2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Naval Forces
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-12-2008, 17:17 PM   #151 (permalink)
glyn
Military Professional
 
glyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-15-06
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
Posts: 6,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tin Man View Post
You would be correct sir!
What of part two of my question?
I'm afraid I don't have the first idea. The maritime world is largely a mystery for me.
__________________
Semper in excretum. Solum profunda variat.
glyn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 17:32 PM   #152 (permalink)
TopHatter
Administrator
 
TopHatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-03
Location: Fort Myers FL
Posts: 9,694
Country:
Send a message via AIM to TopHatter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tin Man View Post
Which allied aircraft accounted for the most axis shipping destroyed in WWII in terms of tonnage ?

What was the total tonnage figure ? A ballpark figure will do.
When you say "Axis" you are referring to the ETO only, correct?

Somewhere around 140,000 tons sunk...more or less.
TopHatter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 18:38 PM   #153 (permalink)
Tin Man
Contributor
 
Tin Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-02-07
Location: In the `shires.
Posts: 396
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by TopHatter View Post
When you say "Axis" you are referring to the ETO only, correct?

Somewhere around 140,000 tons sunk...more or less.
Yes, I see where you could take this! Her majesty`s website does indeed refer to German/Italian "Axis" forces, when you look past the bullet header, so it would seem my question might have been a little spurious!

It poses an interesting question. If we include the Pacific theatre, would the Stringbag still be king?

140,000 tons is a long way out according to the site, which is reputable and should know its own historical records you would think!
__________________
"Liberty is a thing beyond all price.
Tin Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 19:20 PM   #154 (permalink)
RustyBattleship
Defense Professional
 
RustyBattleship's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-06
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,724
Hmmmm. I would have thought of Grumman TBF's and TBM's with their torpedos along with Douglas Dauntless Dive Bombers.

After all, Japan was a member of the Axis powers and had a bigger Navy.
__________________
Able to leap tall tales in a single groan.
RustyBattleship is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 22:10 PM   #155 (permalink)
Albany Rifles
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Albany Rifles's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-27-07
Location: Prince George, VA
Posts: 1,021
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyBattleship View Post
Hmmmm. I would have thought of Grumman TBF's and TBM's with their torpedos along with Douglas Dauntless Dive Bombers.

After all, Japan was a member of the Axis powers and had a bigger Navy.

I would have to say the SBD Dauntless w/ 5 carriers to its credit as well as numerous DDs, CLs, CAs and merchies.
__________________
"Always with the negative waves Moriarty, always with the negative waves." TSGT Oddball, Tank Commander
Albany Rifles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2008, 01:28 AM   #156 (permalink)
Tin Man
Contributor
 
Tin Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-02-07
Location: In the `shires.
Posts: 396
Country:
Damn. I am still digging but have found nothing definitive. I will have to alter my question to include only the European theatre. Of course "axis" included Japan. An oversight in the information I looked at.

Glyn got the aircraft correct, nobody has the tonnage dispatched as yet.
Tin Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2008, 01:37 AM   #157 (permalink)
RustyBattleship
Defense Professional
 
RustyBattleship's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-06
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tin Man View Post
Damn. I am still digging but have found nothing definitive. I will have to alter my question to include only the European theatre. Of course "axis" included Japan. An oversight in the information I looked at.

Glyn got the aircraft correct, nobody has the tonnage dispatched as yet.
Are you including those Italian Battleships, sunk in harbor, by Swordfish? An attack that was a role model for the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.
RustyBattleship is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2008, 05:23 AM   #158 (permalink)
Tin Man
Contributor
 
Tin Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-02-07
Location: In the `shires.
Posts: 396
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyBattleship View Post
Are you including those Italian Battleships, sunk in harbor, by Swordfish? An attack that was a role model for the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.
That is a yes. The figure of tonnage quoted, summarises total tonnage sunk by Swordfish aircraft against German and Italian axis forces. It will certainly include the Taranto victims as it fits the criteria.

In general, if forces sink a ship in combat but that combatant is re-floated and salvaged, does that ship kill become null? Just a question, I would think it would be chalked up as a kill, even if you have to kill it again!
Tin Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2008, 08:18 AM   #159 (permalink)
TopHatter
Administrator
 
TopHatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-03
Location: Fort Myers FL
Posts: 9,694
Country:
Send a message via AIM to TopHatter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tin Man View Post
140,000 tons is a long way out according to the site, which is reputable and should know its own historical records you would think!
I'm sorry, I don't quite understand your wording. Are you saying my figure is too large or too small?
TopHatter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2008, 10:55 AM   #160 (permalink)
Tin Man
Contributor
 
Tin Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-02-07
Location: In the `shires.
Posts: 396
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by TopHatter View Post
I'm sorry, I don't quite understand your wording. Are you saying my figure is too large or too small?
Sorry for any confusion, 140,000 tons is the wrong figure.
Tin Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2008, 13:37 PM   #161 (permalink)
RustyBattleship
Defense Professional
 
RustyBattleship's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-06
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tin Man View Post
In general, if forces sink a ship in combat but that combatant is re-floated and salvaged, does that ship kill become null? Just a question, I would think it would be chalked up as a kill, even if you have to kill it again!
It would still be a kill as it is the option of the country owning the ship to raise it, repair it and modify it. At least you would have put it out of action for a considerable period - like our Battleships at Pearl Harbor. Only two (not counting Utah that was no longer classified as a BB) didn't come back. But they were still "kills".
RustyBattleship is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2008, 15:56 PM   #162 (permalink)
Tin Man
Contributor
 
Tin Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-02-07
Location: In the `shires.
Posts: 396
Country:
Thanks Rusty. I think it would be proper to hand the next question over to Glyn as he got the aircraft type correct. I am willing to bypass the tonnage question as a mere anecdote.
Tophatter, the figure quoted is 300,000 tons of shipping, on the Royal Navy Historical Flight site.

It would be interesting to see what the most successful allied aircraft was against all axis naval forces, in all theatres. Albany, the Dauntless could be a good guess.
Tin Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008, 13:22 PM   #163 (permalink)
Albany Rifles
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Albany Rifles's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-27-07
Location: Prince George, VA
Posts: 1,021
Country:
The Avenger and the Helldiver have the Musashi and Yamato to share as well as I believe 4 hybrid carrier/battleships as well as CAs, CLs, etc. But the tonnage would have to be split between them. The SBDs were teh only things which got hits at Midaway.
Albany Rifles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008, 13:52 PM   #164 (permalink)
glyn
Military Professional
 
glyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-15-06
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
Posts: 6,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tin Man View Post
Thanks Rusty. I think it would be proper to hand the next question over to Glyn as he got the aircraft type correct. I am willing to bypass the tonnage question as a mere anecdote.
Tophatter, the figure quoted is 300,000 tons of shipping, on the Royal Navy Historical Flight site.

It would be interesting to see what the most successful allied aircraft was against all axis naval forces, in all theatres. Albany, the Dauntless could be a good guess.
The Stringbags tally also included submarines and other ships sunk by rockets. I bet the Americans wished they could have had such a technically advanced aircraft as the Swordfish!
I decline the next question as I didn't get the tonnage. Back to you, dear heart!
glyn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008, 14:05 PM   #165 (permalink)
RustyBattleship
Defense Professional
 
RustyBattleship's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-06
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,724
I'll give it a shot.

What German submarine was sunk by Chicago?
RustyBattleship is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
World Navies in Review rickusn Naval Forces 7 06-14-2007 23:51 PM
US Naval Support Activity Souda Bay, Crete KORNET-E The Western Alliance 0 12-27-2006 13:40 PM
2003 Navy Global Conops Defcon 6 Naval Forces 6 07-06-2006 22:26 PM
PLAN Analysis rickusn Naval Forces 9 06-12-2006 15:05 PM
Online Book rickusn Naval Forces 7 03-27-2006 23:59 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:40 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8