2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Naval Forces
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-27-2007, 02:14 AM   #16 (permalink)
RustyBattleship
Defense Professional
 
RustyBattleship's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-06
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,683
To worse
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ghost fleet 5.jpg (87.5 KB, 108 views)
__________________
Able to leap tall tales in a single groan.
RustyBattleship is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2007, 09:28 AM   #17 (permalink)
VarSity
Contributor
 
Join Date: 06-11-07
Location: Leicester
Posts: 446
Country:
Thats really bad to see. Bet it hurts like hell to see your ship in that condition poor girls.

Any reason they keep the Iowa in better condition? Or just because they like it?
VarSity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2007, 10:01 AM   #18 (permalink)
tankie
tankie
Military Professional
 
tankie's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-22-06
Location: u/k
Posts: 1,975
Country:
Send a message via MSN to tankie Send a message via Skype™ to tankie
Are these some of the same ships (4) that were towed to Hartlepool UK for dismantling , app 4 years ago, and i believe are still there as a licence has not been issued to the firm to dismantle them ( could have by now tho ) ?
__________________
TANKIE , WITHOUT WAX

Last edited by tankie : 09-27-2007 at 10:04 AM.
tankie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2007, 12:32 PM   #19 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,242
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by VarSity View Post
Thats really bad to see. Bet it hurts like hell to see your ship in that condition poor girls.

Any reason they keep the Iowa in better condition? Or just because they like it?
Perhaps because she is still listed as a Cat B mobile asset and must be maintained until removed from the register.
__________________
Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2007, 13:17 PM   #20 (permalink)
RustyBattleship
Defense Professional
 
RustyBattleship's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-06
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,683
Quote:
Originally Posted by tankie View Post
Are these some of the same ships (4) that were towed to Hartlepool UK for dismantling , app 4 years ago, and i believe are still there as a licence has not been issued to the firm to dismantle them ( could have by now tho ) ?
These photos were taken just last October in 2006 after we finished our second inspection and evaluation of the Iowa. Only the MARAD people know exactly which ship is which. However, when asked about certain ships, they would point them out for us so we could photograph them.

This is in Siusun Bay just off of Benicia, California (up the river and east of Vallejo and Mare Island).

No, they were not tour guides but as they were manuevering their water taxi from one group of ships to the other to pick up other MARAD workers we got lucky with the views.
RustyBattleship is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2007, 13:21 PM   #21 (permalink)
RustyBattleship
Defense Professional
 
RustyBattleship's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-06
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,683
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreadnought View Post
Perhaps because she is still listed as a Cat B mobile asset and must be maintained until removed from the register.
That is correct as well as both California Senators want the ship put SOMEWHERE in California as a museum. So when authorized visitors or inspection parties (such as mine) board the ship, there won't be any complaints about totally ignoring it.

I must say, though MARAD funds are limited and once got an unqualified sub-contractor, they are doing a tremendous amount of work to keep the ship preserved.

My hat is off to them.
RustyBattleship is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2007, 18:29 PM   #22 (permalink)
VaDon
New Member
 
Join Date: 09-27-07
Posts: 2
Hey Guys,

I just found this site, and quickly registered so I could ask for your help. My father served on the USS Papago, an ocean tug, during WWII. I have been doing some research on this ship, and the last record I can find is from 1997.

I have a picture of the Papago in this ghost fleet in Virginia.

Does anybody know what ships are still there? I fear this ship has been scraped by now. I would love to get close enough one time to lay my eyes on her.

My dad passed away in 1993, and I find myself seeking all the information I can find about his naval service.

Thanks for any info.

VaDon
VaDon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2007, 20:39 PM   #23 (permalink)
RustyBattleship
Defense Professional
 
RustyBattleship's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-06
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 2,683
Quote:
Originally Posted by VaDon View Post
I have a picture of the Papago in this ghost fleet in Virginia.

Does anybody know what ships are still there? I fear this ship has been scraped by now. I would love to get close enough one time to lay my eyes on her.

Thanks for any info.

VaDon
Welcome to the World Affairs Board.

The register of ships in the ghost fleets change weekly and I doubt there is any up-to-date list readily available to us common folk. However, if you contact the Marine Adminstration (MARAD) in Virginia they may be able to give you some information on the ship.

Another possible source of info would be the Inactive Ship Facility back there generally in overall charge of mothballed ships.
RustyBattleship is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2007, 22:33 PM   #24 (permalink)
RAL's_pal?
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 01-22-06
Posts: 443
Quote:
Originally Posted by VaDon View Post

My dad passed away in 1993, and I find myself seeking all the information I can find about his naval service.

Thanks for any info.

VaDon
You can order your dad's military records from the National Personnel Records Center and you can also get one free replacement set of the medals and ribbons he earned.

You can also get the Presidential Memorial Certificate recognizing your dad's service to the country. Both records and certificate information can be located through Google.
RAL's_pal? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2007, 22:40 PM   #25 (permalink)
VaDon
New Member
 
Join Date: 09-27-07
Posts: 2
Thanks for all the help!

VaDon
VaDon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2007, 02:11 AM   #26 (permalink)
Expat Canuck
Homesick Fool
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 05-17-05
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,011
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by RAL's_pal? View Post
You can order your dad's military records from the National Personnel Records Center and you can also get one free replacement set of the medals and ribbons he earned.

You can also get the Presidential Memorial Certificate recognizing your dad's service to the country. Both records and certificate information can be located through Google.

Do you know if something like this exists in Canada?
Expat Canuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2007, 05:53 AM   #27 (permalink)
Shipwreck
Finer than the Finest...
Senior Contributor
 
Shipwreck's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-07-06
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 1,898
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyBattleship View Post
That is correct as well as both California Senators want the ship put SOMEWHERE in California as a museum.
Don't forget Congresswoman Nancy PELOSI !!!
__________________
"Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called children of God" (Matthew 5:9)
Shipwreck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2007, 06:05 AM   #28 (permalink)
Shipwreck
Finer than the Finest...
Senior Contributor
 
Shipwreck's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-07-06
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 1,898
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyBattleship View Post
I must say, though MARAD funds are limited and once got an unqualified sub-contractor, they are doing a tremendous amount of work to keep the ship preserved.

My hat is off to them.
Well said, Dick.

I wish some people had more moral integrity and would publicly apologize for claiming back in 2001 (Link#1, Link#2) that "MARAD does not have the ability to care for a mobilization asset like the Iowa".

Last edited by Shipwreck : 09-28-2007 at 06:57 AM.
Shipwreck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2007, 07:48 AM   #29 (permalink)
RAL's_pal?
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 01-22-06
Posts: 443
Quote:
Originally Posted by Expat Canuck View Post
Do you know if something like this exists in Canada?
You'd probably have to check with the National Archives of Canada or the Chief Military Personnel (CMP) website as a start for military records.

As for the Presidential Memorial Certificate, it was initiated by JFK in 1962.
RAL's_pal? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2007, 10:30 AM   #30 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,242
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyBattleship View Post
That is correct as well as both California Senators want the ship put SOMEWHERE in California as a museum. So when authorized visitors or inspection parties (such as mine) board the ship, there won't be any complaints about totally ignoring it.

I must say, though MARAD funds are limited and once got an unqualified sub-contractor, they are doing a tremendous amount of work to keep the ship preserved.

My hat is off to them.
Mr. L. I dont doubt that MARAD is well capable of caring for Iowa, but would she not be better served in Norfolk with Whiskey? My reasoning is that since Whiskey is on the same bill as the Iowa she is well maintained from what collegues that have inspected her several times over have said. Would it not force the hands on care of the Iowa as well fitting the very same status as Whiskey. You know nobody would want her seen as delapidated especially when compared to her sister in reserve.
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Battleship History Article rickusn Battleships Forum 3 01-17-2007 11:16 AM
Submarine article rickusn Naval Forces 4 06-07-2006 18:18 PM
Annual Naval Review(Quite long) rickusn Naval Forces 2 03-19-2006 14:39 PM
USN 30-Year Fleet Structure Plan rickusn Naval Forces 0 03-28-2005 18:45 PM
Russian Navy rickusn Naval Forces 13 02-16-2005 23:55 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:48 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8