2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Naval Forces
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-10-2008, 03:20 AM   #1 (permalink)
S65
Regular
 
Join Date: 12-22-07
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 35
Country:
Countering detection

I have a scenario that I'd appreciate input on as to whether or not it is feasible.

Let's say two submerged submarines are very close to each other, <2 miles from each other. A large cargo ship is passing through.

Submarine A has detected B passively and has good awareness of what's happening. Submarine B for whatever reason (inferior equipment/etc.) knows A is in the area but not much else, and is looking for A. Unsure that A knows where it is, B avoids using active sonar.

Would it be possible for submarine A to use the cargo ship to help mask its movement away from B? I was thinking like keeping the cargo ship in between A and B, or having A navigate under the cargo ship. Is that feasible, or is that wishful thinking?

Also, it looks like Hugo Chavez is seeking Kilo submarines.
Chavez could take loan to buy Russian subs - Navy News, opinions, editorials, news from Iraq, photos, reports - Navy Times
S65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2008, 05:45 AM   #2 (permalink)
Sea Toby
Patron
 
Sea Toby's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-24-06
Posts: 223
Back during WWII your theory would have worked, but in the twenty first century we have much better sound equipment and computers which can mute the sound of the cargo ship.
Sea Toby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2008, 13:20 PM   #3 (permalink)
Maxor
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 11-18-05
Posts: 325
Going to agree for the most part with toby on this. Though the extra background noise may provide a break in contact so that the second sub can change sound layers or add some distance and blend into background. Its not a sure thing but generally the more noise producing vessels floating about causing interferance and more vessels for the sonar operator to keep track of the better.
Maxor is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
IR launch detection? Maximus Military Aviation 9 10-09-2006 13:09 PM
Are American subs vulnerable to Chinese detection, thanks to a Chinese spy? Zhang Fei Naval Forces 7 06-19-2006 00:21 AM
Big Battleship Doctrine 2 Defcon 6 Battleships Forum 581 06-16-2006 16:37 PM
USN countering AIP Franco Lolan Naval Forces 3 05-26-2005 04:09 AM
The Kyoto Protocol is Dead Gio Current Affairs 48 01-07-2005 03:53 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:44 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8