAR SYSTEMS CLASSIFICATION METHODS

    During World War II, each service used its own method to designate its electronic radar/tracking systems. For example, Army radars were classified under the initials SCR, which stood for "Signal Corps Radio." Different designations for similar systems confused manufacturers and complicated electronics procurement. In February 1943, a universal classification system was implemented for all services to follow, ending the confusion. To indicate that an electronic system designation followed the new universal classification, the letters "AN," for Army-Navy, were placed ahead of a three-letter code. The first letter of the three-letter code denoted the type of platform hosting the electronic device, for example: A=Aircraft; C=Air transportable (letter no longer used starting in the1950s); F=Fixed permanent land-based; G=General ground use; M=Ground mobile; S=Ship-mounted; T=Ground transportable. The second letter indicated the type of device, for example: P=Radar (pulsed); Q=Sonar; R--Radio. The third letter indicated the function of the radar system device, for example: G=Fire control; R=Receiving (passive detection); S=Search; T=Transmitting. Thus an AN/FPS-20 represented the twentieth design of an Army-Navy "Fixed, Radar, Search" electronic device.

    World War II Radars

    This section describes the World War II vintage radars that saw service during the Cold War. The systems are listed in numerical order, bypassing the three-letter code. During World War II, search and height-finder radars became components of America's electronic arsenal. The function of the search radar was to detect and obtain a line of bearing on an aircraft. Early models such as the SCR-270 and 271 looked like large bed-springs. Later designs, such as the AN/CPS-5 looked like a large oval dish. Search radars generally rotated full circle around a central axis. In contrast to the rotating search radar antenna, the horizontally mounted height-finder radar focused on the tracked aircraft's reported bearing. The radar antenna dish then scanned up and down to provide the operators with the estimated height of the aircraft.

    AN/TPS-lB, 1C, 1D

    Bell Telephone Laboratories developed this radar that subsequently was produced by the Western Electric Company. A crew of two could operate the radar. The 1B model could detect bombers at 10,000 feet at a distance of 120 nautical miles. The height detection and range on the 1C and 1D models exceeded those of the 1B. The transmitter sent its pulse at an L-band frequency between 1220 to 1280 megahertz (MHz). This long-range search radar was used in the temporary Lashup system beginning in 1948.

    AN/CPS-4

    Developed by MIT's Radiation Laboratory, this height-finding radar was nicknamed "Beaver Tail." The radar was designed to be used in conjunction with the SCR-270 and SCR-271 search sets. The CPS-4 required six operators. This S-band radar, operating in the 2700 to 2900 MHz range, could detect targets at a distance of ninety miles. The vertical antenna was twenty feet high and five feet wide. This radar was often paired with the AN/FPS-3 search radar during the early 1950s at permanent network radar sites.

    AN/CPS-5

    Bell Telephone Laboratories and General Electric developed this search radar. General Electric began producing sets in January 1945. Designated as a transportable medium-range search radar, the unit was ideal for use in the Lashup system in conjunction with the AN/TPS- 10 height-finder radar. It could be operated with a crew of ten. Some of these units remained to serve in the first permanent network. Designed to provide a solid search of up to 60 miles at 40,000 feet, the radar often had success tracking aircraft as far as 210 miles away.

    AN/CPS-6, 6A, 6B

    The AN/CPS-6 was developed during the later stages of World War II by the Radiation Laboratory at MIT. The first units were produced in mid-1945. General Electric developed and produced the A-model and subsequent B-model at a plant in Syracuse, New York. The unit consisted of two antennas. One of the antennas slanted at a forty-five degree angle to provide the height-finder capability. Initially, the radar was designed to detect fighter aircraft at 100 miles and16,000 feet. The radar used five transmitters that operated at S-band frequencies ranging from 2700 AN/CPS-6to 3019 MHz. It took twenty-five people to operate the radar. An AN/CPS-6 radar was installed as part of the Lashup system at Twin Lights, New Jersey, in 1949 and proved capable of detecting targets at ranges of eighty-four miles. The first units of the follow-on 6B radar set were ready for installation by mid-1950. Fourteen 6B units were used within the first permanent net-work. A component designed to improve the radar's range was added in 1954. Initial tests showed the 6B unit had a range of 165 miles with an altitude limit of 45,000 feet. One radar unit and its ancillary electronic equipment had to be transported in eighty-five freight cars. The Air Force phased out the 6B model between mid-1957 and mid-1959.

    AN/TPS-10, 1OA /AN/FPS-4

    MIT's Radiation Laboratory developed and produced the first version of this radar near the end of World War II. Zenith produced the A-model sets in the post-war period. The vertically mounted antenna was three feet wide and ten feet long. Two operators were needed to run the set. The initial model operated at a frequency of 9000 to 9160MHz and had a maximum reliable range for bombers of 60 miles at 10,000 feet. An updated version designated the AN/FPS-4 was produced by the Radio Corporation of America (RCA) beginning in 1948. Some 450 copies of this and the trailer-mountedAN/MPS-8 version were built between 1948 and 1955.

    Early Cold War Search Radars

    Early Cold War search radars essentially were advanced or improved versions of World War Il era sets. In some cases, the performance of the new sets fell short of expectations.

    AN/FPS-3, 3A

    The AN/FPS-3 was a modified version of the AN/CPS-5 long-range search radar. The first units came off the Bendix production line and were ready for installation in late 1950. Forty-eight of these L-band units were used within the first permanent network. The AN/FPS-3B incorporated an AN/GPA-27, which increased the search altitude to65,000 feet. Installation of these modifications began in 1957.

    AN/FPS-5

    The AN/FPS-5 was a long-range search radar produced in the early 1950s by Hazel-tine. Deployment was limited.

    AN/FPS-8

    The AN/FPS-8 was a medium-range search radar operating on the L-band at a frequency of 1280 to 1380 MHz. Developed in the 1950s by General Electric, over 200 units of this radar were produced between 1954 and 1958. Variants of this radar included theAN/GPS-3 and the AN/MPS-11.

    AN/FPS-10

    This unit was essentially a stripped down version of the AN/CPS-6B. Thirteen of these units served within the first permanent network.

    SAGE System Compatible Search Radars

    Various manufacturers began design work on compatible search radars for SAGE systems in the mid-1950s in conjunction with the development of the SAGE Command and Control System. Because Project LAMPLIGHT indicated radar vulnerability to electronic countermeasures, the Air Force developed a series of radars that could shift frequency. These frequency-diversity (FD) radars included the AN/FPS-24, AN/FPS-27, andAN/FPS-35.

    AN/FPS-7, 7A, 7B, 7CI 7D

    In the mid-1950s, General Electric developed a radar with a search altitude of 100,000 feet and a range of 270 miles. This radar was significant in that it was the first stacked-beam radar to enter into production in the United States. Designed to operate in the L-band at 1250 to 1350 MHz, the radar deployed in late 1959 and the early 1960s. The AN/FPS-7 was used for both air defense and air traffic control in New York, Kansas City, Houston, Spokane, San Antonio, and elsewhere. In the early 1960s, a modification called AN/ECP-91 was installed to improve its electronic countermeasure (ECM) capability. About thirty units were produced.

    AN/FPS-20,20A, 20B

    This Bendix-built radar was an AN/FPS-3 search radar with an AN/GPA-27 installed. Designed to operate in the L-band frequencies of 1250 to 1350 MHz, the radar had a range of over 200 miles. By the late 1950s this radar dominated the United States radar defense net. Deployment continued into the early 1960s. In June 1959, Bendix received a contract to provide private industry's MK-447 (the same as the military's AN/GPA-103) and MK-448 (AN/GPA-102) anti-jam packages to the radars. With the addition of these packages, the Air Force redesignated the radars. The AN/FPS-20A with the AN/GPA-102 became the AN/FPS-66 and the AN/FPS-20A with the AN/GPA-103 became the AN/FPS-67. Over 200 units were built.

    AN/FPS-24

    General Electric built an FD search radar designed to operate in the Very High Frequency (VHF) at 214 to 236 MHz. There were problems with this radar at the test site at Eufaula, Alabama, in 1960. These problems required many modifications. Additional problems occurred when deployment was attempted in 1961. When the radar finally deployed, bearing problems often occurred due to the eighty-five ton antenna weight. Twelve systems were built between 1958 and 1962.

    AN/IFPS-27,27A

    Westinghouse built an FD search radar designed to operate in the S-band at 2322 to2670 MHz. The radar was designed to have a maximum range of 220 nautical miles and search to an altitude of 150,000 feet. System problems required several modifications at the test platform located at Crystal Springs, Mississippi. Once these problems were solved, the first of twenty units in the continental United States became operational a Charleston, Maine, in 1963. The last unit was installed at Bellefontaine, Ohio, a year later. In the early 1970s, AN/FPS-27 radar stations that had not been shutdown received a modification (solid state circuitry replacing vacuum tubes) that improved reliability and saved on maintenance costs.

    AN/FPS-28

    Raytheon designed this search radar to operate at 410 to 690 MHz. A test unit was placed at Huoma Naval Air Station (NAS) in Louisiana.

    AN/FPS-30

    Bendix built this long-range search radar that operated in the L-band.

    AN/FPS-31

    Designed by Lincoln Laboratory, this huge radar was designed to be compatible with the SAGE system. A prototype was built at Jug Handle Hill in West Bath, Maine. The antenna was 120 feet wide and 16 feet high. Operations began in October 1955. After a period of unexpected clutter, it was determined that the radar received echoes from the aurora borealis (Northern Lights) and this hindered tracking. Although this model was never mass-produced for active use, lessons learned from this radar would continue supporting SAGE system research and development.

    AN/FPS-35

    This Sperry-built FD long-range search radar was designed to operate at 420 to 450MHz. It was first deployed in December 1960, but problems hampered the program. Four of these units were operational in 1962. The system suffered frequent bearing problems as the antenna weighed seventy tons.

    AN/FPS-64, 65, 66, 67, 67A, 72

    These radars were modified versions of the Bendix AN/FPS-20 search radar. See theAN/FPS-20 entry.

    AN/FPS-87A

    Bendix built this long-range L-band search radar that was based on the AN/FPS-20. See the AN/FPS-20 entry.

    AN/IFPS-88

    General Electric produced this updated version of the AN/FPS-8 radar in the late1960s. The AN/FPS-88 operated in the L-band at 1280 to 1380 MHz and featured some ECM capability.

    AN/IFPS-91

    This radar was another version of the AN/FPS-20 search radar produced by Bendix. See the AN/FPS-20 entry.

    AN/IFPS-93

    Raytheon modified the AN/FPS-20 radar to create this radar. See the AN/FPS-20entry.

    AN/IFPS-100

    This radar was another modernization of the Bendix AN/FPS-20 radar. See theAN/FPS-20 entry.

    AN/FPS-107

    This Westinghouse-built search radar operated in the L-band at 1250 to 1350 MHz.

    SAGE System Compatible Height-finder Radars

    To complement the search radars, height-finding radars were developed to detect aircraft at increasing altitudes. The AN/FPS-6 would serve as the standard model for much of the Cold War.

    AN/IFPS-6,6A, 6B

    The AN/FPS-6 radar was introduced into service in the late 1950s and served as the principal height-finder radar for the United States for several decades there after. Built by General Electric, the S-band radar radiated at a frequency of 2700 to 2900 MHz. Between 1953 and 1960, 450 units of the AN/FPS-6 and the mobile AN/MPS- 14 version were produced.

    AN/FPS-26

    Avco Corporation built this height-finder radar that operated at a frequency of 5400 to 5900 MHz. This radar deployed in the1960s.

    AN/FPS-89

    General Electric produced this improved version of the AN/FPS-6 height-finder radar in the early

    1970s. Operating in the S-band, this high-power radar was capable of detecting targets at a range of over 110 miles.

    AN/FPS-90

    Martin Marietta produced the high-powered version of the AN/FPS-6 height-finder radar. Seethe AN/FPS-6 entry.

    AN/FPS-116

    This radar was another modernized version of the ANAFPS-6 height-finder radar. Seethe AN/FPS-6 entry.

    Gap-Filler Radars

    Gap-filler radars were designed to cover areas where enemy aircraft could fly low enough to evade detection by distant long-range search radars. Between 1957 and 1962, some 200 AN/FPS-14 and AN/FPS-18 models were built.

    AN/FPS-14

    This medium-range search radar was designed and built by Bendix as a SAGE system gap-filler radar to provide low-altitude coverage. Operating in the S-band at a frequency between 2700 and 2900 MHz, the AN/FPS-14 could detect at a range of 65 miles. The system was deployed in the late 1950s and 1960s.

    AN/FPS-18

    This medium-range search radar was designed and built by Bendix as a SAGE system gap-filler to provide low-altitude coverage. The radar operated in the S-band at a frequency between 2700 and 2900 MHz. The system deployed in the late 1950s and 1960s.

    AN/FPS-19

    This Raytheon gap-filler radar was deployed on the Distant Early Warning (DEW)Line. It operated in the S-band.

    AN/FPS-19

    North Warning System Radars

    The North Warning System replaced the DEW Line system in the late 1970s. New equipment came with the change in system designation. A key component of the modernization was a long-range radar system formally known as Seek Igloo. The system is based around the AN/FPS-117.

    AN/FPS-117

    This 3-D long-range radar was built by GE Aerospace for use at Alaskan sites and on the Northern Warning System. The radar operated at 1215 to 1400 MHz and had a range of about 220 miles.

    AN/FPS-124

    This medium-range radar was built by Unisys to serve as an unmanned gap-filler radar on the North Warning System.

    Ballistic Missile Early Warning System (BMEWS) Radars

    With the advent of ballistic missiles, millions of dollars were spent to research, develop, test, and deploy BMEWS radars.

    AN/FSS-7

    This radar was a modified AN/FPS-26 height-finder radar produced by Avco Corporation to detect submarine-launched ballistic missiles. The system deployed at seven sites in the 1970s. Six sites were phased out during the early 1980s.The remaining unit continued in operation in the southeast for a few more years to provide coverage over Cuba.

    AN/FPS-17

    With the Soviet Union apparently making rapid progress in its rocket program, in1954 the United States began a program to develop a tracking radar. General Electric was the contractor and Lincoln Laboratory was the subcontractor. This tracking radar, the AN/FPS-1 7, was conceived, designed, built, and installed for operation in less than two years. Installed at Laredo AFB in Texas, the first AN/FPS-17 was used to track rockets launched from White Sands, New Mexico. The radar was unique; it featured a fixed-fence antenna that stood 175 feet high and 110 feet wide. The transmitter sent out ash pulse at a frequency between 180 to 220 MHz. Units were installed in the late1950s at Shemya Island in the Aleutians and in Turkey. The unit at Shemya subsequently was replaced by the Cobra Dane (AN/FPS-100) radar.

    AN/FPS-49,49A

    This large radar was built by RCA for use in the BMEWS program and the satellite-tracking program that deployed in the 1960s. The prototype unit operated at Moorestown, New Jersey. Two additional units were installed in Greenland and England. The radar frequency operated in the Ultra High Frequency (UHF) band and could track objects beyond 3,000 miles.

    AN/FPS-50

    This was a BMEWS program surveillance radar that used a large, fixed-antenna fence system. Two beams were projected from the antenna array. Objects passing through the lower-angled beam provided initial data and warning for the North American Air Defense Command (NORAD). Data produced when the object passed through the upper beam allowed computation of trajectories on launch and target points. The radar operated in the UHF range at 425 MHz. General Electric, Heavy Military Electronics Department, installed these systems at Clear, Alaska, and Thule, Greenland, during the early1960s.

    AN/FPS-85

    This UHF, 3-D, phased-array radar was designed by Bendix for satellite tracking. Built in the early 1960s at Eglin AFB in Florida, it was the first phased-array unit in the United States. A fire destroyed the first model in 1965. A rebuilt model became operational in 1969. The southward-sloped structure contained a square transmitter face placed alongside a larger octangular receiving face. The transmitter operated at a UHF frequency of 442 MHz. The AN/FPS-85 was also used to detect submarine-launched ballistic missiles.

    AN/FPS-92

    This improved version of the AN/FPS-49 tracking radar was used in the BMEWS Program. Built by RCA, this radar was installed at Clear, Alaska, in the late 1960s. The radar operated in the UHF band around 425 MHz and had a range of over 3,000 miles.

    AN/FPS-108 (Cobra Dane)

    Cobra Dane was a large single-faced, phased-array radar built by Raytheon in the 1970s on Shemya Island in the Aleutians. As the main component of the Cobra system, the radar had the primary role of providing intelligence on Soviet test missiles fired at the Kamchatka peninsula from locations in southwestern Russia. Other components of the Cobra system included the ship-based Cobra Judy phased-array radar and the aircraft-based Cobra Ball and Cobra Eye radars. In addition to determining Soviet missile capabilities, Cobra Dane had the dual secondary role of tracking space objects and providing ballistic missile early warning. The radar antenna face of the building measured about ninety feet in diameter and contained some 16,000 elements. The L-band radar had a range of 2,000 miles and could track space objects as far as 25,000 miles away.

    AN/FPS-115

    Raytheon built the PAVE PAWS phased-array, missile-warning radar deployed during the early 1980s. At the four continental United States sites, the ninety foot diameter circular panel radars were mounted on two walls of a triangular-shaped pyramid structure. The antenna operated at a frequency of 420 to 450 MHz. PAVE PAWS could detect targets at ranges approaching 3,000 miles.

    AN/FPS-118 (OTH-B)

    Designed and built by GE Aerospace, the OTH-B radar was deployed on the east and west coasts in the 1980s. The system reflected the radar beam off the ionosphere to detect objects from ranges of 500 to nearly 2,000 miles. The transmitter arrays operated at frequencies between 5 and 28 MHz. Fixed transmitter and receiving antenna arrays were separated by a distance of 80 to 120 miles.

    PARCS

    The acronym, PARCS, stands for Perimeter Acquisition Radar attack Characterization System. This huge structure was built as the main sensor for the Army's Safeguard missile system that deployed north of Grand Forks, North Dakota. Upon shut down of Safeguard in 1976, the Air Force took over the huge UHF phased-array radar for use in tracking ballistic missiles and objects in space.

    Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Radars

    Beginning in the late 1950s, the Civil Air Administration (predecessor to the FAA) and the DoD began to cooperate to reduce duplication. By the late 1980s most radars performing air search for the military were operated by the FAA in the joint surveillance program. Because it is a civilian agency, the FAA uses a different radar designation system.

    ARSR-1

    This Raytheon-built Air Route Surveillance Radar (ARSR) was used by the FAA Authority Radar beginning in 1958. It operated on a L-band frequency of 1280 to 1350MHz with a maximum range of 200 miles.

    ARSR-2

    Developed by Raytheon in the 1960s as a replacement for the ARSR-1, this radar also operated in the L-band and had a similar maximum range to the ARSR-1.

    ARSR-3,3D

    This Westinghouse-built search radar was used by the FAA in the Joint Surveillance System (JSS). The radar operated in the L-band at 1250 to 1350 MHz and detected targets at a distance beyond 240 miles. The D model had height-finder capability.

    ARSR-4

    The FAA began installing this Westinghouse-built 3-D air surveillance radar in the1990s for the JSS system. By the late 1990s this radar will have replaced most of the 1960s-vintage AN/FPS-20 variant search radars.
    Last edited by Dago; 29 Mar 06, at 12:19.

  2. #77
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    25 Apr 06
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    1,272
    48 is only the initial figure. Lots of cuts were made from the type 45 for budget reasons - as usual.... if you look carefully at the VLS in this picture it indicates space for another row of VLS cells, possibly 3 x 8, which would bring the total load of missiles to 72.

    http://navy-matters.beedall.com/imag...5-Jun02-02.jpg

    The VLS may actually be replaced by the A70 or Mark 41 in future retrofits to Daring, in order to accomodate either TLAMs or possibly SCALP EG NAVALE ( which has always been a claimed capability for the Type 45 in the longterm).

    I admit that the lack of missiles is slightly worrying although a typical British approach to warfare . The only thing I would put in defence of having such a small load out of missiles is that the RN foresees itself fighting any future large scale conflict alongside the USN, where the abilities of the Aster would compliment those of the SM2 and ESSM.

    The only time that Type 45's are likely to be attacked without a friendly DD51 or Tico nearby is the Falklands and once we have a couple of Darings online - bye bye Argie airforce without or without your Exocets...

    Oh don't slag off Sea Dart - still the only system with a proven anti-missile kill in combat in the world ;-)
    Last edited by PubFather; 26 Apr 06, at 20:41. Reason: typo

  3. #78
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    08 Sep 05
    Posts
    272
    Quote Originally Posted by PubFather

    Oh don't slag off Sea Dart - still the only system with a proven anti-missile kill in combat in the world ;-)
    ---------------------
    Info on Sea Dart
    ---------------------
    Design:-

    Sea Dart is a two-stage, 4.4m long missile weighing 550 kg. It is launched using a drop-off Chow solid-fueled booster that accelerates it to the supersonic speed necessary for the operation of the cruise motor, a Bristol Aerojet kerosene-fueled Odin ramjet. This gives a cruise speed of over Mach 2.5, and unlike many rocket powered designs the cruise engine burns for the entire flight, giving excellent terminal manouverability at extreme range. It is capable of engaging targets out to at least 30 nautical miles over a wide range of altitudes.

    Guidance is by semi-active radar homing, with targets being identified by a radar Type 1022 (originally radar Type 965) and illuminated by 1 of a pair of radar Type 909. This allows two targets to be engaged simultaneously. Firing is from a twin-arm trainable launcher that is loaded automatically from below decks. The original launcher seen on the Bristol was significantly larger than that that appeared on the Type 42 and Invincible classes.


    Combat Service:-


    Falklands War

    Sea Dart was used during the Falklands War and is credited with 7 confirmed kills (plus one british Gazelle helicopter by friendly fire). One kill was against a high-flying Learjet reconnaissance aircraft beyond the missiles stated technical envelope. Other kills were made against low-flying attack aircraft. However, it was found to be unsuitable when operating close inshore as it was unable to lock onto targets at distance obscured by land and fast-moving low-level targets obscured in ground clutter or sea-returns. These shortcomings were more damning of the Type 42 destroyer than Sea Dart itself, as the former were fitted with obsolete 1950s-era radar Type 965 and had no other defence against aircraft apart from a pair of World War 2-vintage 20mm guns.


    Gulf War (1991)

    In February 1991 during the first Gulf War the battleship USS Missouri, escorted by the Sea Dart carrying HMS Gloucester and the Phalanx CIWS-equipped USS Jarrett, was engaged by an Iraqi Silkworm missile (also known as a Seersucker). After an unsuccessful response from the Phalanx 20mm CIWS of Jarrett, the missile was intercepted by a Sea Dart fired from Gloucester, making this the first validated, successful engagement of a missile by a missile during combat at sea.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by Simullacrum; 27 Apr 06, at 12:06.

  4. #79
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    25 Apr 06
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    1,272
    A very fine piece of British engineering indeed....
    As far as I know the RN tested RAM but rejected it in favour of ( eventually) fitting phalanx as CIWS but mainly because of its anti-surface (small boat) capabilities - has anyone else heard this?

    I suppose it could be easily retro-fitted on top of the hangar at some stage, and it would be nice to have another layer of defence - just in case...
    Last edited by PubFather; 27 Apr 06, at 20:05.

  5. #80
    Banned
    Join Date
    17 Jan 06
    Location
    London
    Posts
    31
    I attended an arranged visit to HMS Sultan a week ago where the Daring class was discussed:

    The Sampson radar weights 9 tons and is situated 45m above sea level, so the superstruture must be capable of withstanding a lot of stress, ergo the unusual apprearance

    During recent tests rumour has it that the ship was tracking every aircraft in western europe!! essentially making its long range radar unnecessary

    Its powerplant, the design of which i saw today uses an advanced heat exchanger which increases the air temperature before intake, making it very efficient this is somewhat in response to increased fuel prices. However the engine also requires a lot of man hours to maintain

    The ship will carry the vertically launched sea wolf

    The reason for the daring class only having a weapons module forward of the superstructure is because the rear is dedicated to the hanger for the merlin helicopter. The merlin is far more capable than the sea lynx, overall weight is 3 times greater and it has multi mission capabilities, such as transport of 24 troops, a range of weapons, dunking sonar and a range of 1000km on internal fuel tanks

    On another note I was disappointed to hear half the staff i talked to referring to the new CVFs as still only a maybe

  6. #81
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    09 Aug 03
    Posts
    1,317
    "The ship will carry the vertically launched sea wolf "

    AFAIK The Type 45 is to be equipped with 48 ASTER 15 & 30 missles in Sylver A50 VLS cells not Sea Wolf.

    If somehow this has changed(which I doubt) then it is no longer capable of area anti-air defense and should be reclassified as a frigate to reflect this drastic change in capability.

    As for this:

    "During recent tests rumour has it that the ship was tracking every aircraft in western europe!! essentially making its long range radar unnecessary."

    Horse Manure

  7. #82
    Official Thread Jacker Senior Contributor gunnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    27 Jan 06
    Location
    DPRK, Demokratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
    Posts
    22,082
    Quote Originally Posted by rickusn
    "The ship will carry the vertically launched sea wolf "

    AFAIK The Type 45 is to be equipped with 48 ASTER 15 & 30 missles in Sylver A50 VLS cells not Sea Wolf.

    If somehow this has changed(which I doubt) then it is no longer capable of area anti-air defense and should be reclassified as a frigate to reflect this drastic change in capability.
    Is this how to differentiate a destroyer from a frigate?

    It used to be tonnage, speed, endurance, gun caliber, and armor, right? But that was WW2.

    I always wondered why Type 42 is a destroyer at only 4000t, but some frigates displace as much as 6000t.

    What makes a cruiser a "cruiser" today? Burke weighs almost as much as a Tico, both have Aegis, Tico has a few more missiles and an extra gun, but Burke is faster, yet Tico is a cruiser but Burke is a destroyer. And Burke is bigger than some WW2 cruisers.
    Last edited by gunnut; 28 Apr 06, at 05:19.

  8. #83
    Regular
    Join Date
    17 May 05
    Posts
    112
    Quote Originally Posted by gunnut
    Is this how to differentiate a destroyer from a frigate?

    It used to be tonnage, speed, endurance, gun caliber, and armor, right? But that was WW2.

    I always wondered why Type 42 is a destroyer at only 4000t, but some frigates displace as much as 6000t.

    What makes a cruiser a "cruiser" today? Burke weighs almost as much as a Tico, both have Aegis, Tico has a few more missiles and an extra gun, but Burke is faster, yet Tico is a cruiser but Burke is a destroyer. And Burke is bigger than some WW2 cruisers.
    Ticons were originally ordered as destroyers, but were later redesignated as cruisers.

  9. #84
    Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    25 Apr 06
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    1,272
    Quote Originally Posted by brian00
    I attended an arranged visit to HMS Sultan a week ago where the Daring class was discussed:

    The Sampson radar weights 9 tons and is situated 45m above sea level, so the superstruture must be capable of withstanding a lot of stress, ergo the unusual apprearance

    During recent tests rumour has it that the ship was tracking every aircraft in western europe!! essentially making its long range radar unnecessary

    Its powerplant, the design of which i saw today uses an advanced heat exchanger which increases the air temperature before intake, making it very efficient this is somewhat in response to increased fuel prices. However the engine also requires a lot of man hours to maintain

    The ship will carry the vertically launched sea wolf

    The reason for the daring class only having a weapons module forward of the superstructure is because the rear is dedicated to the hanger for the merlin helicopter. The merlin is far more capable than the sea lynx, overall weight is 3 times greater and it has multi mission capabilities, such as transport of 24 troops, a range of weapons, dunking sonar and a range of 1000km on internal fuel tanks

    On another note I was disappointed to hear half the staff i talked to referring to the new CVFs as still only a maybe
    What utter nonsense - VL Seawolf instead of Aster? What would be the point of the Sampson radar in the first place? The only point of that would be as a testing point but even then it is as unlikely your statement that Sampson was tracking every aircraft in Europe.

    Daring will not carry the Merlin intially - as a cost cutting measure the PRISM deck handling system was deleted so initially it will carry Lynx.

    Why come on the board and just make things up that have no basis in reality?

  10. #85
    Military Professional
    Join Date
    09 Aug 03
    Posts
    1,317
    "Is this how to differentiate a destroyer from a frigate?"

    Its how the UK has since the 1970's.

    Germany, Spain & the Netherlands have all designated what are really AAW Destroyers as AAW Frigates.

    Other nations like Japan France, Korea among others have typed some ships as Destroyers when in fact they are more similar to Frigates.

    The distinctions have blurred over the years.

    There is only one "real" cruiser left in Peru and that will soon be retired.

    Even the humongous Russian Kirovs have more in common with traditional destroyers.And there is only one of these operational another is undergoing a longgggggg refitting period.

    The Ticos(CG47) class were retyped to reflect the enormous cost to build them and to reflect their tremendous Command and Control attributes.

    For the most part Frigates too have more in common with destroyers than early types.

    Or conversely more similar to Ocean Patrol Vessels.

    Its best to take a close look at each individual class to see its range, endurance, speed, size along with sensor and weapon fits to judge its capabilities. Not to mention one should take into account the roles and missions a particular navy forsees or uses the vessel(s) for.

    Even then it can be tough to pigeon-hole many classes especially the newer ones. As sometimes they have such a mix of attributes it can defy any logical classification system.

  11. #86
    Banned
    Join Date
    17 Jan 06
    Location
    London
    Posts
    31
    Quote Originally Posted by PubFather
    What utter nonsense - VL Seawolf instead of Aster? What would be the point of the Sampson radar in the first place? The only point of that would be as a testing point but even then it is as unlikely your statement that Sampson was tracking every aircraft in Europe.

    Daring will not carry the Merlin intially - as a cost cutting measure the PRISM deck handling system was deleted so initially it will carry Lynx.

    Why come on the board and just make things up that have no basis in reality?
    I never said it will carry seawolf instead of aster, it will carry them both

    TRY READING A POST BEFORE YOU REPLY TO IT

  12. #87
    Banned
    Join Date
    17 Jan 06
    Location
    London
    Posts
    31
    [QUOTE=rickusn
    "During recent tests rumour has it that the ship was tracking every aircraft in western europe!! essentially making its long range radar unnecessary."

    Horse Manure[/QUOTE]

    Your arrogance surprises me,

    Do you work for bae systems or the MoD?

    I was told this information by the RN staff who will train the crews for these ships, therefore i will take their word over yours

    Unless you can tell me that you got your information from somewhere else than internet sites, books and the discovery channel then on this topic your opinion isnt worth much

  13. #88
    Banned Regular
    Join Date
    23 Apr 06
    Location
    Bolton, Lancashire, Great Britain
    Posts
    117
    Quote Originally Posted by brian00
    But the higher the radar the better right?
    That radar is capable of detecting an object the size of a golf ball moving at 3 times the speed of sound, so hitting one of these ships with a missile will be pretty difficult.

  14. #89
    Banned Regular
    Join Date
    23 Apr 06
    Location
    Bolton, Lancashire, Great Britain
    Posts
    117
    Horse Manure

    Your arrogance surprises me,

    Do you work for bae systems or the MoD?

    I was told this information by the RN staff who will train the crews for these ships, therefore i will take their word over yours

    Unless you can tell me that you got your information from somewhere else than internet sites, books and the discovery channel then on this topic your opinion isnt worth much
    Brian00 is correct. The radar CAN, and HAS, tracked the aircraft in every airport in Western Europe.

  15. #90
    Banned Regular
    Join Date
    23 Apr 06
    Location
    Bolton, Lancashire, Great Britain
    Posts
    117
    I think rickusn is just jealous that the British have more advanced ships than the Americans.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Interview with PLAAF LGen Liu Yazhou
    By Officer of Engineers in forum The Field Mess
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 04 Jun 11,, 19:09
  2. Replies: 125
    Last Post: 21 Jun 08,, 04:33
  3. Bush, Blair for 'War Crimes'
    By Ray in forum International Politics
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 04 Mar 07,, 20:46
  4. Articles and links for the Military Professional
    By Officer of Engineers in forum The Staff College
    Replies: 115
    Last Post: 20 Nov 06,, 15:28

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •