2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Naval Forces
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-31-2006, 16:48 PM   #1 (permalink)
rickusn
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 08-09-03
Posts: 1,317
China Carrier?

All right so no one is willing to discuss the USN and USMC then how about the next great maritime power China:

PLAN CV aspirations confirmed?

Sailing to a PLAN
2005 was the year of growth and modernisation for the Chinese Navy

By Prasun K. Sengupta
www.forceindia.net
March 06

According to a detailed roadmap prepared by the Chinese Communist Party's Central Committee and the State Council in 1999, the People's Liberation Army's Navy (PLAN) will have gone through a complete force modernisation overhaul by the year 2050. The first phase of this roadmap was already achieved by 2000, during which period the PLAN gained control over the Yellow Sea, the East China Sea and the South China Sea. The three seas are all located within the ‘first island chain' of the Pacific Ocean, including The Philippines and Japan's Ryukyu Islands. The second phase of the roadmap will be completed between 2020 and 2025, by which time the PLAN will have established control over waterways within the ‘second island chain' including the Japan Sea, the Philippines Sea and Indonesia Sea, covering Japan's Kurile and Hokkaido Islands, and Marianas and Palau Islands in the south Pacific. The third phase will be completed by 2050, during which time Mainland China will have established its ocean fleet operating in areas as far as Guam and The Maldives in the ‘third island chain'.

Naval Aviation

The PLAN's Shanghai Research Institute has been spearheading its plans for acquiring a fleet of aircraft carriers and amphibious assault ships (LPD)
LPDs. In 1999 the Chinese Communist Party's Central Committee and the State Council had earmarked Yuan250 million for the design and construction of two LPDs, to be completed by 2009.

The PLAN's interest in aircraft carriers entered an active phase in 2005, and a PLAN delegation visited Russia 's MAKS 2005 aerospace exhibition in Zhukovsky to carefully study all the necessary technologies. A detailed technical presentation by the Sukhoi Aircraft Corp of the Su-33 and Su-33KUB shipborne combat aircraft was specially arranged for the visiting Chinese PLAN delegation, including a late-evening Su-33KUB demonstration flight during the exhibition. The Su27KUB was especially flown in to Zhukovsky for half-a-day from Saki , Ukraine, where it is currently being flight-tested. In early August, just prior to the MAKS exhibition, a PLAN delegation visited St Petersburg, where it listened to detailed technical presentations by representatives of the Nevskoye warship design bureau (PKB), the Russian designer of aircraft carriers, as well as to other companies cooperating with Nevskoye PKB. The visiting delegation also examined aircraft carrier-related equipment, including automatic landing systems and aircraft arresting devices. The delegation next visited the Ukrainian shipyard in Nikolayev, which has built all Soviet aircraft carriers to date. Sukhoi Aircraft Corp also submitted a three-stage proposal with various dates of delivery for the Su-33s and Su-33KUBs.

Going in parallel are efforts to make the 67,500-tonne Kuznetsov-class multi-role aircraft carrier Varyag, currently being refurbished in Dalian, seaworthy within a five-year period. By December, the PLAN had successfully installed an internal air conditioning system along with a reverse osmosis system for recycling sea water. These systems will later be integrated with a COGAG propulsion system that will be acquired from Ukraine 's Zorya Mashproekt Scientific and Production Enterprise.
rickusn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2006, 16:59 PM   #2 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 15,917
Country:
Still NO ENGINES for the VARYAG.
__________________
Chimo
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2006, 18:55 PM   #3 (permalink)
Blademaster
Military Enthusiast
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-15-03
Posts: 3,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickusn
All right so no one is willing to discuss the USN and USMC then how about the next great maritime power China:
.
That's cuz everyone knows that USN is the big whoopass of all and no one even come close to them.
Blademaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2006, 21:43 PM   #4 (permalink)
-{SpoonmaN}-
Death, the Destroyer of Worlds...
Senior Contributor
 
-{SpoonmaN}-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-08-04
Location: The badlands of West London.
Posts: 1,455
Country:
Quote:
Sailing to a PLAN
Man I hate puns.
Anyway, I don't see the PLA-N sorting out many of their woes to a satisfactory level any time soon, right now they have malfunctioning submarines, inadequate air defence, as OOE pointed out the closest thing to a carrier they have lacks propulsion, insufficient amphibious warfare capability since the biggest external role of the PLA is to invade Taiwan if they act up. The entire PLA is having these problems.
In short, they're in a lot of trouble and they'll have to wait until the country gets a lot richer before they can really become a Military Super-Power.
And what good is a carrier if they dont have the air-defence Destroyers and anti-submarine Frigates to protect it?
-{SpoonmaN}- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2006, 22:08 PM   #5 (permalink)
Captain Drunk
Banished
 
Captain Drunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-02-06
Location: Goa, India
Posts: 825
Are these the Chinese Supercarriers?





The bow looks like USS Wasp

Captain Drunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2006, 09:58 AM   #6 (permalink)
HistoricalDavid
Distant Deeps or Skies
Senior Contributor
 
HistoricalDavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-19-05
Location: North London, UK
Posts: 2,008
Country:
The first one has a photoshopped carrier and a wonky missile.

The second looks absolutely nothing like a Wasp. It just looks exactly like a Nimitz's bow, except with a Mandarin banner overhead.

Notice how the white crane's support appears to slot in between the radar. What a poor, poor Photoshopper.

I think OoE once said, 'Photoshop is China's largest arms manufacturer'!

Quote:
Originally Posted by rickusn
All right so no one is willing to discuss the USN and USMC then how about the next great maritime power China:
Don't bet on it any time soon. A single semi-capable carrier like a Varyag is not going turn them into a maritime power, regardless.

Last edited by HistoricalDavid : 04-01-2006 at 10:03 AM.
HistoricalDavid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2006, 10:05 AM   #7 (permalink)
indianguy4u
Real Madrid CF
Senior Contributor
 
indianguy4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-07-05
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 3,213
Country:
Rickusn, Force Mag isnt a good enough & authetic source for any news. The said publication has disputes with BRF & ACIG. link to BRF
__________________
Hala Madrid!!
indianguy4u is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2006, 19:12 PM   #8 (permalink)
tphuang
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 09-05-05
Posts: 841
I don't know if force mag is normally authentic, but the stuff mentionned in the article seems to be fairly accurate from other articles.

China's GDP is probably 4th in the world after the recent 2004 readjustment+10% growth in 2005. GDP in PPP is 2nd in the world behind USA. It's rich enough.

amphibious warfare situation is improving with the recent induction of 072III and the 071 LPD that is currently under construction.

by the time the carrier is ready for operation sometimes next decade, there should be plenty of air defense destroyers following the lines of 052C. ASW is still uncertain.
tphuang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2006, 21:45 PM   #9 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,378
Country:
Yeah but China also has a huge overhead to pay for. A huge GDP doesn't automatically translate into a flush coffer for the military.

A single carrier does not a superpower make. The Royal Navy will have 2 60kt carriers along with Type 45 escorts ready in the next 10 years. Even then it won't be a super power. Merely a partial global force.

Quote:
Rank 1: Major Global Force Projection Navy (Complete) – This is a navy capable of carrying out all the military roles of naval forces on a global scale. It possesses the full range of carrier and amphibious capabilities, sea control forces, and nuclear attack and ballistic missile submarines, and all in sufficient numbers to undertake major operations independently. E.g., United States.

Rank 2: Major Global Force Projection Navy (Partial) – These are navies that possess most if not all of the force projection capabilities of a "complete" global navy, but only in sufficient numbers to undertake one major "out of area" operation. E.g., Britain, France.

Rank 3: Medium Global Force Projection Navy – These are navies that may not possess the full range of capabilities, but have a credible capacity in certain of them and consistently demonstrate a determination to exercise them at some distance from home waters, in cooperation with other Force Projection Navies. E.g., Canada, Netherlands, Australia.

Rank 4: Medium Regional Force Projection Navy – These are navies possessing the ability to project force into the adjoining ocean basin. While they may have the capacity to exercise these further afield, for whatever reason, they do not do so on a regular basis.

Rank 5: Adjacent Force Projection Navies – These are navies that have some ability to project force well offshore, but are not capable of carrying out high-level naval operations over oceanic distances.

Rank 6: Offshore Territorial Defence Navies – These are navies that have relatively high levels of capability in defensive (and constabulary) operations up to about 200 miles from their shores, having the sustainability offered by frigate or large corvette vessels and (or) a capable submarine force.

Rank 7: Inshore Territorial Defence Navies – These are navies that have primarily inshore territorial defence capabilities, making them capable of coastal combat rather than constabulary duties alone. This implies a force comprising missile-armed fast-attack craft, short-range aviation and a limited submarine force.

Rank 8: Constabulary Navies – These are significant fleets that are not intended to fight, but to act purely in a constabulary role.

Rank 9: Token Navies – These are navies that have some minimal capability, but this often consists of little more than a formal organisational structure and a few coastal craft. These states, the world's smallest and weakest, cannot aspire to anything but the most limited constabulary functions.
PLAN with the addition of a carrier group and amphibious group would be at most Rank 3 or Rank 4. It would still take a lot of mondernisation and training to reach Rank 2.
gunnut is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2006, 22:15 PM   #10 (permalink)
Francois
Defense Professional
 
Join Date: 08-18-05
Posts: 129
That article just confirms the theory of China expansionist and hegemonist policy.
Francois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006, 05:08 AM   #11 (permalink)
-{SpoonmaN}-
Death, the Destroyer of Worlds...
Senior Contributor
 
-{SpoonmaN}-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-08-04
Location: The badlands of West London.
Posts: 1,455
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut
Yeah but China also has a huge overhead to pay for. A huge GDP doesn't automatically translate into a flush coffer for the military.

A single carrier does not a superpower make. The Royal Navy will have 2 60kt carriers along with Type 45 escorts ready in the next 10 years. Even then it won't be a super power. Merely a partial global force.



PLAN with the addition of a carrier group and amphibious group would be at most Rank 3 or Rank 4. It would still take a lot of mondernisation and training to reach Rank 2.
Good system. Wouldn't Spain and Italy fit into Category 3 as well? They have their own Light carriers for sea control, with escorts and I believe a reasonable support capability. At the very least they beat our Navy.
And out of Curiosity, where do people think the USSR Navy ranked? To me it's hard to call beause they had such a purpose-built Force, divided between killing American carriers, protecting their Submarine 'bastions' and protecting their territorial waters. They also had to divide between three Oceans and two Seas. Anyway what do you lot reckon?
-{SpoonmaN}- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006, 07:47 AM   #12 (permalink)
TopHatter
Administrator
 
TopHatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-03-03
Location: Fort Myers FL
Posts: 9,694
Country:
Send a message via AIM to TopHatter
Quote:
Originally Posted by -{SpoonmaN}-
And out of Curiosity, where do people think the USSR Navy ranked? To me it's hard to call beause they had such a purpose-built Force, divided between killing American carriers, protecting their Submarine 'bastions' and protecting their territorial waters. They also had to divide between three Oceans and two Seas. Anyway what do you lot reckon?
IMHO, I'd say Rank 1, though not to the same degree that the United States was able to project power, i.e. a dozen or so carrier battlegroups plus massive amphib assets.
__________________
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.
~John Quincy Adams
TopHatter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006, 09:20 AM   #13 (permalink)
-{SpoonmaN}-
Death, the Destroyer of Worlds...
Senior Contributor
 
-{SpoonmaN}-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-08-04
Location: The badlands of West London.
Posts: 1,455
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by TopHatter
IMHO, I'd say Rank 1, though not to the same degree that the United States was able to project power, i.e. a dozen or so carrier battlegroups plus massive amphib assets.
Yeah I guess people forget that in the case of the USN, it's not just technical and tactical domiance; They've got the numbers on everyone too.
-{SpoonmaN}- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006, 15:09 PM   #14 (permalink)
highsea
Defense Professional
 
highsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-04
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,478
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistoricalDavid
...The second looks absolutely nothing like a Wasp. It just looks exactly like a Nimitz's bow, except with a Mandarin banner overhead.
That's the Ronald Reagan at Newport News Shipyard.
__________________
My baby called me up. She said- Why don't you ever take me out? Pick me up in your brand new car....You shake the short change from the old fruit jar...
highsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2006, 16:00 PM   #15 (permalink)
Jay
Tamizhanban
Senior Contributor
 
Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 6,191
Country:
The letterings on the 2nd pic is a big giveaway. I guess none of us here read Mandarin, may be it reads Ronald Regan ?

If not, Colonel has one more pic for his gallery
__________________
A grain of wheat eclipsed the sun of Adam !!
Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Most needed in US NAVY Praxus Naval Forces 345 05-17-2008 20:36 PM
Debate about China, india and US economies, by Businessweek oneman28 Political Discussions 7 11-28-2007 08:43 AM
Sino-Indian War rkam98 South Asian Defense Topics 66 05-09-2007 00:16 AM
For all those stuck in the Cold War.. rickusn International Defense Topics 2 02-11-2007 02:05 AM
China’s democratization and reunification pin_qinghai International Defense Topics 100 01-06-2007 07:59 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:45 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8