2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Naval Forces
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-12-2007, 18:09 PM   #16 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,353
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by BB62squid View Post
Not to bash the EU,
By all means, bash the EU.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BB62squid View Post
but I question the validity of a french-centric military establishment. The French have not exactly established themselves as a military juggernaut...
I think you're too kind to the French.
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 18:12 PM   #17 (permalink)
kato
Patron
 
Join Date: 09-05-06
Posts: 210
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by BB62squid View Post
The French have not exactly established themselves as a military juggernaut...
France currently has the largest military in Europe, excluding Ukraine and Russia (and Turkey). By nominal troop strength, even when excluding the Gendarmerie paramilitary police (which would be combatants in wartime), they're slightly above Germany.
And, seriously, they've probably seen the most action of all European militaries except maybe the UK in the last two to three decades. Compared to the rest of Europe, they are a juggernaut.

If you can find a source on that article, i'd be really interested in reading that btw.
kato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 18:50 PM   #18 (permalink)
PubFather
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 04-25-06
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 1,198
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMH View Post
I seriously doubt the British government will actually have two CVF's built for the Royal Navy considering the great reluctance, and delay in ordering and cuts in numbers of Daring Class Destroyers that will be needed to escort these carriers. Out of 12 planned Daring Class Destroyers, only six have been ordered and out of those six, four will be delivered to the Royal Navy and the remaining two will be sold to Saudi Arabia. With only four missile escorts, only one or two would be available to escort a an Aircraft Carrier. Besides, France has a Nuclear Carrier which eliminates any need for a large British Carrier. The only hope for the Royal Navy is if the Labour Party in the UK loses power and is replaced by a Conservative government in the next elections. This is unlikely to happen beacuse the millions of welfare depandent voters in Wales and Scotland will ensure a Labour victory in England.
JMH - sorry to say this but you are clearly an idiot who spends too much time reading rabidly anti-Labour newspapers.

The fate of the remaining 2 Darings is unclear - your speculation on a Saudi sale probably refers to hulls 7 and 8 rather than 5 and 6 (Dragon and Duncan iirc).

All the indications are that CVF will be ordered - it is less certain (and contingent on the Sarkozy/Royal battle) if PA2 is ever ordered. CdG has not proved to be a successful design/vessel and is plagued with problems.

As for your neo-Conservative venom about some socialist unified EU military - not going to happen, certainly not with UK backing. Some moves to rationalisation certainly, more importantly, a genuine commercial effort to challenge the USA's high tech dominance of the defense market.

Ocean will be (longterm) the LPH component of the CVF mix. It's likely that the CVF's will spend a considerable length of time pretending to be a LPH due to airframe numbers and rotation issues. I very much doubt that Lusty will be refitted in the same way that Ark has, should the CVF contracts appear as expected..

Of course, I stand read to eat my hat should the govt do a complete u-turn on CVF
__________________
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit - Scottish Motto

"They that approve a private opinion, call it opinion; but they that dislike it, heresy; and yet heresy signifies no more than private opinion” Thomas Hobbes - Leviathan

PubFather is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 18:52 PM   #19 (permalink)
sappersgt
Military Professional
 
sappersgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-04-06
Location: Latitude 38 Longitude 112
Posts: 2,342
Country:
PubFather, nice to have you back!
__________________
Reddite igitur quae sunt Caesaris Caesari et quae sunt Dei Deo
(Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's and unto God the things which are God's)
sappersgt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 19:52 PM   #20 (permalink)
Dectilion
Regular
 
Join Date: 01-13-07
Posts: 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by PubFather View Post
The fate of the remaining 2 Darings is unclear - your speculation on a Saudi sale probably refers to hulls 7 and 8 rather than 5 and 6 (Dragon and Duncan iirc).

All the indications are that CVF will be ordered - it is less certain (and contingent on the Sarkozy/Royal battle) if PA2 is ever ordered. CdG has not proved to be a successful design/vessel and is plagued with problems.

As for your neo-Conservative venom about some socialist unified EU military - not going to happen, certainly not with UK backing. Some moves to rationalisation certainly, more importantly, a genuine commercial effort to challenge the USA's high tech dominance of the defense market.

Ocean will be (longterm) the LPH component of the CVF mix. It's likely that the CVF's will spend a considerable length of time pretending to be a LPH due to airframe numbers and rotation issues. I very much doubt that Lusty will be refitted in the same way that Ark has, should the CVF contracts appear as expected..

Of course, I stand read to eat my hat should the govt do a complete u-turn on CVF

actually, most sources do suggest that the Saudi deal will be hulls 5 and 6, though this is by no means definite. CVF will almost certainly happen, and Illustrious will probably be decommisioned by 2010-2012 at the latest, and Ark Royal by 2015. Ocean will probably be replaced by the end of next decade or the early 2020's, it a cheap unit built to fill gaps (just a slightly modified Invincible class, and costing 1/3 as much as a T-45) I dont see the CVF being used as an LPH, its just a complete waste and inefficient use of a 60,000 ton warship, and their wont really be airframe and rotation issues with the JSF (about 36 per ship, well over 100 are being ordered, you do the math)
And the EU military thing, possible, though highly unlikely in the near future, the UK is simply to Euro-sceptic, any anyways, theirs like 50 languages in the EU, it would be sheer madness trying to run a military force)
Dectilion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 20:17 PM   #21 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,353
Country:
CVF is not a small ship. At 60,000t she's almost the size of the Forrestal, the first super carrier. I can't wait to see the Royal Navy operate true carriers again.

Is it feasible for the RN to use 1 or 2 LPD-17s to replace the Ocean class? The design is already done and the production will continue until the next decade. Would that make it cheaper?
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 20:21 PM   #22 (permalink)
Dectilion
Regular
 
Join Date: 01-13-07
Posts: 137
not really viable, LPD-17 is an amphibious assault ship, not a dedicated helicopter carrier, it can only carry a fraction of the heli's that Ocean can. plus i dont see the UK buying American built ships, Britain has always preferred to make their military equipment
Dectilion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 21:17 PM   #23 (permalink)
kato
Patron
 
Join Date: 09-05-06
Posts: 210
Country:
The French Mistral would probably fit the UK requirements - they carry 16 medium/heavy or up to 35 light helos (and it's their primary role), plus retain amphibious capability. Or rather a follow-on product to Mistral by then, DCN would take that contract any day
Though with the way it's been going lately, Schelde should have a good chance with their through-deck version of the Enforcer as well.

Last edited by kato : 04-12-2007 at 21:19 PM.
kato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2007, 01:17 AM   #24 (permalink)
BB62squid
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 02-25-07
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 17
Country:
I'll see what I can do on that, Kato
__________________
Any international dispute can be resolved through the liberal application of cruise missiles.
BB62squid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2007, 05:09 AM   #25 (permalink)
Stan
Contributor
 
Stan's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-11-06
Posts: 370
Country:
it is nice to have pubfather back.
Stan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2007, 09:32 AM   #26 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,310
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by PubFather View Post
JMH - sorry to say this but you are clearly an idiot who spends too much time reading rabidly anti-Labour newspapers.

The fate of the remaining 2 Darings is unclear - your speculation on a Saudi sale probably refers to hulls 7 and 8 rather than 5 and 6 (Dragon and Duncan iirc).

All the indications are that CVF will be ordered - it is less certain (and contingent on the Sarkozy/Royal battle) if PA2 is ever ordered. CdG has not proved to be a successful design/vessel and is plagued with problems.

As for your neo-Conservative venom about some socialist unified EU military - not going to happen, certainly not with UK backing. Some moves to rationalisation certainly, more importantly, a genuine commercial effort to challenge the USA's high tech dominance of the defense market.

Ocean will be (longterm) the LPH component of the CVF mix. It's likely that the CVF's will spend a considerable length of time pretending to be a LPH due to airframe numbers and rotation issues. I very much doubt that Lusty will be refitted in the same way that Ark has, should the CVF contracts appear as expected..

Of course, I stand read to eat my hat should the govt do a complete u-turn on CVF
Dam, look at Daddy back one moment kicking ass taking names!
__________________
Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2007, 11:33 AM   #27 (permalink)
glyn
Military Professional
 
glyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-15-06
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
Posts: 6,512
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreadnought View Post
Dam, look at Daddy back one moment kicking ass taking names!
True, true and spoken with a mouthful of teeth DN but it seems our greatly respected and once tolerant PubFather has developed a sharp edge to his persona during his absence . Is this a good thing, I ask myself?
__________________
Semper in excretum. Solum profunda variat.
glyn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2007, 11:39 AM   #28 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,310
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by glyn View Post
True, true and spoken with a mouthful of teeth DN but it seems our greatly respected and once tolerant PubFather has developed a sharp edge to his persona during his absence . Is this a good thing, I ask myself?
You dont suppose the Dems got him too do you?
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2007, 14:34 PM   #29 (permalink)
PubFather
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 04-25-06
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 1,198
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dectilion View Post
actually, most sources do suggest that the Saudi deal will be hulls 5 and 6, though this is by no means definite.
At lot of that is supposition - given that "two hulls" are under threat. Logically, this suggests 5+6, however, iirc the funding for 7 & 8 exists. However, as you say, its all very unclear at the moment. I certainly hope its not true..
Quote:
CVF will almost certainly happen, and Illustrious will probably be decommisioned by 2010-2012 at the latest, and Ark Royal by 2015. Ocean will probably be replaced by the end of next decade or the early 2020's, it a cheap unit built to fill gaps (just a slightly modified Invincible class, and costing 1/3 as much as a T-45)
Accurate details!!
Quote:
I dont see the CVF being used as an LPH, its just a complete waste and inefficient use of a 60,000 ton warship, and their wont really be airframe and rotation issues with the JSF (about 36 per ship, well over 100 are being ordered, you do the math)
That's the "in theory" part unfortunately. circa 120-132 are likely to be ordered. However, that is designed to replace the entire Harrier force (RN and RAF) as well, it is not ring fenced for the RN. Plus, it is possible that some the number (2* squadrons worth) will replace some the Tornados in the deep strike role.

When you add in attrition replacements/OCU/WEU aircraft - its likely that at typical load will be err, 12 F35... They can surge to a much higher level of course. The other problem is rotation - at some stage the LPH will be in refit/run-up and a CVF will need to step in.

Incidentally, the LHA-6 class will displace about 50,000 tonnes.

ideally, CVF wouldn't be used like this - but we arent in an ideal world. Nor is using the £750 million Invincible (replacement cost) in the £150 million Ocean role... UK defense procurement seldom makes sense.. lol

Quote:
And the EU military thing, possible, though highly unlikely in the near future, the UK is simply to Euro-sceptic, any anyways, theirs like 50 languages in the EU, it would be sheer madness trying to run a military force)
I agree - its very very unlikely in the near/medium future without a catalyst..
PubFather is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2007, 14:38 PM   #30 (permalink)
PubFather
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 04-25-06
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 1,198
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post

Is it feasible for the RN to use 1 or 2 LPD-17s to replace the Ocean class? The design is already done and the production will continue until the next decade. Would that make it cheaper?
We don't really need (in the short-term) anymore LPD's. We have Ocean, Albion and Bulward (LPDs) and the Bay class (4 ships) LSLs (sort of a budget LPD).

Replacing Ocean in 2020, LHA-6 class vessel might be very nice, especially if it offers F35 B capability...
PubFather is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:59 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8