2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Naval Forces
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-05-2003, 23:22 PM   #1 (permalink)
BUFFB52
Regular
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Posts: 116
Smaller Carriers

I heard the USN is planning to make 'Smaller Carriers', didn't read to much about it. But it should get USN forces to the hotspot faster and capable of action till the big boys come in'.
BUFFB52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2003, 02:00 AM   #2 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
The new carrier concept, CVX, is a big fleet carrier, but with greatly reduced manning.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2003, 13:13 PM   #3 (permalink)
ZFBoxcar
Moderator
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 2,129
Country:
Send a message via MSN to ZFBoxcar
is that the thing the British are doing? Because their new carrier design carries 50 aircraft and has a displacement of 60,000 tons with a crew of only 600.
ZFBoxcar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2003, 16:58 PM   #4 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
No, that's the US Nimitz class replacement.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2003, 18:24 PM   #5 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,845
Country:
Re: Smaller Carriers

Quote:
Originally Posted by BUFFB52
I heard the USN is planning to make 'Smaller Carriers', didn't read to much about it. But it should get USN forces to the hotspot faster and capable of action till the big boys come in'.
The Marine Corps has a few flattop transport ships that currently have helicopters and Harrier jets........ any small carriers would probably go into service with the USMC.
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2003, 18:24 PM   #6 (permalink)
BUFFB52
Regular
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Posts: 116
Currently I think US officials are trying to convince the Aussies to help build a small and faster carrier.

CVX are supposed to be built after the last USS Nimitz class right? I think the USS George H Bush.
BUFFB52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2003, 18:53 PM   #7 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
After the last of the Nimitz's correct.

The USMC has 8 Wasp LHD's(20 harriers max), and 5 Tarawa's(12 Harriers max.)

Not to bad for a bunch of Jarheads.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2003, 22:33 PM   #8 (permalink)
BUFFB52
Regular
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Posts: 116
I hope the Aussies agree...think about it! It's a win, win situation!

You get a small and fast carrier, and the JSF package!
BUFFB52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2003, 01:43 AM   #9 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
They got no money.

Carriers for Oz are a pipedream.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2003, 13:09 PM   #10 (permalink)
ZFBoxcar
Moderator
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 2,129
Country:
Send a message via MSN to ZFBoxcar
If Thailand can afford 2, I think the Aussies can afford one. Albeit the Thais carriers are only helicopter carriers (I think). The new one the Italians are about to start building costs 1.02 billion dollars.

"The ship could support eight VTOL (vertical take-off and landing) aircraft such as AV-8B Harrier or F-35 joint strike fighter VTOL variant, or 12 helicopters, such as the EH101, AB-212, NH 90 or SH-3D, or a mix of platforms.
"

The Aussies could certainly afford something like this.
ZFBoxcar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2003, 18:11 PM   #11 (permalink)
Gio
Administrator
 
Gio's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Westwood, Los Angeles, California
Posts: 918
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by M21Sniper

Not to bad for a bunch of Jarheads.
LOL, i had a feeling you'd say something like that.
Gio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2003, 18:12 PM   #12 (permalink)
Gio
Administrator
 
Gio's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Westwood, Los Angeles, California
Posts: 918
Country:
I'm sure they could afford them, but think Canada...

Social programs over defense.
Gio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2003, 18:30 PM   #13 (permalink)
BUFFB52
Regular
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Posts: 116
The Aussies should be capable of affording an aircraft carrier. They have one of their own carriers in the works in the design phase. But now the US is talking to the Aussies about co-devolping a small and speedy carrier.
BUFFB52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2003, 18:56 PM   #14 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 0
"Thailand can afford 2, I think the Aussies can afford one."

Thailand has one. They bought it from Spain.

"Albeit the Thais carriers are only helicopter carriers (I think)."

It operates AV-8S Harriers. 9 of them.


"The ship could support eight VTOL (vertical take-off and landing) aircraft such as AV-8B Harrier or F-35 joint strike fighter VTOL variant, or 12 helicopters, such as the EH101, AB-212, NH 90 or SH-3D, or a mix of platforms.
"

"The Aussies could certainly afford something like this."

The Aussies are getting ready to axe thier F-111 fleet, 3 FFGs, and 2 Collins SSK's.

They're not buying any carriers. Their defense budget is all of 1.5% of their GDP. Peanuts.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2003, 19:54 PM   #15 (permalink)
Gio
Administrator
 
Gio's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Westwood, Los Angeles, California
Posts: 918
Country:
The Collins too? I thought they were the pride of the Aussie navy?
Gio is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UK Drawdown? rickusn Naval Forces 19 05-03-2007 11:22 AM
Favorite Naval Book(s) RAL's_pal? Naval Forces 62 02-09-2007 04:46 AM
Should USN go with midsized carriers? gunnut Naval Forces 78 06-03-2006 19:29 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:08 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8