2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > Military Forums > Naval Forces
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-22-2007, 01:58 AM   #31 (permalink)
dundonrl
Military Professional
 
dundonrl's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-23-07
Posts: 119
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post

Besides, our big ships won't enter the gulf. Too shallow. Burkes have plenty of room to manuever in the gulf. They are fast too at 30+ knots. I doubt small boats can catch a Burke if the Burke decides to run.
hmmm, just looking on The US Navy and as of 21 April 07, the USS Eisenhower CVN 69 and USS Bataan LHD 5, along with their battlegoups are both in the gulf right now..
dundonrl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2007, 21:57 PM   #32 (permalink)
Akita
Regular
 
Join Date: 04-25-07
Posts: 34
U.S.Navy has prepared for swarming attacks by small combatants since the early 1980s. They were called Soviet cruise missles, the 'Vampires' of Clancey novel fame.
One of Navy Secretary Lehman's main efforts during the "600 ship Navy" buildup of the 1980s was the equipping of the surface fleet to defeat massed attacks by enemy cruise missles. The Vulcan Phalanx and RAM systems can still do that job well.

For swarming attacks by surface craft, Navy ships will rely on cannon fire by the main gun, Vulcan systems, (though some of the older ones won't operate in this mode), 50 cal machine guns, (which have been shipped in large numbers since the Cole incident in Aden harbor) and Hellfire missles, Penguin missles and gunfire from LAMPS and Ocean Hawk/Rescue Hawk/Knighthawk and Sea Cobra helicopters as well as conventional and VSTOL combat aircraft.

At least some U.S.Navy ships are protected by Barret rifles for self defence the old fashioned "Sgt York" way. I suspect there are additional capabilities we aren't privy to...don't you?

(Keep in mind that the Cole was injured, (not sunk), by a sneak attack while at anchor, in harbor, in peace time, while being serviced by native Yemeni small craft on a port call that the Navy was not sanguine about. They will not allow themselves to be caught flat footed like that again.
I am told that the IRIN is very cautious operating anywhere near USN forces. In the event of hostilities it will be thier antiquated fleet that is 'Pearl harbored'--not the Americans.)
Akita is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 19:37 PM   #33 (permalink)
ChrisF202
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-12-03
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 2,576
Country:
Send a message via AIM to ChrisF202
We should invest in more Cyclone class patrol vessels. They would be great for patrolling the Persian Gulf and for homeland security related missions.

Cyclone class patrol ship - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Has a crew of 4 officers and 24 enlisted and can carry 8 SEALs, Coast Guard MLEBP members, etc. It has armaments of 1 MK 96 and 1 MK 38 25mm machine guns; 5 .50 caliber machine guns; 2 MK 19 40mm automatic grenade launchers and 2 M-60 machine guns PLUS small arms. Thats a helluva lot of firepower.
ChrisF202 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 20:29 PM   #34 (permalink)
B.Smitty
Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-15-05
Location: Oak Hill, VA
Posts: 549
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisF202 View Post
We should invest in more Cyclone class patrol vessels. They would be great for patrolling the Persian Gulf and for homeland security related missions.

Cyclone class patrol ship - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Has a crew of 4 officers and 24 enlisted and can carry 8 SEALs, Coast Guard MLEBP members, etc. It has armaments of 1 MK 96 and 1 MK 38 25mm machine guns; 5 .50 caliber machine guns; 2 MK 19 40mm automatic grenade launchers and 2 M-60 machine guns PLUS small arms. Thats a helluva lot of firepower.
The problem with patrol craft for the USN is how do you move them to a forward operating area, and then support them when you have no local, friendly ports.
B.Smitty is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 22:21 PM   #35 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,377
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dundonrl View Post
hmmm, just looking on The US Navy and as of 21 April 07, the USS Eisenhower CVN 69 and USS Bataan LHD 5, along with their battlegoups are both in the gulf right now..
How do we know the big ships actually entered the gulf? It could be just a ruse.

I'm not saying you're wrong, but a former coworker served on an LSD during the tanker wars and he said the battleships can barely clear the bottom in the gulf. I assumed the carriers would require too much of a draft to manuver in the gulf.
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
gunnut is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2007, 13:41 PM   #36 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,329
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
How do we know the big ships actually entered the gulf? It could be just a ruse.

I'm not saying you're wrong, but a former coworker served on an LSD during the tanker wars and he said the battleships can barely clear the bottom in the gulf. I assumed the carriers would require too much of a draft to manuver in the gulf.
Figure a BB at a "light" ship minimum 44 feet depth (48,650 tons) "empty" for manuver. A heavy BB more like 57,000-60,000 "loaded" tons add a minimum 10 foot to depth. This is not an accurate account namely "ball park" figure.
Soundings would quickly tell the real tale.
__________________
Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.

Last edited by Dreadnought : 05-08-2007 at 13:51 PM.
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Scorpene vs. U212 Blademaster Naval Forces 13 05-15-2006 23:58 PM
Iran to be refered to U.N. Security Council Dreadnought Political Discussions 13 01-16-2006 15:14 PM
Why use force when talk works so well? Leader International Defense Topics 54 12-05-2005 04:29 AM
World Naval Rankings rickusn Naval Forces 66 03-04-2005 01:11 AM
A Preemptive Attack on Iran's Nuclear Facilities: Possible Consequences lulldapull International Defense Topics 14 11-20-2004 16:27 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:45 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8