2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Naval Forces
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-01-2008, 02:31 AM   #16 (permalink)
Dectilion
Regular
 
Join Date: 01-13-07
Posts: 137
you need to take that with a grain of salt, those statistics are two(three, sorry) years out of date, and include all small patrol craft and boats, for example, it says the UK has 164 combat vessels, but only about 60 of those could operate in open water, and many of those were fleet tankers and replenishment ships.
__________________
ROAD WARRIOR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dectilion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 18:45 PM   #17 (permalink)
rocket-dog
New Member
 
rocket-dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-07-07
Posts: 13
As we are amongst the Greeks does anybody know how much a Jason class LST can lift?
rocket-dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 19:22 PM   #18 (permalink)
rocket-dog
New Member
 
rocket-dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-07-07
Posts: 13
Further to my last post, do the Jason's ever get beached?
rocket-dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 19:58 PM   #19 (permalink)
Gun Grape
Resident Curmudgeon
Military Professional
 
Gun Grape's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-12-05
Location: Panama City Fl
Posts: 2,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocket-dog View Post
Further to my last post, do the Jason's ever get beached?
Your thinking of a different type of LST, like the USS Newport LST-1179 class.(spit)

The Jason class doesn't beach.
Gun Grape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 07:09 AM   #20 (permalink)
rocket-dog
New Member
 
rocket-dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-07-07
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gun Grape View Post
Your thinking of a different type of LST, like the USS Newport LST-1179 class.(spit)

The Jason class doesn't beach.
Thanks! I was specifically asking about Jason's. I suppose with plenty of shallow harbours in the Greek archipelago there is no need to beach (you only have to look at the myriad of ferry routes covered by vessels of similar dimensions to the Jason's.) I just wondered if they were designed to be used in similar fashion to traditional LST's (or the British RFA Knight class.)

Why are you spitting at the Newport's?

Thanks again!
rocket-dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 08:58 AM   #21 (permalink)
Khan_Han
Banished
 
Join Date: 11-16-07
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 205
Country:
I would suggest that our neigbour follows in our footsteps (Turkey's) and starts designing and building it own toys. It can go nowhere with the "junk" provided from others.
Khan_Han is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 10:01 AM   #22 (permalink)
antiochos
Banished
Regular
 
Join Date: 12-22-07
Posts: 72
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Khan_Han View Post
I would suggest that our neigbour follows in our footsteps (Turkey's) and starts designing and building it own toys. It can go nowhere with the "junk" provided from others.
Thank you for the info but i must inform you that our future strategy is focused not to LST but in hovercraft type vessels.
antiochos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 13:23 PM   #23 (permalink)
rocket-dog
New Member
 
rocket-dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-07-07
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Khan_Han View Post
I would suggest that our neigbour follows in our footsteps (Turkey's) and starts designing and building it own toys. It can go nowhere with the "junk" provided from others.
You Turks do do some innovative stuff; you don't just bash metal to other countries' design. I note that the Israeli supplied UAV will eventually be out fitted with Turkish optics.

Quote:
Originally Posted by antiochos View Post
Thank you for the info but i must inform you that our future strategy is focused not to LST but in hovercraft type vessels.
The islands are indeed ideal ACV territory. But occasionally your military will need to lift a large amount of cargo so your navy will still need conventional cargo ships unless it takes up from trade what tonnage it needs in an emergency (back to all those ferries in my previous post!)
rocket-dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 20:33 PM   #24 (permalink)
Khan_Han
Banished
 
Join Date: 11-16-07
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 205
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocket-dog View Post
You Turks do do some innovative stuff; you don't just bash metal to other countries' design. I note that the Israeli supplied UAV will eventually be out fitted with Turkish optics
Yes spot on, rocket-dog we do quite a bit of R&D. As, our economy improves so too does our indegenous projects.

I Just wanted to add to your information regarding our Heron UAV purchase from Israel. It is correct we are using our own optics such as the ASEL Flir 300T, but I would like to inform you that this acquisition is only a stop gate solution until the Turkish UAV TIHA enters into service in 2010.

The TIHA will be based on the US made MQ-1 Predator but be much larger with a larger payload and service ceiling. It will also carry laser-guided anti-tank missiles, inter alia. It will also be used to guide Turkish Balistic Missiles and Artilery units etc via datalinks.
Khan_Han is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 21:13 PM   #25 (permalink)
Gun Grape
Resident Curmudgeon
Military Professional
 
Gun Grape's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-12-05
Location: Panama City Fl
Posts: 2,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocket-dog View Post

Why are you spitting at the Newport's?
I had the distinct pleasure of being embarked on one in the North Atlantic.
Gun Grape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2008, 03:58 AM   #26 (permalink)
Ucar
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 06-19-07
Posts: 292
Country:
Khan Han Reply

Quote:
Originally Posted by Khan_Han View Post
...It will also be used to guide Turkish Balistic Missiles and Artilery units etc via datalinks.
Turkey has signed and subscribed to the 2002 MTCR International Code of Conduct Against Ballistic Missile Proliferation. Although it is non-binding, Turkey has pledged to

"b) To curb and prevent the proliferation of Ballistic Missiles capable of delivering weapons of mass destruction, both at a global and regional level, through multilateral,bilateral and national endeavours;
c) To exercise maximum possible restraint in the development, testing and deployment of Ballistic Missiles capable of delivering weapons of mass destruction, including, where possible, to reduce national holdings of such missiles, in the interest of global and regional peace and security;"

http://www.law.berkeley.edu/centers/...t_Missiles.pdf

Thus, under reasonable expectations, Turkey would be expected to honor its pledge and NOT develop balistic missiles. However, at the time of its signing, Turkey had already begun the cooperation to develop a BM system with China. In my opinion, sadly to say, the recently revealed B-611 Yildirim SRBM system violates this pledge.
Ucar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2008, 04:43 AM   #27 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,143
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gun Grape View Post
I had the distinct pleasure of being embarked on one in the North Atlantic.
Was it the rolling or the pitching that did it?
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2008, 06:09 AM   #28 (permalink)
SnowLeopard
Military Professional
 
SnowLeopard's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-18-06
Location: Texas
Posts: 695
Quote:
Originally Posted by kompikos View Post
What's your opinion on the Hellenic (Greek) Navy compared to other Navies in the world? How would you classify it? Here is a link to get you started of you know nothing about it :

Hellenic Navy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
On the face of it, it looks like it could be okay ........ depending on what enemy it is formed for, what it's principle purpose is for, does it serve the nation in war, peace, and emergency (ie, natural disaster)?

Given that the ships come from so many countries including one that doesn't use the metric system, however, it's logistics system, particularly spare parts, must be a miracleous creation of order ........................... or a nightmare that drives one to insanity.
_____________________________________
("Here's your problem. This circuit is a bravo; those don't work in these units."--Miles O'Brien
"It says it is an alpha."--Mining Family Son
"It may say it is an alpha, but it is a bravo.", (w,stte), DS 9 "Prodigal Daughter")
SnowLeopard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2008, 07:04 AM   #29 (permalink)
Khan_Han
Banished
 
Join Date: 11-16-07
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 205
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ucar View Post
Turkey has signed and subscribed to the 2002 MTCR International Code of Conduct Against Ballistic Missile Proliferation. Although it is non-binding, Turkey has pledged to

"b) To curb and prevent the proliferation of Ballistic Missiles capable of delivering weapons of mass destruction, both at a global and regional level, through multilateral,bilateral and national endeavours;
c) To exercise maximum possible restraint in the development, testing and deployment of Ballistic Missiles capable of delivering weapons of mass destruction, including, where possible, to reduce national holdings of such missiles, in the interest of global and regional peace and security;"

http://www.law.berkeley.edu/centers/...t_Missiles.pdf

Thus, under reasonable expectations, Turkey would be expected to honor its pledge and NOT develop balistic missiles. However, at the time of its signing, Turkey had already begun the cooperation to develop a BM system with China. In my opinion, sadly to say, the recently revealed B-611 Yildirim SRBM system violates this pledge.
Thanks Ucar for the insight. Yes, Turkey is a party to the aforementioned treaty, however, Turkey's Ballistic Missiles inventory is for its space program.
Furthermore, because the TIHA has the ability to guide Ballisitic missiles it does not mean that Turkey will use such ability. It may be used for increasing the export potential of the platform to countries such as Pakistan.
Khan_Han is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2008, 10:47 AM   #30 (permalink)
Ucar
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 06-19-07
Posts: 292
Country:
How do you evalute the B-611 Yildirim project with respect to the 2002 MTCR International Code of Conduct Against Ballistic Missile Proliferation ?

Do you think it contradicts with the pledge Turkey has made ?
Moreover, do you think it is correct to display a weapon system, when you are claiming to develop the missile component of that system for your space program ?

Last edited by Ucar : 01-03-2008 at 10:51 AM.
Ucar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
World Navies in Review rickusn Naval Forces 7 06-14-2007 23:51 PM
UK Drawdown? rickusn Naval Forces 19 05-03-2007 11:22 AM
BMD Article rickusn Naval Forces 6 02-05-2007 23:04 PM
Royal Navy ASW, MW,careers, etc rickusn Naval Forces 8 12-04-2006 15:12 PM
PLAN Analysis rickusn Naval Forces 9 06-12-2006 15:05 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:47 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8