2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Naval Forces
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-07-2008, 13:44 PM   #136 (permalink)
RustyBattleship
Defense Professional
 
RustyBattleship's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-06
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,665
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreadnought View Post
Mr. L. a question. No doubt in my mind a CIWS mount but if it was a pulse laser type why the drum underneath still mounted?
If it is an ammo drum, they probably just didn't bother to take it out. Most likely it's some motor system that fit just right in there.
__________________
Able to leap tall tales in a single groan.
RustyBattleship is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008, 14:02 PM   #137 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,199
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyBattleship View Post
If it is an ammo drum, they probably just didn't bother to take it out. Most likely it's some motor system that fit just right in there.
What do you think Mr. L. One fore One aft both Port and Starboard? I want one.
__________________
Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008, 14:31 PM   #138 (permalink)
Tin Man
Contributor
 
Tin Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-02-07
Location: In the `shires.
Posts: 396
Country:
Rusty` got it, just about!

It is indeed the Laser Area Defence System. It is based on a solid state fibre laser of some 20 kW. It isn`t a pulsed laser, the beam is held on target constantly until it is ruptured. Talk is of a range of 550 yds. A real deal ship mounted system is 2 years away according to Raytheon. They will need a hell of a lot more power than 20 kW to give it a decent range. I guess that is what Integrated electric propulsion is for then! The box on top of the Phalanx mount is the actual laser.

I am not convinced they can overcome dust/fog/humidity issues though...
Both Northrop and Raytheon are big players in these types of weapons nowadays, along with TRW etc.. Sandia lab`and Lauwrence Liv` probably do a bit of work as well!

A Laser Phalanx?
Lasers go to war | www.azstarnet.com ®
Raytheon Tests New Laser Weapon
__________________
"Liberty is a thing beyond all price.
Tin Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2008, 18:31 PM   #139 (permalink)
RustyBattleship
Defense Professional
 
RustyBattleship's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-06
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,665
550 yards is a little too close for me. Especially since the standard 20mm Phalanx has a far greater range but is programmed not to open fire until the target is 1,850 meters (2,000 yards) incoming.

I uploaded a real player news report to TopHatter of a Laser not only shooting down missiles but blowing up incoming 8 inch artillery shells also.

I don't know how to upload this kind of stuff but it really is amazing that we have a Buck Rogers type of "Ray Gun" now.

Or is it a Star Wars "Blaster"?

Maybe a Star Trek "Phaser"?
RustyBattleship is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2008, 06:55 AM   #140 (permalink)
Tin Man
Contributor
 
Tin Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-02-07
Location: In the `shires.
Posts: 396
Country:
550 yards would increase pucker factor, the LADS is really aimed at replacing Counter Rocket-Mortar Phalanx, land based systems.

A 100kW system would give a ship based CIWS an effective range of about 3 times that of Phalanx, according to some sources.
It is exciting, the technical problems look pretty tough though.

Rusty`, would love to see those videos you have of the test! If they were from a site, you could post the link or put it on Youtube? I don`t know if this forum has a facility for video upload. If Rochenhost have a video player inbuilt to run video attachments, it would be much like uploading a picture, the player automatically popping up in a window within a post. I am not sure if the site does this....

Phaser or Blaster? I prefer "Disruptor", sounds a bit meaner
Tin Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2008, 09:12 AM   #141 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,199
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyBattleship View Post
550 yards is a little too close for me. Especially since the standard 20mm Phalanx has a far greater range but is programmed not to open fire until the target is 1,850 meters (2,000 yards) incoming.

I uploaded a real player news report to TopHatter of a Laser not only shooting down missiles but blowing up incoming 8 inch artillery shells also.

I don't know how to upload this kind of stuff but it really is amazing that we have a Buck Rogers type of "Ray Gun" now.

Or is it a Star Wars "Blaster"?

Maybe a Star Trek "Phaser"?
Wow, 550 yards that is way to close. That missle will strike with approx 2.5-3 seconds. I hope that laser is not only fast but extremely powerful and reliable. Myself I would install multiple Phalanx cannons down the sides of the ship fore and aft and increase its standard load out time from 4,500 rounds per minute and make it capable of several (5) minutes worth of concentrated 20mm gatling fire. Make it its own magazine if you have to but atleast 5 solid minutes of concentrated fire from eack mount to protect the ship and faster drum or mag reloads instead of 30 min to 45 min for reloads to protect from mulitple inbounds.

Phalanx is simplicity it only requires minimal electric from its host and cooling water for the mount and its radar/s.

I wonder how much current that pulse laser draws under load.

Last edited by Dreadnought : 04-08-2008 at 09:17 AM.
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2008, 08:21 AM   #142 (permalink)
Silent Hunter
Contributor
 
Silent Hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-09-07
Location: London, UK
Posts: 500
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Silent Hunter
24 hours past, so:

What was USS Triton designed to do?
Silent Hunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2008, 10:57 AM   #143 (permalink)
Albany Rifles
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Albany Rifles's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-27-07
Location: Prince George, VA
Posts: 971
Country:
Nuclear radar picket submarine

She was the first submarine to cirumnavigate the globe submerged.

Adn she was commanded by a great WW II submariner and author Ed Beach


Submarine Photo Index
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 0858619.jpg (44.2 KB, 38 views)
__________________
“When the gods wish to punish us, they answer our prayers.” — Oscar Wilde
Albany Rifles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2008, 13:37 PM   #144 (permalink)
Silent Hunter
Contributor
 
Silent Hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-09-07
Location: London, UK
Posts: 500
Country:
Send a message via MSN to Silent Hunter
Correct!
Silent Hunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2008, 20:46 PM   #145 (permalink)
Albany Rifles
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Albany Rifles's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-27-07
Location: Prince George, VA
Posts: 971
Country:
What was the importance of Mound City?
Albany Rifles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2008, 05:21 AM   #146 (permalink)
Tin Man
Contributor
 
Tin Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-02-07
Location: In the `shires.
Posts: 396
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Albany Rifles View Post
What was the importance of Mound City?
I will try this one...

Union gunboat USS Mound City (iron clad steamer)took the single most destructive shot of the Civil war. It took fire from a confederate shore battery and a boiler exploded. This single shot killed almost 130 men. White River, June 17th, 1862?

Seems more unfortunate than important though!

Last edited by Tin Man : 04-11-2008 at 10:40 AM.
Tin Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2008, 21:18 PM   #147 (permalink)
Albany Rifles
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Albany Rifles's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-27-07
Location: Prince George, VA
Posts: 971
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tin Man View Post
I will try this one...

Union gunboat USS Mound City (iron clad steamer)took the single most destructive shot of the Civil war. It took fire from a confederate shore battery and a boiler exploded. This single shot killed almost 130 men. White River, June 17th, 1862?

Seems more unfortunate than important though!

Not quite what I was looking for but I will take it.

Mound City was the lead gunboat in a class of river gunboats used in the American Civil War along the Mississippi River and its tributaries. It was nemed for the city where they were built in southern
Illinois, Mound City.

Tin Man...all yours.
Albany Rifles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 15:32 PM   #148 (permalink)
Tin Man
Contributor
 
Tin Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-02-07
Location: In the `shires.
Posts: 396
Country:
You are very gracious sir!

An easy one.

Which allied aircraft accounted for the most axis shipping destroyed in WWII in terms of tonnage ?

What was the total tonnage figure ? A ballpark figure will do.
Tin Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 16:38 PM   #149 (permalink)
glyn
Military Professional
 
glyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-15-06
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
Posts: 6,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tin Man View Post
You are very gracious sir!

An easy one.

Which allied aircraft accounted for the most axis shipping destroyed in WWII in terms of tonnage ?

What was the total tonnage figure ? A ballpark figure will do.
I would plump for the Fairey Swordfish
__________________
Semper in excretum. Solum profunda variat.
glyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 16:47 PM   #150 (permalink)
Tin Man
Contributor
 
Tin Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-02-07
Location: In the `shires.
Posts: 396
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by glyn View Post
I would plump for the Fairey Swordfish
You would be correct sir!
What of part two of my question?
Tin Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
World Navies in Review rickusn Naval Forces 7 06-14-2007 23:51 PM
US Naval Support Activity Souda Bay, Crete KORNET-E The Western Alliance 0 12-27-2006 13:40 PM
2003 Navy Global Conops Defcon 6 Naval Forces 6 07-06-2006 22:26 PM
PLAN Analysis rickusn Naval Forces 9 06-12-2006 15:05 PM
Online Book rickusn Naval Forces 7 03-27-2006 23:59 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:37 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8