2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Naval Forces
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-08-2007, 06:05 AM   #16 (permalink)
braindead
Lost in Translation
Senior Contributor
 
braindead's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-30-06
Location: estonia
Posts: 1,211
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteeljawScribe View Post
Why would you want to? The reason the AEW Nimrod didn't work lay in a host of mechanical and other issues - two rotating masses at the end of a structural member? Trying to synchronize returns from two antennas? Just doesn't make economical sense, especially since AEW platforms are going to be expensive and complex beasts to begin with. As for side mounted/fixed antennas, you end up with blind spots that force you to a defined station profile, giving up some flexiblity in the process. I suppose if you are looking for a cheap(er) capability and are willing to accept some of the compromises as a result, a set-up like the Israeli Phalcon would work - but keep in mind that they have a very specifc environement and very specific need.
could you please this to an amateur ? What are the compromises of Phalcon and what is the specific enviroment of theirs ? Thanks in advance .
__________________
....
braindead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2007, 19:18 PM   #17 (permalink)
Tin Man
Contributor
 
Tin Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-02-07
Location: In the `shires.
Posts: 396
Country:
No AEW V-22 for the Royal Navy at least. I put my money on a MASC Merlin right now.
__________________
"Liberty is a thing beyond all price.
Tin Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2007, 15:21 PM   #18 (permalink)
adroth
Regular
 
adroth's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-30-07
Posts: 40
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteeljawScribe View Post
Why would you want to? The reason the AEW Nimrod didn't work lay in a host of mechanical and other issues - two rotating masses at the end of a structural member? Trying to synchronize returns from two antennas? Just doesn't make economical sense, especially since AEW platforms are going to be expensive and complex beasts to begin with. As for side mounted/fixed antennas, you end up with blind spots that force you to a defined station profile, giving up some flexiblity in the process. I suppose if you are looking for a cheap(er) capability and are willing to accept some of the compromises as a result, a set-up like the Israeli Phalcon would work - but keep in mind that they have a very specifc environement and very specific need.
Thanks Mr S.

Those were issues that I did not consider.
adroth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 15:44 PM   #19 (permalink)
BenRoethig
Senior Contributor
 
BenRoethig's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-03-04
Location: Dubuque, IA
Posts: 1,033
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by avon1944 View Post
What sort of altitude and radar range do the helo AEW's have?
Considering the problems caused by the props on the V-22 AEW, I wonder if part of the problem could be solved AESA radar? Being able to transmit the signal between the propeller blades, etc.

Adrian
I don't know much about radar range (they aren't published) but the Sea King can only track about 20% of the targets the Hawkeye can.
__________________
F/A-18E/F Super Hornet: The Honda Accord of fighters.
BenRoethig is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 15:07 PM   #20 (permalink)
Sea Toby
Patron
 
Sea Toby's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-24-06
Posts: 223
I'm sure a computer and software upgrade can increase the number of targets tracked using the same antenna on a Sea King or a new Merlin or NH-90 helicopter.
Sea Toby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 15:11 PM   #21 (permalink)
omon
Field mechanik
Senior Contributor
 
omon's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-06
Location: bk
Posts: 1,869
Country:
what if engine tilt mechanism gets stock, with props in plane mode? i doubt it can land in plane mode, can it?
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!" B. Franklin
omon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 23:51 PM   #22 (permalink)
B.Smitty
Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-15-05
Location: Oak Hill, VA
Posts: 548
How about developing a podded solution for carriage underwing on an F-35B?

The hardpoints would likely need a power upgrade. You'd have to have a robust datalink to send everything down to the carrier (e.g. the Israeli CAEW). There isn't a ton of volume. And endurance wouldn't be a strong suit.

But it could get higher, faster than any of the other options. And if it was completely podded, you could move it from aircraft to aircraft. A fighter could fly an AEW sortie, then turn around and fly a strike or CAS sortie. This would let you carry more multirole fighters, rather than having to dedicate deck spots to AEW-specific aircraft.

With a modern, AESA radar in each pod, and APG-81 covering the front hemisphere, it could perform as well or better than an AEW Merlin.
B.Smitty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 10:03 AM   #23 (permalink)
Pioneer
Regular
 
Join Date: 03-29-08
Posts: 46
Found these on the web

Pic 1
Is a model of what Boeing is actively promoting as a version of the V-22 Osprey fitted with a palletized version of the Thales Cerberus mission system and the Searchwater airborne radar system under the project designation of TOSS.
Pioneer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 11:59 AM   #24 (permalink)
Sea Toby
Patron
 
Sea Toby's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-24-06
Posts: 223
Boeing and the USMC are busy with the Boeing TOSS, and the British are busy with Boeing developing an AEW version of the Boeing TOSS. Should fit the bill for AEW. The Osprey should fit the bill for COD. Question remains whether they are affordable and more worthy than a Merlin or Sea King. Of course the Osprey would be larger.

Sea Toby is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New and Current Carriers Stan Naval Forces 68 05-02-2007 06:42 AM
Excellent LCA info Archer Military Aviation 202 02-15-2007 06:30 AM
Pakistan to develop AWACS with China Advent South Asian Defense Topics 46 12-29-2006 23:53 PM
Pak to get most advanced F-16 and another billion dollar arms package Asim Aquil South Asian Defense Topics 53 12-29-2006 00:36 AM
Saudi Arabia, Pakistan Eye Joint AEW Buy Ray Military Aviation 2 11-15-2004 20:20 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:20 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8