2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Naval Forces
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
View Poll Results: HMS Victory vs. USS Constitution
HMS Victory...indubitably 30 50.85%
USS Constitution...Old Ironsides baby 18 30.51%
It's too close I just can't decide... 3 5.08%
Dude you suck at making up pissing contests...get off the stage 8 13.56%
Voters: 59. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-22-2007, 15:22 PM   #46 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,330
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAD_333 View Post
You're right, of course. However, one assumes that at the outset of a battle between unevenly matched ships, the more powerful one is the theoretical winner. We've been indulging in what-ifs, all of which are possible. But what-if occur during a battle. Now before the battle, would you as the captain of the Independence order it into battle one-on-one with the Victory, and I don't mean hail mary ranging shots, but up close and personal?
Im assuming that you mean the Constitution and Victory and the answer is a definate YES. The USN holds the Constitution very deeply as far as tradition and as far back as the Continental Navy's inception they were always outmatched by the British and French, ship for ship, gun for gun and especially in experience at sea and always went into battle none the less. We didnt always win but we didnt always loose either.

The smaller of the ships (Constitution) would need every tool in the box to out run and out manuver Victory and if smart concentrate her gunnery in the important places (more or less waterline and below and or rudder) or even perhaps draw her into the shallows hoping she would ground and then open full broadsides. As far as boarding parties go the advantage would certainly be Victory's. Constitution would have to sink her and certainly rule out boarding parties all together. Thanks.
__________________
Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 16:58 PM   #47 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,387
Country:
You'd have to be as mad as a rat in a coffee can, and if ever there were cause for relief of a captain by his second, that would be IT, and no court would convict on mutiny.
__________________
"The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory."
- George Orwell
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 23:52 PM   #48 (permalink)
JAD_333
Defense Professional
 
JAD_333's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,691
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreadnought View Post
Im assuming that you mean the Constitution and Victory and the answer is a definate YES. The USN holds the Constitution very deeply as far as tradition and as far back as the Continental Navy's inception they were always outmatched by the British and French, ship for ship, gun for gun and especially in experience at sea and always went into battle none the less. We didnt always win but we didnt always loose either.

The smaller of the ships (Constitution) would need every tool in the box to out run and out manuver Victory and if smart concentrate her gunnery in the important places (more or less waterline and below and or rudder) or even perhaps draw her into the shallows hoping she would ground and then open full broadsides. As far as boarding parties go the advantage would certainly be Victory's. Constitution would have to sink her and certainly rule out boarding parties all together. Thanks.
Yes, excuse me, I meant Constitution.

On the contrary, the US admiralty wouldn't risk a perfectly good frigate when its navy is so small. No captain would do it on his own. Of course, we are assuming both ships are in good condition, ably commanded and the wind is ideal for manoeuvering.
__________________
To be Truly ignorant, Man requires an Education. (Plato)
JAD_333 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2007, 12:08 PM   #49 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,330
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluesman View Post
You'd have to be as mad as a rat in a coffee can, and if ever there were cause for relief of a captain by his second, that would be IT, and no court would convict on mutiny.
Sir,
I would rather be tried by the admirality for endangering the ship and its crew (not storm or seas related mind you.) before being tried for failure to engage the enemy when chance presented itself. In being the captain (assumed) that call stands with no one but myself when at sea as I would be tried for the responsibility of the ship as a whole.
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2007, 19:23 PM   #50 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,387
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreadnought View Post
Sir,
I would rather be tried by the admirality for endangering the ship and its crew (not storm or seas related mind you.) before being tried for failure to engage the enemy when chance presented itself. In being the captain (assumed) that call stands with no one but myself when at sea as I would be tried for the responsibility of the ship as a whole.
Then you're not fit for your hypothetical command. No decent commander leads his unit into self-destruction and almost hopeless combat. You'd not be tried for EITHER failure to engage the enemy, NOR for endangering the ship and crew, because no trial would be convened for the former, and you likely wouldn't live to see the latter.
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2007, 19:45 PM   #51 (permalink)
Parihaka
Moderator
 
Parihaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-04
Location: Te Ika a Maui
Posts: 9,465
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluesman View Post
Then you're not fit for your hypothetical command. No decent commander leads his unit into self-destruction and almost hopeless combat. You'd not be tried for EITHER failure to engage the enemy, NOR for endangering the ship and crew, because no trial would be convened for the former, and you likely wouldn't live to see the latter.
Quote:
In 1800 Cochrane was appointed to command the sloop HMS Speedy. Later that year he was almost captured by a Spanish warship concealed as a merchant ship. He escaped by flying a Danish flag and dissuading an attempt to investigate by claiming his ship was plague-ridden. Chased by an enemy frigate, and knowing it would follow him in the night by the glimmer of light from the Speedy, he placed a candle on a barrel and let it float away. The enemy frigate followed the barrel and Speedy escaped.

One of his most famous exploits was the capture of the Spanish frigate El Gamo, on 6 May 1801. El Gamo carried 32 guns and 319 men, compared with the 14 guns and 54 men on Speedy. Cochrane flew an American flag to get close, finally approaching so closely to Gamo that its guns could not depress to fire on the Speedy's hull. This left only the option of boarding, but whenever the Spanish were about to board Cochrane would pull away briefly, and fire on the concentrated boarding parties with his ship's guns. Cochrane then boarded the Gamo, despite still being outnumbered about five to one, and captured her. St Vincent, not wishing to enrich an officer recently reprimanded, refused to purchase the Gamo for the royal navy: as a result Cochrane and the crew of the Speedy received no prize money.
Rear Admiral Thomas Alexander Cochrane, 10th Earl of Dundonald, Marquês do Maranhão
__________________
In the realm of spirit, seek clarity; in the material world, seek utility.
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
Parihaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2007, 19:51 PM   #52 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,387
Country:
Very familiar with that incident.

Long odds aren't the same as impossible odds, and Dagoes ain't Limeys.
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2007, 20:29 PM   #53 (permalink)
Parihaka
Moderator
 
Parihaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-10-04
Location: Te Ika a Maui
Posts: 9,465
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluesman View Post
and Dagoes ain't Limeys.
Parihaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2007, 20:43 PM   #54 (permalink)
zraver
Contrary by nature.
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 10-22-06
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 2,532
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluesman View Post
Then you're not fit for your hypothetical command. No decent commander leads his unit into self-destruction and almost hopeless combat. You'd not be tried for EITHER failure to engage the enemy, NOR for endangering the ship and crew, because no trial would be convened for the former, and you likely wouldn't live to see the latter.
Midway, Fredricksburg, Thermopylae, Salamis, Crecy, Austerlitz, Jutland not all victories but all pitted an on paper inferior force agaisnt a "supreme" enemy and the issue was very much in doubt.
zraver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2007, 21:07 PM   #55 (permalink)
dundonrl
Military Professional
 
dundonrl's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-23-07
Posts: 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluesman View Post
Then you're not fit for your hypothetical command. No decent commander leads his unit into self-destruction and almost hopeless combat. You'd not be tried for EITHER failure to engage the enemy, NOR for endangering the ship and crew, because no trial would be convened for the former, and you likely wouldn't live to see the latter.
Well.. it depends on the circumstances. Look at Taffy III and her Destroyers and Corvettes that took on Battleships, heavy Cruisers, Light Cruisers and squadrons of Destroyers..

I'll post a report about the USS Johnston and her CO, CDR Ernest E. Evans.

One of the pilots flying patrol reported the approach of the Japanese Centre Force steaming straight for Taffy III. JOHNSTON's Gunnery Officer, LT Robert C. Hagen, later reported, "...we felt like little David without a slingshot." Soon after contact, JOHNSTON was zigzagging between the escort carriers and the Japanese fleet, laying a smoke screen to hide the American task unit from the enemy. For the first twenty minutes the large caliber Japanese battleship and heavy cruiser guns fired upon with Americans without fear of reprisal, the range being too great for the American 5-inch guns. "...even as we began laying smoke, the Japanese started lobbing shells at us and the JOHNSTON had to zigzag between the splashes....we were the first destroyer to make smoke, the first to start firing, the first to launch a torpedo attack...."

As the range closed, JOHNSTON opened her 5-inch battery on the nearest cruiser, scoring damaging hits. About this time an 8-inch shell landed right off her bow, its red dye splashing the face of JOHNSTON Gunnery Officer. He mopped the dye from his eyes while remarking, "Looks like somebody's mad at us!" In five furious minutes, JOHNSTON pumped 200 rounds at the enemy, then Commander Evans gave the order to fire the torpedoes. The destroyer got off a full salvo of ten fish then whipped around to retire behind a heavy smoke screen. When she came out of the smoke a minute later, Japanese cruiser KUMANO could be seen burning furiously from torpedo hits. KUMANO later sank. Shortly thereafter, JOHNSTON took three 14-inch shell hits from a battleship followed closely by three 6-inch shells from a light cruiser. "It was like a puppy being smacked by a truck. The hits resulted in the loss of all power to the steering engine, all power to the three 5-inch guns in the after part of the ship, and rendered our gyro compass useless." Through "sheer providence" a rainstorm came up; and JOHNSTON "ducked into it" for a few minutes of rapid repairs and salvage work.

At 0750, Admiral Sprague ordered the destroyers to make a torpedo attack. But JOHNSTON had already expended her full compliment of ten torpedoes. With one engine, she couldn't keep up with the others "...but that wasn't Commander Evans' way of fighting; 'we'll go in with the destroyers and provide fire support,' he boomed." JOHNSTON went in, dodging salvoes and blasting back with her 5-inch guns. As she charged out of blinding smoke, the ship was pointed straight at the bridge of the gallant task unit destroyer HEERMANN (DD 532), "All engines back full!" was ordered by Commander Evans. That meant one engine for JOHNSTON who could hardly do more than slow down. HEERMANN's two engines backed down hard and the two destroyers missed each other by less than ten feet.

There was so much smoke that Commander Evans ordered no firing unless the gunnery officer could see the enemy. "At 0820, there suddenly appeared out of the smoke a 30,000 ton KONGO Class battleship, only 7,000 yards off our port beam. I took one look at the unmistakable pagoda mast, muttered, 'I sure as hell can see that!" and opened fire. In 40 seconds we got off 30 rounds, at least 15 of which hit the pagoda superstructure....the battleship belched a few 14-inchers at us, but, thank God, registered only clean misses."

JOHNSTON soon observed GAMBIER BAY (CVE 73) under fire from a cruiser. "Commander Evans then gave the most courageous order I've ever heard, 'Commence firing on that cruiser, draw her fire on us and away from GAMBIER BAY'." JOHNSTON scored four hits in a deliberate slug match with a heavy cruiser, then broke off the futile battle as the Japanese destroyer squadron was seen closing rapidly on the American escort carriers.

JOHNSTON outfought the entire Japanese destroyer squadron, concentrating on the lead ship until the enemy quit cold, then concentrated on the second destroyer until the remaining enemy units broke off to get out of effective gun range before launching torpedoes, all of which went wild. JOHNSTON took a hit which knocked out one forward gun, damaged another, and her bridge was rendered untenable by fires and explosions resulting from a hit in her 40mm ready ammunition locker. Commander Evans shifted his command to JOHNSTON's fantail, yelling orders through an open hatch to men turning her rudder by hand. Still the destroyer battled desperately to keep the Japanese destroyers and cruisers from reaching the five surviving American carriers. "We were now in a position where all the gallantry and guts in the world couldn't save us, but we figured that help for the carriers must be on the way, and every minute's delay might count...."

"By 0930 we were going dead in the water; even the Japanese couldn't miss us. They made a sort of running semi-circle around our ship, shooting at us like a bunch of Indians attacking a prairie schooner. Our lone engine and fire room was knocked out; we lost all power, and even the indomitable skipper knew we were finished. At 0945 he gave the saddest order a captain can give: 'Abandon Ship.'..."
dundonrl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2007, 02:30 AM   #56 (permalink)
pdf27
Contributor
 
pdf27's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-05-06
Location: UK
Posts: 538
Country:
There's a difference between cases like that (and for example the defence of convoy JW51B) and a Constitution-Victory fight. In the first two cases the defending force had a more-or-less fixed target of high value it had to protect. In the theoretical Constitution-Victory fight, the Constitution wouldn't have anything to protect and so isn't forced to fight - running away won't cause the US to lose something more valuable than the ship itself.
__________________
Rule 1: Never trust a Frenchman
Rule 2: Treat all members of the press as French
pdf27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2007, 08:52 AM   #57 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,387
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdf27 View Post
There's a difference between cases like that (and for example the defence of convoy JW51B) and a Constitution-Victory fight. In the first two cases the defending force had a more-or-less fixed target of high value it had to protect. In the theoretical Constitution-Victory fight, the Constitution wouldn't have anything to protect and so isn't forced to fight - running away won't cause the US to lose something more valuable than the ship itself.
Precisely. There's a difference between a man ankle-tied to a post that is being menaced by a 300-pound prize fighter trying to defend himself, and walking into a precinct house and kicking the desk sergeant in the nuts during shift change.

I'm not saying that if Constitution can't get away for some reason while Victory is bearing down on her that she must immediately strike her colors; certainly, she'd fight back until all hope was gone. But if Constitution's skipper CAN avoid the engagement, he should, and the question of being court-martialed for it is just plain silly.
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2007, 08:54 AM   #58 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,330
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parihaka View Post
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2007, 08:56 AM   #59 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,330
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dundonrl View Post
Well.. it depends on the circumstances. Look at Taffy III and her Destroyers and Corvettes that took on Battleships, heavy Cruisers, Light Cruisers and squadrons of Destroyers..

I'll post a report about the USS Johnston and her CO, CDR Ernest E. Evans.

One of the pilots flying patrol reported the approach of the Japanese Centre Force steaming straight for Taffy III. JOHNSTON's Gunnery Officer, LT Robert C. Hagen, later reported, "...we felt like little David without a slingshot." Soon after contact, JOHNSTON was zigzagging between the escort carriers and the Japanese fleet, laying a smoke screen to hide the American task unit from the enemy. For the first twenty minutes the large caliber Japanese battleship and heavy cruiser guns fired upon with Americans without fear of reprisal, the range being too great for the American 5-inch guns. "...even as we began laying smoke, the Japanese started lobbing shells at us and the JOHNSTON had to zigzag between the splashes....we were the first destroyer to make smoke, the first to start firing, the first to launch a torpedo attack...."

As the range closed, JOHNSTON opened her 5-inch battery on the nearest cruiser, scoring damaging hits. About this time an 8-inch shell landed right off her bow, its red dye splashing the face of JOHNSTON Gunnery Officer. He mopped the dye from his eyes while remarking, "Looks like somebody's mad at us!" In five furious minutes, JOHNSTON pumped 200 rounds at the enemy, then Commander Evans gave the order to fire the torpedoes. The destroyer got off a full salvo of ten fish then whipped around to retire behind a heavy smoke screen. When she came out of the smoke a minute later, Japanese cruiser KUMANO could be seen burning furiously from torpedo hits. KUMANO later sank. Shortly thereafter, JOHNSTON took three 14-inch shell hits from a battleship followed closely by three 6-inch shells from a light cruiser. "It was like a puppy being smacked by a truck. The hits resulted in the loss of all power to the steering engine, all power to the three 5-inch guns in the after part of the ship, and rendered our gyro compass useless." Through "sheer providence" a rainstorm came up; and JOHNSTON "ducked into it" for a few minutes of rapid repairs and salvage work.

At 0750, Admiral Sprague ordered the destroyers to make a torpedo attack. But JOHNSTON had already expended her full compliment of ten torpedoes. With one engine, she couldn't keep up with the others "...but that wasn't Commander Evans' way of fighting; 'we'll go in with the destroyers and provide fire support,' he boomed." JOHNSTON went in, dodging salvoes and blasting back with her 5-inch guns. As she charged out of blinding smoke, the ship was pointed straight at the bridge of the gallant task unit destroyer HEERMANN (DD 532), "All engines back full!" was ordered by Commander Evans. That meant one engine for JOHNSTON who could hardly do more than slow down. HEERMANN's two engines backed down hard and the two destroyers missed each other by less than ten feet.

There was so much smoke that Commander Evans ordered no firing unless the gunnery officer could see the enemy. "At 0820, there suddenly appeared out of the smoke a 30,000 ton KONGO Class battleship, only 7,000 yards off our port beam. I took one look at the unmistakable pagoda mast, muttered, 'I sure as hell can see that!" and opened fire. In 40 seconds we got off 30 rounds, at least 15 of which hit the pagoda superstructure....the battleship belched a few 14-inchers at us, but, thank God, registered only clean misses."

JOHNSTON soon observed GAMBIER BAY (CVE 73) under fire from a cruiser. "Commander Evans then gave the most courageous order I've ever heard, 'Commence firing on that cruiser, draw her fire on us and away from GAMBIER BAY'." JOHNSTON scored four hits in a deliberate slug match with a heavy cruiser, then broke off the futile battle as the Japanese destroyer squadron was seen closing rapidly on the American escort carriers.

JOHNSTON outfought the entire Japanese destroyer squadron, concentrating on the lead ship until the enemy quit cold, then concentrated on the second destroyer until the remaining enemy units broke off to get out of effective gun range before launching torpedoes, all of which went wild. JOHNSTON took a hit which knocked out one forward gun, damaged another, and her bridge was rendered untenable by fires and explosions resulting from a hit in her 40mm ready ammunition locker. Commander Evans shifted his command to JOHNSTON's fantail, yelling orders through an open hatch to men turning her rudder by hand. Still the destroyer battled desperately to keep the Japanese destroyers and cruisers from reaching the five surviving American carriers. "We were now in a position where all the gallantry and guts in the world couldn't save us, but we figured that help for the carriers must be on the way, and every minute's delay might count...."

"By 0930 we were going dead in the water; even the Japanese couldn't miss us. They made a sort of running semi-circle around our ship, shooting at us like a bunch of Indians attacking a prairie schooner. Our lone engine and fire room was knocked out; we lost all power, and even the indomitable skipper knew we were finished. At 0945 he gave the saddest order a captain can give: 'Abandon Ship.'..."
Ah the story of "GQ Johnny". A very good story indeed.
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2007, 08:56 AM   #60 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,387
Country:
By the way, my favorite story of a self-sacrificing unit is of the 1st Minnesota at Gettysburg:

Quote:
The men of the 1st Minnesota are most remembered for their actions on July 2, 1863, during the second day's fighting at Gettysburg, resulting in the prevention of a serious breach in the Union defensive line on Cemetery Ridge. Maj. Gen. Winfield S. Hancock, commander of the II Corps of the Army of the Potomac, ordered the regiment to assault a much larger enemy force (a brigade commanded by Brig. Gen. Cadmus M. Wilcox) in an effort to buy time while other forces could be brought up. During the charge, 215 members of the 262 men who were present at the time became casualties, including the regimental commander, Col. William Colvill, and all but three of his officers. The unit's flag fell five times and rose again each time. The 47 survivors rallied back to General Hancock under the senior surviving officer, a captain. The 82 percent casualty rate stands to this day as the largest loss by any surviving military unit in American history during any single engagement. The unit's flag is now in the Minnesota Capital's rotunda.

Despite the horrendous casualties the 1st Minnesota had incurred, it continued the fight the next day, helping to repulse Pickett's Charge. The surviving Minnesotans just happened to have been positioned at one of the few places where Union lines were breached during that engagement, and, as a result, charged the advancing Confederate positions one last time as a unit.

The monument to the 1st Minnesota at the Gettysburg National Battlefield Park bears the following inscription:

Quote:
“ On the afternoon of July 2, 1863 Sickles' Third Corps, having advanced from this line to the Emmitsburg Road, eight companies of the First Minnesota Regiment, numbering 262 men were sent to this place to support a battery upon Sickles repulse.
As his men were passing here in confused retreat, two Confederate brigades in pursuit were crossing the swale. To gain time to bring up the reserves & save this position, Gen Hancock in person ordered the eight companies to charge the rapidly advancing enemy.

The order was instantly repeated by Col Wm Colvill. And the charge as instantly made down the slope at full speed through the concentrated fire of the two brigades breaking with the bayonet the enemy's front line as it was crossing the small brook in the low ground there the remnant of the eight companies, nearly surrounded by the enemy held its entire force at bay for a considerable time & till it retired on the approach of the reserve the charge successfully accomplished its object. It saved this position & probably the battlefield. The loss of the eight companies in the charge was 215 killed & wounded. More than 83% percent. 47 men were still in line & no man missing. In self sacrificing desperate valor this charge has no parallel in any war. Among the severely wounded were Col Wm Colvill, Lt Col Chas P Adams & Maj Mark W. Downie. Among the killed Capt Joseph Periam, Capt Louis Muller & Lt Waldo Farrar. The next day the regiment participated in repelling Pickett's charge losing 17 more men killed & wounded.[1]
During the chaotic fighting that took place in the repulse of Pickett's Charge, Private Marshall Sherman of Company C of the 1st Minnesota captured the colors of the 28th Virginia.[2] Private Sherman received the Medal of Honor for his exploit. The flag was taken back to Minnesota as a prize of war and is displayed at the Minnesota Historical Society. In the mid-1990s, several groups of Virginians unsuccessfully sued the Society to return the 28th Virginia's battle flag to the Old Dominion State.
NOTE: this was a desperate, last-ditch, all-or-nothing case, only ordered due to the extreme peril to the entire army, maybe the outcome of the whole war. It wasn't seen as 'optional'; and neither were any of the other cases mentioned. OF COURSE mis-matches sometimes occur in war, and 'hopeless' feats-of-arms are sometimes attempted. Most of those times, though, are forced upon the underdog, and end predictably.

Last edited by Bluesman : 08-24-2007 at 09:02 AM.
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
US Navy to Commision USS Momsen Aug. 9th. BUFFB52 Naval Forces 67 07-18-2008 20:48 PM
New Info Re: Iwo Jima Battle vaughn The World Wars 1 07-16-2008 00:16 AM
Carrier Battle Group Essay rickusn Naval Forces 56 09-05-2007 12:27 PM
Royal Navy Analysis rickusn Naval Forces 7 01-22-2007 09:42 AM