![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#211 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
I will give the win to Dreadnought due to his answer being much more specific. Johnny does get honorable mention so if Dread wants to let Johnny ask the next question, that is fine by me.
__________________
Hit Hard, Hit Fast, Hit Often... Last edited by maximusslade : 05-07-2008 at 13:20 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#212 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
![]() P.S. So long as he does it "smartly" ![]()
__________________
Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#215 (permalink) | |
|
Defense Professional
|
Quote:
The American research sub carrying the Russian inspectors had a dial face from the Red October hidden in its framework. The operator faked seeing something shiney and while backing the sub up dropped the dial face into the artifact basket. Inspection of the dial face and its serial number convinced the Russians that the Red October had been blown up. The way an FAE bomb works is using a small explosive to throw out a cloud of gasoline in a mist. Then an ignition explosive sets off the mist of gasoline vapor and can be more devastation than a WW II 500 lb General Purpose bomb. Lately the Russians have been bragging about developing an aerial bomb that works like that. However, we've had ours in inventory since the 1960's.
__________________
Able to leap tall tales in a single groan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#216 (permalink) | |
|
Regular
|
Quote:
![]() Ok, a Battleship related question then. In September of 1942, Vice Admiral Willis A Lee assumed command of Battleship division 6 and broke out his flag on USS Washington BB56, in part due to the death of his predecessor a few months earlier. His predecessor, Admiral Wilcox died while in Command of Battleship Division 6. What were the unusual circumstances of Admiral Wilcox's death? I didn't check all of the previously posted questions, so my apologies if this one has already been covered. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#217 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
I admired Lee and his style and only wished his battlegroup would have found suitable advesary during Leyte such as he did at Savo. Last edited by Dreadnought : 05-08-2008 at 10:57 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#218 (permalink) | |
|
Defense Professional
Military Professional |
Quote:
__________________
“When the gods wish to punish us, they answer our prayers.” — Oscar Wilde |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#219 (permalink) | |
|
Regular
|
Quote:
To easy I guess. Suicide was also considered a possibility but other than that, you are correct. I also wonder what would have happened had Lee met up with Kurita. The American battleships would likely have won due to a advantage in numbers and supporting assets, but I am not sure I wish for it because there might have been quite a few more casualties, especially if the Yamato's big guns had found one of the smaller battleships of the South Dakota class or the Washington. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#220 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
Since no one has posted in two weeks, I am going to bring one over from the history quiz section to see if anyone get's it.
Here might be an interesting one.... What US warship class had a preliminary design scheme that, if built, would have ended up resembling the HMS Rodney? |
|
|
|
|
|
#221 (permalink) |
|
Defense Professional
Military Professional |
http://www.hazegray.org/navhist/batt...s/usa/m7-2.jpg
How about the Arkansas class of seagoing monitors. |
|
|
|
|
|
#222 (permalink) | ||
|
Patron
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
:-?? |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#223 (permalink) |
|
Defense Professional
Military Professional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#225 (permalink) |
|
Senior Contributor
|
A question for those familiar with the USN and probably RN engineering systems aboard ship.
On the (conventional powered or steam powered) Cruisers and Battleships of WWII there are/were water desalination plants for the production of clean water for the ship. It has many uses (cooking,cleaning,showering, firefighting etc.) The question is what is the two most important purposes for the treated (beyond normal clean) water? Hint its not for the purposes listed above. ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| World Navies in Review | rickusn | Naval Forces | 7 | 06-14-2007 23:51 PM |
| US Naval Support Activity Souda Bay, Crete | KORNET-E | The Western Alliance | 0 | 12-27-2006 13:40 PM |
| 2003 Navy Global Conops | Defcon 6 | Naval Forces | 6 | 07-06-2006 22:26 PM |
| PLAN Analysis | rickusn | Naval Forces | 9 | 06-12-2006 15:05 PM |
| Online Book | rickusn | Naval Forces | 7 | 03-27-2006 23:59 PM |