![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Patron
|
Quote:
And, seriously, they've probably seen the most action of all European militaries except maybe the UK in the last two to three decades. Compared to the rest of Europe, they are a juggernaut. If you can find a source on that article, i'd be really interested in reading that btw. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
The fate of the remaining 2 Darings is unclear - your speculation on a Saudi sale probably refers to hulls 7 and 8 rather than 5 and 6 (Dragon and Duncan iirc). All the indications are that CVF will be ordered - it is less certain (and contingent on the Sarkozy/Royal battle) if PA2 is ever ordered. CdG has not proved to be a successful design/vessel and is plagued with problems. As for your neo-Conservative venom about some socialist unified EU military - not going to happen, certainly not with UK backing. Some moves to rationalisation certainly, more importantly, a genuine commercial effort to challenge the USA's high tech dominance of the defense market. Ocean will be (longterm) the LPH component of the CVF mix. It's likely that the CVF's will spend a considerable length of time pretending to be a LPH due to airframe numbers and rotation issues. I very much doubt that Lusty will be refitted in the same way that Ark has, should the CVF contracts appear as expected.. Of course, I stand read to eat my hat should the govt do a complete u-turn on CVF
__________________
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit - Scottish Motto "They that approve a private opinion, call it opinion; but they that dislike it, heresy; and yet heresy signifies no more than private opinion” Thomas Hobbes - Leviathan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
Regular
|
Quote:
actually, most sources do suggest that the Saudi deal will be hulls 5 and 6, though this is by no means definite. CVF will almost certainly happen, and Illustrious will probably be decommisioned by 2010-2012 at the latest, and Ark Royal by 2015. Ocean will probably be replaced by the end of next decade or the early 2020's, it a cheap unit built to fill gaps (just a slightly modified Invincible class, and costing 1/3 as much as a T-45) I dont see the CVF being used as an LPH, its just a complete waste and inefficient use of a 60,000 ton warship, and their wont really be airframe and rotation issues with the JSF (about 36 per ship, well over 100 are being ordered, you do the math) And the EU military thing, possible, though highly unlikely in the near future, the UK is simply to Euro-sceptic, any anyways, theirs like 50 languages in the EU, it would be sheer madness trying to run a military force) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Senior Contributor
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,353
Country:
|
CVF is not a small ship. At 60,000t she's almost the size of the Forrestal, the first super carrier. I can't wait to see the Royal Navy operate true carriers again.
Is it feasible for the RN to use 1 or 2 LPD-17s to replace the Ocean class? The design is already done and the production will continue until the next decade. Would that make it cheaper? |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
not really viable, LPD-17 is an amphibious assault ship, not a dedicated helicopter carrier, it can only carry a fraction of the heli's that Ocean can. plus i dont see the UK buying American built ships, Britain has always preferred to make their military equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) |
|
Patron
|
The French Mistral would probably fit the UK requirements - they carry 16 medium/heavy or up to 35 light helos (and it's their primary role), plus retain amphibious capability. Or rather a follow-on product to Mistral by then, DCN would take that contract any day
![]() Though with the way it's been going lately, Schelde should have a good chance with their through-deck version of the Enforcer as well. Last edited by kato : 04-12-2007 at 21:19 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
|
Quote:
. Is this a good thing, I ask myself?
__________________
Semper in excretum. Solum profunda variat. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) | ||||
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
When you add in attrition replacements/OCU/WEU aircraft - its likely that at typical load will be err, 12 F35... They can surge to a much higher level of course. The other problem is rotation - at some stage the LPH will be in refit/run-up and a CVF will need to step in. Incidentally, the LHA-6 class will displace about 50,000 tonnes. ideally, CVF wouldn't be used like this - but we arent in an ideal world. Nor is using the £750 million Invincible (replacement cost) in the £150 million Ocean role... UK defense procurement seldom makes sense.. lol Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Contributor
|
Quote:
Replacing Ocean in 2020, LHA-6 class vessel might be very nice, especially if it offers F35 B capability... |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|