![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#346 (permalink) |
|
Defense Professional
|
Been too long so I'll give the answer.
Actually, ceiling boards go way back to the days of the tall ships and were the bottom decking of the cargo holds. Along comes the 20th century with steel cargo ships. The steel decks of the cargo holds were decked over with wood dunnage, BUT some of the old-timers still called them the ceiling boards. Therefore, you could walk on the ceiling, at least until the cargo was put aboard. Sorry. Guess that was too sneaky. Anixtu gets the next question as he weas absolutely correct about the floors being the vertical intercostals (framing) of the innerbottom of a ship.
__________________
Able to leap tall tales in a single groan. |
|
|
|
|
|
#347 (permalink) | |
|
Defense Professional
Military Professional |
Quote:
I never want to hear any more complaints about any of my questions again!!! ![]() ![]()
__________________
"Always with the negative waves Moriarty, always with the negative waves." TSGT Oddball, Tank Commander |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#350 (permalink) |
|
New Member
|
I may have been too Brito-centric in my choice of question. Having Googled for pics, the US variant may not be the same shape as the British one. I did on a previous occasion find an Australian one that appeared to be identical to the Brit. I've been on the receiving end (wee hint) of a Dutch one and they are a different shape again (butt plug was suggested
).I have photographs of the article ready for use that I will link to later. |
|
|
|
|
|
#352 (permalink) |
|
New Member
|
Very suggestive, but not the one. A dildo is a similar size and shape (obviously), but plastic with a yellow shaft and a much shorter pink rubber knob on the end. In my experience on replenishment auxiliaries the slang term is used universally and the proper term almost never.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#353 (permalink) | |
|
Defense Professional
|
Quote:
Yellow plastic handle with a pink rubber knob on the end. Then again, if I ever saw one lying around, I probably would not have touched it without a dissinfectant. PROFILE: You sound interesting and experienced. Would you please fill in your profile so we know a little more about you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#354 (permalink) | |
|
tankie
Military Professional
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
TANKIE , WITHOUT WAX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#355 (permalink) |
|
New Member
|
It is a line throwing projectile:
Dildo2.jpg - Image - Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting Seen about to be fired from an L85/SA80. Also: Dildo1.jpg - Image - Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting and Dildo3.jpg - Image - Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting I'd be interested to see what the US version looks like. A Google Images search brought up plenty of pics of M14s with a fairly short cup shaped firing adapter but I didn't spot the projectile. |
|
|
|
|
|
#356 (permalink) | |
|
Defense Professional
|
Quote:
Originally we used a modified Remington 11mm receiver and black powder blank. Basically it was just the tube sticking out there. On civilian ships, however, they are not allowed to carry rifles (except MARAD). So the devices they are allowed for line throwing or emergency flares are only harmful to the user. Line throwing is done the old fashioned way with a big guy standing in a clear area, swinging the monkey fist in circles until he builds up speed and finally casts it over to the next ship. The American movie actor Steve Reeves who played Hercules back in the 60's was ex-Navy. Whenever line throwers were needed he would voluteer and they would make a contest as to who could heave the line the furthest over the other ship. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#357 (permalink) |
|
New Member
|
Very interesting, thanks. I'll keep a close eye for what they're shooting if I ever RAS with a US unit. So far only British, Dutch and German.
The commercial civilian (emergency) line throwing systems I've seen have all been rocket based, usually Speedline 250s. I was on one ship that had a (non-operational) pneumatic line throwing system for mooring ops. |
|
|
|
|
|
#358 (permalink) |
|
Senior Contributor
|
This would be the older version of the gun from the 1960's era for line throwing. The USN currently uses the MI4- aboard ship. It would like to have the (M16A3) as of a 2006 report Naval small arms program JSSP (perhaps this has changed since) but they still want to retain the M14 for burials at sea and line throwing.
__________________
Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure. Last edited by Dreadnought : 07-07-2008 at 12:21 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| World Navies in Review | rickusn | Naval Forces | 7 | 06-14-2007 23:51 PM |
| US Naval Support Activity Souda Bay, Crete | KORNET-E | The Western Alliance | 0 | 12-27-2006 13:40 PM |
| 2003 Navy Global Conops | Defcon 6 | Naval Forces | 6 | 07-06-2006 22:26 PM |
| PLAN Analysis | rickusn | Naval Forces | 9 | 06-12-2006 15:05 PM |
| Online Book | rickusn | Naval Forces | 7 | 03-27-2006 23:59 PM |